ToxicFemininitySucks
Star
- Joined
- Jun 26, 2022
- Messages
- 2,264
I hope this is the correct section, it falls under "health", albeit not human health. We had a "dog thread" but it vanished...
From what I've seen on here, the majority of posters don't have a favorable view of big pharma. I guess i was wondering, does this extend to veterinarians? Are they also seen as big pharma, and if not, why?
Veterinarians administed c0vid v@x to humans
Are people that are anti v@x when it comes to themselves also anti v@x about their pets? What about people that deny germ theory/the existence of viruses altogether?
As a pet owner, I'm skeptical of vets. I read years ago that they make the bulk of their money off pushing vaccines and putting animals to sleep. Something about paying someone to kill your animal has always bothered me.
For those who live in certain areas, or are willing to travel, there are "holistic" veterinarians available, wonder if those dont force yearly v@xx.
From what I've seen on here, the majority of posters don't have a favorable view of big pharma. I guess i was wondering, does this extend to veterinarians? Are they also seen as big pharma, and if not, why?
Veterinarians administed c0vid v@x to humans
Dentists, veterinarians and med students authorized to administer Covid shots as Biden expands vaccine program
Dentists, EMTs, midwives, optometrists, paramedics, physician assistants, podiatrists, respiratory therapists and veterinarians can begin administering Covid-19 vaccines.
www.cnbc.com
Are people that are anti v@x when it comes to themselves also anti v@x about their pets? What about people that deny germ theory/the existence of viruses altogether?
As a pet owner, I'm skeptical of vets. I read years ago that they make the bulk of their money off pushing vaccines and putting animals to sleep. Something about paying someone to kill your animal has always bothered me.
Some Veterinarians Sell Unnecessary Shots, Tests to Make Extra Money, Says Former Vet
A former veterinarian says that some vets, out to make an extra buck, will sell unnecessary shots, tests and procedures to unsuspecting pet owners.
abcnews.go.com
Mandatory microchipping of pets seemed to me a way of normalizing ID tracking. And the chips can cause cancer.For most pet owners, man's best friend is another member of the family and deserves the best care, but a former veterinarian says that some vets, out to make an extra buck, will pad the bill with unnecessary shots, tests and procedures.
...
Throughout his career, Jones said he discovered a dark reality about some veterinarians in the United States and Canada, including himself.
"They feel that pressure of, 'I've got these overhead costs to make,' and that's where your judgment gets caught," he said.
Jones said that, under pressure from bosses, he ordered services that were not needed. He said "no question" he would have been fired if he hadn't done as his bosses asked.
"If I didn't meet this certain target, then yeah, my employment was at threat."
But Jones said even after he owned his own clinic, at times, he continued upselling.
...
Another big ticket item on vets' bills, Jones said, are vaccination costs, and he said some vets can be quick to push the shots.
Every year, pet owners are reminded that their animals are due for their annual vaccinations, but what many vets apparently fail to disclose is that, according to the latest guidelines from the American Animal Hospital Association (AAHA), some of the vaccines only need to be given once every three years.
According to the AAHA, an annual revaccination "booster," which includes multiple vaccines, is commonly recommended and most state and local laws mandate an annual rabies vaccine. But for other viral diseases, such as canine distemper virus (CDV) and canine parvovirus (CDV-2), the AAHA guidelines say that after dogs receive their 1-year-old booster vaccinations, then vaccines for those viral diseases can be administered every three or more years.
"A lot of people are still into giving them every year," Becker said. "But that is not the recommended protocol by the American Veterinary Medical Association."
To find out what some vets recommend for vaccines, ABC News went undercover with Honey, the pitbull, who was up-to-date on her shots.
But at a New York clinic, the vet ordered Honey, who had the distemper vaccine two years ago, a new round of shots without asking about Honey's vaccination status, and then told Honey's owner that distemper was "typically an annual vaccine."
The New York clinic later told ABC News that a vet's individual judgment is just as important as the AAHA guidelines.
At another clinic, Honey was also told she had "dental disease" and was recommended for a $300 teeth cleaning under general anesthesia. That clinic didn't respond to ABC News' request for comment.
In the end, both undercover dog owners could have incurred hundreds of dollars for potentially unnecessary treatments.
How Mandatory Microchipping can be Dangerous – www.NoPitBullBans.com
www.nopitbullbans.com
Whenever i have a pet question and try to search online, the replies always involve "ask your veterinarian". It's even worse than asking about human health, because then usually some one will have alternative suggestions that don't involve "go to a doctor", but when it comes to animal health it seems no one wants to share what worked for them. Kind of makes me wonder why.So its no mistake when those pushing mandatory microchipping legislation extol the supposed virtues of microchipping by claiming that microchips are “invaluable tools” in reuniting lost pets with their owners. Its meant to tug at your heart strings and keep you from doing research on RFID technology and discovering that microchipping is potentially unhealthy for humans and animals, and that mandatory microchipping in particular is a violation of Constitutitonal freedoms.
...
From there, RFID microchipping will go to people. It already has. A Time magazine article from 2007 noted that Human ˜tagging was approved by the Food and Drug Administration in 2004 to facilitate retrieval of private medical records but to no surprise the procedure has had few takers. Gee, I wonder why?
So because there have been few takers, I guess they, whoever they are, decided to forcibly microchip people against their will. As the Time article mentions, there has already been a pilot program to RFID chip residents at the Alzheimers Community Care agency in West Palm Beach, Florida.
Whats the problem with a granny LoJack, i.e. forcibly microchipping people who have Alzheimers? That it is done without their consent, of course. After all, they really cant consent can they? Forget medical proxies, there are some things a person must be able to decide for themselves and if they cant, then they should be left alone. Indeed, RFID chipping the elderly who have Alzheimers or some other kinds of dementia very well could be against their will, which means its wholly unconstitutional and a violation of the liberty we true Americans and our Constitution hold dear.
...
There is a backstory to RFID microchipping that you need to know; its not as benign as they would have you believe when they tell you its no more than a method to electronically license or identify your dog or cat or your livestock.
In fact, microchipping can literally cause malignancies (meaning harmful and deadly cancer). A few years ago, Katherine Albrecht, who co-wrote Spychips: How Major Corporations and Government Plan to Track Your Every Move, issued a press release/commentary on research that has proven microchips can cause deadly tumors:
So there it is: RFID microchips can cause deadly cancer. Still I have yet to see one article about a city or county proposing a mandatory microchipping law for pets that mentions that microchips can cause malignant tumors.. . . microchip implants have induced cancer in laboratory animals and dogs, says privacy expert and long-time VeriChip opponent Dr. Katherine Albrecht.
As the AP will report, a series of research articles spanning more than a decade found that mice and rats injected with glass-encapsulated RFID transponders developed malignant, fast-growing, lethal cancers in up to 1% to 10% of cases. The tumors originated in the tissue surrounding the microchips and often grew to completely surround the devices, the researchers said.
Albrecht first became aware of the microchip-cancer link when she and her Spychips co-author, Liz McIntyre, were contacted by a pet owner whose dog had died from a chip-induced tumor. Albrecht then found medical studies showing a causal link between microchip implants and cancer in other animals. Before she brought the research to the APs attention, the studies had somehow escaped public notice (Intel Daily*).
For those who live in certain areas, or are willing to travel, there are "holistic" veterinarians available, wonder if those dont force yearly v@xx.
VetFinder – Find a Holistic Veterinarian – AHVMA
www.ahvma.org