Satanism in TOYS [Trigger Warning]

ToxicFemininitySucks

Established
Joined
Jun 26, 2022
Messages
338
I took a screenshot, this appears to be an auction so once it sells no one will know what we're talking about
Screenshot_20220904-211437.jpg

I mean this is for children… she has a shaved pubic line and a very sexualised swimsuit
I agree that this toy is inappropriate for children and that the swimsuit is sexualized.

But i dont think she has a shaved pubic line. Its a doll, and normally dolls dont come with body hair. It would be more disturbing if they had added hair to the doll in my opinion.
 

ToxicFemininitySucks

Established
Joined
Jun 26, 2022
Messages
338
Children can play with whatever kind of toys they want (girls with cars, boys with nonsexualized dolls) but that doesnt change the fact that they were born their gender and they will remain their gender. Its not an "identity" its a biological fact. Its not "fluid".

Parents need to see what nonsense these modern teachers are indoctrinating their children with.

Lol and depopulation globalists are not trying to groom little girls to pop out babies as soon as they hit puberty. If anything they want little girls to get on birth control as soon as they hit puberty. And anyone who wants to have s*x with an underage child is a disgusting pervert p3d0. Sexualized dolls groom children, but it has nothing to do with "popping out babies".
 

Dreamymoon

Rookie
Joined
Mar 12, 2022
Messages
76
Everything on this thread about dolls needs to be seen by every parent in this country. This crap is why I'm so selective about what kinds of dolls I use in my preschool classroom. It's also why I get livid when my students bring in Barbie, L.O.L, or Bratz dolls from home. I make a point that those stay hidden in their bags and cannot be taken out by the kids for any reason.

I have no issue with children, boys and girls alike, having baby dolls. Especially in a school setting, when the dolls are realistic and have varying skin tones so they see themselves in the dolls. Dressing the dolls and feeding them are great self help tasks and help children form a positive relationship with food. Putting secret lingerie and junk food on a doll's body encourages the sexualization of minors and poor eating habits.

I want to be in the mind of the idiots who made these things so I can understand why they did it. How does someone's brain think this is okay?

I'm speechless about the "baby you can shave". Why is pubic hair on an infant? Are they trying to sexualize infants, or is this a weird thing about making a person less "ape-like" (as in, that racist idea about removing the savagery), or both? Regardless, any way you look at it, it takes wrong to a whole new level.

These "toys" are all about grooming little girls to become slaves who pop out children as soon as they hit puberty.

I never liked dolls as a kid and I'm glad both my parents didn't encourage me to. While other girls were playing with Barbies, I was building tree houses and collecting hot wheels. Which is another thing, that stupid franchise with the stupid happy meals and the fact that every time we went there my mom had to say I was a boy because that was the only way to ensure I'd get the hot wheels I wanted instead of the stupid Barbie dolls. I remember a time that one of the staff saw me, realized I was a girl and tried to switch the toy and we started shrieking at her that we didn't want Barbies. People are so outrageously aggressive about gendering children, like, stop it, leave them and their bodies and identities alone.

It's not like when parents tell other people that their child was born male or born female. I had a student a year ago who's parents claimed he identified as non-binary. He was an infant. He wasn't capable of identifying as non-binary, male or female. Gender is too abstract and complicated of a concept for young children, especially in early childhood. That doesn't mean that as children grow they don't become aware of their own gender identity or sexual orientation, because they do become aware of it and do so in a way that is healthy and NOT sexualized. It's a matter of simply knowing who they are as a person. Identifying a child before they are able to even consider identifying themselves is nothing more than grooming that child to be a prop. Now these parents can parade their child around as their "gender fluidity" trophy. It's all about saying "See, this is my precious non-binary child, isn't it great how I've allowed them to be who they are from the moment they were born because I just knew that's what they wanted since I'm the parent and can do whatever I want to my child? Afterall, my child is MINE." The way parents own their children is the creepiest thing.
I think children should play with whatever toys they want to, not just dolls for girls or cars for boys.
 

theartbook35

Established
Joined
Dec 9, 2020
Messages
288
Children can play with whatever kind of toys they want
Yes, absolutely.

but that doesnt change the fact that they were born their gender and they will remain their gender. Its not an "identity" its a biological fact. Its not "fluid".
Just to clarify, my point in my previous post is that I was criticizing parents for making their children into gender fluidity trophies and pushing an identity onto them that they aren't old enough to understand. I can't tell if you are agreeing or disagreeing with me, so I figured I'd clarify.

Parents need to see what nonsense these modern teachers are indoctrinating their children with.
Parents need to see a lot of things, bottom line. Not just one or the other.

Lol and depopulation globalists are not trying to groom little girls to pop out babies as soon as they hit puberty. If anything they want little girls to get on birth control as soon as they hit puberty. And anyone who wants to have s*x with an underage child is a disgusting pervert p3d0. Sexualized dolls groom children, but it has nothing to do with "popping out babies".
Baby dolls that come with ways to simulate breast feeding, are most definitely targeting girls and heavily encouraging them to be nothing more than people who pop out kids.

There are so many cults around the world that raise little girls from birth to focus on being nothing more than an underage wife and mother (in other words, a sex slave). These creepy dolls that are featured in this thread, they play a role in that.

A number of sickos who groom the children they prey upon also force them to bear children.
 

theartbook35

Established
Joined
Dec 9, 2020
Messages
288
I think children should play with whatever toys they want to, not just dolls for girls or cars for boys.
Agreed. That's why I said I was fine with boys playing with dolls, and why I was glad my parents respected that I wasn't interested in dolls and let me play with the toys I was interested in.
 

ToxicFemininitySucks

Established
Joined
Jun 26, 2022
Messages
338
Just to clarify, my point in my previous post is that I was criticizing parents for making their children into gender fluidity trophies and pushing an identity onto them that they aren't old enough to understand. I can't tell if you are agreeing or disagreeing with me, so I figured I'd clarify.
Yeah im not sure if we agree or disagree either lol.

My viewpoint is that gender is something a person is born with and is not changeable, something that is known at birth, or even before birth with ultrasound, not something that a child discovers later on.

But i don't believe in forcing people to conform to gender roles. If a girl hates dolls or the color pink for example, that doesnt mean she's a boy. Tomboys exist (and i was one), but theyre still girls. So many children are damaged by being forced to conform, or conversely, by parents that want to parade the child around as an example of their "tolerance" or something, as you said.

I also don't believe that girls should be discouraged from being wives and mothers when they grow up if they choose to, or are well suited for it. And i acknowledge that biologically that is something that only women can do.

Baby dolls that come with ways to simulate breast feeding, are most definitely targeting girls and heavily encouraging them to be nothing more than people who pop out kids.
Im actually against dolls that simulate breastfeeding as well, but for slightly different reasons.

Some women struggle to do so, especially if they're working moms, and this constant pressure to be a "supermom" who does it all is very damaging to an already overwhelmed and sleep deprived woman. Ive actually seen people be unsympathetic about the formula shortage because they blame the women for not breastfeeding, though not all women are able to produce enough milk. I think this "normalize breast feeding" trend has gone too far. But now im threadjacking lol.

There are so many cults around the world that raise little girls from birth to focus on being nothing more than an underage wife and mother (in other words, a sex slave). These creepy dolls that are featured in this thread, they play a role in that
I mostly speak of the US and mainstream society who buys toys for their kids. Parents do not want their daughters to be under age moms. Most parents these days want their daughters to go to college, or possibly to work if they are poor.

It is terrible that children are being sold into slavery since birth. But since they are keeping them as slaves i dont think these children have much of a say in the matter of being forced to have kids, dolls or no dolls. Horrible situation, dont get me wrong, but i dont think the dolls are having much of an impact there. Unless what youre saying is that they have to get the "consent" of the slave children rather than pure force?
 

Seekeroftruth55

Veteran
Joined
Jul 12, 2022
Messages
652
Either way, this is absolutely disgusting..they should never sell this crap to kids. Aren't little girls groomed enough? Everything they see and watch their are told that being sexy is the number one thing..these LOL dolls are just promoting this further. And to be completely honest, this just gets worse and worse. I heard the 80s was pretty bad for the behind the scenes stuff in movies and tv shows due to the p*do agenda, now it's so highly out in the open and so many don't even bat an eye to it.
I also have to agree that kids don't have to play with specific toys. I hated most dolls as a little girl, they were so boring to me!
 

theartbook35

Established
Joined
Dec 9, 2020
Messages
288
Yeah im not sure if we agree or disagree either lol.

My viewpoint is that gender is something a person is born with and is not changeable, something that is known at birth, or even before birth with ultrasound, not something that a child discovers later on.
For the most part I think we agree on a lot of things.

Biology and identity aren't the same thing, but if we wanna dive into cognitive psychology and the theory about whether or not the brain and the body are separate or together are a single entity, it can become a very complicated discussion, lol. My cognitive psychology class last week dove into this and oooh boy was it interesting. I'm a person of science, and the way I see it, when you're born you get what you get and you don't get upset. But anyway, I'm not gonna threadjack either.

But i don't believe in forcing people to conform to gender roles. If a girl hates dolls or the color pink for example, that doesnt mean she's a boy. Tomboys exist (and i was one), but theyre still girls. So many children are damaged by being forced to conform, or conversely, by parents that want to parade the child around as an example of their "tolerance" or something, as you said.

I also don't believe that girls should be discouraged from being wives and mothers when they grow up if they choose to, or are well suited for it. And i acknowledge that biologically that is something that only women can do.
Gender roles are what cause the problems. That's one of my issues with a lot of toys that are marketed to girls and boys with the intent to push gender roles. Girls don't all like pink and purple, and boys don't all like camouflage color palettes. My mom had this saying, "There's no such thing as girl toys or boy toys. Toys are for everyone." I say this to my students often. I've seen students from non-white families get the most aggressive about "which genders can play with which toys" for over 16 years. There's something about the black and Hispanic community that are really intense about what kinds of toys their kids can play with. As a POC myself, it frustrates me, especially since parents try all the time to bring that negativity into our classroom. Teaching kids is easy, teaching parents though, that's a special kind of hell.

I do, to a certain extent, blame parents for these kinds of toys. I know it's bad to blame parents but, they are very much happy to conform their children to these gender roles and force them to think and live a certain way. If someone wants to be a mom, yay, and if not, yay! It's the aggressive encouragement I have an issue with.

Im actually against dolls that simulate breastfeeding as well, but for slightly different reasons.

Some women struggle to do so, especially if they're working moms, and this constant pressure to be a "supermom" who does it all is very damaging to an already overwhelmed and sleep deprived woman. Ive actually seen people be unsympathetic about the formula shortage because they blame the women for not breastfeeding, though not all women are able to produce enough milk. I think this "normalize breast feeding" trend has gone too far. But now im threadjacking lol.
Adult moms breastfeeding is normal. Kids breastfeeding a toy doll is not, and never will be normal.

I don't even have a problem with mothers breastfeeding publicly. The child is eating. Doesn't need to be seen as anything more than that.

Making a "toy" that simulates breastfeeding is just... like you said it puts on pressure to be a supermom. What if that kid grows up thinking they will breastfeed and then they find out they can't and get horribly upset? Because that most certainly will happen. The "just breastfeed" argument during the formula shortage was so out of touch. What about moms who can produce breastmilk but cannot breastfeed because they have HIV or another illness that could be passed to the child? What about mother's who have had a double mastectomy? The breastfeeding trend has gotten out of control indeed and the fact that it's being pushed onto children is just too much. When I was a kid it was the children's movies that were all about lab animals, and granted, testing human products on animals is horrifying but stop taking advantage of how easily influenced children are. It's like every generation there's some kind of nonsense. I shudder to think what children's toys and media will look like in ten years.
 

ToxicFemininitySucks

Established
Joined
Jun 26, 2022
Messages
338
For the most part I think we agree on a lot of things.

Biology and identity aren't the same thing
We do :)
But not this thing.

Gender roles are what cause the problems. That's one of my issues with a lot of toys that are marketed to girls and boys with the intent to push gender roles. Girls don't all like pink and purple, and boys don't all like camouflage color palettes. My mom had this saying, "There's no such thing as girl toys or boy toys. Toys are for everyone."
I agree that forcing roles is a big cause of the problems. As a girl who didn't fit into the gender stereotype (I did not enjoy playing with dolls and brushing their hair, for example, but i loved to play outside with my neighbors, who all happened to be boys), i can relate to this.

But i don't think nonsexualized "gendered" toys are necessarily grooming children into gender roles. I was the only girl i knew from school who rejected playing with dolls. The only boy i knew who liked dolls liked them because he would play with them alonside action figures (which are really boy dolls lol). I think in the majority of cases children choose to play with toys that are "gendered". I can't find the article but i remember reading one thst said that every time they try marketing toys that challenge gender roles they are a massive flop.

The way boys play really rough (in general, not always) and girls like to hold their dolls and cuddle them (in general, not always) seems to be almost innate. However, if we are the parent of a child who does not conform to these "in generals" i think it is important to show support, to reassure them that there's nothing wrong with wanting to play wih the toys they want to play with, and definitely to not declare them to be the opposite sex because of their toy preference. I wish people would include the "in general, not always" when discussing these things.
Your mom sounds very supportive btw.

I've seen students from non-white families get the most aggressive about "which genders can play with which toys" for over 16 years. There's something about the black and Hispanic community that are really intense about what kinds of toys their kids can play with. As a POC myself, it frustrates me, especially since parents try all the time to bring that negativity into our classroom. Teaching kids is easy, teaching parents though, that's a special kind of hell.

I do, to a certain extent, blame parents for these kinds of toys. I know it's bad to blame parents but, they are very much happy to conform their children to these gender roles and force them to think and live a certain way. If someone wants to be a mom, yay, and if not, yay! It's the aggressive encouragement I have an issue with.
I know you said its been going on for 16 years, but the way things have been in the last several years, can you really blame them? Teachers are actively asking very young children what they "identify" as, and telling them they can change their gender. If the parents are concerned about their children picking up some new strange and confusing ideas i can't really blame them for being on the defensive. Of course I know that theres a difference between playing with a certain toy and claiming to be the opposite gender, but im the kind of person that likes to overthink and ponder everything lol. And it doesnt help that there are people that will claim that a toy preference DOES indicate your gender.
Adult moms breastfeeding is normal. Kids breastfeeding a toy doll is not, and never will be normal.

I don't even have a problem with mothers breastfeeding publicly. The child is eating. Doesn't need to be seen as anything more than that.
I personally see a difference between a newborn-4 month old that has to be fed pretty much around the clock, and often tolerates a nursing cover, and a woman choosing to expose herself in public to feed a 2-3 year old who eats full solid meals. I think it contributes to this culture of exhibitionism and attention seeking, in my opinion. It's no coincidence the powers that be are pushing it. I know literally no one ever agrees with this opinion, but it's my opinion regardless.
The "just breastfeed" argument during the formula shortage was so out of touch
YES, THANK YOU!

Making a "toy" that simulates breastfeeding is just... like you said it puts on pressure to be a supermom. What if that kid grows up thinking they will breastfeed and then they find out they can't and get horribly upset? Because that most certainly will happen. The "just breastfeed" argument during the formula shortage was so out of touch. What about moms who can produce breastmilk but cannot breastfeed because they have HIV or another illness that could be passed to the child? What about mother's who have had a double mastectomy? The breastfeeding trend has gotten out of control indeed and the fact that it's being pushed onto children is just too much
I agree. There's a lot of possible scenarios in which a woman can't breastfeed, and adding on pressure since childhood is just wrong. I definitely agree that this particular toy is grooming children.
 

Dreamymoon

Rookie
Joined
Mar 12, 2022
Messages
76
Agreed. That's why I said I was fine with boys playing with dolls, and why I was glad my parents respected that I wasn't interested in dolls and let me play with the toys I was interested in.
Yes I played with cars as a kid and loved them and trains I liked too. I liked Pokémon too. All were typical “boy“ toys. I liked anything but I did not like baby dolls they creeped me out
 

delusion.everywhere

Established
Joined
Feb 12, 2022
Messages
271
MINECRAFT
The Note for Tom Hanks has a MINECRAFT player next to it — another gaming system where players can communicate anonymously. One victim testimones about him.

MINECRAFT also game about cubes. Cube of Saturn.
And

Atari have symbolic elements.


Founder Nolan Kay Bushnell (born February 5, 1943) is an American businessman and electrical engineer. He established Atari, Inc. and the Chuck E. Cheese's Pizza Time Theatre chain. Bushnell has been inducted into the Video Game Hall of Fame and the Consumer Electronics Association Hall of Fame, received the BAFTA Fellowship and the Nations Restaurant News "Innovator of the Year" award, and was named one of Newsweek's "50 Men Who Changed America." Bushnell has started more than twenty companies and is one of the founding fathers of the video game industry. He is on the board of Anti-Aging Games. In 2012 he founded an educational software company called Brainrush,[4] that is using video game technology in educational software.

Bushnell enrolled at Utah State University in 1961 to study engineering and then later business. In 1964, he transferred to the University of Utah College of Engineering, where he graduated with a Bachelor's degree in electrical engineering.[6] He was a member of the Pi Kappa Alpha fraternity. He was one of many computer science students of the 1960s who played the historic Spacewar! game on DEC mainframe computers.

Direct satanism themes and symbolism in games too


Pong is the fist game and to learn their symbolic study Pizzagate also.

Also space themes which is actually direct to NASA programming center. There are more games about occult scripts and all of them I believe for MK Ultra made. Most games have wizards and Mario Bros have occult themed elements.


2. Adventure (1979):

It may look painfully simplistic by modern standards, as your character is a square and the fierce dragons pretty much look like ducks, but for its time, Adventure was a revelation. It essentially created the action-adventure genre and was one of the first games to feature an easter egg. (Game designer Warren Robinett hid his name in a secret room.) What it lacked in graphics, it more than made up for in imagination.

6. Pitfall! (1982):

Largely credited with creating the side-scrolling platformer genre, Pitfall! was one of the most influential games of the Atari 2600. The sprawling adventure has you controlling Pitfall Harry, navigating jungle hazards as you swing over crocodiles, jump over scorpions and leap across the titular pits while collecting treasure. Without Pitfall Harry, there would be no Mario, and there might be no Jack Black, who was featured in the game’s commercial.

8. Q*bert (1983):

Another arcade port, Q*bert lost the cool isometric perspective but none of the addictive gameplay that made it such a classic. You play as a long-snouted, armless orange thing as you jump around a pyramid, trying to touch every cube while avoiding Coily the snake and other creatures. Get hit by an enemy and Q*bert curses “@!#?@!,” which is probably much nicer than what most players yelled at the screen. Though he hasn’t had any recent games, the iconic character showed up in last year’s animated hit
Where can I find about this tom hanks thing? I've read it first time. God all these pedos in Hollywood?.
I couldn't find anything specific about this on the internet.
 

Vmort

Star
Joined
Dec 1, 2019
Messages
1,356
Where can I find about this tom hanks thing?
Sara Ruth ascraft twitter and Fighting Monarch who wrote a lot about Hanks.
RAINBOW THEME
Cisco Wheeler writes of color programming.
One of the things developed in the California Universities and then implemented at China Lake was color programming, which will be covered later in this book. Red and green were discovered to be the most visible colors for programming. Various colored flashing lights were used in programming at NOTS. Survivors of the programming all remember flashing lights. The use of flashing lights has been introduced into American culture by the CIA. If a person goes into bars and places where bands play, you will notice multi-colored lights flashing. The flashing lights create disassociation, especially in people who are programmed.
Seven seems to occupy a privileged role among the Illuminati. There are seven days of the week, and there are seven ages of man. Seven is considered lucky.
But my interest here is more in the use of seven for programming under MK-ULTRA. Hypnosis figures heavily in mind control, and different types of programming, or alters, are placed at different levels up to seven. As far as I know, there is no deeper level, but some subjects may be programmed only up to five.

Common: Apparently Normal Parts (ANP) / Host,Child alter,Internal Self-helper (ISH),Introjects,Opposite-sex alters,Persecutor,Protector,Sexual Alter,Suicidal Alter or Internal Homicide,Teen alter. Less Common: Animal Alter,Baby and infant alter, Caretaker/Soother, Demon, Demonic and ‘Evil’ Alter, Fragment, Military or Political Alter, Nonhuman Alter, Robot or Machine Alter, Shell, Spirit, Ghost, or Supernatural being Alters. Sub-parts.No particular types of alter are needed for a DID diagnosis, most people will only recognize a few types. Some people with DID may not recognize any, or may have types not listed. Types of alters depend on what each person needed to survive.
Seven shows up in color programming, used by the Illuminati. The visible spectrum, with which Illuminist Sir Isaac Newton experimented, has seven colors into which light is split, just as programming splits our personalities.
KIDS ENTERTAINMENT FROM MY YOUTH
HOLE, PIPE, RODENT THEME ARE ALLUSION TO SEX MAGIC
Безымянный_012321.jpegБезымянный_049289.jpegБезымянный_049486.jpegБезымянный_026017.jpeg

Slinky
The Slinky was invented and developed by American naval engineer Richard T. James in 1943 and demonstrated at Gimbels department store in Philadelphia in November 1945. The toy was a hit, selling its entire inventory of 400 units in 90 minutes. James and his wife Betty formed James Industries in Clifton Heights, Pennsylvania to manufacture Slinky and several related toys such as the Slinky Dog and Suzie, the Slinky Worm. In 1960, James's wife Betty James became president of James Industries, and, in 1964, moved it back to Hollidaysburg, Pennsylvania. In 1998 she sold the company to Poof Products, Inc.
The Slinky was originally priced at $1, but many paid much more due to price increases of spring steel in Pennsylvania. It has, however, remained modestly priced throughout its history as a result of Betty James' concern about the toy's affordability for less affluent customers. In addition to its use as a toy, it has been used as a classroom teaching tool; as a portable and extendable radio antenna in wartime (particularly the Vietnam War); and in NASA physics demonstrations, as when astronaut Margaret Rhea Seddon demonstrated its behavior in zero gravity during a telecast from the Discovery Space Shuttle in 1985.[1] It was inducted into the National Toy Hall of Fame at The Strong in Rochester, New York in 2000. In 2003, it was named to the Toy Industry Association's Century of Toys List.[2] In its first 60 years, about 300 million have been sold.[3]
In 1999, the United States Postal Service issued a Slinky postage stamp.[22] The Slinky was inducted into the National Toy Hall of Fame in 2000 in their Celebrate the Century stamp series. A bill to nominate the slinky as the state toy of Pennsylvania was introduced by Richard Geist in 2001 but not enacted.[23] The same year, Betty James was inducted into the Toy Industry Association's Hall of Fame.[13] In 2003, Slinky was named to the Toy Industry Association's "Century of Toys List", a roll call of the 100 most memorable and most creative toys of the twentieth century.[24]


PIPE -- SEX MAGIC ALLUSION
MAGNA -- TILES

Pipe Mania
Pipe Mania is a puzzle video game developed by The Assembly Line for the Amiga and published in 1989. It was ported to several other platforms by Lucasfilm Games as Pipe Dream; the company distributed the game in the US. The player must connect randomly appearing pieces of pipe on a grid to a given length within a limited time.

BALLS THEME -- BAAL
Безымянный_055902.jpegБезымянный_056020.jpegБезымянный_055962.jpeg

Bubble pipe
FLUTE PLAYING --- PAN SYMBOLISM


SLIME -- BLACK GOO

Slime
was a toy product manufactured by Mattel, sold in a plastic trash can and introduced in February 1976.[2] It consisted of a non-toxic viscous, squishy and oozy green or other color material made primarily from guar gum.[3] Different variations of Slime were released over the years, including Slime containing rubber insects, eyeballs, and worms and Masters of the Universe Slime for Hordak's Slime Pit playset in the 1980s.
The late 1970s also introduced a Slime Monster board game; the object of the game was to avoid having your game piece slimed on by a foot-tall plastic monster that had slime oozing from its mouth. Other toy companies have produced their own slime such as the Ecto-Plazm play gel[4] sold with selected figures in Kenner's Real Ghostbusters toyline. Playmates Toys' Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles figure line also had Retro-Mutagen slime sold in containers and included with playsets.[5]
Tamagotchi -- ALTER CREATING

The Tamagotchi (Japanese: たまごっち, IPA: [tamaɡotꜜtɕi], "Egg Watch") is a handheld digital pet that was created in Japan by Akihiro Yokoi of WiZ and Aki Maita of Bandai.[1] It was released by Bandai on November 23, 1996 in Japan and in the USA on May 1, 1997,[2][3] quickly becoming one of the biggest toy fads of the late 1990s and the early 2000s. As of March 2021, over 83 million units have been sold worldwide. Most Tamagotchi are housed in a small egg-shaped handheld video game with an interface consisting of three buttons, with the Tamagotchi Pix adding a shutter on the top to activate the camera.
 
Last edited:

Vmort

Star
Joined
Dec 1, 2019
Messages
1,356
DEGENERATIVE DESIGNS
None of these are normal animals: there are drunken, drugged and perverted pedo eyes. Straight evil eyes will be here because it was created by evil people. Безымянный_015695.jpegБезымянный_019040.jpegБезымянный_013220.jpegБезымянный_018844.jpegБезымянный_018985.jpegБезымянный_019708.jpegБезымянный_029551.jpegБезымянный_032037.jpegБезымянный_061587.jpegБезымянный_065467.jpeg
 
Top