I'm reading "about" on this think tank that the material about Joe is from, and it's very good:
The practical and moral failures of U.S. efforts to unilaterally shape the destiny of other nations by force requires a fundamental rethinking of U.S. foreign policy assumptions. So does the emergence of a multi-polar world in the 21st century where economic power is more evenly shared across nations. Yet the influence of the “military industrial complex” that President Eisenhower warned of has led to a situation where the foreign policy debate within Washington is intentionally constrained and fails to incorporate the diversity of views needed for that rethinking.
Overview The practical and moral failures of U.S. efforts to unilaterally shape the destiny of other nations by force requires ...
quincyinst.org
And this is from Putin's decree on the Concept of Foreign Policy of the Russian Federation, signed on March 31, 2023:
...
II. The modern world: the main trends and prospects of development
7. Humanity is going through an era of revolutionary changes. The formation of a more just, multipolar world continues. The non-equilibrium model of world development, which for centuries ensured the outstripping economic growth of colonial powers by appropriating the resources of dependent territories and states in Asia, Africa and the Western Hemisphere, is irreversibly going into the past. Sovereignty is being strengthened and the competitive capabilities of non-Western world powers and regional leaders are increasing. The structural restructuring of the world economy, its transfer to a new technological basis (including the introduction of artificial intelligence technologies, the latest information and communication, energy, biological technologies and nanotechnologies), the growth of national consciousness, cultural and civilizational diversity and other objective factors accelerate the processes of redistribution of development potential in favor of new centers of economic growth and geopolitical influence, contribute to the democratization of international relations.
Владимир Путин подписал Указ «Об утверждении Концепции внешней политики Российской Федерации».
kremlin.ru
The same (which you will hear/read from WEF, the UN, the "transformation of the financial system" of BIS, and elsewhere), but the Russians have quite well put it together in one paragraph, pointing out creme de la creme: the transition to world justice goes through the transformation of everything on a new technological base. The details of the specific implementation are not announced (but WEF has them, Yuval Harari talks a lot about them and looking at the multipolar world, we register a full correspondence in the main).
Innovation is the key to global justice, so shortly before entering the headlines recently, Ramaphosa did not fail to boast:
12 Dec 2023
Address by President Cyril Ramaphosa at the Inaugural Presidential Science, Technology and Innovation Plenary, CSIR Convention Centre, Tshwane, 12 December 2023
…
Medical innovation is another area where South Africa has recorded progress.
Our experience of the COVID-19 pandemic has accelerated our nation’s drive to achieve health security through, among others, vaccine production.
Earlier this year, the World Health Organisation officially launched its mRNA vaccine technology hub in Cape Town.
Afrigen Biologics, a South African company part-owned by the Industrial Development Corporation, is working on a new tuberculosis vaccine using mRNA technology.
The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation recently allocated $5 million to Biovac in South Africa to develop mRNA vaccines using a local platform.
This grant enables our researchers and scientists to strengthen the pharmaceutical research and vaccine production ecosystem so that we are able to address both current and future health challenges.
www.gov.za
And it gets a little confused: innovation creates the conditions for world justice, but first conditions must be created for innovation (then, when innovations are implemented and established, justice is expected). I got a little confused, so, finally, I consulted Leonid Greenin, one of the "50 foremost global thinkers," according to Schwab (2022), who explained back in 2014:
…
As is clear, the scientific-cybernetic production principle is at the beginning of its development. Only its first phase finished, and in the mid-1990s the second started. The second phase is proceeding now and will last till the early 2030s. The third phase is likely to begin approximately in the 2030s or the 2040s. At this particular time the final phase of the Cybernetic Revolution should start.
…
As regards the 1990s – 2020s (the intermediate phase of the Cybernetic Revolution) the question is that the launch of a new innovative breakthrough demands that the developing countries reach the level of the developed ones, and the political component of the world catches up with the economic one; all this needs changes of the structure of societies and global relations.[...] introduction and distribution of the new basic technologies do not occur naturally, but only within the appropriate social political environment. In order for basic innovations to be suitable for business, structural changes in political and social spheres are necessary, eventually promoting their synergy and wide implementation in the world of business.[…] We believe that at present we witness the downward phase of the fifth K-wave which will last till the early or the mid-2020s.
…
At the end of 2021, Grinin (et al.)
wrote "COVID-19 pandemic as a trigger for the acceleration of the cybernetic revolution, transition from e-government to e-state, and change in social relations", Schwab included it among the 50 world thinkers, then the "war in Ukraine" (Russia powerfully started to innovate, so it approached world justice), and now Grinin does not stop writing about "American hegemony" and its fall..
..In this sense, they (USA-Israel) can be expected to fall together (a bit to catch up with the multipolar world) so that there is justice (well, a little innovation first). And at the moment, as the think tanks also say, "the US made a lot of mistakes in supporting Israel", Israel itself "screwed up", the International Court of Justice has condemned them (South Africa <-multipolar/BRICS), "the world community is increasingly against them", even many of the mainstream regularly record their violations; and in general, the US/Israel hegemony (+"collective West") is at its twist and fall point (to a level with the non-West).
Or not, and everything that happens is regular (or at least not set).
consortiumnews.com
www.middleeasteye.net
www.declassifieduk.org
