Stephania
Star
- Joined
- Jun 5, 2019
- Messages
- 1,287
LoLEditor's note: The author is a freelance writer in her early 30s whose identity has been verified by Business Insider. While some people consider sugar relationships a form of sex work, it's a label rejected by sugar dating sites and some members themselves. Regardless, prostitution is a dangerous and illegal activity. This story is part of a series on the financial side of relationships, and you can read other entries in the series here.
I think this clears up everything. No need to overthink about it.
The fact that there is a whole article about how to go about doing it here, complete with link to sugaring site in article.. and that Google trended it from Business Insider Magazine is shocking to me. I've never seen anything like that here before.It’s a little hard to tell. The government really cracked down on it after the murders and there’s a big campaign against it (sort of like the Just Say No To Drugs thing the US did), but it’s a very common plot line in TV shows and movies. If you were involved though it wouldn’t really be something you would be proud to admit, it’s considered extremely trashy. It was a bigger deal in the 2000s because it wasn’t as stigmatized, but it still happens. It seems like the attitudes sort of switched in the US and Japan. It used to be if you admitted to compensated dating in the US people would think you were low class and desperate, and while it wasn’t ever really accepted in Japan it was just sort of acknowledged as something people would do. Now in Japan it’s very stigmatized while some people proudly admit it in the US. People will be like “oh my sugar daddy paid my rent!” You mean you prostituted yourself to get your rent?
Well I am Japanese, in my experience we aren’t too different from most people. People who aren’t involved tend to find it kind of trashy.Trashy for us, maybe not to them. We can't expect everything to think the same way we ourselves feel about relationships.
As I said before.. if a woman does this, I don't judge her. But the way that this is presented is to get women to try it who have never done it before, and glorifies it in a well known American business magazine in a way that I find highly suspiciousTrashy for us, maybe not to them. We can't expect everything to think the same way we ourselves feel about relationships.
How do you know who she is? Her identity is hidden, she is teaching ppl how to do it through a linked website in the article, and telling people who have never done it the perks of it. I'm sure she got paid for all of that too, it reads like it was written by a handler, and an advertisement for the sugaring site to lure more women there for the men. And TBH, this post wasn't about stigmatizing her, it was questioning the intent of BI magazine and Google. But since you want to make it a simply personal issue, yeah, I don't trust the writer either. I already said people can make their own choices and do what they want with their lives. But this is blatant phishing for new women in that market to go to that site. And why on earth is BI doing a series on the positive benefits of monetarily based relationships in the midst of the Epstein scandal anyways. BTW.. how old does that 'sugar baby' pic of the girl holding all of the sugar cubes look to you? Does the linked site validate girls ages? Just wondering... Also.. I had a friend who had sugar daddies, and she never used the term 'sugar baby' once. ( I also never judged her, and still don't, it was her choice.) But the way this is in the mainstream Business news, the way the terminology is stated, and pushing the benefits of having a monetarily based relationship with an older man in the midst of the Epstein scandal is all too weird for meAnd after all, it's just another person's story, someone like you or me, who makes her own decisions and has obviously thought about this "sugar baby" thing a lot. I don't think stigmatizing is what she deserves for that. Not that glorifying either.
sounds like they wanna blur the lines btw mainstream dating and prostitutionEditor's note: The author is a freelance writer in her early 30s whose identity has been verified by Business Insider. While some people consider sugar relationships a form of sex work, it's a label rejected by sugar dating sites and some members themselves. Regardless, prostitution is a dangerous and illegal activity. This story is part of a series on the financial side of relationships, and you can read other entries in the series here.
I think this clears up everything. No need to overthink about it.
Yeah, I think it does. At least for me, it's very clear what they are saying.Editor's note: The author is a freelance writer in her early 30s whose identity has been verified by Business Insider. While some people consider sugar relationships a form of sex work, it's a label rejected by sugar dating sites and some members themselves. Regardless, prostitution is a dangerous and illegal activity. This story is part of a series on the financial side of relationships, and you can read other entries in the series here.
I think this clears up everything. No need to overthink about it.
Wow. And that's just in Australia.. now it's hit the mainstream media here. I was thinking about it earlier today.. and I remember seeing a billboard on Sunset Blvd in Hollywood about 4-5 years ago advertising sugar babies and dating. But at the time, I wrote it off in my mind as just a dating site because, I was like, they couldn't actually advertise sex for money legally, right? Wrong.Apparently, it's more common that we might have expected.