“Is it cuz I is black?” Will “Transracial” become the new Transgender?

[KoncreteMind]

Moses is one person. That’s not the creator walking with humanity. Tbh this is just getting way too low iq if you can’t even understand simple things

Lightseeker: God hasn’t walked with man since Adam
*Brings up Moses*
LS: um um umm, I meant people!

Yup pretty much, they did

“If I bring someone the meaning of the verse that will prove him wrong.” Uhh, yeah, it does

And that’s the flimsiness of your faith in action that you think a mans explanation is proof of what scripture means or doesn’t mean. Trust not in man? Out the window with your weak faith.

But yea you can believe that people dedicated a generation and a half to build one castle if you want. While another did it for a temple. While another did it for a cathedral lol. Less and less people are believing the mainstream narratives everyday, a sign that it’s crumbling. The spell has been lifted and the current rulers won’t be the next rulers. You’re free to go down with their lies though.The wicked were created for a day of destruction

so Darwin is like some great wise sage for you. Interesting.

Alright well we’re not talking about the title of this thread anymore, you were already proven wrong about that, americans arent transracialists because American isnt a race, so it doesn’t matter if you want to bring a bunch of other topics you’re wrong about, seems like your just wrong about everything because your mad that white people built castles you like and don’t want to admit they built them. Well they did. LMAO

Darwin looked into your origins and posted what he found. Don’t get mad at me because you don’t like what he found lol

You got off the subject of the thread when I explained that black white American Indian Asian are all made up terms that exist to hide who people really are. You won’t address that. You think a white couple moving to China and having kids there means their kids are Chinese. And that’s how it works in this luciferian global society. But you’re not going to be able to hide for much longer

 

[lightseeker]

Lightseeker: God hasn’t walked with man since Adam
*Brings up Moses*
LS: um um umm, I meant people!

Not so fast there little guy. You were saying that there was a time when God was walking with everyone therefore they had technology. Moses was one person that God spoke to while the rest of humanity was in ignorance. You have proven nothing towards what you were arguing

And that’s the flimsiness of your faith in action that you think a mans explanation is proof of what scripture means or doesn’t mean. Trust not in man? Out the window with your weak faith

So faith to yoy is just making up whatever you think about the text and not learning it's actual meaning. Ok. Believe that deuteronomy 23 is proving Darwinism, genius lmao

You got off the subject of the thread when I explained that black white American Indian Asian are all made up terms that exist to hide who people really are. You won’t address that. You think a white couple moving to China and having kids there means their kids are Chinese. And that’s how it works in this luciferian global society. But you’re not going to be able to hide for much longer

They're not racially Chinese if they move to China.

Darwin looked into your origins and posted what he found. Don’t get mad at me because you don’t like what he found lol

Someone already posted that Darwin thought that blacks were most closely related to apes so you might want to drop that line of argument. Darwin was a racist trying to prove the superiority of the English in the time of the monarchs

 

[KoncreteMind]

Not so fast there little guy. You were saying that there was a time when God was walking with everyone therefore they had technology. Moses was one person that God spoke to while the rest of humanity was in ignorance. You have proven nothing towards what you were arguing

I asked the question of how at the time He was dealing with people (that doesn’t mean everyone) directly would technology be at its lowest but now that He turned away from people, it’s at highest? I never said anything about walking with them or anything.YOU DID. And you STILL GOT THAT WRONG.

So faith to yoy is just making up whatever you think about the text and not learning it's actual meaning. Ok. Believe that deuteronomy 23 is proving Darwinism, genius lmao

Pulling a random explanation from some random isn’t proof of its actual meaning lol

They're not racially Chinese if they move to China.

Someone already posted that Darwin thought that blacks were most closely related to apes so you might want to drop that line of argument. Darwin was a racist trying to prove the superiority of the English in the time of the monarchs

LS: American is not about race!
Also LS: People who move to China aren’t racially chinese

And since race is made up you can make up arbitrary reasons as to why one nationality can mean race but another can’t. And that’s fine. It’s all made up. There’s no such thing as race so transracialism is irrelevant as it’s really a taking of someone else’s title. So as to cover up who people really are behind all these made up titles. Specifically black and white.

And one of y’all can line up where Darwin said blacks were closely (biologically) related to apes. I can line out where he said they were savages because of their “morality” or lack thereof, but I didn’t see where he said anything about blacks being related to apes.

 

[Red Sky at Morning]

There’s no such thing as race so transracialism is irrelevant as it’s really a taking of someone else’s title. So as to cover up who people really are behind all these made up titles. Specifically black and white.

And one of y’all can line up where Darwin said blacks were closely (biologically) related to apes. I can line out where he said they were savages because of their “morality” or lack thereof, but I didn’t see where he said anything about blacks being related to apes.

So just to be clear, if you had a room full of people of different ethnic backgrounds, you would be unable to distinguish those characteristic attributes without the application of national labels?

 

[KoncreteMind]

from wikipedia: the chicago worlds fair (colombian exposition of 1893) was planned in the early 1890s. lets say it was planned at construction started that same year in 1890. by may 1st, 1893, it was open. so who believes that 200 buildings with canals and lagoons, moving sidewalks, and a monstrous ferris wheel on 690 acres were completed in 3 years? think about the manpower needed, the material, bringing the material to this location, and how much time would be required at the end of the 19th century to do this.
and then almost all of the buildings are destroyed afterward since all of this was meant to be temporary.

some "temporary" structures:
View attachment 73803

View attachment 73804

View attachment 73805

What do you think happened?

 

[lightseeker]

I asked the question of how at the time He was dealing with people (that doesn’t mean everyone) directly would technology be at its lowest but now that He turned away from people, it’s at highest? I never said anything about walking with them or anything.YOU DID. And you STILL GOT THAT WRONG.

Well in Moses time there was approximately 1 (one) person who was close to God as we’ve established. There’s a lot more than 1 now, now that the teachings of the bible have spread throughout the earth so I guess it does make sense doesn’t it. Still there’s nowhere in the bible where it says God was very close to people and gave them great technology as a consequence, the bible is a slow redeeming of man from 0. So that’s just another thing you made up in your fantasy fairy tale make believe world

Pulling a random explanation from some random isn’t proof of its actual meaning lol

its a pretty simple explanation. How about a linguistic explanation then. “Not a people” doesnt mean “not a human”. “A people” -plural : human beings making up a group or assembly or linked by a common interest. Merriam Webster. In this case, the common interest being God, a people not linked to God by knowing and worshipping him.

And one of y’all can line up where Darwin said blacks were closely (biologically) related to apes. I c

From the link above
”Darwin says that the gap between civilized man and his closest evolutionary ancestor will widen. The gap will eventually be between civilized man “and some ape as low as a baboon, instead of as at present between the negro or Australian and the gorilla”Darwin’s theory claims that Africans and Australians are more closely related to apes than Europeans are. The spectrum of organisms is a hierarchy here, with white Europeans at the top and apes at the bottom. In Darwin’s theory, colored people fall somewhere in between. Modern human is essentially restricted only to white Europeans, with all other races viewed as somehow sub-human.”

 

[Linsky]

First off who the fuck talks like that I really wanna know I’m from the Deep South and never met anyone who says that shit, y’all really must forget there’s Black People on this site lmao I thought this was a site for truthers not wannabe w/s who will never dare to say any of the sly remarks in person.

And the fact that most of y’all in your 60s and would shit your self if you had an altercation with a Black Person lol y’all weird as hell, no threat whatsoever.

 

[KoncreteMind]

So just to be clear, if you had a room full of people of different ethnic backgrounds, you would be unable to distinguish those characteristic attributes without the application of national labels?

I don’t even understand your question. But the way they label “national identities” are fake. There is no “African” as “Africa” is something THEY came up with. Just as there is no “May 1 2022” because they changed the times...

 

[Linsky]

Well in Moses time there was approximately 1 (one) person who was close to God as we’ve established. There’s a lot more than 1 now, now that the teachings of the bible have spread throughout the earth so I guess it does make sense doesn’t it. Still there’s nowhere in the bible where it says God was very close to people and gave them great technology as a consequence, the bible is a slow redeeming of man from 0. So that’s just another thing you made up in your fantasy fairy tale make believe world

its a pretty simple explanation. How about a linguistic explanation then. “Not a people” doesnt mean “not a human”. “A people” -plural : human beings making up a group or assembly or linked by a common interest. Merriam Webster. In this case, the common interest being God, a people not linked to God by knowing and worshipping him.

From the link above
”Darwin says that the gap between civilized man and his closest evolutionary ancestor will widen. The gap will eventually be between civilized man “and some ape as low as a baboon, instead of as at present between the negro or Australian and the gorilla”Darwin’s theory claims that Africans and Australians are more closely related to apes than Europeans are. The spectrum of organisms is a hierarchy here, with white Europeans at the top and apes at the bottom. In Darwin’s theory, colored people fall somewhere in between. Modern human is essentially restricted only to white Europeans, with all other races viewed as somehow sub-human.”

My guy you really don’t want to do this, if we were to go thru history and really point to who the most destructive race on this planet is it wouldn’t be Africans or Aborginals they actually for the most part lived life the way god intended also since we want to play this game.

If your a truther what race of people are known to be satanist? What race of people brought satanism to the west? What race are the Elites who practice child sacrifice? Occult practices? Are leading humanity astray?

What race are the people who are the most famous satanist on planet earth?
What race has killed millions around the world, stolen land, destroyed entire cultures and who actively are closer to the devils aim of steal, killing and destroying?

 

[Rufus McKenzie]

I've been in the trades all my life and these structures are not impossible. We just don't see new ones because they are not economical. Only people with obscene money like the Rothchilds are building castles today.

The kind of opulence that people use as evidence of one’s racial/ethnic/nationalist superiority in fact actually shows the opposite as those buildings were just pleasure palaces for the rich or centers of state administrative power.

Say what you will about the “primitives” but the chief’s hut is made from the same material as yours, if you get my meaning.

 

[Rufus McKenzie]

My guy you really don’t want to do this, if we were to go thru history and really point to who the most destructive race on this planet is it wouldn’t be Africans or Aborginals they actually for the most part lived life the way god intended also since we want to play this game.

If your a truther what race of people are known to be satanist? What race of people brought satanism to the west? What race are the Elites who practice child sacrifice? Occult practices? Are leading humanity astray?

What race are the people who are the most famous satanist on planet earth?
What race has killed millions around the world, stolen land, destroyed entire cultures and who actively are closer to the devils aim of steal, killing and destroying?

He’s gonna say “Jew” and hell get six to twelve likes

 

[Rufus McKenzie]

Actually Darwin believed that black people were more related to apes than white people. He was deeply racist and ignorant of DNA and basic biology.

The Dark Side of Darwinism | Philosophy for the Many

Prior to Darwin the more widely held belief was that God created several different races with some being superior to others.

That doesn’t seem to godly to me, especially if one professes any kind of belief in the New Testament as Jesus is pretty clearly there for everyone, all the so called races as he knew it was all one.

God works in mysterious ways.

@redskyatmorning

I would argue those that try and shoehorn evidence to match their one true scriptural interpretation actually just damage the faith.

Taking a firm stand on scientific matters is not the point of the Bible and doing so discredits the faith and drives people into atheism.

Thanks Protestant Extremists! ( )

 

[Red Sky at Morning]

@redskyatmorning

I would argue those that try and shoehorn evidence to match their one true scriptural interpretation actually just damage the faith.

Taking a firm stand on scientific matters is not the point of the Bible and doing so discredits the faith and drives people into atheism.

Thanks Protestant Extremists! ( )

@Rufus McKenzie

What would you consider to be the most compelling evidence that made you equate the word “evolution” with the word “scientific”?

*from my training in evolutionary biology, those who believed the theory always had an evidential shoehorn to hand!

“The Scopes ‘Monkey Trial’ Revisited” - An invitation to examine both sides of the origins debate

[Edit] This heated presentation by Dr James Tour reflects the closed shop of Evolutionary science. His response is as incisive as it is scathing! I found something I wrote years ago... “Earlier this century the famous Scopes "Monkey" Trial proved to be a turning point in science education...

vigilantcitizenforums.com

 

[KoncreteMind]

Well in Moses time there was approximately 1 (one) person who was close to God as we’ve established. There’s a lot more than 1 now, now that the teachings of the bible have spread throughout the earth so I guess it does make sense doesn’t it. Still there’s nowhere in the bible where it says God was very close to people and gave them great technology as a consequence, the bible is a slow redeeming of man from 0. So that’s just another thing you made up in your fantasy fairy tale make believe world

The proof is in the architecture that past civilizations were more advanced than what we are seeing today. They, today, make you pay for electricity and use coal, gas and oil that harms the environment they hide the free energy they know exists but suppress. And you defend it lol

It’s not even just about tech it’s about the understanding of the world HE CREATED. He gave that to the Israelites but they’ll have you believe they know or have accomplished the most ever in history. It’s false..

its a pretty simple explanation. How about a linguistic explanation then. “Not a people” doesnt mean “not a human”. “A people” -plural : human beings making up a group or assembly or linked by a common interest. Merriam Webster. In this case, the common interest being God, a people not linked to God by knowing and worshipping him.

It’s the “human” part that makes them “not a people” not because they don’t share a common interest with Israelites. A people are any group of humans that share an interest within themselves not with those outside the group.

From the link above
”Darwin says that the gap between civilized man and his closest evolutionary ancestor will widen. The gap will eventually be between civilized man “and some ape as low as a baboon, instead of as at present between the negro or Australian and the gorilla”Darwin’s theory claims that Africans and Australians are more closely related to apes than Europeans are. The spectrum of organisms is a hierarchy here, with white Europeans at the top and apes at the bottom. In Darwin’s theory, colored people fall somewhere in between. Modern human is essentially restricted only to white Europeans, with all other races viewed as somehow sub-human.”

I’m just going to bring the quote without the authors (of the link)and input you let me know how it’s saying that black people are closer related biologically than whites:


“The break will then be rendered wider, for it will intervene between man in a more civilised state, as we may hope, than the Caucasian, and some ape as low as a baboon, instead of as at present between the negro or Australian and the gorilla.”

My guy you really don’t want to do this,

It looks bad but read the context of the convo. That’s not the position he’s holds. He’s trying to point out to me that Darwin held those views

 

[Red Sky at Morning]

“The break will then be rendered wider, for it will intervene between man in a more civilised state, as we may hope, than the Caucasian, and some ape as low as a baboon, instead of as at present between the negro or Australian and the gorilla.”

It looks bad but read the context of the convo. That’s not the position he’s holds. He’s trying to point out to me that Darwin held those views

 

[polymoog]

It’s all made up. There’s no such thing as race so transracialism is irrelevant as it’s really a taking of someone else’s title. So as to cover up who people really are behind all these made up titles. Specifically black and white.

of course there is a thing as race. how can you say that?
there are 3 main groups black, asian, and white, that can be further subdivided (latinos, middle easterners, etc.). a halfway decent anthropologist can pick up a skull and determine if that person was any of those groups. certain races have genetic disorders endemic to them (phenylketonurics for irish, tay sachs for ashkenazi jews, sickle cell anemia for blacks, etc.) the genes are clearly apparent as are the phenotypes. on a less physical level, different races have clearly different attributes.
in any case, anyone can see the difference.

by the way, the dutch colonized south africa hundreds of years ago. theyre south african and are clearly white people. race cannot change. nationalities can change.

 

[polymoog]

I thought this was a site for truthers not wannabe w/s who will never dare to say any of the sly remarks in person.

let me guess, you will use physical violence against the individual because you dont like their comments. how shocking. are people like you so intellectually retarded that you cannot verbally rebut anything you feel is "racist"? and if people like you have such a hard time with a retort against speech which you find repugnant, is it that difficult for you to walk away and ignore the person? is your skin that thin?

 

[polymoog]

What do you think happened?

many of those structures were preexisting there and the history was erased and rewritten.

i do not know how old those buildings are and when the timeline was altered; i suppose it was around the time of the orphan trains, at the very least. lewis and clark said they were finding large forts (star forts?) along the mississippi in 1805, but id very much like to read other eyewitness accounts of early explorers noting these buildings/structures before i am 100% convinced.

 

[lightseeker]

A people are any group of humans that share an interest within themselves not with those outside the group.

Yes but in that quote it is God speaking, so it is deduced to mean not a people in relation to God.

It’s not even just about tech it’s about the understanding of the world HE CREATED. He gave that to the Israelites but they’ll have you believe they know or have accomplished the most ever in history. It’s false..

but the Israelites in the Bible aren’t ever described as great creators, technological savants. They are in constant conflict with God by not fulfilling his wishes. They often are worshipping strange gods, God is punishing them etc. So what you’re arguing isn’t biblical if that’s your foundation.

I’m just going to bring the quote without the authors (of the link)and input you let me know how it’s saying that black people are closer related biologically than whites:


“The break will then be rendered wider, for it will intervene between man in a more civilised state, as we may hope, than the Caucasian, and some ape as low as a baboon, instead of as at present between the negro or Australian and the gorilla.”

it does say that. Darwin believed that all humans were evolved species of apes. He thought that blacks and Australians were closer to apes and whites had evolved far past it, although all come from there.

It looks bad but read the context of the convo. That’s not the position he’s holds. He’s trying to point out to me that Darwin held those views

thanks for clarifying that

so a question, if you don’t believe in race then what is the problem with trans racialism? Wouldn’t it be normal for someone to assume any race he wanted then?

 

[KoncreteMind]

of course there is a thing as race. how can you say that?
there are 3 main groups black, asian, and white, that can be further subdivided (latinos, middle easterners, etc.). a halfway decent anthropologist can pick up a skull and determine if that person was any of those groups. certain races have genetic disorders endemic to them (phenylketonurics for irish, tay sachs for ashkenazi jews, sickle cell anemia for blacks, etc.) the genes are clearly apparent as are the phenotypes. on a less physical level, different races have clearly different attributes.
in any case, anyone can see the difference.

by the way, the dutch colonized south africa hundreds of years ago. theyre south african and are clearly white people. race cannot change. nationalities can change.

Ancestry is what’s real. Dividing everyone based on phenotypes is not. That’s something the modern European came up with to cover up ancestry

Black and white are only things that have existed in the last 200 years as a distinction for groups of people and you think that outweighs the rest of history and how people were looked at.When the modern power structure goes down, all these things go down with it. No more “Africa” or “Asia” or black white Indian etc....

Going by identifications that came in the last 200 years is like watching a kid come out and label everything he sees. We’re only following the kids labels because their is a power backing it. But once that power isn’t backing him,no ones going to follow it anymore. People have always identified themselves by ancestry not by how they looked, not by their skin color, not by their hair type, not by their skull size...Again, ancestry is real. Race, made up human concept...