Cia Agent Confesses On Deathbed: ‘we Blew Up Wtc7 On 9/11’

[Zakat]

By contrast, the arrival of Jesus 600 years before was foretold multiple time by the Old T prophets, which make his credentials far more weighty..

Check this out

(copy pasted below)
​

Surah 96: The Clot (96:1-5)

This short passage consists of the very first words that were revealed to Muhammad in the cave outside of Mecca.

When Muhammad was forty years old, he went to Mt. Hira, outside of Mecca, to have a spiritual retreat by himself.

During the night, the Angel Gabriel appeared to him and spoke these words to him.

In the Hadiths, which collect stories about Muhammad, he told others that he heard the words but also felt like the words were being seared into him and that it was a physically and mentally difficult process to receive the revelation.

After Muhammad received this revelation, he raced home to his wife Khadija and told her what had happened.

She believed his story and suggested he speak to her cousin, Waraqa, who was a Christian.

When Waraqa heard the story, he told Muhammad that there had been other revelations in the past, and it sounded like God wanted him to be a prophet to the Arab people.

​

The angel Gabriel told Muhammad to “read,” which is important for Muslims, because Muhammad was illiterate and told Gabriel that he could not read, but Gabriel pressed on with the second line, commanding him to “read” again.

Muhammad’s illiteracy is also important to Muslims because they insist that Muhammad did not have the education to be able to come up with the Quran himself.

This passage also states that God “taught by the pen,” which is another reference to the previous revelations that God gave and were recorded in the Jewish and Christian sacred texts.

This passage also showcases another feature of the Quran, which is that it is not ordered chronologically.

As you can see, this is from Surah 96, and there are only 114 surahs in the entire Quran.

So the very first revelation is placed almost at the end of the Quran.

The order of the Quran is believed to have been a revelation in itself that Muhammad received from God near the end of his life after all the revelations had been given.

So the ordering is believed to be perfect.

Additionally, there are multiple revelations in each Surah – this Surah, Surah 96, contains this first revealed Chapter/Sūrah through Archangel Gabriel (Jibrīl)

Surah 96: The Clot

Read: In the Name of your Lord who created.

Created man from a clot.

Read: And your Lord is the Most Generous.

He who taught by the pen.

Taught man what he never knew.

In fact, man oversteps all bounds.

When he considers himself exempt.

But to your Lord is the return.

Have you seen him who prevents?

A servant when he prays?

Do you think he is upon guidance?

Or advocates righteousness?

Do you see how he disbelieved and turned away?

Does he not know that God sees?

No. If he does not desist, We will drag him by the forelock.

A deceitful, sinful forelock.

Let him call on his gang.

We will call the Guards.

No, do not obey him; but kneel down, and come near.​

Access the text here:

https://www.clearquran.com/096.html

Source

 

[A Freeman]

Clout quote- Mate, you often quote the Koran, but where does the Bible command you to do that?
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


But I asked you where exactly does the BIBLE tell us to read the Koran?
In fact it's an impossibility because the Koran was written 600 years AFTER the Bible, so how on earth can the Bible tell us to read the Koran?..

No more "buts". You're still attempting to deflect.

Is the reason you're evading the original question, as to whether you keep The Law that God gave us, and share this truth with others -- as Christ teaches -- because you know that if you face the truth, you would have to admit that you're not a REAL Christian (a true follower of Christ's Teachings)?

And isn't that same deflection technique the same reason you refuse to spend even 5 minutes actually reviewing the mountain of evidence which proves beyond any reasonable doubt that 9/11 was an inside job, planned and perpetrated by agents of the U.S. government, in obedience to their Ashkenazi (counterfeit-Jewish) task masters?

 

[Zakat]

Need I add that history repeats itself in one way or another?​

 

[A Freeman]

Clout quote- Mate, you often quote the Koran, but where does the Bible command you to do that?
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


But I asked you where exactly does the BIBLE tell us to read the Koran?
In fact it's an impossibility because the Koran was written 600 years AFTER the Bible, so how on earth can the Bible tell us to read the Koran?..

Further, and to show how ridiculous your question is, where in the Old Covenant/Testament does it tell us to read the New Covenant/Testament?
There is a several hundred year gap between end of Malachi and the Gospel as recorded by Matthew, just as there's several hundred years in between the New Covenant/Testament and the Koran/Quran.

The New Covenant/Testament (Gospel) CONFIRMS the Old Covenant/Testament (God's Law) and the fulfillment of the prophecies, just as the Koran/Quran CONFIRMS both the Old Covenant/Testament and the New Covenant/Testament. And anyone who actually does what all three of them tell us to do -- which is to keep and enforce God's Law ONLY and to DO God's Will -- will be given the spiritual insight to recognize God's Word everywhere they find it, exactly as God has promised (Acts 5:29-33).

John 7:15-17
7:15 And the Jews marvelled, saying, How knoweth this man "Letters", having never been taught (Sura 7:157-158)?
7:16 Jesus answered them, and said, My doctrine is NOT mine, but His that sent me.
7:17 If any man will do His will, he shall KNOW of the doctrine, whether it be of God, or [whether] I speak of myself.

Sura 61:6-7
61:6. And remember, Jesus, the son of Mary, said: "O Children of Israel! I am the Apostle of "I AM" (sent) to you, CONFIRMING The Law (which came) before me (the Torah - Matt. 5:17-20), and giving Glad Tidings of a Messenger to come after me, whose name shall be the Comforter (John 16:7-15)." But when he came to them with Clear Signs, they said, "this is evident sorcery!"
61:7. Who doth greater wrong than one who invents falsehood against "I AM", even as he is being INVITED to do His Will? And "I AM" guides not those who do wrong (Satan does).

It is Satan -- through the ego ("self") -- who stands as sentinel to the mind, to prevent the truth from getting through.

Learn to open your mind to the truth, including the truth about 9/11.

 

[Clout]

..where in the Old Covenant/Testament does it tell us to read the New Covenant/Testament?

Mate-

When the Old T was written, there was NO New T because it'd still be hundreds of years until Jesus arrived to deliver it..

 

[Zakat]

Mate-

When the Old T was written, there was NO New T because it'd still be hundreds of years until Jesus arrived to deliver it..

And to me, you are very disrespectful of Scripture, and people!

 

[Clout]

Is the reason you're evading the original question, as to whether you keep The Law that God gave us, and share this truth with others -- as Christ teaches -- because you know that if you face the truth, you would have to admit that you're not a REAL Christian (a true follower of Christ's Teachings)?

The Old T and the Koran tell us to kill adulteresses, you can do that if you like, but I prefer Jesus's approach..

 

[Clout]

And to me, you are very disrespectful of Scripture, and people!

You can respect fools if you like, but include me out..
"Speak not in the ears of a fool: for he will despise the wisdom of thy words" (Proverbs 23:9)

 

[Zakat]

I don't fly aeroplanes into buildings or go on stabbing and bombing sprees..

Yeah, you keep on believing that!

 

[Clout]

I'm trying to save souls, huh you try to be nice (sniffle)..
"Don't have anything to do with foolish and stupid arguments....those who oppose him he must gently instruct, in the hope that God will grant them repentance leading them to a knowledge of the truth, and that they will come to their senses and escape from the trap of the devil, who has taken them captive to do his will" (2 Tim 2:23-26)

 

[A Freeman]

Mate-

When the Old T was written, there was NO New T because it'd still be hundreds of years until Jesus arrived to deliver it..

And when the New Covenant/Testament was written there was no Koran/Quran, because it would be hundreds of years later before God sent it as an invitation to the Gentiles and to correct the damage that Roman Catholicism had done.

You're still evading the very simple question that was asked of you, just as you evade looking at any real evidence about 9/11, choosing instead to believe the lies promoted by the mainstream media, including the laughable "never trust a truss" nonsense.

 

[A Freeman]

The Old T and the Koran tell us to kill adulteresses, you can do that if you like, but I prefer Jesus's approach..

The story of the adulterous woman was very obviously ADDED to the Bible by the Roman Catholics, as you have previously been shown but chose to ignore, so you can continue to ignore that Christ did NOT come to destroy The Law, to your own detriment.

It is IMPOSSIBLE to be a true follower of Christ while continuing to break The Law, just as it's IMPOSSIBLE for a steel skyscraper to fail due to fire, or to collapse in its own footprint at near free-free fall speed from an explosion near the top of it.

 

[Clout]

..Christ did NOT come to destroy The Law, to your own detriment.
It is IMPOSSIBLE to be a true follower of Christ while continuing to break The Law, just as it's IMPOSSIBLE for a steel skyscraper to fail due to fire, or to collapse in its own footprint at near free-free fall speed from an explosion near the top of it.

1- If the law in the Old T was all we needed, why did God sent Jesus to give us the New?..
2- There's a saying in the building industry- "Never trust a truss", but the WTC towers had trusses holding up every floor, so when the burning jet fuel melted one truss, it collapsed and brought down the floors above in concertina fashion, the weight of which brought down all the other floors below it in a total collapse-

 

[Clout]

You're still evading the very simple question that was asked of you..

Prove it..

 

[A Freeman]

1- If the law in the Old T was all we needed, why did God sent Jesus to give us the New?..

Because we all had earned the death penalty for breaking The Law, exactly as it states in The Law (Deut. 28:15-68), and as the New Covenant/Testament reminds us.

Romans 6:23 For the wages of sin [is] DEATH (Eze. 18:4); but the gift of God [is] eternal Life through Jesus Christ our Lord.

Instead of God destroying the entire nation, God sent His Eldest/First-created Son -- Prince Michael/Christ -- to pay the price for the entire nation, and the rest of the world, giving us all the opportunity to repent, i.e. STOP SINNING/BREAKING THE LAW.

Of course Christ, as our Teacher, is also THE Example (John 14:6; Sura 3:55). Did Christ sin? Obviously not.

1 Peter 2:20-25
2:20 For what glory [is it], if, when ye be buffeted for your faults, ye shall take it patiently? but if, when ye do well, and suffer [for it], ye take it patiently, this [is] acceptable with God.
2:21 For even hereunto were ye called: because Christ also suffered for us, LEAVING US AN EXAMPLE, THAT YE SHOULD FOLLOW HIS STEPS:
2:22 WHO DID NO SIN, neither was guile found in his mouth:
2:23 Who, when he was reviled, reviled not again; when he suffered, he threatened not; but committed [himself] to Him that judgeth righteously:
2:24 Who his own self bare our sins in his own body on the tree, that we, BEING DEAD TO SINS, should Live by righteousness: by whose stripes ye were healed.
2:25 For ye were as sheep going astray; but are now returned unto The Shepherd (Eze. 34) and Governor of your souls.

2- There's a saying in the building industry- "Never trust a truss",

No, there isn't. Virtually every building on Earth employs trusses in one form or another.

But this lie, like the rest of the lies you espouse, you repeat ad nauseum, not only in the hope of deceiving others, but to try to convince yourself that these lies are somehow true? Do you really believe you can pretend to be a follower of Christ, and continue to tell lies, and that somehow you'll be rewarded for being a criminal? This is the exact question all of us need to be asking ourselves, you included.

but the WTC towers had trusses holding up every floor, so when the burning jet fuel melted one truss,

How could jet fuel, which cannot burn hotter than ~500 F (260 C), somehow melt structural steel, when ASTM A36 structural steel has a melting point of 2750 F (1510 C)?

https://www.911research.wtc7.net/mirrors/guardian2/wtc/how-hot.htm

And before you're duped into crying "but the fires could weaken the steel" (in an hour or less?) even though no steel skyscraper has ever failed due to fire in the history of mankind (and some have burned for days), you may wish to consider that ALL of the ~100,000 tons of structural steel in WTC1 (or WTC2) was INTERCONNECTED, and thus would have acted as a gigantic ~100,000-ton HEAT-SINK.

So, please stop pretending to be an engineer, or that you know ANYTHING about building construction, or about the properties of materials, because you have proven beyond a shadow of a doubt that you are absolutely clueless when it comes to this subject matter.

it collapsed and brought down the floors above in concertina fashion, the weight of which brought down all the other floors below it in a total collapse-

Repeating lies, regardless of how often they are repeated, will NEVER make them true.

 

[Clout]

You're still evading the very simple question that was asked of you..

Mate, it's a a common trick of people who are losing debates to say that.
I've been bouncing around the forums for 22 years and am used to all their little tricks..

 

[Clout]

Repeating lies, regardless of how often they are repeated, will NEVER make them true.

Al Qaeda says they brought down the WTC, were they lying?..

 

[Orwell's mentor]

For anyone who's really interested in the OP (no wonder @DesertRose went AWAL), skip pages 11-15 as most of the posts are completely irrelevant that are filled with religious quotes.

Not sure what that has to do with the CIA confessing they were involved with blowing up the WTC 7 on 9/11, but anyway....

 

[A Freeman]

Mate, it's a a common trick of people who are losing debates to say that.
I've been bouncing around the forums for 22 years and am used to all their little tricks..

You're still doing it, and aren't fooling anyone with your nonsense.

Please be respectful of this thread topic, which is discussing the fact that 9/11 was very obviously an inside job, just as the CIA agent confessed on his deathbed.

And by respectful, what is meant is for you take your bag of tricks elsewhere, for everyone's benefit, as you know absolutely nothing about this subject.

 

[Clout]

Please be respectful of this thread topic, which is discussing the fact that 9/11 was very obviously an inside job, just as the CIA agent confessed on his deathbed.

You're obviously a muslim sympathiser mate, so of course you'd say that, even though Al-Qaeda admitted doing it..
As for the alleged CIA agent, he's dead now so people can claim he said anything since he's not around to say "No I didn't"..