Palestinian Resistance Launch Major Attack on Israel: What Happened? – LIVE BLOG

DavidSon

Star
Joined
Jan 10, 2019
Messages
2,144

“The enemy thinks that it kills civilians because we (the fighters) are present among civilians. No actually, we, as fighters, are in an area completely devoid of civilians. This despicable enemy has no power against us as men in the battlefield, the battlefield which (the enemy) specified its location, and the field from which they commanded people to evacuate. And the people did evacuate. And we came for (the enemy) in the place that they evacuated.

“But this cowardly and criminal enemy goes and kills our children in their homes— their safe homes—our wives, our women, our children, and the children of the people, the children of the society. They kill them with F-16s and grill their flesh. They bully women and the elderly and civilians in their homes, their safe homes.

“However, we as fighters are here on the battlefield. Come. Let us show you how to deal with men, by Allah’s will.

“This enemy lies. And it deceives people by claiming that it bombs homes to kill Hamas leaders and Al-Qassam fighters. Al-Qassam fighters, here they are, all of them are in their advanced combat readiness, awaiting the enemy in the places that the enemy commanded the evacuation of.
 

A Freeman

Superstar
Joined
Nov 11, 2019
Messages
8,245
Every single day, the AshkeNAZI counterfeit Jews, aka "Israelis" are proving to the world exactly why Christ referred to them as "the synagogue of Satan" in the Revelation.

Revelation 2:9 I know thy works, and tribulation, and poverty, (but thou art rich) and [I know] the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews, and are NOT, but [are] (Ashkenazis and Idumean Edomites) the synagogue of Satan.

Revelation 3:9 Behold, I will make them of the synagogue of Satan, which say they are Jews, and are NOT, but do LIE (Ashkenazis and Idumean Edomites); behold, I will make them to come and worship before thy feet, and to know that I have loved thee.

LA Times Today: Gazans in Rafah watch Israeli bombs move closer with nowhere left to run

 

Haich

Superstar
Joined
Mar 15, 2017
Messages
7,312
They are still targeting hospitals.

Why are they being evacuated? There are no Hamas operations inside these hospitals and even if they produced a shred of probable evidence, the manner in which they infiltrate these heavily civilian populated areas constitutes as a war crime.
Don’t be fooled by the ‘evacuation order’…there are people too sick or weak to evacuate the hospital. Not to mention that there are still displaced families seeking shelter and solace in these hospitals. Surely these evacuation orders alarm ‘Hamas’? Wouldn’t a stealthy, organised and coordinated entry, be more befitting as to not alarm ‘Hamas’? Well, it’s intentional on the part of the IDF as they can later blame the inevitable high civilian death/casualty toll, on ‘Hamas’ using ‘human shields’

They rinse and repeat the same old tired tactics. They’re not fooling anyone.

 

Haich

Superstar
Joined
Mar 15, 2017
Messages
7,312
I genuinely don’t believe anti semitism has increased exponentially since Oct 7th. Multiple reports keep alluding to this without much credible evidence.

Anyway, there is a secret police/security service called Community Security Trust which serves the Jewish community in London. They are a registered charity and regularly post stats about antisemitism.

As a registered charity their finances are publicly available. They recorded a total income of over £22m for 2022 and made a profit of over £1m.

Significantly, the UK government grants CST around £13m a year. This is money that could be going to the police or other significantly underfunded public services. The charity employs 16 people who each earn between £60k-£200k. The average Brit earns between 24-34k a year. So that bracket is well above average…

The CST depends on donations and grants. They have reported an increase in reports of "antisemitic incidents" year-on-year, which correlates with an increase in donations.

Why is the Jewish community granted such privileges at the expense of the tax payer? Why is this grant extended to other religions in the UK? Why aren’t other forms of prejudice chronicled as meticulously? In my view, by synonymously correlating Judaism with Israel, it propels and cements the MM narrative of a displaced, marginalised minority being stuck in loop of oppression.

Here is a detailed thread with their full financial details and how their structure mirrors the ADL in The US.

 

Stucky

Superstar
Joined
May 17, 2020
Messages
5,960
I genuinely don’t believe anti semitism has increased exponentially since Oct 7th. Multiple reports keep alluding to this without much credible evidence.

Anyway, there is a secret police/security service called Community Security Trust which serves the Jewish community in London. They are a registered charity and regularly post stats about antisemitism.

As a registered charity their finances are publicly available. They recorded a total income of over £22m for 2022 and made a profit of over £1m.

Significantly, the UK government grants CST around £13m a year. This is money that could be going to the police or other significantly underfunded public services. The charity employs 16 people who each earn between £60k-£200k. The average Brit earns between 24-34k a year. So that bracket is well above average…

The CST depends on donations and grants. They have reported an increase in reports of "antisemitic incidents" year-on-year, which correlates with an increase in donations.

Why is the Jewish community granted such privileges at the expense of the tax payer? Why is this grant extended to other religions in the UK? Why aren’t other forms of prejudice chronicled as meticulously? In my view, by synonymously correlating Judaism with Israel, it propels and cements the MM narrative of a displaced, marginalised minority being stuck in loop of oppression.

Here is a detailed thread with their full financial details and how their structure mirrors the ADL in The US.

Unfortunately i can't read the thread.

All this "rise in anti semitism" will be used by the government to push through legislation that will outlaw all manner of signs/symbols/protests. Just the other day there was a court case with an extremely worrying verdict and it seems to have passed under the radar,

Three protesters were charged under the Terrorism Act with carrying or displaying an article to arouse reasonable suspicion that they are supporters of banned organisation Hamas, which they denied.

They were found guilty and here's the scary part. The Judge concluded,

"I want to be clear, there’s no evidence that any of these defendants are supporters of Hamas, or were seeking to show support for them."

Apply similar to "anti semitism" under some bs new legislation. Here's what could happen. Just like wee Greta did you take a selfie with your friends supporting Gaza (or anything for that matter) and in that selfie there's a toy octopus. Some zionist decides to call the Police and says that your octopus is an anti semitic trope and therefore causes fear, alarm or distress. The Police come and knock on your door and tell you they are pressing charges because you displayed an anti semitic symbol. You then go to court and the Judge finds you guilty but declares there's no evidence of anti semitism.

It's getting scarier by the day when mere suspicion of being a terrorist sympathiser/anti semitic is enough to get you a guilty verdict in a court of law even though the Judge concludes that there's no evidence to suggest you are any of these things.
 

Haich

Superstar
Joined
Mar 15, 2017
Messages
7,312
Unfortunately i can't read the thread.

All this "rise in anti semitism" will be used by the government to push through legislation that will outlaw all manner of signs/symbols/protests. Just the other day there was a court case with an extremely worrying verdict and it seems to have passed under the radar,

Three protesters were charged under the Terrorism Act with carrying or displaying an article to arouse reasonable suspicion that they are supporters of banned organisation Hamas, which they denied.

They were found guilty and here's the scary part. The Judge concluded,

"I want to be clear, there’s no evidence that any of these defendants are supporters of Hamas, or were seeking to show support for them."

Apply similar to "anti semitism" under some bs new legislation. Here's what could happen. Just like wee Greta did you take a selfie with your friends supporting Gaza (or anything for that matter) and in that selfie there's a toy octopus. Some zionist decides to call the Police and says that your octopus is an anti semitic trope and therefore causes fear, alarm or distress. The Police come and knock on your door and tell you they are pressing charges because you displayed an anti semitic symbol. You then go to court and the Judge finds you guilty but declares there's no evidence of anti semitism.

It's getting scarier by the day when mere suspicion of being a terrorist sympathiser/anti semitic is enough to get you a guilty verdict in a court of law even though the Judge concludes that there's no evidence to suggest you are any of these things.
I summarised most of it in the post but here are the Companies House screenshots the poster uploaded:
IMG_7592.jpegIMG_7593.jpegIMG_7594.jpeg
They’re clearly profiting from the supposed exponential rise in anti semitism as their funding increases each time it’s reported to have increased.

From the thread:

‘The business structure for CST isn't original. In the US, it's the ADL, regarded as extremely influential politically. Part of the ADL's remit is to record reports of "antisemitism". Here's a clip from "Defamation", a documentary about the ADL, showing them "at work":


(For those who can’t see the clip, it’s a lady presumably working for ADL and collecting anti semitism complaints. Some of the complaints in the clip: a Jewish school teacher complaining about not being able to have time off & a member of the public complaining about an article they read having ‘anti semitism undertones)

‘As the CST grows and gains influence, what will that mean for society? What issues arise when they assume the role of the police? Is there a conflict of interest if, for example, a large donation should be accepted from the state of Israel? We should be very wary’

Precisely, Stucky. There’s no credible evidence in most of these cases.
 
Top