Exposing the luciferian sunke temple trust cult; "divine mother"; isis/ishtar; "kaneh bosm"; mary jane blackshear/maitreya

Joined
Jun 26, 2022
Messages
2,264
This next few pages are incredibly repetitive...

Screenshot_20230823-013637.jpgScreenshot_20230823-013723.jpgScreenshot_20230823-013737.jpgScreenshot_20230823-013749.jpgScreenshot_20230823-013810.jpgScreenshot_20230823-013827.jpg

The definitions over the next few pages are an attempt to explain the variety of different combitations of rh factor blood types, which "genesis" they're from, and compatible breeding.

+/+ supposedly created so beings from other planets could survive on earth (and venus and mars)

Only -/+ or -/- men can mate with -/- women or else the blood will attack the "invader"

Yes and no. Before the discovery of the rh factor about 10,000 babies died or were disabled per year in the US because of rh factor incompatibility, and it is still a problem in countries where they don't test. (I am wondering if blackshear is opposed to rhogam, or is she just believes people should only choose certain partners)

The so-called Rh factor makes few headlines these days, but until the middle of the 20th century it was a serious public-health concern, implicated in the deaths and severe disabilities of 10,000 babies in this country every year.

The presence or absence of the blood protein Rh (for rhesus, the monkey in which it was discovered) can lead to runaway immune reactions in Rh-positive babies born to Rh-negative mothers, or in people receiving transfusions of incompatible blood.

So in hindsight, The New York Times’s first mention of the Rh factor, on Sunday, March 26, 1944, should have made bigger news than it did in a brief article at the bottom of the “Science in Review” column on Page 9 of Section 4, The News of the Week in Review. “The recently discovered Rh factor in human blood,” it said, “need not cause infant deaths and childless marriages.”
In a pregnancy where the mother is RhD negative and the father is RhD positive, the probability of the fetus having RhD positive blood is dependent on whether the father is homozygous for RhD (i.e., both RhD alleles are present) or heterozygous (i.e., only one RhD allele is present). If the father is homozygous, the fetus will necessarily be RhD positive, as the father will necessarily pass on a Rh D positive allele. If the father is heterozygous, there is a 50% chance that the fetus will be RhD positive, as he will randomly pass on either the RhD positive allele or not.

If a fetus is RhD positive and the mother is RhD negative, the mother is at risk of RhD alloimmunization, where the mother mounts an immune response (develops antibodies) to fetal red blood cells. This usually has minimal effect on the first such pregnancy; but, in a second such pregnancy, pre-existing maternal antibodies to RhD antigens on fetal red blood cells often leads to erythroblastosis fetalis, a condition which can be fatal to the fetus. In countries without Rh immune globulin (RhIG) protocols, as many as 14% of affected fetuses are stillborn and 50% of live births result in neonatal death or brain injury.


She makes a biblical reference to cherubs guarding the garden. There is nothing in scripture to indicate this verse has to do with blood type compatibility.

Genesis
24So he drove out the man; and he placed at the east of the garden of Eden Cherubims, and a flaming sword which turned every way, to keep the way of the tree of life.

Then we get into all the compatibility charts.

-/- men with +/+ women resulted in -/+ individuals


-/+ women can mate with -/- men, +/+ men, and -/+ men


-/+ men can mate with -/-, -/+, +/+ women

If a -/+ man with a -/- woman have a -/- daughter then she can reproduce asexually(?)

At this point i started to glaze over... if this is not clarified in the manuscript and it's relevant i will revisit, but for now i think everyone gets the point.


Some beings decided to create others to serve them. The elites purposely kept their bloodlines -/- in order to oppress everyone else (how is this oppression?)


I still don't understand how exactly it is oppression to not be a rh- blood type, it seems to me as though she's just constantly trying to show that she's superior while claiming to feel bad for everyone else.

She is now saying we are all heirs (in the interview she said only the A- blood type).
calling out her blood brothers and sisters the A negs and reminding them as well, of who they are, and how they are, also 'beneficiaries' of the assets of our Earth Mother
 
Joined
Jun 26, 2022
Messages
2,264
That just looks like ancient mythology with modern terminology added everywhere!!!!!
Yeah something like a strange combination of mythology and paganism and twisting scripture, but throwing in scientific terms to attempt to "prove" it to those who won't research her claims.

I think she deliberately overcomplicates the science parts by being overly wordy to make research less likely as well.
 

JoChris

Superstar
Joined
Mar 15, 2017
Messages
6,168
Yeah something like a strange combination of mythology and paganism and twisting scripture, but throwing in scientific terms to attempt to "prove" it to those who won't research her claims.

I think she deliberately overcomplicates the science parts by being overly wordy to make research less likely as well.
Here is an example of a Greek creation myth where the male was not needed at first:

.......Gaia, the divine personification of the earth, gave birth to three offspring without any sexual concourse.

Gaia's first such child was Uranus, the starry heavens that fit around her perfectly and that provide a home for the immortals. Then she gave birth to the mountains, where the Nymphs live in the hills and the forests. Then she gave birth to Pontos, the sea on which sailors challenge the raging waves. Then Gaia lay with Uranus, the heavens, and she gave birth to Okeanos, the ocean that circles the world. Thus in three generations, from Chaos in the first, to Gaia, Tartaros, Eros, Erebos, and Nyx in the second, and to Aether, Hemera, Uranus, Pontos, and Okeanos in the third, the entire world as we know it came to be.
Gaia and Uranus went on to have twelve children, known as the Titans, and Gaia gave rise to many others as well....
 

Maldarker

Star
Joined
Mar 23, 2021
Messages
2,081
Next excerpt from "intro"




Blackshear refers to the planet earth as "tiamat" or "ki-earth", depending on what point we are at in the story.

Tiamat refers to a babylonian goddess. Several names that appear in the following wiki article are the names of characters in the "divine mother" manuscript as well. The incestous concept of a female taking on one of her male offspring as a partner will also be making an appearance.






It is hard to ignore the striking similarities between what is depicted in the manuscript and the (discredited) theories of zecharia sitchin. I noticed the manuscript was published in 2011, a year after sitchin's death in 2010. Could that be a factor in blackshear blatantly using his work as an uncredited influence, as he isn't around to object?





Not to go on too much of a tangent, but the city of Ur is where Abraham was from before being called by God to leave (Genesis 11:28, 31)

Also, just because these babylonian stories were written before does not mean they predate the Bible. The evens early in the book of Genesis happened thousands of years before the Bible was written.






"perpetuate war on Tiamat Ki-Earth through their acts of aggression and genocide. Therefore, war does not qualify for anything beneficial to the Temple Beings and all in creation, even to the Elite Occultist/Zionist."


It did occur to me long before reading the manuscript that if the elites hurt the planet and the plant/animal life (through gmo crops pollinating crops in the wild, or genetically modifying animals, or polluting the oceans with microplastics, for example) it hurts them too. They have to live in the same polluted conditions. That was one of the reasons i've rejected the notion that money was the only motivation - they would have to live with the resulting damage too. It can be difficult for regular people to imagine the motivations of people with infinite amounts of money, but in my opinion it is about power, control and evil.



Next excerpt.

If we define lunatic as a mentally deranged person, then yes, i agree that anyone harming another or themselves is a lunatic.

Do i believe they should be apprehended for a psych evaluation? No. There is too much potential of this being abused. It's a tricky situation.

The military is a topic i don't know much about, but to the best of my knowledge military personnel swear an oath to defend their country, not "the very essence of all life". I genuinely don't know where she is going with this comment. Some possible theories are the abolishing of a military force in her version of utopia. Perhaps as we continue this comment will make more sense.
All roads lead to babel start there.
 

JoChris

Superstar
Joined
Mar 15, 2017
Messages
6,168
It has a day to day history of Jesus that I have seen nowhere else in one of the sections that is pretty extensive. The whole book is very complex and is not easy reading.
I think I did come across the Book of Urantia while doing research for my other thread but since it wasn't relevant I didn't read it.
 
Joined
Jun 26, 2022
Messages
2,264
Finally to the end of the definitions section.

Screenshot_20230823-230422.jpgScreenshot_20230823-230437.jpg
Screenshot_20230823-230452.jpgScreenshot_20230823-230509.jpg

As i mentioned previously, there is no evidence of such thing as a "sacred archer ceremony" provided by blackshear (or the internet), nor that the solar system was in a different galaxy before being "hijacked".

nowhere in the manuscript does blackshear attempt to provide any proof that there is such thing as a "sacred archer ceremony" which causes the dwarf galaxy to pass through the galatic center for ANY reason

There is no evidence that mercury was ever the moon of venus provided by either blackshear or the rest of the internet.

Due to venus' rotation if it had a moon its moon would have traveled towards it and been destroyed, not away to become mercury.

However, if a planet rotates in the opposite direction of its moon’s orbit, the planet no longer transfers energy to its moon. Instead, the planet absorbs the orbital energy of its moon, gradually causing the moon to fall towards the planet. Once the moon is close enough, the planet's gravitational pull rips it apart, and the debris comes crashing down. Scientists believe this is what happened to Venus many billions of years ago, and it’s the reason why Venus does not have any moons today.

"Divine universal law court" is not so much defined as blackshear informing us that it is the only valid court and it's above all other courts. No evidence or reasons provided, of course.

I previously discussed what "divine universal law" may be here.
divine universal law
The rest of the definitions are word salad combined with the many repetitive titles blackshear calls herself.
 
Joined
Jun 26, 2022
Messages
2,264
This next series of pages appear to be part of the paper work blackshear received when she sent a DNA sample to be analyzed for ancestry. I am surprised someone so paranoid and anti-government would do such a thing, but anyway, she did.


Her results are later on in the manuscript (no idea why she didnt just put it all together). I am also unsure what this is supposed to be evidence of or prove.

I'm posting under a spoiler tag so it doesn't make the page load slower, especially as this doesn't seem to be too relevant.

Screenshot_20230823-233626.jpgScreenshot_20230823-233640.jpgScreenshot_20230823-233652.jpgScreenshot_20230823-233709.jpgScreenshot_20230823-233727.jpgScreenshot_20230823-233736.jpgScreenshot_20230823-233748.jpgScreenshot_20230823-233758.jpgScreenshot_20230823-233811.jpgScreenshot_20230823-233821.jpg
 
Joined
Jun 26, 2022
Messages
2,264
Next page is a larger version of the seal from page 1

Screenshot_20230824-000936.jpg
The woman is "isis" presumably.
It has a resemblance to the tattoo on rihanna's chest, except for the large red orb she's holding.

Screenshot_20230824-002559.jpg

Screenshot_20230824-001027.jpgScreenshot_20230824-001042.jpg

Blackshear makes another incorrectly paraphrased biblical reference, asking the readers to "forgive me for any harm or trespass i have caused you, as i have forgiven myself and anyone who has made a trespass against me."

The real Bible verse refers to asking God for forgiveness and forgiving others, nothing about forgiving ourselves.

Matthew 6
9After this manner therefore pray ye: Our Father which art in heaven, Hallowed be thy name. 10Thy kingdom come. Thy will be done in earth, as it is in heaven. 11Give us this day our daily bread. 12And forgive us our debts, as we forgive our debtors. 13And lead us not into temptation, but deliver us from evil: For thine is the kingdom, and the power, and the glory, for ever. Amen. 14For if ye forgive men their trespasses, your heavenly Father will also forgive you: 15But if ye forgive not men their trespasses, neither will your Father forgive your trespasses.

There's also a mention of a "map home". Is she saying this is not our home? Strange after the emphasis dhe has put on her blood type being native to this planet unlike the rest of us...

She also makes this "divine mother" to be omniscient - she knows, hears, and sees all possible paths. Yet, she never mentions righteousness. That must not be important in this cult's religion.


Blackshear could have written all this without including incorrect biblical references. I am unsure about her motive - could she be trying to appeal to those who are unfamiliar with the Bible, yet perhaps raised nominally Christian and are now looking for something that supports their own female supremacist outlook? Or is it a deliberate attempt to mock God?
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jun 26, 2022
Messages
2,264
Screenshot_20230824-001159.jpgScreenshot_20230824-001212.jpg





Starting from the top, the inscription brings to mind helena blavatsky's book isis unveiled

I have not read it, but it is the first book written by the founder of theosophy.


Isis Unveiled: A Master-Key to the Mysteries of Ancient and Modern Science and Theology, published in 1877, is a book of esoteric philosophy and Helena Petrovna Blavatsky's first major work and a key text in her Theosophical movement

This is not the first connection to theosophy. Remember back when i was discussing the written inverview there was a mention of a "maitreya".
Maitreya is a figure from theosophy, and quite incompatible with Christianity - they claim this entity possessed Jesus Christ.



The poem is an excerpt from a gnostic work called "the thunder perfect mind" which was found at Nag Hammadi.
Either there are multiple versions or blackshear took a lot liberties with it.

This is the entire text. I bolded the parts that appear in the manuscript.
I was sent forth from the power,
and I have come to those who reflect upon me,
and I have been found among those who seek after me
.
Look upon me, you who reflect upon me,
and you hearers, hear me.
You who are waiting for me, take me to yourselves.
And do not banish me from your sight.
And do not make your voice hate me, nor your hearing.
Do not be ignorant of me anywhere or any time.
Be on your guard!Do not be ignorant of me.
For I am the first and the last.
I am the honored one and the scorned one.
I am the whore and the holy one.
I am the wife and the virgin.

I am <the mother> and the daughter.
I am the members of my mother.
I am the barren oneand many are her sons.
I am she whose wedding is great,and I have not taken a husband.
I am the midwife and she who does not bear.
I am the solace of my labor pains.
I am the bride and the bridegroom,
and it is my husband who begot me.
I am the mother of my fatherand the sister of my husbandand he is my offspring.
I am the slave of him who prepared me.
I am the ruler of my offspring
.But he is the one who begot me before the time on a birthday.
And he is my offspring in (due) time,and my power is from him.
I am the staff of his power in his youth,and he is the rod of my old age.
And whatever he wills happens to me.
I am the silence that is incomprehensible and the idea whose remembrance is frequent.
I am the voice whose sound is manifold and the word whose appearance is multiple.
I am the utterance of my name.
Why, you who hate me, do you love me,and hate those who love me?
You who deny me, confess me,and you who confess me, deny me.
You who tell the truth about me, lie about me,
and you who have lied about me, tell the truth about me.
You who know me, be ignorant of me,
and those who have not known me, let them know me.
For I am knowledge and ignorance.
I am shame and boldness.
I am shameless;
I am ashamed.
I am strength and I am fear.
I am war and peace.Give heed to me.
I am the one who is disgraced and the great one.
Give heed to my poverty and my wealth.
Do not be arrogant to me when I am cast out upon the earth,
and you will find me in those that are to come.
And do not look upon me on the dung-heapnor go and leave me cast out,
and you will find me in the kingdoms.
And do not look upon me when I am cast out among those who are disgraced and in the least places,
nor laugh at me.
And do not cast me out among those who are slain in violence.
But I, I am compassionate and I am cruel.Be on your guard!
Do not hate my obedienceand do not love my self-control.
In my weakness, do not forsake me,and do not be afraid of my power.
For why do you despise my fear and curse my pride?
But I am she who exists in all fearsand strength in trembling.
I am she who is weak,and I am well in a pleasant place.
I am senseless and I am wise.
Why have you hated me in your counsels?
For I shall be silent among those who are silent,
and I shall appear and speak,
Why then have you hated me, you Greeks?
Because I am a barbarian among the barbarians?
For I am the wisdom of the Greeks and the knowledge of the barbarians.
I am the judgement of the Greeks and of the barbarians.
I am the one whose image is great in Egypt and the one who has no image among the barbarians.
I am the one who has been hated everywhere and who has been loved everywhere.
I am the one whom they call Life,and you have called Death.
I am the one whom they call Law,and you have called Lawlessness.
I am the one whom you have pursued,and I am the one whom you have seized.
I am the one whom you have scattered,and you have gathered me together.
I am the one before whom you have been ashamed,and you have been shameless to me.
I am she who does not keep festival,and I am she whose festivals are many.
I, I am godless,and I am the one whose God is great.
I am the one whom you have reflected upon,and you have scorned me.
I am unlearned,and they learn from me.
I am the one that you have despised,and you reflect upon me.
I am the one whom you have hidden from,and you appear to me.
But whenever you hide yourselves,I myself will appear.
For whenever you appear,I myself will hide from you.
Those who have [...] to it [...] senselessly [...].Take me [... understanding] from grief.and take me to yourselves from understanding and grief.
And take me to yourselves from places that are ugly and in ruin,and rob from those which are good even though in ugliness
.Out of shame, take me to yourselves shamelessly;and out of shamelessness and shame,upbraid my members in yourselves.
And come forward to me, you who know meand you who know my members,and establish the great ones among the small first creatures.
Come forward to childhood,and do not despise it because it is small and it is little.
And do not turn away greatnesses in some parts from the smallnesses,for the smallnesses are known from the greatnesses.
Why do you curse me and honor me?
You have wounded and you have had mercy.
Do not separate me from the first ones whom you have known.
And do not cast anyone out nor turn anyone away[...] turn you away and [... know] him not.[...].What is mine [...].I know the first ones and those after them know me.
But I am the mind of [...] and the rest of [...].
I am the knowledge of my inquiry,and the finding of those who seek after me,and the command of those who ask of me,and the power of the powers in my knowledgeof the angels, who have been sent at my word,and of gods in their seasons by my counsel,and of spirits of every man who exists with me,and of women who dwell within me.
I am the one who is honored, and who is praised,and who is despised scornfully.
I am peace,and war has come because of me.
And I am an alien and a citizen.
I am the substance and the one who has no substance.
Those who are without association with me are ignorant of me,and those who are in my substance are the ones who know me.
Those who are close to me have been ignorant of me,and those who are far away from me are the ones who have known me.
On the day when I am close to you, you are far away from me,and on the day when I am far away from you, I am close to you.
[I am ...] within.[I am ...] of the natures.
I am [...] of the creation of the spirits.[...] request of the souls.
I am control and the uncontrollable.
I am the union and the dissolution.
I am the abiding and I am the dissolution.
I am the one below,and they come up to me.
I am the judgment and the acquittal.
I, I am sinless,and the root of sin derives from me.
I am lust in (outward) appearance,and interior self-control exists within me.
I am the hearing which is attainable to everyoneand the speech which cannot be grasped.
I am a mute who does not speak,and great is my multitude of words.
Hear me in gentleness, and learn of me in roughness.
I am she who cries out,and I am cast forth upon the face of the earth.
I prepare the bread and my mind within.I am the knowledge of my name.
I am the one who cries out,and I listen.
I appear and [...] walk in [...] seal of my [...].I am [...] the defense [...].I am the one who is called Truthand iniquity [...].
You honor me [...] and you whisper against me.
You who are vanquished, judge them (who vanquish you)before they give judgment against you,because the judge and partiality exist in you.
If you are condemned by this one, who will acquit you?
Or, if you are acquitted by him, who will be able to detain you?
For what is inside of you is what is outside of you,and the one who fashions you on the outsideis the one who shaped the inside of you.

And what you see outside of you, you see inside of you;it is visible and it is your garment.
Hear me, you hearersand learn of my words, you who know me.
I am the hearing that is attainable to everything;I am the speech that cannot be grasped.I am the name of the soundand the sound of the name.
I am the sign of the letterand the designation of the division.
And I [...].(3 lines missing)[...] light [...].[...] hearers [...] to you[...] the great power.
And [...] will not move the name.[...] to the one who created me.
And I will speak his name.
Look then at his wordsand all the writings which have been completed.
Give heed then, you hearersand you also, the angels and those who have been sent,and you spirits who have arisen from the dead.
For I am the one who alone exists,and I have no one who will judge me.
For many are the pleasant forms which exist in numerous sins,and incontinencies,and disgraceful passions,and fleeting pleasures,which (men) embrace until they become soberand go up to their resting place.
And they will find me there,and they will live,and they will not die again.



Screenshot_20230824-031413.jpgScreenshot_20230824-031430.jpg

In this page blackshear once again reveals her pro masonic sympathies. Remember, according to her they are good guys (which tells us much about where she's coming from)


I was able to find the quote. Mostly i had been wondering if the original quote contains the word "isis" and it does not. It appears blackshear equates isis with masonry, they are one and the same.


Screenshot_20230824-033637.jpg
 

JoChris

Superstar
Joined
Mar 15, 2017
Messages
6,168
Next page is a larger version of the seal from page 1

View attachment 90143
The woman is "isis" presumably.
It has a resemblance to the tattoo on rihanna's chest, except for the large red orb she's holding.


View attachment 90153View attachment 90152

Blackshear makes another incorrectly paraphrased biblical reference, asking the readers to "forgive me for any harm or trespass i have caused you, as i have forgiven myself and anyone who has made a trespass against me."

The real Bible verse refers to asking God for forgiveness and forgiving others, nothing about forgiving ourselves.

Matthew 6
9After this manner therefore pray ye: Our Father which art in heaven, Hallowed be thy name. 10Thy kingdom come. Thy will be done in earth, as it is in heaven. 11Give us this day our daily bread. 12And forgive us our debts, as we forgive our debtors. 13And lead us not into temptation, but deliver us from evil: For thine is the kingdom, and the power, and the glory, for ever. Amen. 14For if ye forgive men their trespasses, your heavenly Father will also forgive you: 15But if ye forgive not men their trespasses, neither will your Father forgive your trespasses.

There's also a mention of a "map home". Is she saying this is not our home? Strange after the emphasis dhe has put on her blood type being native to this planet unlike the rest of us...

She also makes this "divine mother" to be omniscient - she knows, hears, and sees all possible paths. Yet, she never mentions righteousness. That must not be important in this cult's religion.


Blackshear could have written all this without including incorrect biblical references. I am unsure about her motive - could she be trying to appeal to those who are unfamiliar with the Bible, yet perhaps raised nominally Christian and are now looking for something that supports their own female supremacist outlook? Or is it a deliberate attempt to mock God?
Years ago I read some of an old book that was a transcript of what a medium said to a grieving widower over many meetings.
The way the bible verses [without references, I had to look what sounded familiar up in the bible] were misused, it had to be demons implanting the distorted/ out-of-context verses into the channeler's mind.

I can't remember if you said she used automatic writing or a similar method or not?

After everything I typed though, only she would know if she was faking it or not.
 
Last edited:

JoChris

Superstar
Joined
Mar 15, 2017
Messages
6,168
She says that she is divine mother's "scribe", so from that i'm assuming that she's saying she writes what comes to her mind, kind of like a channeler i guess?

automatic writing, in spiritualism, writing produced involuntarily when the subject’s attention is ostensibly directed elsewhere. The phenomenon may occur when the subject is in an alert waking state or in a hypnotic trance, usually during a séance. What is produced may be unrelated words, fragments of poetry, epithets, puns, obscenities, or well-organized fantasies. During the late 19th century, at the height of popular interest in the phenomenon, inspiration for automatic writing was generally attributed to external or supernatural forces.
 
Joined
Jun 26, 2022
Messages
2,264
Screenshot_20230825-001136.jpgScreenshot_20230825-001150.jpg

Screenshot_20230825-001211.jpgScreenshot_20230825-001225.jpg




As i've mentioned previously, blackshear writes many unecessary words (she claims to "reawaken our cellular memories") but i have a hunch it's to make it illegible and hard to follow. (Assuming she is writing this fiction consciously rather than chanelling an entity, that is.)


I found myself simplifying it down in order to even get what she's saying as far as subject-verb sentence structure. Blackshear often uses a varierty of phrases and adjectives to simply refer to herself, for example.


The convoluted first paragraph says this once the redundant words are removed:
"The prophecies of our ancient ancestors foretell of divine mother's return. Divine mother's prophecy states: delta 9 lucifer shall resurrect blackshear by divine blood terra covenant."

Blackshear then goes onto state that at her conception the "divine spirit of delta9 lucifer" and isis blended with hers. It is unclear if she means delta9 lucifer and isis are the same being.

She then declares herself the manifestation of "delta9 lucifer" and isis and the "sole crowned heir" of "divine mother"

She asks for "universal sacred sisterhoods divine blood terra covenant treaties with delta9 lucifer" to join her. She claims we have the "power to restore the sacred balance with delta9 lucifer".


Joining forces with lucifer is a bad idea, that should go without saying...



"In peace we find joy and with peace and joy we find love and with peace and joy and love we find compassion"

According to blackshear this is "anointed divine life knowledge".


Peace, joy, love and compassion sound like good things.

In fact, the first three are the first three fruits of the spirit (in reversed order - i don't know if i'm reading too much into it to think that either blackshear or whatever she is chanelling is purposely trying to invert the words of God)

Galatians 5
22But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, longsuffering, gentleness, goodness, faith, 23Meekness, temperance: against such there is no law.

But once again, blackshear mentions (on the next page) that the "sacred foundational law" is "to know and love thyself".

I've previously discussed the concept of self love as opposed to loving God here.

"self love" as opposed to the love of God,
And not to get off topic, but the word compassion has been hijacked by some truly evil people these days who comsider an act of murder to be "compassionate". I will leave it at that.

Blackshear then gives "facts" she claims prove this "divine univeral law". I will discuss them in the next post.
 
Joined
Oct 20, 2021
Messages
2,471
Years ago I read some of an old book that was a transcript of what a medium said to a grieving widower over many meetings.
The way the bible verses [without references, I had to look what sounded familiar up in the bible] were misused, it had to be demons implanting the distorted/ out-of-context verses into the channeler's mind.

I can't remember if you said she used automatic writing or a similar method or not?

After everything I typed though, only she would know if she was faking it or not.
I think that is how The Urantia Book was written by automatic writing.
 
Top