Sorry I keep referring to the same author Matt Ehret but he has many interesting arguments in favor of republican government. While imperfect the American system of economy and political organization was a revolutionary movement against European oligarchic power. From the perspective of Universal History we could say there's always been conflicting human forces of good against bad, and the US is no different. Some years ago I felt the US was evil and satanic but realize now why our constitution has become a celebrated model copied by most of the world.
The majority of his writings are on the theme of the American System but I was just looking at this one:
https://matthewehret.substack.com/p/how-to-save-a-dying-republic-part-288
...Although City of London-affiliated traitors in America like Aaron Burr established the speculative Bank of Manhattan which started Wall Street, killed Alexander Hamilton in 1804, and derailed many of Hamilton’s grand designs, the system was never completely destroyed despite the decades of attempts to do so. In 1824, the great German economist Frederick List came to America with the last surviving leader of 1776 Marquis Lafayette as part of an international effort to revive the sabotaged plans to create a world of sovereign republics modelled on the American experience of 1776.
...List studied Hamilton’s system and was the first to codify it as the American System of Political Economy (1827). This was the system which List transported to Germany by driving rail development, industrial growth, protectionism under the German Zollverein which finally blossomed under the rule of Chancellor Otto von Bismarck. List’s system was also studied, translated and applied in Russia by many “American System economists” with the greatest being the Transport Minister and Prime Minister Sergei Witte who oversaw the trans Siberian railway’s completion and envisioned a line eventually connecting the Americas to Russia via the Bering Straits.
Do you think Democracy is approved by God?
It is a simple question. People would say its what the majority wants so of course it is. But i think you and i both know on some level its 2 wolves and a sheep deciding whats for dinner. With Democracy there is always a side that has no voice, a side that suffers and we can see the results of that. Look at Gitmo for example. 20 years later and we are still torturing people.
Are there good people in the system, sure. But it says alot when our number 1 export is homosexuality and gender fluidity. Imagine this being a
Christian country constantly forcing satanic ideals on the globe.
We literally bring nothing to the world but occupation and theft of their resources. If they don't obey we run psyops and coups to overthrow their governments. There is a reason we have 750 military bases outside of the US and we both know its not for defense.
I think if democracy worked, the prophets would have installed them. But we know they had kings / caliphs with advisors. For example King Solomon didn't run a democracy.
The difference is kings of today like Charles compared to Solomon, is the later were God fearing. Charles literally wears stolen jewels on his crown and scepter. God save the king indeed.
Our very system is corrupt, catering to the deep pockets. But is is sold to the masses as
freedom.
If we have a voice why are we always scraping the bottom of the barrel for presidents?
No, Always. 350 million people and 2 pro-Israel candidates is the best we can do?
