i think the moon is an artificial satellite. theres plenty of evidence to suggest this.
View attachment 80053
there is also this:
updated playlist:
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLMuTjP_Ne90mXOODoJjFkVvacyRpzgPlR
This is an extremely interesting subject, as the moon appears to be too large and too close to the Earth to be a natural satellite, among many other anomalies.
The following is being offered as food for thought...
In the 1977 film "Star Wars" there's a line when the Millennium Falcon is approaching the Death Star near Alderaan, where OB1 says "
that's no moon...that's a space station". Could it be that's exactly what our moon is (or what our moon is hiding inside of it)? Our moon is reportedly ~2160 miles in diameter.
In the Bible Book of Revelation, it refers to the "New Jerusalem", a massive spaceship that will descend out of Heaven into Earth's atmosphere, to pick up the "Elect". The dimensions of the New Jerusalem are provided as 12000 furlongs, with its length, breadth, and height being equal.
It is speculated by some that these 3 equal measurements/dimensions (length, breadth, and height) are referring to a cube. But the same hold true for a sphere, and thus the New Jerusalem could be a sphere, which is actually the most logical 3D shape.
By today's definition of a furlong, and using the most logical presumption of the shape being spherical, 12000 furlongs would equate to a spherical object 1500 miles in diameter, which would fit inside the moon. However, a furlong is based upon the measurement of a "rod", with one furlong being equal to 40 rods which, by today's standards are 16 1/2 feet per rod. But this wasn't always the case.
In dialectal English the term
lug has also been used in place of rod, although the
Oxford English Dictionary states that this unit, while usually of 16+1⁄2 feet, may also be of 15, 18, 20, or 21 feet (or even up to 25 feet). So 40 rods/lugs (a furlong) could have been longer in our distant past, meaning the diameter or New Jerusalem may be very close to what the diameter of our moon is.
In the Bible, there are numerous other references to spaceships, e.g. the spaceship that led the Israelites through the wilderness for 40 years (going before them by day in a pillar of a "Cloud", to lead them along the way and by night in a pillar of fire, to give them light; to go by day and night"), the "Chariot of Fire" that took Elijah up, Ezekiel's "wheels", the "star of Bethlehem" that guided the wise men for months to the exact house where the young Child (Jesus) and Mary were, and even the spaceship that gathered Jesus from Mt. Olivet. So everyone should be prepared to see the New Jerusalem, when it comes down out of heaven.
All of these spaceships would logically need to be close enough to monitor Earth activity, and be able to make the trip back and forth to Earth when called to do so. And what would offer a closer, more concealed base of operations than the moon? A moon that we only see one side of at all times, because its rotational rate just happens to exactly match its orbital rate?
So
"that's no moon...that's a space station" may very well be describing our own moon.
