COVID-19, DOCTORS SPEAK OUT, W.H.O./GREAT RESET/4IR, 5G, DIGITAL ID, VACCINE, FOOD SUPPLY, TRACKING & TRACING...

chrisocn

Established
Joined
Aug 21, 2017
Messages
137
Why Is It You Guys Dont See The Bigger Picture. I means The Government, Their Agenda, And The People. This is all a game and you guys(people) are playing along. Like the bible filling itself by you unfolding it.
Ummmmmmmmmm...wha-what?!!!
 

Awoken2

Superstar
Joined
Jan 22, 2018
Messages
6,206
On the track and trace side of things here in the UK things are moving on rapidly.

The 16 million people who downloaded the NHS app to "keep people safe" now find themselves tracked and traced via facial recognition tech with their data shared with the police.



 

Karlysymon

Superstar
Joined
Mar 18, 2017
Messages
6,722


2019

2021
1632137286152.png
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jan 27, 2018
Messages
1,377
Could we ethically edit ourselves...?
Why is it...the so called “bio-ethicists” are the LEAST ethical people I ever hear speak!!???

If anyone sees the title “BIO-ETHICIST” attached to someone’s name, you better RUN in the OTHER DIRECTION!!!!

They are the modern day Mengeles and I’m not even exaggerating.

Next - listen to “Get ‘em Out by Friday” by Genesis. This song is exactly about a future run by these psychopaths.
 

Frank Badfinger

Superstar
Joined
Aug 4, 2019
Messages
15,775


2019

2021
View attachment 62804
How predictable that the UN and World Bank sponsor the big machine behind the curtain gathering and dissecting behavioral data, which is then used against the masses when they pump fear based media propaganda 24/7 and implement re-education programs to "nudge" the masses into drinking the kool-aid. All I could think about reading this material was the movie 'Wag the Dog.' For those that haven't seen it, its worthwhile.

 
Joined
Jan 27, 2018
Messages
1,377


2019

2021
View attachment 62804
BIT - Behavioral Insights Team

I immediately thought of this definition:

Bit: noun “The metal mouthpiece of a bridle, serving to control, curb, and direct an animal.”

Thanks KarlysMom - you always manage to dig up information on these somewhat “fringe” organizations or theories that 100% play into what is going on these days. Much appreciated!!!
 
Joined
Jan 27, 2018
Messages
1,377
How predictable that the UN and World Bank sponsor the big machine behind the curtain gathering and dissecting behavioral data, which is then used against the masses when they pump fear based media propaganda 24/7 and implement re-education programs to "nudge" the masses into drinking the kool-aid. All I could think about reading this material was the movie 'Wag the Dog.' For those that haven't seen it, its worthwhile.

Thanks for that reminder of that movie Frank! I’m gonna re-watch it this week! :)
 

justjess

Superstar
Joined
Mar 16, 2017
Messages
11,510


2019

2021
View attachment 62804
this is such a misuse of behavioral science and a violation of the professions ethics it’s appalling.
 

justjess

Superstar
Joined
Mar 16, 2017
Messages
11,510
BIT - Behavioral Insights Team

I immediately thought of this definition:

Bit: noun “The metal mouthpiece of a bridle, serving to control, curb, and direct an animal.”

Thanks KarlysMom - you always manage to dig up information on these somewhat “fringe” organizations or theories that 100% play into what is going on these days. Much appreciated!!!
behavioral science’s code of ethics requires the use of reinforcement prior to any adverse procedures are even allowed to be considered. it also states quite clearly that the client is entitled to self determination and can refuse any and all treatment whatsoever with no judgement.

these people are misusing behavioral science and quite frankly i’m appalled. i hold degrees and certifications in behavioral science MYSELF. this is government looking for someone to green light shit that they need to justify and it’s disgusting and whoever is working with them should be stripped of their licenses to practice.

for anyone interested: technically what they are doing is manipulating response cost and magnitude of reinforcement on concurrent schedules of reinforcement - making it more “costly” to not get vaccinated then to get “vaccinated” because typically the schedule of reinforcement that requires no actual effort (not vaccinate) would outweigh its alternative by default. you come into an ethical situation when the behavior your trying to encourage (the vaccine) can cause HARM. governments and everyone else involved in this effort is getting around that by pretending that either the vaccine can not cause harm or the potential harm from not being vaccinated is greater then the harm for the proposed action. until such point as someone can get it crystal clear in public opinion that the vaccine itself is causing harm - clear enough that those in charge can’t deny or wiggle out of it - this will just continue.
 
Last edited:

Karlysymon

Superstar
Joined
Mar 18, 2017
Messages
6,722
How predictable that the UN and World Bank sponsor the big machine behind the curtain gathering and dissecting behavioral data, which is then used against the masses when they pump fear based media propaganda 24/7 and implement re-education programs to "nudge" the masses into drinking the kool-aid. All I could think about reading this material was the movie 'Wag the Dog.' For those that haven't seen it, its worthwhile.

If “you” are a conspiracy theorist and you don’t know who Cass Sunstein is, then “you” need to look again. He is over at the WHO now with the BeSci team (if I remember correctly). That’s why I posted the tweet of his book to further get the point across about “nudging”. There are plans to use BeSci for the climate agenda aswell.

this is such a misuse of behavioral science and a violation of the professions ethics it’s appalling.
The science is there to serve a higher agenda.
behavioral science’s code of ethics requires the use of reinforcement prior to any adverse procedures are even allowed to be considered. it also states quite clearly that the client is entitled to self determination and can refuse any and all treatment whatsoever with no judgement.

these people are misusing behavioral science and quite frankly i’m appalled. i hold degrees and certifications in behavioral science MYSELF. this is government looking for someone to green light shit that they need to justify and it’s disgusting and whoever is working with them should be stripped of their licenses to practice.

for anyone interested: technically what they are doing is manipulating response cost and magnitude of reinforcement on concurrent schedules of reinforcement - making it more “costly” to not get vaccinated then to get “vaccinated” because typically the schedule of reinforcement that requires no actual effort (not vaccinate) would outweigh its alternative by default. you come into an ethical situation when the behavior your trying to encourage (the vaccine) can cause HARM. governments and everyone else involved in this effort is getting around that by pretending that either the vaccine can not cause harm or the potential harm from not being vaccinated is greater then the harm for the proposed action. until such point as someone can get it crystal clear in public opinion that the vaccine itself is causing harm - clear enough that those in charge can’t deny or wiggle out of it - this will just continue.
These BIT teams are everywhere. I’ll quote again from the transcript I posted afew pages ago because I feel like the psychological aspect of the Covid game hasn’t been publicized as much and we are bewildered, not knowing how, when or where we are being played.

"Brian Gerrish: First of all, I’d agree with you that the Coronavirus “pandemic”, if we want to call it that in inverted commas, did catch everybody by surprise. I don’t think we saw that coming, and it happened very quickly. So I’d certainly agree with you on that.

But I’ll come back to the fact that we started to see very, very serious things things happening in the UK. If I just focus immediately on the Government’s use of applied behavioural psychology: back in 2010 and 2011, we as the UK Column were warning that the Government had set up a team which was called the Behavioural Insights Team [UK Column note: whose former homepage address 'behaviouralinsights.co.uk' now redirects to the consciously globalist 'bi.team']. This was a team of psychologists who were working directly alongside not only the political process, but the policy-forming process within the British Government.

A critical document which we found in 2010 was called Mindspace (you can find it very easily by searching online for it as a PDF document). In that document, the Government admitted that it was using applied behavioural psychology to influence how it designed policy and how it implemented policy.


At one particular point in that document—in fact, it’s at the bottom of page 66, if I remember correctly—the Government boasts that it can change the way people think and behave, and that people will not be aware that this has been done to them. But it adds the caveat that if they do realise that their behaviour is changed, they will not know how it was changed.

We read this document and we were shocked, and we then started to research further. That then led us to discover that, around that time and of course a little bit earlier, the British Government had been conducting meetings with the French, in which we were bringing the political psychology teams together to produce joint plans with the French. The key Frenchman who was present in the meetings was called Olivier Ouillier, and he was working directly at that time for Sarkozy’s private office.

Now, all these meetings were essentially held in secret. We were able to discover that they had taken place, but we were only able to discover that by carefully researching along specific routes which we understood were important. For example, most of these meetings were conducted under the guise that they were part of a charity, the Franco-British Council, which said it was simply set up in order to improve relationships between Britain and France.

So these meetings took place, and it was very clear that there was concerted effort to expand the use of these techniques: not only from Britain and France, but the implication at that time was that these techniques were going to be used across the wider power base of the European Union.

And I’ll just say again that the Mindspace document was boasting that this was the first time the Government would be able to use applied techniques where people would have their behaviour changed—that means their thoughts changed!—and they wouldn’t even be aware that it had occurred.

Reiner Füllmich:
For what purpose?

Brian Gerrish: Well, if you want to execute power, then you’re going to try and use normal, democratic politics, or you’re going to try and use force, or you’re going to try and use other means.

And so this comes to me as other means. I have to say that when I saw how cynical this was, how calculated it was, when I was using effectively my military background, I could see that this was the use of raw power.

Now, if I jump forward into events around Covid: very early on in the Covid pandemic (I’ve called it a “pandemic”; of course, I don’t believe that that is what it is, but that’s how it was reported), it came to our attention that the Government scientific advisory group, SAGE, had actually had an internal meeting with elements of the Government’s Behavioural Insights Team.

The key gentleman concerned with this was a man called Dr David Halpern. That meeting was not properly minuted in a proper official sense, but they did put out a briefing sheet from the meeting, and in that document, which I think was dated 22 March 2020, it admitted that the SAGE team and the Government’s policy on Coronavirus was going to use applied psychology in order to ramp up fear in the population, in order to get the population to adhere more closely to the Government’s policy over the response to Coronavirus.

We have the document; we can provide you with a copy of that document.

Reiner Füllmich: Yes, please, because we have the same thing. It’s a leaked paper from the [Federal] Secretary of the Interior, and it is now referred to as the Panic Paper [UK Column note: reported by us on 10 February, commencing at 53:15].

Brian Gerrish: Yes, I’ve heard about the paper in Germany. I haven’t seen it or been able to read it in English. I’m going to suggest to you that that German paper would have come out of the specific talks that I just referred to. When we started to see that the British Government was having these secretive meetings with French applied behavioural psychology experts, it was clear to us that this was going to be rolled out in other European countries. So I was not surprised when I heard about that German document.
"
 
Top