Why is Feminism much worse than Cancer nowadays that is caused by women which keeps most men single?

Joined
May 14, 2017
Messages
1,269
Why would you feel compelled to say that based off of that seemingly non controversial remark you quoted? I dont understand why having a strong family somehow implies control and treating someone like property.
I felt the need to do that, since the rest of the post was trying to make an argument that civil rights were a bad thing and most of his other posts in this topic have been pretty much saying women would be happier if they had less freedom and were submissive to the men in their life.
 
Joined
Mar 17, 2017
Messages
2,342
We actually agree. Family wise especially blacks were much better off before the civil rights movement. Much higher rates of marriage, less out of wedlock births. These white liberals think they're everyone's savior.
Where I most likely lose you is where the govt purposely moved in certain ways that increased the likelihood of these outcomes occurring. For instance after most of the civil rights leaders were killed jailed or exiled, the govt was in South America supporting drug traffickers. Drug traffickers that were supplying the crack cocaine that was the centerpiece of the crack era. The same crack era that led to the “three strikes rule”. You see what was happening? Supply the drugs on one end while locking up the users on the other. Everything was by design like a game. But when enough of the subjects stop playing the game, well, the games over.

And a liberal plays the role of the good cop the conservative the role of bad cop.Doesn’t matter which role either is playing because at the end of the day they’re still cops


...you know you can have strong family bonds and not control the lives of the women in your life, right? Like, if you actually treat the people you live like human beings and not your property, they'll actually love you, right?
You don’t understand that it’s not up to you what your role is here.
 

weskrongden

Veteran
Joined
Nov 30, 2017
Messages
688
Where I most likely lose you is where the govt purposely moved in certain ways that increased the likelihood of these outcomes occurring. For instance after most of the civil rights leaders were killed jailed or exiled, the govt was in South America supporting drug traffickers. Drug traffickers that were supplying the crack cocaine that was the centerpiece of the crack era. The same crack era that led to the “three strikes rule”. You see what was happening? Supply the drugs on one end while locking up the users on the other. Everything was by design like a game. But when enough of the subjects stop playing the game, well, the games over.

And a liberal plays the role of the good cop the conservative the role of bad cop.Doesn’t matter which role either is playing because at the end of the day they’re still cops
Yeah I've read about Gary Webb's reporting. Democrats were actually big supporters of the 3 strike rule including prominent blacks. I'm for extremely harsh drug laws like Singapore. That solves the problem real quick. But the civil rights movement and all this stuff was a disaster. Blacks and whites better separated which you'd probably agree with.
 
Joined
Mar 17, 2017
Messages
2,342
It's completely up to me to decide what my role in my life is.
Yea luciferian “do what thou wilt” stuff. You do know those in power push that ideology of “do/be whatever you want” to the masses right? Thats not gonna fly forever though


Yeah I've read about Gary Webb's reporting. Democrats were actually big supporters of the 3 strike rule including prominent blacks. I'm for extremely harsh drug laws like Singapore. That solves the problem real quick. But the civil rights movement and all this stuff was a disaster. Blacks and whites better separated which you'd probably agree with.
Yea I don’t care about your right vs left wing dichotomy. That’s all you’re stuck on.

When in reality both sides are just answering to those above them that hide behind the curtains. And it’s funny that when the govt was supporting drug traffickers on one end then trying to play hardball on the users on the other, it was “we gotta be tough on crime”. You know the “tough on crime” stance they can take so they can enact the slavery in prison they can’t enact in the real world?

13th amendment
Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.

Now in Oregon when the users are of a different kind they’re legalizing all the drugs lol. Crack heroin shrooms etc all legal because it’s not just or majorly black people getting messed up on it anymore. It was always a rigged game against black people and you don’t want to admit it.
 
Last edited:

justjess

Superstar
Joined
Mar 16, 2017
Messages
11,534
Yea luciferian “do what thou wilt” stuff. You do know those in power push that ideology of “do/be whatever you want” to the masses right? Thats not gonna fly forever though




Yea I don’t care about your right vs left wing dichotomy. That’s all you’re stuck on.

When in reality both sides are just answering to those above them that hide behind the curtains. And it’s funny that when the govt was supporting drug traffickers on one end then trying to play hardball on the users on the other, it was “we gotta be tough on crime”. You know the “tough on crime” stance they can take so they can enact the slavery in prison they can’t enact in the real world?

13th amendment
Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.

Now in Oregon when the users are of a different kind they’re legalizing all the drugs lol. Crack heroin shrooms etc all legal because it’s not just or majorly black people getting messed up on it anymore. It was always a rigged game against black people and you don’t want to admit it.
So.. as much as I hate to, I agree with the bottom half of that completely. Targeted black people and poor white people caught up as collateral damage. Now that it’s rich white people and their kids the whole story changes.
 

Tidal

Star
Joined
Mar 4, 2020
Messages
3,803
Men are placed in a tricky situation, because if they're too caring and loving women might think they're wimps and ditch them, it's happened to me on two separate occasions, the first one said "You're not assertive enough", and the other one said "I only like the Sean Connery types who take firm control".
We blokes just can't win..:)

PS- perhaps I should start telling women that I'm an ex-convict (3 month vigilante rap in 2002- true-) to toughen up my image.
 
Last edited:

weskrongden

Veteran
Joined
Nov 30, 2017
Messages
688
Yea I don’t care about your right vs left wing dichotomy. That’s all you’re stuck on.

When in reality both sides are just answering to those above them that hide behind the curtains. And it’s funny that when the govt was supporting drug traffickers on one end then trying to play hardball on the users on the other, it was “we gotta be tough on crime”. You know the “tough on crime” stance they can take so they can enact the slavery in prison they can’t enact in the real world?

13th amendment
Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.

Now in Oregon when the users are of a different kind they’re legalizing all the drugs lol. Crack heroin shrooms etc all legal because it’s not just or majorly black people getting messed up on it anymore. It was always a rigged game against black people and you don’t want to admit it.
I brought that up because you were talking about conservatives and liberals being good cop bad cop. In major cities you have DAs just ignoring crimes like drug possession and shop lifting. Literally videos all over the place of black people walking into stores and just taking things with no confrontation. There's been bail reform which has been a disaster. Most of those BLM rioters/looters last summer acted with impugnity and you want to talk about some drug law in Oregon lol.

The crack epidemic was started by the government and CIA. I just said I agreed with that.
 

Lyfe

Star
Joined
May 11, 2020
Messages
3,639
Men are placed in a tricky situation, because if they're too caring and loving women might think they're wimps and ditch them, it's happened to me on two separate occasions, the first one said "You're not assertive enough", and the other one said "I only like the Sean Connery types who take firm control".
We blokes just can't win..:)

PS- perhaps I should start telling women that I'm an ex-convict (3 month vigilante rap in 2002- true-) to toughen up my image.
I think the problem is Hollywood and the music industry, namely rnb. It conditions men into believing that the way to impress and attract a woman is to treat them a certain way. If you listen to enough Brian Mcknight or Justin Timberlake and their message about being a good attentive man that puts the woman first and and does all these small tokens and affirmation of love then you pretty much begin to follow their advice. This type of music basically pedestalizes women. It turns men into simps and you learn real fast that in allot of instances it does the opposite of what its believed to do. In fact it was times when I did do those small affirmations of love to my girlfriend a few years back that she became difficult and when I gave the impression that I was done trying and didnt care anymore then of a sudden she became attracted again. In almost any kind of relationship I had with a woman since that one in particular I mainly just didn't care anymore. I wasnt mean, I just didnt care. I didnt want to and I couldnt. I was indifferent and didnt regard what they said cause it got me nowhere, because I came to see that allot of them just simply don't even know what they want. If they wanted to have a good time then cool, but if not than whatever. In a twisted sense my indifference attracted them more than when I actually did care. This was all when I was backslidden in Christ though. I think worldly relationships nowadays are doomed to fail anyways.
 

Tidal

Star
Joined
Mar 4, 2020
Messages
3,803
..I think worldly relationships nowadays are doomed to fail anyways.

Yes if men/women are not on the same wavelength they've got little chance of making a relationship work.
For examp, I like deep-thinking spiritual-natured sweet and lonely women who want to love and be loved, but they're almost impossible to find nowadays.
A Christina type would be my cup of tea, I want to give her a great big hug and tell her how beautiful and precious she is to me...oops sorry was I rambling?..:)-

 

Lyfe

Star
Joined
May 11, 2020
Messages
3,639
Yes if men/women are not on the same wavelength they've got little chance of making a relationship work.
For examp, I like deep-thinking spiritual-natured sweet and lonely women who want to love and be loved, but they're almost impossible to find nowadays.
A Christina type would be my cup of tea, I want to give her a great big hug and tell her how beautiful and precious she is to me...oops was I rambling?..:)-

I think that's why the Bible promoted chastity and not having sexual relations before marriage. There are studies that show the more sexual partners someone has the less likely they are to have success in relationships and stay with just one person. In fact we leave an imprint on every person we sleep with and the two most powerful imprints that can be left are imprints with your first sexual partner and the mother/father of your offspring. We live in an age of social media, smart phones, and dating. It encourages people to sample as many options as possible. People are not designed to share all these imprints or have all these soul ties with so many partners. Think of it as a pie. You start out with a whole pie and each person you sleep with you give a piece of that pie away to them. That pie is kind of like your soul and each person you sleep with has a share of your soul. After a while you are unable to love with what would otherwise be all of yourself(the whole pie) and the person you do desire to love can now only receive the little share you have left that you can give them. At least that is how I understand how soul ties to work.
 

Tidal

Star
Joined
Mar 4, 2020
Messages
3,803
And here's another sublimely-sensitive piece by Christina, it symbolises our daily trudge through life towards that final resting place-

Up-Hill by Christina Rossetti

Does the road wind up-hill all the way?
-Yes, to the very end.

Will the day’s journey take the whole long day?
-From morn to night, my friend.

But is there for the night a resting-place?
-A roof for when the slow dark hours begin.

May not the darkness hide it from my face?
-You cannot miss that inn.

Shall I meet other wayfarers at night?
-Those who have gone before.

Then must I knock, or call when just in sight?
-They will not keep you standing at that door.

Shall I find comfort, travel-sore and weak?
-Of labour you shall find the sum.

Will there be beds for me and all who seek?

-Yea, beds for all who come.

 

Tidal

Star
Joined
Mar 4, 2020
Messages
3,803
I think that's why the Bible promoted chastity and not having sexual relations before marriage..

I can't speak for other blokes but personally I could never make love to a woman without wanting to get to know her as a friend/soulmate first, which could take months.
That's cost me at least two failed relationships in the past because the women didn't want to wait, they wanted to hop into bed on our first and second dates respectively and I had to make excuses not to..:)
 
Joined
Mar 17, 2017
Messages
2,342
I brought that up because you were talking about conservatives and liberals being good cop bad cop. In major cities you have DAs just ignoring crimes like drug possession and shop lifting. Literally videos all over the place of black people walking into stores and just taking things with no confrontation. There's been bail reform which has been a disaster. Most of those BLM rioters/looters last summer acted with impugnity and you want to talk about some drug law in Oregon lol.

The crack epidemic was started by the government and CIA. I just said I agreed with that.
If the crack epidemic was started by the govt then that mean the govt actively engaged in disenfranchising the black community.. Wanna go into that? You just said you’d take a Singapore stance on drugs yet Oregon said all drugs are legal. This being 30 years after this same country took the hard stance on drug use when they were pushing drugs into the black community. Wanna go there?

Of course not because left vs right is all you got. But that’s for the low levels to go back and forth about.And I’m not a low level so that convo is best directed to someone else.
 
Joined
Oct 2, 2017
Messages
1,502
Men discussing what women want. Going into serious detail, adding religion, culture, popular music.......yet they have never contemplated maybe i dont know asking women. Not telling women, not going ''WeLl AcTuAlLy,'' actually listen. Movies and music dont count, they are prominently written by men, not guessing, not hallmark cards. Shut up for a few minutes and listen.

You men might find out women arent the borg, we are not some collective hive mind, you might find we all differ in what we want in men and have unique different personalities. Shocker i know

1628365264889.png
 

Cintra

Star
Joined
Jan 11, 2020
Messages
3,224
"Did you miss me ?
Come and kiss me.
Never mind my bruises,
Hug me, kiss me, suck my juices
Squeezed from goblin fruits for you,
Goblin pulp and goblin dew.
Eat me, drink me, love me;
Laura, make much of me:

My contribution to the Christina Rossetti appreciation society.
 

Drifter

Veteran
Joined
Apr 15, 2021
Messages
515
Men discussing what women want. Going into serious detail, adding religion, culture, popular music.......yet they have never contemplated maybe i dont know asking women. Not telling women, not going ''WeLl AcTuAlLy,'' actually listen. Movies and music dont count, they are prominently written by men, not guessing, not hallmark cards. Shut up for a few minutes and listen.

You men might find out women arent the borg, we are not some collective hive mind, you might find we all differ in what we want in men and have unique different personalities. Shocker i know

View attachment 59884
Oh @kerrichinchilla , remember that us womenfolk dont have independent thoughts of our own. We werent cReAtEd as individuals, just diminutive sidekicks with wombs.
 
Joined
Oct 2, 2017
Messages
1,502
Oh @kerrichinchilla , remember that us womenfolk dont have independent thoughts of our own. We werent cReAtEd as individuals, just diminutive sidekicks with wombs.
I forgot. I just love the fact there are 2-3 men discussing what women want in me, trying to be all philosophical, when women are actually here and could easily tell them
 

Tidal

Star
Joined
Mar 4, 2020
Messages
3,803
Yup, women certainly take some figgering out; my phone went near midnight and it was a tearful June-
"I'm sitting halfway down the stairs wishing I was dead"
"Hang on" I replied, "I'll hop on me bike and come straight over".
"No don't bother" she answered, "I'm going to watch my Billy Elliot video"
 

Lyfe

Star
Joined
May 11, 2020
Messages
3,639
I have been in and seen enough relationships to realize that you could give a person exactly what they say they want and the same person still cant be happy. In fact in a very twisted sense it can even lead to the exact opposite of what you intended which is to make the other person happy. Whether you give someone what they say they want or not give them what they say they want the end result in all relationships is now pretty much the same. No point in listtening to someone who isnt made happy by the things they tell you they think will make them happy, but dont. In fact once you give a woman all she asks for and wants she will often lose respect for you as a man who is supposed to be the one leading the relationship.
 
Top