Wow! That shedding document from the FDA was published in 2015!
Rosemary Frei recently wrote this article about how to know if a study is BS or not. She uses the mRNA shedding issue as an example. She's skeptical that it exists and calls out Americas Frontline Doctors for spreading misinformation based on "flimsy" evidence.
Simple and easy tools to use to check whether a paper is solid or shaky.
www.rosemaryfrei.ca
That’s a good article by Rosemary and I noted the same in relation to her Point 3 - where she talks about the Pfizer protocol as it relates to reporting inadvertent exposure to the product.
Like she mentions- the protocol talks about reporting environmental exposures to the vaccines. I wondered too, if many were misinterpreting this guidance. I can understand why however, because one would wonder - how does someone, who is not part of the trial, get exposed to the vaccine? So basically people inferred that “drug exposure” meant exposure to a vaccinated person.
But as Rosemary stated, it probably IS boilerplate language talking about the potentiality of someone literally, physically encountering the vaccine product OUT of the vial.
For example, if it spilled and someone touched it - like say a pharmacy worker. That’s an environmental exposure incident. Or if a pregnant woman encounters it spilled somehow on a table - or somehow breathes it in.
Again - such scenarios for vaccines would be extremely rare - but it’s simply boilerplate language that all drug manufacturers have to put in their documents because they are supposed to always report those events and collect that data.
That all being said - it doesn’t mean the vaccines aren’t shedding! They could be - certainly with gene modifying vaccines were in totally uncharted waters and I’m sure the pharmaceutical companies have no idea what the long term effects are.
www.zerohedge.com
