2020 General Election Thread

rainerann

rainerann

Star
Joined
Mar 18, 2017
Messages
4,550
lightseeker said:
What? No, only democrats voted by mail. That's why when they counted them, 100% were democrat. Nothing fishy about this either right @rainerann
Click to expand...
a small remaining number of mail in vote strongly leaning blue is not fishy.

what would be fishy is for someone to win an election twice without winning the popular vote either time. There is no way trump will win the popular vote. He is almost 3 million behind and you can’t blame California and New York for this. Blame Texas and Florida for being an almost 50/50 split of their vote count.

right now only 65% of California voted blue. We need to go to a popular vote. There will be something very fishy about one president winning two elections without winning the popular vote either time.

I looked it up and a president winning an election without winning the popular vote has only happened around 5 times In us history. It will be six if trump wins this election which will be 2 out of six times happened to the same person. Nothing fishy about that at all. It wouldn’t look like someone made our electoral voting system into an a video game that you could navigate a win without having an higher approval rate for the majority of the population.

if anyone cheats to win in this election, its going to be trump, but I can already see what will happen next. The lot of you will continue painting trump as a hero and suggesting that the election was rigged by the dems for the next four years, which is why I probably will be taking a vow of silence rather than continue wasting my time trying to talk with people who carry such opinions in their back pocket.

I remember a time when I used to think I could find intelligent conversations around here. I will pray for this to return someday and keep out of most of it otherwise.
 
L

lightseeker

Star
Joined
May 18, 2018
Messages
4,060
rainerann said:
a small remaining number of mail in vote strongly leaning blue is not fishy.

what would be fishy is for someone to win an election twice without winning the popular vote either time. There is no way trump will win the popular vote. He is almost 3 million behind and you can’t blame California and New York for this. Blame Texas and Florida for being an almost 50/50 split of their vote count.

right now only 65% of California voted blue. We need to go to a popular vote. There will be something very fishy about one president winning two elections without winning the popular vote either time.

I looked it up and a president winning an election without winning the popular vote has only happened around 5 times In us history. It will be six if trump wins this election which will be 2 out of six times happened to the same person. Nothing fishy about that at all. It wouldn’t look like someone made our electoral voting system into an a video game that you could navigate a win without having an higher approval rate for the majority of the population.

if anyone cheats to win in this election, its going to be trump, but I can already see what will happen next. The lot of you will continue painting trump as a hero and suggesting that the election was rigged by the dems for the next four years, which is why I probably will be taking a vow of silence rather than continue wasting my time trying to talk with people who carry such opinions in their back pocket.

I remember a time when I used to think I could find intelligent conversations around here. I will pray for this to return someday and keep out of most of it otherwise.
Click to expand...
That's not fishy, thats just the way the system is set up. You can imagine that it has only happened that many times in history because of the change in population distribution. "Fishy" is 100% of votes going to democrats, not a single one excluded in Michigan when counting the mail ins. How exactly will trump cheat to win? It's pretty obvious the democrats are doing that, a few ways that they are have already been posted. I don't have a horse in the race, I'm not a Trump fan, never have been, but it seems pretty obvious to me
 
rainerann

rainerann

Star
Joined
Mar 18, 2017
Messages
4,550
lightseeker said:
That's not fishy, thats just the way the system is set up. You can imagine that it has only happened that many times in history because of the change in population distribution. "Fishy" is 100% of votes going to democrats, not a single one excluded in Michigan when counting the mail ins. How exactly will trump cheat to win? It's pretty obvious the democrats are doing that, a few have already been posted. I don't have a horse in the race, I'm not a Trump fan, never have been, but it seems pretty obvious to me
Click to expand...
I believe you are referring to something already posted in this thread regarding something around 124,000 votes. I don’t remember how far back this is in the thread. 124,000 is not fishy to me. That is a small population size.
 
L

lightseeker

Star
Joined
May 18, 2018
Messages
4,060
rainerann said:
I believe you are referring to something already posted in this thread regarding something around 124,000 votes. I don’t remember how far back this is in the thread. 124,000 is not fishy to me. That is a small population size.
Click to expand...
I linked the post I am referring to above.
"When everyone went home, they found 138,339 votes and all 138,339 went to Biden"
That's fishy
 
J

justjess

Superstar
Joined
Mar 16, 2017
Messages
11,534
Lurker said:
Actually it was in person (early) this time.
www.npr.org

Trump Votes Early In Florida 'For A Guy Named Trump'

The president cast his ballot from his adopted home state before departing for rallies on Saturday in North Carolina, Ohio and Wisconsin. More than 50 million Americans have already voted.
www.npr.org www.npr.org
Click to expand...
Ahh... I saw he had requested a mail in ballot. Must have changed his mind on the optics
 
rainerann

rainerann

Star
Joined
Mar 18, 2017
Messages
4,550
lightseeker said:
I linked the post I am referring to above.
"When everyone went home, they found 138,339 votes and all 138,339 went to Biden"
That's fishy
Click to expand...
no it’s actually not fishy at all that this number of final votes were blue when you consider what I already said about the longer time required to process and count mail in votes and the early predictions that these votes were going to lean dem because trump was trumpeting to his supporters that mail in voting was a fraudulent process.

It was expected that people who supported trump would go to the ballot box rather than mail in their votes. There is nothing fishy about evidence that more democrats mailed in their votes when they have been saying that more democrats had mail in votes in their possession than republicans for weeks.

it’s not fishy either when you look at some of the states voting histories and how narrowly trump won Michigan and Wisconsin to begin with in 2016. Michigan and Wisconsin were both blue for Obama in 2012. There is only something fishy about this to people who bought into trump propaganda. It is just not that many votes. If biden wins by this number, he will have very narrowly won. Trump would not win by a landslide without these votes.

he is not that popular evidenced by the fact that he is badly losing the popular vote right now.
 
Last edited:
L

lightseeker

Star
Joined
May 18, 2018
Messages
4,060
rainerann said:
no it’s actually not fishy at all that this number of final votes were blue when you consider what I already said about the longer time required to process and count mail in votes and the early predictions that these votes were going to lean dem because trump was trumpeting to his supporters that mail in voting was a fraudulent process.

It was expected that people who supported trump would go to the ballot box rather than mail in their votes. There is nothing fishy about evidence that more democrats mailed in their votes when they have been saying that more democrats had mail in votes in their possession than republicans for weeks.

it’s not fishy either when you look at some of the states voting histories and how narrowly trump won Michigan and Wisconsin to begin with in 2016. Michigan and Wisconsin were both blue for Obama in 2012. There is only something fishy about this to people who bought into trump propaganda. It is just not that many votes. If biden wins by this number, he will have very narrowly won. Trump would not win by a landslide without these votes.

he is not that popular evidenced by the fact that he is badly losing the popular vote right now.
Click to expand...
They didn’t “lean dem”, every single one was a Democrat vote in a so called contested zone. If you can’t grant that that’s fishy well carry on then
 
Last edited:
rainerann

rainerann

Star
Joined
Mar 18, 2017
Messages
4,550
lightseeker said:
They didn’t “lean dem”, every single one was a Democrat vote in a so called contested zone. If you can’t grant that that’s fishy well carry on them
Click to expand...
mail in votes were expected to lean dem. 138,000 of them is a slim number of votes to win on. Have you bothered to look at the number of votes trump has in other states. Texas is like a 700,000 difference With trump coming out ahead. That is still a slim difference and a split of 52% to 46% of the vote.

if the final count came down to a difference of 138,000 in Michigan. I think this would justify a recount. Trump has requested a recount in Wisconsin already because there is a vote difference of under 1% which equals around 30,000 in the case of Wisconsin. Michigan has a different population size and that might be enough to justify a recount, it is such a small difference.

when you look at the bigger picture, this doesn’t appear fishy at all without more information. A certain number of votes does not equal fishy. The number of votes does not need to be less than or equal to a number in order to be acceptable.

What would be fishy is for someone to lose the popular twice and somehow win according to the rules of the electoral college. That would be fishy.
 
Last edited:
Faker He-Man

Faker He-Man

Star
Joined
Apr 12, 2017
Messages
2,024
“Only deeply depraved people are capable of serving such a deeply depraved machine, and only deeply depraved people will ever be given an opportunity to. Trump and Biden are not unique in their depravity. They’re not even remarkable. They’re just the next in line to serve at the front desk of the smiley faced murder factory.”

The US Empire Is A Smiley-Faced Serial Killer
https://caitlinjohnstone.com/2020/11/03/the-us-empire-is-a-smiley-faced-serial-killer/
 
T

Truthteller

Veteran
Joined
Dec 14, 2018
Messages
795
I admit that Biden may win the election after all, despite losing the popular vote. Regardless of the result many will be unhappy and there is a likelihood that people will protest on the streets. Both candidates are unfit for presidency, a choice between bad and terrible. I don’t think it is very ethical to push a nearly 80 year old man with early signs of dementia towards on if the most demanding jobs in the world. Then again Reagan also showed clear signs of dementia during his second term. And of course there is 74 year old Trump, a former reality star, once bankrupt and indebted, unhinged excuse of a person with no political background who is currently the president of ” the world’s most powerful country”.
Makes you really wonder if democracy is all a facade. Who is actually running the country?
 
M

meximonk

Star
Joined
Oct 15, 2020
Messages
1,754
Truthteller said:
I admit that Biden may win the election after all, despite losing the popular vote. Regardless of the result many will be unhappy and there is a likelihood that people will protest on the streets. Both candidates are unfit for presidency, a choice between bad and terrible. I don’t think it is very ethical to push a nearly 80 year old man with early signs of dementia towards on if the most demanding jobs in the world. Then again Reagan also showed clear signs of dementia during his second term. And of course there is 74 year old Trump, a former reality star, once bankrupt and indebted, unhinged excuse of a person with no political background who is currently the president of ” the world’s most powerful country”.
Makes you really wonder if democracy is all a facade. Who is actually running the country?
Click to expand...
Both Candidates are unfit IMO too, but that doesn't really matter in the scheme of things because they're just NWO Puppets and this Election, regardless of who wins, is a Farce.

America's not a Democracy, it's a Constitutional Republic. A Democracy is Socialism. (Seriously, look it up).

To answer your question, the Illuminati have been running the show at least since the Federal Reserve Act of 1913 & the 16th Amendment, both of which were passed at the same time when Congress was out to Lunch. Others argue that it's been since the Civil War when Lincoln starting really abusing his power and abusing Executive Orders, and they might be right.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top