wakethefakeup
Established
- Joined
- Oct 18, 2019
- Messages
- 180
The catholic church used to do it to boys to preserve the soprano range in their voices.I can never imagine a circumstance where a parent would choose to castrate a male child to make them more feminine. I can’t imagine a circumstance where a doctor would agree to do that.
The next time you look at them, think about whether or not a parent who loves their child, would be willing to castrate their male child to make them feminine.
If you knew anything about biology you would know that testosterone is practically undetectable in boys until puberty and peaks at age 17, then remains high for about 20 years.
There would be no benefit to castrating a child early.
Yes, in medieval times! You do know that just because the Catholic Church did it, centuries ago, won’t make it more acceptable to most people? What do you think is happening? Do you think music companies are going around maternity hospitals and picking out babies and asking their parents to castrate them, so they can be singers in 15 years time? That’s how ridiculous what you are saying sounds!The catholic church used to do it to boys to preserve the soprano range in their voices.
They did it for centuries.
Parents used to allow this to be done to their children.
Wtf????Yes, in medieval times! You do know that just because the Catholic Church did it, centuries ago, won’t make it more acceptable to most people? What do you think is happening? Do you think music companies are going around maternity hospitals and picking out babies and asking their parents to castrate them, so they can be singers in 15 years time? That’s how ridiculous what you are saying sounds!
You can change the voice if you castrate someone before puberty because it won’t deepen when testosterone starts to be produced.
However castrating a young male child will have no effect on whether a child grows up masculine or feminine because boys don’t produce testosterone until puberty.
The lack of basic awareness about how the body even works here, is what makes all of your speculation unfounded.
It’s not even biologically accurate!
Don't play stupid,It is their tradition and they have been doing it for a long time, transgender the children so that in the future they will be famous and promise them wealth, you're 33 I thought you already knew, but I guess you're here just to troll as usual.Do you think music companies are going around maternity hospitals and picking out babies and asking their parents to castrate them, so they can be singers in 15 years time?
your question don't even make senseHow do these companies decide which children they are going to “transgender” (is that even a real term?)?
You clearly did not understand my post andWtf????
You said no parent would have their kid castrated.
I pointed out that it has happend historically. The castrati were my example. They were castrated at the start of puberty.
They were the singing idols of their day
Castrato - Wikipedia
en.m.wikipedia.org
I have no speculation, unfounded or otherwise.
I was just making a comment.
I do know what I am talking about.
I am not sure why you just decided I said a lot of things I didn't.
Get a grip and stop making arguments where there are none.
It perhaps doesn’t make sense because I repeated the term you used.No, 33 because you are a freemason probably, deliberately asking dumb questions
your question don't even make sense
it's not legal yet they're doing many things that are not legalYou clearly did not understand my post and
you clearly do not understand the history of “the castrations” - why it was done back then and why there is absolutely no need for it to be done today. Why would it benefit parents to castrate a male child today? Females and males are accepted into the industry? There is no need to force a child to undergo castration. Even then, it was an illegal procedure that was frowned upon!
If you want to understand it better, I would suggest you use a source other than Wikipedia.
It was not legal back then and it certain isn’t legal today.
It is legal today.You clearly did not understand my post and
you clearly do not understand the history of “the castrations” - why it was done back then and why there is absolutely no need for it to be done today. Why would it benefit parents to castrate a male child today? Females and males are accepted into the industry? There is no need to force a child to undergo castration. Even then, it was an illegal procedure that was frowned upon!
If you want to understand it better, I would suggest you use a source other than Wikipedia.
It was not legal back then and it certain isn’t legal today.