OnceUponATime
Established
- Joined
- Oct 23, 2019
- Messages
- 314
The Insidious 'Toxic Masculinity' Myth is Damaging Humanity
- Thread starter OnceUponATime
- Start date
Faker He-Man
Star
- Joined
- Apr 12, 2017
- Messages
- 2,024
Do you think Paul will ever come out of the closet? I hope so.
Corvus Metus
Star
- Joined
- May 14, 2017
- Messages
- 1,269
My favorite part about Paul Joseph Watson is that he really pushed that whole "soy makes you into an effeminate" thing, while selling health supplements that contain soy.
Anyway, toxic masculinity is a thing. I'll prove it...
You if you see a video on toxic masculinity and your first response is to get outraged and say it's totally not real? You're a fucking a bitch who likely feels uncomfortable about your dick size and likely have a big gun to compenasate. Also, there's about a nintity three percent chance your favorite sort of porn is interracial but all your wanks are filled with racial slurs and misogynistic tirades.
Maes17
Superstar
- Joined
- Jul 27, 2017
- Messages
- 6,521
Damn. That’s real shiz right there
OnceUponATime
Established
- Joined
- Oct 23, 2019
- Messages
- 314
There's a few women on this forum who seem to be possessed by the Jezebel spirit. They need to watch this video.
Lisa
Superstar
- Joined
- Mar 13, 2017
- Messages
- 20,288
I don’t think Paul’s in the closet.
Lisa
Superstar
- Joined
- Mar 13, 2017
- Messages
- 20,288
Do you think they will watch the video?
Ahh.. and there we have it
Awoken2
Superstar
- Joined
- Jan 22, 2018
- Messages
- 6,504
You haven't yet observed that this forum doesn't want us discussing any depopulation agenda. The only depopulation that will be occurring is the one done by God apparently...because that's what's written in their bible .
So in short, anything bad that happens...it's God...not a bunch of new age psycopaths.
Faker He-Man
Star
- Joined
- Apr 12, 2017
- Messages
- 2,024
He is so deep in the closet that he got lost somewhere in Narnia.
I am not religious, and unless there is a rule specifically against it, then I can talk about the depopulation agenda.
It is happening as we speak. Hasn't anyone noticed?
Lisa
Superstar
- Joined
- Mar 13, 2017
- Messages
- 20,288
I don’t see it.
Here’s my issue with the depopulation agenda... despite birth rates seemingly dropping amongst most groups the population keeps increasing. On top of that the elite NEED massive amounts of people in the lower classes to continue fueling their money machine so what would be the point? How would it benefit them?
Awoken2
Superstar
- Joined
- Jan 22, 2018
- Messages
- 6,504
No there isn't any rule against it but you will be labelled a maaad conspiracy theorist for trying to talk about it on this particular forum. Give it time, you will see
They don't really need that many people. They certainly don't need as many as there are now.
They want to rule a world full of useful slaves, not useless breathers and breeders.
That is why both masculinity and femininity are being disenfranchised in favor of a gender neutral homogenous population.
This is why veganism is being promoted,because soy products contain natural estrogens that decline male fertility.
This is why young people are being encouraged to not have children to 'save the planet'.
If we reduced the planets population by 90% we would have the same amount of people as there were around 1700 ad.
This was the age of 'enlightenment', and the beginning of the new world order.
In no way do the elite want to share their planet with millions of people who do nothing to benefit them, but instead use up resources and make a mess.
They want to rule a world full of useful slaves, not useless breathers and breeders.
That is why both masculinity and femininity are being disenfranchised in favor of a gender neutral homogenous population.
This is why veganism is being promoted,because soy products contain natural estrogens that decline male fertility.
This is why young people are being encouraged to not have children to 'save the planet'.
If we reduced the planets population by 90% we would have the same amount of people as there were around 1700 ad.
This was the age of 'enlightenment', and the beginning of the new world order.
In no way do the elite want to share their planet with millions of people who do nothing to benefit them, but instead use up resources and make a mess.
Then I can and will speak of it.
As for maaaaad conspiracy theorist...
A. This is a forum for conspiracies, maaaaad or otherwise.
B. I really do not care how other people label me.
I’ve heard this said but I’m not sure this argument takes into consideration how economics actually works... without a surplus of lower class people the elite would have to pay more to get people to work for them. Less competition. They’d also sell less of their shitty products or whatever the hell they are making money on. Less consumers. It’s a tightly interwoven system that isn’t so easy to deconstruct.