You base your view of "disgustingly misygonistic" viewpoints on your own grasp of modern feminism.
Misogyny is defined as treating women in a prejudiced way... i.e. treating women as lesser than yourself and assuming them to be below men. This can can happen in any time period and hopefully you are aware that it was a very prominent practice in the past. Feminism is why we see less overt sexism in the modern day but it has nothing to do with the demonstrable existence of prevalent sexism in the past throughout history. A sexist practice is still sexist in both the past and present and there is no justification for it. It doesn't cease to be sexist simply because it takes place in a different time. Owning a woman as property was seen as perfectly fine by many men in biblical times, but that doesn't mean that it isn't wrong... that doesn't mean that it isn't sexist.
If you'd like to point out particular scriptures in the bible that you see as such, please point them out and we can discuss them.
Your idea of discussion is to say there's actually no sexism present in the bible because it can be explained away or to say that direct quotes somehow aren't reflective of the general viewpoint of the people who wrote the bible. But that doesn't make sense. The bible literally begins in genesis by claiming that god cursed all women so that men will "rule over them" because eve was responsible for everything. It's convenient that the book written by sexist men blames women for all evil in the world and also gives themselves a convenient "justification" for trying to subjugate women.... must just be a coincidence. (No, wait... it's a prophecy fulfilled lol)
When the bible says that women are "unclean" for "seven days" if they give birth to a boy but "unclean" for "two weeks" when they give birth to a girl, that already establishes that people saw girls as lesser than boys even as babies because they make the mother twice as "unclean" than a boy would. The fact that they say that women are somehow spiritually unclean simply for giving birth already demonstrates that they see a natural process of a woman's body to somehow be wrong or bad. They required a woman to be secluded for up to multiple months simply because she had a baby... and nothing similar to this is required of men. When the bible says "Neither was the man created for the woman; but the woman for the man" this shows the mentality that men held towards women, they believed that women were created for men as if women are property and they specifically make sure to point out that men were definitely not created for women as well. Because they don't see men and women as equal... They saw women as things that are there for men's own personal fulfillment. According to the people who wrote the bible, women aren't created for themselves or their own purpose, they're only created for men. They obviously don't see women as having agency or being fully human. And we know that during that time period women were seen as property in those societies. The reality was that they were either owned by their father or their husbands... marriage was akin to a property transfer between those two individuals... and that's wrong. A relationship should be an expression of love between two equals, but most women were denied that.
The bible says things like "wives should submit to their husbands" and "slaves should submit to their masters"... these are clearly not the words of a loving and just god, but the people who wrote these words thought they were true and justified and they claimed that their god supports these ideas. The problem is that slavery and sexism are unjustified. To say that women should submit to and follow their husbands is to say that women are less than men, which is an inherently sexist concept. To say that men are an authority and women are beneath them is the epitome of what sexism boils down to. Women should not be akin to slaves with an obligation to submit to men that proclaim themselves to be a higher authority... but many people believe it to be okay especially in the past because they wrote it into their holy book. These are a few of the various examples of the sexist ways in which people viewed and treated women in biblical times.
Also regardless of whether the bible also includes a few positive depictions of women or not, that doesn't detract from the fact that many sexist ideas do exist and are promoted within it and those are not justifiable... A supposed holy and perfectly moral book that's directly from god should really contain no moral corruption or depravity in the slightest and yet it does. This is because the people who wrote the books were not perfect, they were immoral in many ways and had some terrible practices. You can't just ignore the sexism as if it's insignificant when it's actually very prominent and it's directly reflective of the harmful beliefs that people held and still hold today. When Paul wrote that women should not speak or teach and that they should submit, that's an expression of his own sexist ideas and the ideas of his culture and they were written into the bible for people to follow as the supposedly divinely inspired word of god. The entire bible was written by similar processes, just people writing their own ideas, beliefs, desires, histories, and traditions down... and a lot of those ideas were bad/morally wrong.
I think people forget that no religious books were written by god... they were written by humans, from their own brains with their own hands, and those humans also happened to be extremely sexist (among other things). The bible was written in a time and culture that said that treating women as property was acceptable and the people who wrote the books believed women to be inferior to them... this is why their idea of god reflects their sexist beliefs and they wrote those beliefs into their books. This is a simple concept... we can observe the sexist ideas that are entrenched in religions and we can logically trace them back to the sexist beliefs of the people who created them.