@TMT
how can you defend crowley though, isn't it sort of hypocritical to say that the old testament is harsh and cruel but defend an occultist/satanist? he advocated for human sacrifice and is one of the main teachers for black magic and rituals- i don't think this is a fair comparison.
“For when Gentiles, who do not have the law,
by nature do what the law requires, they are a law to themselves, even though they do not have the law” — meaning the law of Moses. “They show that the work of the law is written on their hearts, while their conscience also bears witness, and their conflicting thoughts accuse or even excuse them” (Romans 2:15).
like i said before the canaanites were sexually immoral (beastiality, incest), sacrificed their children, and worshipped false idols. the curse of ham was because of all the immorality that happened. so yes, although he wiped them out, it was justified
but even tribes like moab which he didn't like, he liked individuals like ruth who were righteous and not immoral
he saved the israelites from egypt from slavery- he never advocated for the enslavement of Africans. that was a misinterpretation, and honestly if you read deuteronomy 28 it sounds like the slaves are the Israelites that were disobedient (keep in mind the blessings they would have been given for obedience and a warning that was given to them) but despite this:
God said to Abram, “Know for certain that your descendants will be strangers in a land that is not theirs, where they will be enslaved and oppressed four hundred years.
14“But I will also judge the nation whom they will serve, and afterward they will come out with many possessions.
He still promises them prosperity and forgiveness after many acts of disobedience and disrespect. He's fair, and he's not cruel- it wouldn't be fair of Him to not punish unrighteousness and sin