Why Michael (the Antichrist) is a Safe Messiah

King David

Established
Joined
Mar 13, 2017
Messages
338
Shalom :)

Hello All. So on this thread I'd like to quickly explain why Michael will be safe and not the dreaded evil one that most of you will think He is when He stands up soon and rules the world...

Let's talk about three characteristics that the Evil One you dread will have.

First let me say again that Michael will be Antichrist. He will be called the actual "Antichrist" by many. But HE WILL NOT BE the Evil One that you are all dreading..

Here's why...

The first characteristic of the Evil One will be that he will have "fierce features," or a "fierce countenance," (KJV) or a "Brazen-face" (Tanakh). So what exactly are "fierce features"? Does it mean the Evil One will have bulging muscles and be handsome? This is what the evil ones will want you to believe, because that's how Michael will appear. He will be handsome and have a perfect physic.

In the Hebrew Scriptures however, there are many examples when Yahwuah through Moses or His prophets describes someone with beauty. Yahuwah described David as "Handsome" in 1 Samuel 16:12 and 1 Samuel 17:42. Yahuwah even described Saul as being handsome in 1 Samuel 9:2.

So if the Evil One is supposed to be "handsome," then why didn't Yahuwah say through Daniel that he is going to be "handsome?" Instead He chose to say "fierce features." Why?

In Judges 16:6, Samson is described as having "great strength." Does "having fierce features" mean that the Evil One will have "great strength?" If so, then why didn't Yahuwah just say "he will have great strength" like he did for Samson?

Yahuwah even called David's men who were valorous "mighty men." So if the Evil One is supposed to be a "mighty man," then why didn't Yahwuah just say "he will be a mighty man?"

Yahuwah did not chose any of these descriptors to describe the person who will kill the Prince and take over the Temple, because "fierce features" does not mean "handsome," or "strong," or "mighty." Fierce features means alien type features that are unknown to us.

Again, Michael will be handsome and built, but not be the "fierce featured one" that the Book of Daniel says to beware of...

The second characteristic of the man who challenges Yahuwah comes from Daniel 11:37 that says that the one who takes over the Temple of Yahuwah will "have no regard for the Elohim of his fathers nor the desire for women."

So who is the "God of his fathers" Well, I propose that this is Yahuwah, but someone will most likely say that this could be any god, depending upon heir interpretation. So let's just leave that where it is...

Let's focus on "the desire for women." This person coming will not have the desire for women, whereas Michael will have at least 7 wives and thousands of concubines, including many virgins.

Where is this written you may ask?

First, go to Psalm 45 that says:

"9 Kings’ daughters are among Your honorable women;
At Your right hand stands the queen in gold from Ophir.

10 Listen, O daughter,
Consider and incline your ear;
Forget your own people also, and your father’s house;
11 So the King will greatly desire your beauty;
Because He is your Lord, worship Him.
12 And the daughter of Tyre will come with a gift;
The rich among the people will seek your favor.

13 The royal daughter is all glorious within the palace;
Her clothing is woven with gold.
14 She shall be brought to the King in robes of many colors;
The virgins, her companions who follow her, shall be brought to You.
15 With gladness and rejoicing they shall be brought;
They shall enter the King’s palace.

16 Instead of Your fathers shall be Your sons,
Whom You shall make princes in all the earth.
17 I will make Your name to be remembered in all generations;
Therefore the people shall praise You forever and ever."

Also Psalm 68 describes an erotic and righteous scene of 20,000 virgin "chariots" that are upset at the Queen for the time she is given to spend with Michael.

"The Lord gave the word;
Great was the company of those who proclaimed it:
12 “Kings of armies flee, they flee,
And she who remains at home divides the spoil.
13 Though you lie down among the sheepfolds,
You will be like the wings of a dove covered with silver,
And her feathers with yellow gold.”
14 When the Almighty scattered kings in it,
It was white as snow in Zalmon.

15 A mountain of God is the mountain of Bashan;
A mountain of many peaks is the mountain of Bashan.
16 Why do you fume with envy, you mountains of many peaks?
This is the mountain which God desires to dwell in;
Yes, the Lord will dwell in it forever.

17 The chariots of God are twenty thousand,
Even thousands of thousands;
The Lord is among them as in Sinai, in the Holy Place.
18 You have ascended on high,
You have led captivity captive;
You have received gifts among men,
Even from the rebellious,
That the Lord God might dwell there.

19 Blessed be the Lord,
Who daily loads us with benefits" ("lays on us" -Young's Literal Translation)

There are so many other Psalms that revel the secret of Michael (called the BRANCH) as a love maker. Search them yourself for the hidden symbolism and you will see.

Michael will have at least 7 wives...
Please review Isaiah 4 that says:

"4 And in that day seven women shall take hold of one man, saying,
“We will eat our own food and wear our own apparel;
Only let us be called by your name,
To take away our reproach.”
2 In that day the Branch of the Lord shall be beautiful and glorious;
And the fruit of the earth shall be excellent and appealing
For those of Israel who have escaped."

So not only is Michael going to have a Queen, but He will have many wives and concubines according to scripture.

Lastly, the evil one who will come and take over the sacrifices in the Temple will be lawless, meaning he will not follow the Torah. Instead, the he will advocate that everyone follow his law, which he will take in pieces from every religion. It will be a pluralistic view that will be a new law entirely. It will be programmed into everyone who will be more like operating systems at this point in time.

Michael will follow the Law of Yahwuah, therefore he cannot be against Yahuwah.

Here is a Christian website that gives several transhuman websites as well as a website that reveals the 2045 Transhuman Agenda. This agenda involves turning everyone into a programmed slave. They even have the ability to upload someone's conscience - just like the movies...

http://www.livescience.com/37499-immortality-by-2045-conference.html

http://www.inquisitivechristianity.com/index.php/research-links/transhumanism/transhumanism-websites/pro-transhumanism-websites

So there you have it...

Michael will not have "fierce features," but be handsome and strong.
Michael will have a great desire for women and will show love to His Father's creation. Even more, when the Father descends upon Him and His face shines, He will show them the physical love of the Father, as Michael will be the Father in flesh form.
Michael will follow the Torah, whereas that the person who takes over the Temple will not.

"Who will believe Our report? To whom has the Arm of Yahuwah been revealed?" Isaiah 53:1

Shalom
 
Last edited:

rainerann

Star
Joined
Mar 18, 2017
Messages
4,550
Shalom :)

Hello All. So on this thread I'd like to quickly explain why Michael will be safe and not the dreaded evil one that most of you will think He is when He stands up soon and rules the world...

Let's talk about three characteristics that the Evil One you dread will have.

First let me say again that Michael will be Antichrist. He will be called the actual "Antichrist" by many. But HE WILL NOT BE the Evil One that you are all dreading..


The second characteristic of the man who challenges Yahuwah comes from Daniel 11:37 that says that the one who takes over the Temple of Yahuwah will "have no regard for the Elohim of his fathers nor the desire for women."

So who is the "God of his fathers" Well, I propose that this is Yahuwah, but someone will most likely say that this could be any god, depending upon heir interpretation. So let's just leave that where it is...

Let's focus on "the desire for women." This person coming will not have the desire for women, whereas Michael will have at least 7 wives and thousands of concubines, including many virgins.

Where is this written you may ask?

Michael will have at least 7 wives...
Please review Isaiah 4 that says:

"4 And in that day seven women shall take hold of one man, saying,
“We will eat our own food and wear our own apparel;
Only let us be called by your name,
To take away our reproach.”
2 In that day the Branch of the Lord shall be beautiful and glorious;
And the fruit of the earth shall be excellent and appealing
For those of Israel who have escaped."

So not only is Michael going to have a Queen, but He will have many wives and concubines according to scripture.

Shalom
So again, the "antichrist" is not mentioned in the book of Revelation and it means to be against Christ. It is assumed that the beast will be the against Christ and that is why he is referred to as the antichrist, or the one who implements the mark of the beast is referred to as the antichrist. Therefore, unless you are suggesting that "Michael" is the beast referenced in Revelation, and Revelation is wrong, and the beast is actually the Messiah according to the Old Testament, I am not sure that you are making the point that you want to make. What you are saying is a whole bunch of confusion.

Basically, your argument doesn't require the condescending tone that you integrate into it. If Michael returns, and he is a righteous man, then why do you feel like you need to spend your time prior to his arrival insulting people who inaccurately believe something that would be simple to overcome in the presence of a righteous man. However, you keep comparing him to the antichrist, which encompasses more than just rejecting Christ even while this is the primary identifying feature. To be the antichrist is to be lawless. How could that be what Daniel 12:1 is talking about. You are saying that the Messiah will be lawless or an oppressor or something of that nature when you make the comparison between Daniel 12:1 and the concept of the antichrist according to the New Testament.

Michael should not create a contradiction to what is written in the Old Testament. The antichrist is a contraction of the teachings of the Old Testament as well as the New because the antichrist is someone who rejects Christ and assumes himself to be God similar to the account of the tower of Babel, or Nebuchadnezzar, or Pharoah. This is what Christians believe the Antichrist will be like, so I don't understand why you keep making this comparison. If someone does not embody these attributes, they will not be called the Antichrist. If they do, they will. Do you believe that Michael will behave in a way that would cause Christians to refer to him as the antichrist by behaving in a lawless way?

I also included your concept of the Messiah having seven wives to point out how terribly you present the teachings of the Old Testament. This is a direct contradiction of Deuteronomy 17:17 "He must not acquire many wives for himself so that his heart won't go astray. He must not acquire very large amounts of silver and gold for himself." I am sure you are familiar with this verse describing the conduct of a king.

Furthermore, let's put Isaiah 4 in context
"The Lord says, 'The women of Zion are haughty walking along with outstretched necks, flirting with their eyes, strutting along with swaying hips, with ornaments jingling on their ankles. Therefore the Lord will bring sores on the heads of the women of Zion; the Lord will make their scalps bald." In that day the Lord will snatch away their finery: the bangles and headbands and crescent necklaces, the earring and bracelets and veils, the headdresses and anklets and sashes, the perfume bottles and charms, the signet rings and nose rings, and the linen garments and tiaras and shawls. Instead of fragrance there will be stench; instead of a sash, a rope; instead of well-dressed hair, baldness; instead of fine clothing, sackcloth; instead of beauty, branding. Your men will fall by the sword, your warriors in battle. The gates of Zion will lament and mourn; destitute, she will sit on the ground. In that day seven women will take hold of one man and say, ' We will eat our own food and provide our own clothes; only let us be called by your name. Take away our disgrace!" (Isaiah 3:16-Isaiah 4:1).

So, we can see that the women have been judged for their vanity and the men have died in battle. The women still refuse to repent and instead desperately try to find a way to cover up the visible signs of God's judgement against them by getting married.
This has nothing to do with the Messiah having many wives especially when it says that seven women will take hold of one man indicating that many men have fallen by the sword. This is a very sad state of affairs.

Following this, the remaining verses in Isaiah chapter four describe how the branch of the Lord will rule over the remnant of Jerusalem and wash away the filth of the women of Zion. I would imagine this would require marrying more than seven women according to the remedy the women request in Isaiah 4:1, unless you are suggesting there are only seven women left at this point. However, this would contradict Isaiah 4:1 as well.
 

Yahda

Veteran
Joined
Mar 14, 2017
Messages
711
Just to be clear for all the Christians and the Hebrew-Christians...the anti-Christ will be from and of God. The anti-Christ is coming to kill this notion of what you all call Christ. As you can see the ball is already rolling.

Idol worship will be no more. So to sum it up God is anti-Christ.
 

TMT

Star
Joined
Mar 15, 2017
Messages
1,201
[QUOTE="rainerann, post: 2382, member:

I also included your concept of the Messiah having seven wives to point out how terribly you present the teachings of the Old Testament. This is a direct contradiction of Deuteronomy 17:17 "He must not acquire many wives for himself so that his heart won't go astray. He must not acquire very large amounts of silver and gold for himself." I am sure you are familiar with this verse describing the conduct of a king.

Furthermore, let's put Isaiah 4 in context
"The Lord says, 'The women of Zion are haughty walking along with outstretched necks, flirting with their eyes, strutting along with swaying hips, with ornaments jingling on their ankles. Therefore the Lord will bring sores on the heads of the women of Zion; the Lord will make their scalps bald." In that day the Lord will snatch away their finery: the bangles and headbands and crescent necklaces, the earring and bracelets and veils, the headdresses and anklets and sashes, the perfume bottles and charms, the signet rings and nose rings, and the linen garments and tiaras and shawls. Instead of fragrance there will be stench; instead of a sash, a rope; instead of well-dressed hair, baldness; instead of fine clothing, sackcloth; instead of beauty, branding. Your men will fall by the sword, your warriors in battle. The gates of Zion will lament and mourn; destitute, she will sit on the ground. In that day seven women will take hold of one man and say, ' We will eat our own food and provide our own clothes; only let us be called by your name. Take away our disgrace!" (Isaiah 3:16-Isaiah 4:1).

So, we can see that the women have been judged for their vanity and the men have died in battle. The women still refuse to repent and instead desperately try to find a way to cover up the visible signs of God's judgement against them by getting married.
This has nothing to do with the Messiah having many wives especially when it says that seven women will take hold of one man indicating that many men have fallen by the sword. This is a very sad state of affairs.

Following this, the remaining verses in Isaiah chapter four describe how the branch of the Lord will rule over the remnant of Jerusalem and wash away the filth of the women of Zion. I would imagine this would require marrying more than seven women according to the remedy the women request in Isaiah 4:1, unless you are suggesting there are only seven women left at this point. However, this would contradict Isaiah 4:1 as well.[/QUOTE]

Man, God has a lot of sexual hang-ups and control issues. Oh no! Women wearing ankle bracelets and flirting with their eyes, God forbid a woman has a control over her sexuality! Come cleanse us oh lord!
 

King David

Established
Joined
Mar 13, 2017
Messages
338
For anyone genuinely interested in discovering the Truth -- if you read Deuteronomy 33:2 it shows that the Law of Yahuwah will be revised by Michael the Arc Angel (Yahuwah in male flesh form); a new "fiery Law." Isaiah 42:4 also reveals this...

Shalom
 

Thunderian

Superstar
Joined
Mar 13, 2017
Messages
7,515
The same law that scribes handled falsely (Jeremiah 8:8) that they originally lost but "found" along with the money in the temple (2 Kings 22:8-10)?
I am sure I've asked you this before, but if Jeremiah 8:8 means that the Law has been corrupted, why does Jeremiah 26:4 command Israel to follow the Law?

And for a bonus question: If the Bible has been corrupted, why would you believe it if it said it had been?
 

King David

Established
Joined
Mar 13, 2017
Messages
338
For anyone genuinely interested in discovering the Truth -- if you read Deuteronomy 33:2 it shows that the Law of Yahuwah will be revised by Michael the Arc Angel (Yahuwah in male flesh form); a new "fiery Law." Isaiah 42:4 also reveals this...

Shalom
So again, the "antichrist" is not mentioned in the book of Revelation and it means to be against Christ. It is assumed that the beast will be the against Christ and that is why he is referred to as the antichrist, or the one who implements the mark of the beast is referred to as the antichrist. Therefore, unless you are suggesting that "Michael" is the beast referenced in Revelation, and Revelation is wrong, and the beast is actually the Messiah according to the Old Testament, I am not sure that you are making the point that you want to make. What you are saying is a whole bunch of confusion.

Basically, your argument doesn't require the condescending tone that you integrate into it. If Michael returns, and he is a righteous man, then why do you feel like you need to spend your time prior to his arrival insulting people who inaccurately believe something that would be simple to overcome in the presence of a righteous man. However, you keep comparing him to the antichrist, which encompasses more than just rejecting Christ even while this is the primary identifying feature. To be the antichrist is to be lawless. How could that be what Daniel 12:1 is talking about. You are saying that the Messiah will be lawless or an oppressor or something of that nature when you make the comparison between Daniel 12:1 and the concept of the antichrist according to the New Testament.

Michael should not create a contradiction to what is written in the Old Testament. The antichrist is a contraction of the teachings of the Old Testament as well as the New because the antichrist is someone who rejects Christ and assumes himself to be God similar to the account of the tower of Babel, or Nebuchadnezzar, or Pharoah. This is what Christians believe the Antichrist will be like, so I don't understand why you keep making this comparison. If someone does not embody these attributes, they will not be called the Antichrist. If they do, they will. Do you believe that Michael will behave in a way that would cause Christians to refer to him as the antichrist by behaving in a lawless way?

I also included your concept of the Messiah having seven wives to point out how terribly you present the teachings of the Old Testament. This is a direct contradiction of Deuteronomy 17:17 "He must not acquire many wives for himself so that his heart won't go astray. He must not acquire very large amounts of silver and gold for himself." I am sure you are familiar with this verse describing the conduct of a king.

Furthermore, let's put Isaiah 4 in context
"The Lord says, 'The women of Zion are haughty walking along with outstretched necks, flirting with their eyes, strutting along with swaying hips, with ornaments jingling on their ankles. Therefore the Lord will bring sores on the heads of the women of Zion; the Lord will make their scalps bald." In that day the Lord will snatch away their finery: the bangles and headbands and crescent necklaces, the earring and bracelets and veils, the headdresses and anklets and sashes, the perfume bottles and charms, the signet rings and nose rings, and the linen garments and tiaras and shawls. Instead of fragrance there will be stench; instead of a sash, a rope; instead of well-dressed hair, baldness; instead of fine clothing, sackcloth; instead of beauty, branding. Your men will fall by the sword, your warriors in battle. The gates of Zion will lament and mourn; destitute, she will sit on the ground. In that day seven women will take hold of one man and say, ' We will eat our own food and provide our own clothes; only let us be called by your name. Take away our disgrace!" (Isaiah 3:16-Isaiah 4:1).

So, we can see that the women have been judged for their vanity and the men have died in battle. The women still refuse to repent and instead desperately try to find a way to cover up the visible signs of God's judgement against them by getting married.
This has nothing to do with the Messiah having many wives especially when it says that seven women will take hold of one man indicating that many men have fallen by the sword. This is a very sad state of affairs.

Following this, the remaining verses in Isaiah chapter four describe how the branch of the Lord will rule over the remnant of Jerusalem and wash away the filth of the women of Zion. I would imagine this would require marrying more than seven women according to the remedy the women request in Isaiah 4:1, unless you are suggesting there are only seven women left at this point. However, this would contradict Isaiah 4:1 as well.
It appears a little complicated doesn't it? That was Satan's aim. That's why you have to have a firm grasp of the Prophets First. Reaching for the Book of Revelation is only going to confuse you, because it does not mesh with Daniel.

It is written in Greek and not Hebrew, which is a sign that it was not inspired by Yahuwah, whose kodesh (holy) language is Hebrew. That being said, there is some truth to Revelation, because it is a result of astrological prognostication.

Beast vs. Antichrist...

The is no Beast mentioned in the the Hebrew Scriptures, except in Daniel 7:3, where it mentions 4 Beasts. There is only mention of "the people of the monarch who is to come" Daniel 9:26 - Tanakh. The KJV replaced "monarch" with "prince" to confuse the reader. This "monarch is "the Beast," whom you think is the antichrist (the evil one).

The Evil "Beast" is not the same as the Antichrist, whom you think is the "bad guy." The Antichrist is Michael. He is antichrist because Christ is Zeus and a deception given to you by Satan. Michael is the Messiah, the Good Prince. He is the True Son of Yahuwah.

The "Beast" will be a false alien god that houses the spirit of Satan and tells people that he is the LAM of God. Why LAM? That's who Alister Crowley revealed he talked to a century ago and Alister Crowley has been positioned at the forefront of Occult and New Age knowledge... LAM an alien god -- really just a demon.
 

Yahda

Veteran
Joined
Mar 14, 2017
Messages
711
Just to be clear for all the Christians and the Hebrew-Christians...the anti-Christ will be from and of God. The anti-Christ is coming to kill this notion of what you all call Christ. As you can see the ball is already rolling.

Idol worship will be no more. So to sum it up God is anti-Christ.
I am sure I've asked you this before, but if Jeremiah 8:8 means that the Law has been corrupted, why does Jeremiah 26:4 command Israel to follow the Law?

And for a bonus question: If the Bible has been corrupted, why would you believe it if it said it had been?
It's only corrupted when it does not fit certain ( people) narratives. You know how that goes.

One thing about the Bible it's easy to spot the deception. There is a common theme in every chapter. As we all know the book is repetitive. God is basically telling you the same thing over and over.....chapter after chapter, book after book, verse after verse. The rest is the history of God's people the Hebrew Israelites.

So when there is something that does not fit that narrative, then you bring Jeremiah 8:8 to the table.

A perfect example of this is the New Testament lol I kid, I kid. That's neither here nor there for now.
 

TMT

Star
Joined
Mar 15, 2017
Messages
1,201
For anyone genuinely interested in discovering the Truth -- if you read Deuteronomy 33:2 it shows that the Law of Yahuwah will be revised by Michael the Arc Angel (Yahuwah in male flesh form); a new "fiery Law." Isaiah 42:4 also reveals this...










The "Beast" will be a false alien god that houses the spirit of Satan and tells people that he is the LAM of God. Why LAM? Because that's who Alister Crowley revealed he talked to a century ago... LAM and alien god -- really just a demon.
That is a lot of speculation. Mr. Crowley wrote one paragraph and one drawing about LAM and that's it.
 

King David

Established
Joined
Mar 13, 2017
Messages
338
[QUOTE="rainerann, post: 2382, member:

I also included your concept of the Messiah having seven wives to point out how terribly you present the teachings of the Old Testament. This is a direct contradiction of Deuteronomy 17:17 "He must not acquire many wives for himself so that his heart won't go astray. He must not acquire very large amounts of silver and gold for himself." I am sure you are familiar with this verse describing the conduct of a king.

Furthermore, let's put Isaiah 4 in context
"The Lord says, 'The women of Zion are haughty walking along with outstretched necks, flirting with their eyes, strutting along with swaying hips, with ornaments jingling on their ankles. Therefore the Lord will bring sores on the heads of the women of Zion; the Lord will make their scalps bald." In that day the Lord will snatch away their finery: the bangles and headbands and crescent necklaces, the earring and bracelets and veils, the headdresses and anklets and sashes, the perfume bottles and charms, the signet rings and nose rings, and the linen garments and tiaras and shawls. Instead of fragrance there will be stench; instead of a sash, a rope; instead of well-dressed hair, baldness; instead of fine clothing, sackcloth; instead of beauty, branding. Your men will fall by the sword, your warriors in battle. The gates of Zion will lament and mourn; destitute, she will sit on the ground. In that day seven women will take hold of one man and say, ' We will eat our own food and provide our own clothes; only let us be called by your name. Take away our disgrace!" (Isaiah 3:16-Isaiah 4:1).

So, we can see that the women have been judged for their vanity and the men have died in battle. The women still refuse to repent and instead desperately try to find a way to cover up the visible signs of God's judgement against them by getting married.
This has nothing to do with the Messiah having many wives especially when it says that seven women will take hold of one man indicating that many men have fallen by the sword. This is a very sad state of affairs.

Following this, the remaining verses in Isaiah chapter four describe how the branch of the Lord will rule over the remnant of Jerusalem and wash away the filth of the women of Zion. I would imagine this would require marrying more than seven women according to the remedy the women request in Isaiah 4:1, unless you are suggesting there are only seven women left at this point. However, this would contradict Isaiah 4:1 as well.

Good for you being Antichrist. Please pay close attention to Isaiah 4:2 that says "In that day the branch of Yahuwah will be glorious." The reason the women reach to Yahwuah to take them as wife is to take their shame away. His holy seed will not only impregnate them with angel offspring, but will cause them to be changed. This is why they will desire Him. To talk away their reproach (Isaiah 4:1).

Shalom :)
 

TMT

Star
Joined
Mar 15, 2017
Messages
1,201
Man, God has a lot of sexual hang-ups and control issues. Oh no! Women wearing ankle bracelets and flirting with their eyes, God forbid a woman has a control over her sexuality! Come cleanse us oh lord!
Good for you being Antichrist. Please pay close attention to Isaiah 4:2 that says "In that day the branch of Yahuwah will be glorious." The reason the women reach to Yahwuah to take them as wive is to take their shame away. His holy seed will not only impregnate them with angel offspring, but will cause them to be changed. This is why they will desire Him. To talk away their reproach (Isaiah 4:1).

Shalom :)[/QUOTE]

They should have no shame in the first place.
 

King David

Established
Joined
Mar 13, 2017
Messages
338
That is a lot of speculation. Mr. Crowley wrote one paragraph and one drawing about LAM and that's it.
Not speculation...revelation. It's a deceptive conspiracy that was released in part so it could remain hidden to those on the outside, but those on the inside it is known full well.


Shalom
 

King David

Established
Joined
Mar 13, 2017
Messages
338
Good for you being Antichrist. Please pay close attention to Isaiah 4:2 that says "In that day the branch of Yahuwah will be glorious." The reason the women reach to Yahwuah to take them as wive is to take their shame away. His holy seed will not only impregnate them with angel offspring, but will cause them to be changed. This is why they will desire Him. To talk away their reproach (Isaiah 4:1).

Shalom :)
They should have no shame in the first place.[/QUOTE]
What am I supposed to say to you man? Wow, you're right! Great point! What was I thinking?

Listen, quit trying to judge God and take Him for His word. You are a sinful wicked man. Humble yourself!

And if your intentions are otherwise and I misunderstood you, then please explain. But do it quickly, because I'm mobile at the moment and my battery is about to die on my laptop (10min)...

Shalom
 

JoChris

Superstar
Joined
Mar 15, 2017
Messages
6,168
So if the Bible doesn't say what you want it to, it's corrupt.
Just like Islam, Jehovah's Witnesses, Christian Science, Church of the Latter Day Saints (Mormons)...

Bible is/ was the Word of God UNTIL it contradicts the religion's own teachings.
 

TMT

Star
Joined
Mar 15, 2017
Messages
1,201
They should have no shame in the first place.
What am I supposed to say to you man? Wow, you're right! Great point! What was I thinking?

Listen, quit trying to judge God and take Him for His word. You are a sinful wicked man. Humble yourself!



Shalom[/QUOTE]

Yes I am those things, and proud of it.
 

King David

Established
Joined
Mar 13, 2017
Messages
338
What am I supposed to say to you man? Wow, you're right! Great point! What was I thinking?

Listen, quit trying to judge God and take Him for His word. You are a sinful wicked man. Humble yourself!



Shalom
Yes I am those things, and proud of it.[/QUOTE]
Then your a fool and I will turn my back on you until you repent.
 

Yahda

Veteran
Joined
Mar 14, 2017
Messages
711
Just like Islam, Jehovah's Witnesses, Christian Science, Church of the Latter Day Saints (Mormons)...

Bible is/ was the Word of God UNTIL it contradicts the religion's own teachings.
Muslim are thee worst when it come to this.
 
Top