- May 11, 2020
Ok so you admit it. Finally not trying to backtrack. You believe a woman’s place is in the house. Your pissed at feminism and feminists (and believe feminists have been brainwashed) because they don’t want to be in the house. You believe that allowing adult women to follow their own desires is harmful to men and are in agreement with MGTOW that men should shun and shame women who “don’t know their place” and you justify this by the divorce rate while refusing to acknowledge that it’s attitudes like yours that lead women EN MASSE to support feminism to begin with (to the point of literal death) and oftentimes NOW lead to divorce “when abuse and infedility” are absent.
I haven’t been brainwashed by anyone, feminism didn’t “groom” me - I’ve watched with my own eyes what happened to women in my own life who were completely dependent on a man. I decided it wasn’t for me. That is not saying I think all men abuse that position - my grandmother was left destitute when my grandfather died an untimely death, her children (including my mother) were raised in abject poverty because she didn’t have the means to provide for them on her own or the ability to acquire them. Numerous aunts and in laws who dedicated themselves to being housewives only to be left for younger women when their children reached adulthood and to have their husbands deny them any legitimate means of support afterwards despite the fact they sacrificed their own earning potential to be in the home as men like you insist we should do. So no, no one brainwashed me. I’m smart enough to recognize the risks associated with your preferred relational arrangement and choose something else for myself.
you harp on about how smart MGTOW is for looking at the statistics and choosing not to take the risk but condemn women for doing the same and then infantalize them by insisting they must only be doing so because they have been “groomed and brainwashed” by feminism. See the double standard? I’m sure you don’t since your blinded by self preservation and decided the scape goat for your own inability to mantain a relationship was feminism long ago. But it’s blatant to pretty much everyone else.
for the record: I have no issue with anyone of either gender deciding to abstain from relationships instead of risking being HURT (because that is what it boils down to). I do have an issue with anyone of either gender making that decision but then justifying it by demonizing 50% of the population. And I have a massive issue when it’s taken a step further and used to actually advocate for stripping all rights to personhood from 50% of the population. Especially when in the next breath you claim like a hypocrite to be charged by god to love and protect and provide for the people you are trying to make indentured slaves while disregarding every and anything they say about why that will make them miserable and hurt them. You can’t claim to love someone you are actively engaged in hurting. That’s abusive. That’s the furthest thing from love there is. And fuck you and anyone else who wants to do so or thinks doing so is in any way shape or form okay.
god sent Jesus to correct Israel from their mistakes, Jesus treated women so well they flocked To him and were an integral part of spreading and supporting his ministry. I’ll follow Jesus rather than the mistakes of those who came before him and the interpretations of men raised in the defective culture he came to correct that came after him.
I'm actually really not even mad and again you fail to discern where I am coming from. I would just like to point out though that prior to electricity and the technological revolutions of the 20th century there is really no reason to assume that most women held the view that being the keeper of the home was restricting to any sort of potential(in the sense that we think of today). There's no reason to believe that the consensus among women was that most of them wanted out of the house and the opportunity to work in the same capacity as men did. Why would there be? Lets just pretend that the grid went down and there was no electricity. Do you really think all these feminists would be eager to get out there and work in the same elements right alongside men with the type of work that would be needed just to survive? Especially if these were the only type of jobs primarily available and the only things that became worth anything were food and shelter? That's basically how it used to be. This is why its a moot point of reference to contend things like women ALWAYS wanted out of the house in the sense they wanted to earn their own money to go on a shopping spree and follow their dreams... In fact this truth in and of itself basically undermines many of the arguments feminists make when using the past as an example to prove their point. This is why you should stop assuming that the majority of women for hundreds of years actually wanted out of the house and to work in the same capacity as men especially in a time before there was all this commerce and worldly toys like smartphones and coach bags. You had to work really hard and that was only for the bare minimum to survive like food and shelter. Its foolish to assume most women would want to trade their keeper of the home role for labors that men mostly did. Im willing to bet that between laboring as a single woman (when the only things you could purchase are food and shelter) and entering into a marriage with a man while he works and she raises the kids at home that many of the women indeed preferred the second option. Its interesting that feminism fails to mention any of this.Ok so you admit it. Finally not trying to backtrack. You believe a woman’s place is in the house. Your pissed at feminism and feminists (and believe feminists have been brainwashed) because they don’t want to be in the house. You believe that allowing adult women to follow their own desires is harmful to men and are in agreement with MGTOW that men should shun and shame women who “don’t know their place” and you justify this by the divorce rate while refusing to acknowledge that it’s attitudes like yours that lead women EN MASSE to support feminism to begin with (to the point of literal death) and oftentimes NOW lead to divorce “when abuse and infedility” are absent.