Why I believe the Jews are not behind everything

A Freeman

Superstar
Joined
Nov 11, 2019
Messages
6,727
agreed.

jews are overrepresented in a number of fields. i asked if this was due to cronyism or whether is was earned. in most cases, it is earned.
jewish doctors and lawyers are overrepresented, but passing the medical examinations and the bar exam negate cronyism. if they were bad doctors or lawyers, no one would choose them. but they are indeed chosen. the number of jewish comedians (seinfeld, dangerfield, youngman, rickles) speaks for itself-- if they werent good, they wouldnt draw crowds.

the only conclusion one can reach from this is that they are a very driven and intellectual people. i recall reading a book where the author claimed that the ashkenazi IQ was high because their genetics were forced that way--forced into usury and other narrow fields of work-- they had to be sharp to survive. the author also interestingly points out that ashkenazi jews, as a whole, are underrepresented in physical sciences which supports his genetic selection theory.

how jews became liberals
we need to turn the clock back to the closing years of the 19th c. and the early years of the 20th c. when the vast majority of jews entered the US. at this time, russian jews began streaming into ellis island who were avoiding the cossack pogroms. other repressed jews fled their countries and entered the US en masse.
young jews began applying to the elite universities in the US which included harvard, princeton, and columbia. in the beginning, their test scores were high enough for entrance. as the years went by, the number of jews in these top universities became a problem as american-born collegic legacies were not given enough room in these schools. this led to determining "character" as a factor in admissions. however, even with this new factor, the immigrant jewish students formed a large number of the student body. for those blueblood universities that did everything they could to keep out the immigrants, the jews still found other universites in which to attend (cornell, etc.)
its my opinion that this shunning of jews in higher education (whether one agrees with it or not is besides the point) was the initial factor in jewish animosity, leading them to begin to circle the wagons together. in other fields where they were successful at the time (vaudeville, broadway/stage, music, boxing, etc.) they were forced to change their last names in many cases to avoid discrimination. given this treatment in america, compounded by their treatment in europe/poland/russia over centuries (again, we are not debating whether their treatment was justified or not)-- mainly being resigned as moneylenders and persecution, they maintained their tightly knit religio-racial group.
as this generation matured and had children of their own, they instilled those same concepts to their own kids. the rise of hitler in germany as the western media presented him, helped fuel those sentiments.
by the time the 60s rolled around and the civil rights protests began, many of those jews participated and marched with blacks in unity, no doubt some of them recalling their own moments of discrimination in years past. and when nixon authorized the first of the affirmative action bills, many jews supported it.

-----
i dont think the average jew is behind the evil in the world. i agree with michael tsarion, however, as a group they are most manipulated group and used as key chess pieces (creation of israel, gas chamber holocaust hoax, russian revolution, etc.) by the elites in world domination, especially when a hidden faction within is pulling many of the strings (khazars). if the khazarian jews are not in the top position, then a highly successful and equally amoral jew is there in that place.
From: The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion:-

PROTOCOL 9
RE-EDUCATION

Meaning of anti-semitism – Source of the all-engulfing terror – Boosting of false theories

1. In applying our principles, let attention be paid to the character of the people in whose country you live and act; a general, identical application of them, until such time as the people shall have been re-educated to our pattern, cannot have success. But, by approaching their application cautiously, you will see that not a decade will pass before the most stubborn character will change and we shall add a new people to the ranks of those already subdued by us.

2. The words of the liberal, which are in effect the words of our masonic watchword, namely, "Liberty, Equality, Fraternity," will, when we come into our kingdom, be changed by us into words no longer of a watchword, but only an expression of idealism, namely, into "The right of liberty, the duty of equality, the ideal of brotherhood." That is how we shall put it, – and so we shall catch the bull by the horns ... de facto we have already wiped-out every kind of rule except our own, although de jure there still remain a good many of them. Nowadays, if any States raise a protest against us, it is only pro forma at our discretion and by our direction, for their anti-semitism is indispensable to us for the management of our lesser brethren. I will not enter into further explanations, for this matter has formed the subject of repeated discussions amongst us.
 

FilthPig

Veteran
Joined
Jul 28, 2021
Messages
741
Talmud is a touchy subject because its content is rather straight forward and cant be spinned.No wonder Sibi is pretending it dont exist. It's for the eyes of the Rabbis only and every non-jew who happens to read it must be put to death,no ?
Since he is calling me a troll i guess im gonna "troll" with some more facts.I kinda like it how upset they get when they encounter facts they cant spin or disprove. They just get mad and pretend those facts dont exist.
Trolololol ...








 
Last edited:

Sibi

Star
Joined
Aug 11, 2021
Messages
1,563
Protocols of the Elder of Zion - A Fraud
In 1921, the London Times presented conclusive proof that the Protocols was a "clumsy plagiarism." The Times confirmed that the Protocols had been copied in large part from a French political satire that never mentioned Jews—Maurice Joly's Dialogue in Hell Between Machiavelli and Montesquieu (1864). Other investigations revealed that one chapter of a Prussian novel, Hermann Goedsche's Biarritz (1868), also "inspired" the Protocols.

--------
Excerpt form “THE LONDON TIMES”, Wednesday, August 17, 1921, pp. 9, 10
“JEWISH PERIL” EXPOSED. HISTORIC “FAKE.”

We published yesterday an article from our Constantinople Correspondent, which showed that the notorious “Protocols of the Elders of Zion”— one of the mysteries of politics since 1905—were a clumsy forgery, the text being based on a book published in French in 1865.

The book, without title page, was obtained by our Correspondent from a Russian source, and we were able to identify it with a complete copy in the British Museum.

The disclosure, which naturally aroused the greatest interest among those familiar with Jewish questions, finally disposes of the “Protocols” as credible evidence of a Jewish plot against civilization.

We publish below a second article, which gives further close parallels between the language of the Protocols and that attributed to Machiavelli and Montesquieu in the volume dated from Geneva.


PLAGIARISM AT WORK
While the Geneva Dialogues open with an exchange of compliments between Montesquieu and Machiavelli, which covers seven pages, the author of the Protocols plunges at once in medias res.

One can imagine him hastily turning over those first seven pages of the book which he has been ordered to paraphrase against time, and angrily ejaculating, “Nothing here.” But on page 8 of the Dialogues he finds what he wants; the greater part of this page and the next are promptly paraphrased, thus:—

[Start Quote from Dialogues on Evil Instincts of Man]

Geneva Dialogues, p. 8.​
“Among mankind the evil instinct is mightier than the good. Man is more drawn to evil than to good. Fear and Force have more empire over him than reason….​
Every man aims at domination: not one but would be an oppressor if he could: all or almost all are ready to sacrifice the rights of others to their own interests…​
“What restrains those beasts of prey which they call men from attacking one another? Brute un-restrained Force in the first stages of social life, then the Law, that is still force regulated by forms. You have consulted all historical sources: everywhere might precedes right. Political Liberty is merely a relative idea….”​

[End Quote from Dialogues on Evil Instincts of Man]

**

[Start Quote from Protocols on Evil Instincts of Man]

Protocols, p.1 (“The Britons Edition).​
“It must be noted that people with corrupt instincts are more numerous than those of noble instinct. Therefore in governing the world the best results are obtained by means of violence and intimidation, and not by academic discussions. Every man aims at power; every one would like to become a dictator if he only could do so, and rare indeed are the men who would not be disposed to sacrifice the welfare of others in order to attain their own personal aims.​
“What restrained the wild beasts of prey which we call men? What has ruled them up to now? In the first stages of social life they submitted to brute and blind force, then to law, which in reality is the same force, only masked. From this I am led to deduct that by the law of nature right lies in might. Political freedom is not a fact but an idea.”​

[End Quote from Protocols on Evil Instincts of Man]

The gift of liberty according to the Machiavelli of the Geneva Dialogues, of self-government according to the Protocols (page 2), leads speedily to civil and social strife, and the State is soon ruined by internal convulsions or by foreign intervention following on the heels of civil war. Then follows a singular parallel between the two books which deserves quotation:—

[Start Quote from Dialogues on Using Deceit Against Internal Enemies]

Geneva Dialogues. p. 9.​
“What arms will they (States) employ in war against foreign enemies? Will the opposing generals communicate their plans of campaign to one another and thus be mutually in a position to defend themselves? Will they mutually ban night attacks, traps, ambushes, battles with inequality of force? Of course not: such combatants would court derision. Are you against the employment of these traps and tricks, of all the strategy indispensable to war against the enemy within, the revolutionary?”​

[End Quote from Dialogues on Using Deceit Against Internal Enemies]

**

[Start Quote from Protocols on Using Deceit Against Internal Enemies]

Protocols, p. 2.​
“… I would ask the question why is it not immoral for a State which has two enemies, one external and one internal, to use different means of defence against the former to that which it would use against the latter, to make secret plans of defence, to attack him by night or with superior force?”​

[End Quote from Protocols on Using Deceit Against Internal Enemies]

RIGHT AND WRONG.
Both “Machiavelli” and the author of the Protocols agree (Prot. p. 3, Geneva Dialogues, p. 11) almost in the same words that politics have nothing in common with morality. Right is described in the Protocols as “an abstract idea established by nothing,” in the Dialogues as an “infinitely vague” expression. The end, say both, justifies the means. “I pay less attention,” says Machiavelli, “to what is good and moral than to what is useful and necessary.” The Protocols (p. 4) use the same formula, substituting “profitable” for “useful.” According to the protocols he who would rule “must have recourse to cunningness (sic) and hypocrisy.” In the second Dialogue (p. 15) Montesquieu reproaches Machiavelli for having “only two words to repeat—‘Force’ and ‘guile.’” Both Machiavelli and the “Elders” of the Protocols preach despotism as the sole safeguard against anarchy. In the Protocols the despotism has to be Jewish and hereditary. Machiavelli’s despotism is obviously Napoleonic.

There are scores of other parallels between the books. Fully 50 paragraphs in the Protocols are simply paraphrases of passages in the Dialogues. The quotation per me reges regnant, rightly given in the Vieille France edition of the Protocols (p. 29), while regunt is substituted for regnant in the English version (p. 20), appears on p. 63 of the Geneva Dialogues. Sulla, whom the English version of the Protocols insists on calling “Silla,” appears in both books.

“After covering Italy with blood, Sulla reappeared as a simple citizen in Rome: no one durst touch a hair of his head.” —Geneva Dialogues, p. 159.​
“Remember at the time when Italy was streaming with blood, she did not touch a hair of Silla’s head, and he was the man who made her blood pour out.” —Protocols, p. 51.​

Sulla, who after the proscriptions stalked “in savage grandeur home,” is one of the tyrants whom every schoolboy knows and those who believe that Elders of the 33rd Degree are responsible for the Protocols, may say that this is a mere coincidence. But what about the exotic Vishnu, the hundred-armed Hindu deity who appears twice in each book? The following passages never were examples of “unconscious plagiarism.”

Geneva Dialogues, p. 141:—

Machiavelli.—“Like the God Vishnu, my press will have a hundred arms, and these arms will give their hands to all the different shades of opinion throughout the country.”​

Protocols, p. 43:—

“These newspapers, like the Indian god Vishnu, will be possessed of hundreds of hands, each of which will be feeling the pulse of varying public opinion.”​

Geneva Dialogues, p. 207:—

Montesquieu.—“Now I understand the figure of the god Vishnu; you have a hundred arms like the Indian idol, and each of your fingers touches a spring.”​

Protocols, p 65:—

[Protocls. —] “Our Government will resemble the Hindu god Vishnu. Each of our hundred hands will hold one spring of the social machinery of State.”​

TAXATION OF THE PRESS.
The Dialogues and the Protocols alike devote special attention to the Press, and their schemes for muzzling and control thereof are almost identical, absolutely identical, indeed, in many details. Thus Machiavelli on pp. 135 and 136 of the Dialogues expounds the following ingenious scheme:—

[Dialogues, pp. 135 and 136 —]

“I shall extend the tax on newspapers to books, or rather I shall introduce a stamp duty on books having less than a certain number of pages. A book, for example, with less than 200 or 300 pages will not rank as a book, but as a brochure. I am sure you see the advantage of this scheme. On the one hand I thin (je rarifie) by taxation that cloud of short books which are the more of journalism; on the other hand I force those who wish to escape stamp duty to throw themselves into long and costly compositions, which will hardly ever be sold and scarcely read in such a form.”​

The Protocols, p. 41, has:—

“We will tax it (the book press) in the same manner as the newspaper Press—that is to say, by means of Excise stamps and deposits. But on books of less than 300 pages we will place a tax twice as heavy. These short books we will classify as pamphlets, which constitute the most virulent form of printed poison. These measures will also compel writers to publish such long works that they will be little read by the public and chiefly so on account of their high price.”​

Both have the same profound contempt for journalists:

Geneva Dialogues, pp. 145, 146:—

Machiavelli.—“You must know that journalism is a sort of Freemasonry; those who live by it are bound… to one another by the ties of professional discretion; like the augurs of old, they do not lightly divulge the secret of their oracles. They would gain nothing by betraying themselves, for they have mostly won more or less discreditable scars…”​

Protocols, p. 44:—

“Already there exists in French journalism a system of Masonic understanding for giving countersigns. All organs of the Press are tied by mutual professional secrets in the manner of the ancient oracles. Not one of its members will betray his knowledge of the secret, if the secret has not been ordered to be made public. No single publisher will have the courage to betray the secret entrusted to him, the reason being that not one of them is admitted into the literary world without bearing the marks of some shady act in his past life.”​

CONTEMPT FOR THE PEOPLE.
But this contempt is nothing compared to that which both Machiavelli and the Elders evince towards the masses whom tyranny is to reduce to a more than Oriental servitude.

Geneva Dialogues, p. 43:—

Machiavelli.—“You do not know the unbounded meanness of the peoples… groveling before force, pitiless towards the weak, implacable to faults, indulgent to crimes, incapable of supporting the contradictions of a free régime, and patient to the point of martyrdom under the violence of an audacious despotism… giving themselves masters whom they pardon for deeds for the least of which they would have beheaded twenty constitutional kings.”​

Protocols, p. 15:—

“In their intense meanness the Christian peoples help our independence—when kneeling they crouch before power; when they are pitiless towards the weak; merciless in dealing with faults, and lenient to crimes; when they refuse to recognize the contradictions of freedom; when they are patient to the degree of martyrdom in bearing with the violence of an audacious despotism. At the hands of their present dictators, Premiers, and ministers, they endure abuses for the smallest of which they would have murdered twenty kings.”​

ATTITUDE TO THE CHURCHES
Both the Elders and Machiavelli propose to make political crime thoroughly unpopular by assimilating the treatment of the political criminal to that of the felon. Both devote not a little attention to police organization and espionage; the creator of Machiavelli had evidently studied Napoleon III.’s police methods, and suffered at the hands of his agents. Each proposes to exercise a severe control over the Bar and the Bench. As regards the Vatican, Machiavelli-Napoleon, with recent Italian history in mind, aims at the complete control of the Papacy. After inflaming popular hatred against the Church of Rome and its clergy, he will intervene to protect the Holy See, as Napoleon III did intervene, when “the chassepots worked wonders.” The Learned Elders propose to follow a similar plan: “when the people in their rage thro themselves on to the Vatican we shall appear as its protectors in order to stop bloodshed.” Ultimately, of course, they mean to destroy the church. The terrible chiefs of a Pan-Judaic conspiracy could hardly have any other plan of campaign. Machiavelli, naturally, does not go so far. Enough for him if the Pope is safely lodged in the Napoleonic pocket.

Is it necessary to produce further proofs that the majority of the Protocols are simply paraphrases of the Geneva Dialogues, with wicked Hebrew Elders, and finally an Israelite world ruler in the place of Machiavelli-Napoleon III., and the brutish goyim (Gentiles) substituted for the fickle masses, “gripped in a vice by poverty, ridden by sensuality, devoured by ambition,” whom Machiavelli intends to win?

The questions now arise, how did the originals become known in Russia, and why were the Protocols invented?

(To be continued.)

_________________________________

Excerpt form “THE LONDON TIMES”, Thursday, August 18, 1921, pp. 9, 10
THE PROTOCOL FORGERY. USE IN RUSSIAN POLITICS. METHODS OF SECRET POLICE. SOME CONCLUSIONS.

In articles from our Constantinople Correspondent, published yesterday and on Tuesday, we proved that the so-called “Protocols of the Elders of Zion,” which have been believed by some since their publication in 1905 to indicate a Jewish plot against civilization, were a clumsy forgery.

To-day our Correspondent reviews the use to which the Protocols were put in recent Russian politics, and summarizes his conclusions.

______________________________________

THE PROTOCOLS IN RUSSIA. (From Our Constantinople Correspondent.)

There is no evidence as to how the Geneva Dialogues reached Russia. The following theory may be suggested.

The Third Napoleon’s secret police, many of whom were Corsicans, must have known the existence of the Dialogues and almost certainly obtained them from some of the many persons arrested on the charge of political conspiracy during the reign of Napoleon III. In the last two decades of the 19th century and in the early years of the 20th there were always a few Corsicans in the Palace Police of the Tsar, and in the Russian secret service. Combining courage with secretiveness, a high average of intelligence with fidelity to his chief, the Corsican makes a first-class secret agent or bodyguard. It is not improbable that Corsicans who had been in the service of Napoleon III., or who had kinsmen in his secret service, brought the Geneva Dialogues to Russia, where some members of the Okhrana or some Court official obtained possession of them. But this is only a theory.

SERGEI NILUS.

As to the Protocols, they were first published in 1905 at Tsarskoye Selo in the second edition of a book entitled “The Great Within the Small,” the author of which was Professor Sergei Nilus. Professor Nilus has been described to the writer as a learned, pious, credulous Conservative, who combined much theological and some historical erudition with a singular lack of knowledge of the world. In January, 1917, Nilus, according to the introduction to the French version of the Protocols, published a book, entitled “It is here, at Our Doors!!” in which he republished the Protocols. In this latter work, according to the French version, Professor Nilus states that the manuscript of the Protocols was given him by Nicolaievich Sukhotin, a noble who afterwards became Vice-Governor of Stavropol.

According to the 1905 edition of the Protocols they were obtained by a woman who stole them from “one of the most influential and most highly initiated leaders of Freemasonry. The theft was accomplished at the close of the secret meeting of the ‘initiated’ in France, that nest of Jewish conspiracy.” But in the epilogue to the English version of the Protocols Professor Nilus says, “My friend found them in the safes at the headquarters of the Society of Zion which are at present situated in France.” According to the French version of the Protocols, Nilus in his book of 1917 states that the Protocols were notes of a plan submitted to the “Council of Elders” by Theodor Hertzl at the first Zionist Congress which was held at Basle, in August, 1897, and that Hertzl afterwards complained to the Zionist Committee of Action of the indiscreet publication of confidential information. The Protocols were signed by “Zionist representatives of the 33rd Degree” in Orient Freemasonry and were secretly removed from the complete file of the proceedings of the afore-said Zionist Congress, which was hidden in the “Chief Zionist office, which is situated in French territory.”

Such are Professor Nilus’ rather contradictory accounts of the origin of the Protocols. Not a very convincing story! Theodor Hertzl is dead; Sukhotin is dead, and where are the signatures of the Zionist representatives of the 33rd Degree!

Turning to the text of the Protocols, and comparing it with that of the Geneva Dialogues, one is struck by the absence of any effort on the part of the plagiarist to conceal his plagiarisms. The paraphrasing has been very careless; parts of sentences, whole phrases at times, are identical: the development of the thought is the same; there has been no attempt worth mentioning to alter the order of the Geneva Dialogues. The plagiarist has introduced Darwin, Marx, and Nietzsche in one passage in order to be “up to date”; he has given a Jewish colour to “Machiavelli’s” schemes for dictatorship, but he has utterly failed to conceal his indebtedness to the Geneva Dialogues. This gives the impression that the real writer of the Protocols, who does not seem to have had anything to do with Nilus and may have been some quite unimportant précis writer employed by the Court or by the Okhrana, was obliged to paraphrase the original at short notice. A proof of Jewish conspiracy was required at once as a weapon for the Conservatives against the Liberal elements in Russia.

Mr. X, the discoverer of the plagiarism, informs me that the Protocols, shortly after their discovery in 1901, four years before their publication by Professor Nilus, served a subsidiary purpose, namely, the first defeat of monsieur Phillippe, a French Hypnotist and thought-reader, who acquired considerable influence over the Tsar and the Tsaritsa at the beginning of the present century. The Court favourite was disliked by certain great personages, and incurred the natural jealousy of the monks, thaumaturgists, and similar adventurers who hoped to capture the Tsar through the Empress in their own interest, or in that of various cliques. Phillippe was not a Jew, but it was easy to represent a Frenchman from “that nest of Jewish conspiracy” as a Zionist agent. Phillippe fell from favour, to return to Russia and find himself once more in the Court’s good graces at a later date.

THE FIRST REVOLUTION

But the principal importance of the Protocols was their use during the first Russian Revolution. This revolution was supported by the Jewish element in Russia, notably by the Jewish Bund. The Okhrana organization knew this perfectly well; it had its Jewish and crypto-Jewish agents, one of whom afterwards assassinated M. Stolypin; it was in league with the powerful Conservative faction; with its allies it sought to gain the Tsar’s ear. For many years before the Russian revolution of 1905-1906 there had been a tale of a secret council of Rabbis who plotted ceaselessly against the Orthodox. The publication of the Protocols in 1905 certainly came at an opportune moment for the Conservatives. It is said by some Russians that the manuscript of the Protocols was communicated to the Tsar early in 1905, and that its communication contributed to the fall of the Liberal Prince Sviatopolk-Mirski in that year and the subsequent strong reactionary movement. However that may be, the date and place of publication of Nilus’s first edition of the Protocols are most significant now that we know that the originals which were given him were simply paraphrases.

CONCLUSIONS.

The following conclusions are, therefore, forced upon any reader of the two books who has studied Nilus’s account of the origin of the Protocols and has some acquaintance with Russian history in the years preceding the revolution of 1905-1906:—

1. The Protocols are largely a paraphrase of the book here provisionally called the “Geneva Dialogues.”​
2. They were designed to foster the belief among Russian Conservatives, and especially in Court circles, that the prime cause of discontent among the politically minded elements in Russia was not the repressive policy of the bureaucracy, but a world-wide Jewish conspiracy. They thus served as a weapon against the Russian Liberals, who urged the Tsar to make certain concessions to the intelligentsia.​
3. The Protocols were paraphrased very hastily and carelessly.​
4. Such portions of the Protocols as were not derived from the Geneva Dialogues were probably supplied by the Okhrana, which organization very possibly obtained them from the many Jews it employed to spy on their co-religionists.​

So much for the Protocols. They have done harm not so much, in the writer’s opinion, by arousing anti-Jewish feeling, which is older than the Protocols and will persist in all countries where there is a Jewish problem until that problem is solved; rather, they have done harm by persuading all sorts of mostly well-to-do people that every recent manifestation of discontent on the part of the poor is an unnatural phenomenon, a factitious agitation caused by a secret society of Jews.
------
 

Sibi

Star
Joined
Aug 11, 2021
Messages
1,563
And, on top of it, there's pretentious victim-pampering by (majority) of the Christian followers (even after probably being cognizant of what Talmud actually has in store for the individual named Jesus Christ).
Jesus is not mentioned in the Talmud.
 

Sibi

Star
Joined
Aug 11, 2021
Messages
1,563
"Kill-the-Jews" propaganda in Arabic Countries

Video in article link
Head of Psychiatry at Cairo's 'Ein Shams University, Prof. Adel Sadeq, on the Psychological Make-Up of a Suicide Bomber. Iqra TV (Saudi Arabia)

Interviewer: Let's begin by asking about the psychological structure make-up of the martyr. Who is the martyr? Who is this young woman, about to be married in two or thee months, a 17-year-old beauty queen, who straps on an explosives belt and turns herself into a human bomb? What is the psychological make-up of a martyr?​
Prof. Adel Sadeq: The psychological make-up is that of a person who loves life.​
Interviewer: Allah be praised! He's seeking death!​
Sadeq: This is the thing that may appear peculiar to people who see the human soul as the most supreme thing. They are incapable of understanding this, because their cultural structure has no concepts such as self-sacrifice and honor. These concepts do not exist in some cultures. Therefore, when confronted with (suicide bombers), they find themselves in a state of denial, total denial. They think that this is impossible, and therefore they begin to present idiotic and silly interpretations, stemming from ignorance.​
Interviewer: So, a martyr is someone who loves life!​
Sadeq: Of course. When he is martyred, he reaches the pinnacle of happiness. He reaches maximal ecstasy. You and I may never know such ecstasy. We feel happiness when we pray to Allah, or, for example, when we win a large sum of money, or have a great success. You feel happiness, joy, as if you are flying. The maximal ecstasy, and the maximal happiness - and I am talking as a professional, as a psychiatrist - comes the moment... Like when the director said to you: ten, nine, eight, seven, six, two, six, five, four, three, two - and then he presses the button to blow himself up. The most beautiful moment, for which he cannot wait, is the moment he says "one - hop" - this person explodes, and he feels he's flying, because he knows for sure that he does not die, and this is the difference between us and them.​
(Westerners) believe that he turns into a corpse that burns and flies through the air. That's the kind of culture they have. But, in fact, this is the act of transition to another, beautiful, world, and he knows very well that within seconds he will see the light of his Creator. He will be as close as he can possibly be to the Creator.​
On the strategic level, there must be a pan-Arab plan to reach our goal. Our common goal is to liberate Palestine from the Israeli aggressors. To use words that people do not like anymore: we will throw Israel into the sea. This phrase, by the way, was the truth. Either they will throw us into the sea, or we will throw them into the sea. There is no compromise. Coexistence is all (nonsense)...​
Interviewer: It's either us or them​
 

Sibi

Star
Joined
Aug 11, 2021
Messages
1,563
Kill the Jews Propaganda in Arab Countries

Nowhere on earth will one find Israeli academics - or Jewish academics outside Israel - glorifying self-destruction in the slaughter of Arabs as "The height of ecstasy and happiness..."

Notice that Prof. Sadeq's demeanor is thoughtful and cheerful, as befits the head of a Department of Psychiatry. This relaxed intellectual style makes what Prof. Sadeq is saying all the more nightmarish. And note how smoothly he makes the transition from hysterical fanaticism to a Jew-obsessed political strategy. In one sentence we are told that by blowing oneself up the young terrorist "… knows very well that within seconds he will see the light of his Creator. He will be at the closest possible point to Allah." And in the very next sentence we are told that, "On the strategic level, there must be a pan-Arab plan to reach our goal."

What a speedy transition from ecstatic psychosis to practical politics!

To whom does the "our" in Prof. Sadeq's "our goal" refer? Not to Palestinians - Prof. Sadeq is an Egyptian citizen of standing. This is, as he informs us, a "Pan-Arab plan." And what is to be the goal of this Pan Arab plan? To advance Arab culture? To free Arab women from centuries of oppression? To combat social inequality? To educate the illiterate? To improve health care? To develop a progressive and tolerant approach, allowing Berbers in Algeria to be Berbers, Assyrians in Iraq to be Assyrians, Copts in Egypt to be Copts - even Jews to be Jews? Would this plan involve the full democratization of political life in the Arab countries? Elimination of all hereditary and non-hereditary dictatorships?

No. The goal of Pan Arab striving is: to "…throw Israel into the sea." Why? Why on earth should 300,000,000 Arabs be united and mobilized around the goal of throwing the little country of Israel into the sea? Because, "Either they will throw us into the sea, or we will throw them into the sea."

In Arab propaganda, "the Jews" serve the same role as the character Goldstein in George Orwell's famous book, 1984. Goldstein's pictures were shown everywhere; he was always plotting to destroy society, to enslave, to ruin; he was always just barely defeated, and then only in the nick of time. All forms of dissent were thus attributed to the work of Goldstein, and with him as the excuse, dissent was crushed.

This in part explains the billions of dollars the rich Arab states have poured into paying organizers, creating TV stations, even satellite stations, setting up mosques and schools world wide - all teaching that "The Jews" must be killed. By fanning hysterical hatred and fear, the Arab leaders prevent people from fighting for health care, an end to social inequality, full cultural rights for minorities, full democratization of political life, and all the rest.

In the Arab world, the most authoritarian, anti-Jewish, religion-cloaked gangsters have been elevated to power by the combined meddling of the Great Powers (starting with Britain and Nazi Germany) and also of the rich Arab states, especially Saudi Arabia and the Emirates, which manipulate the other Muslim states like rich uncles. Since the time (in 1921) when the British made Hajj Amin al-Husseini the dominant leader in the Palestine Mandate area, Arabs in general and Palestinians in particular have been mobilized around hatred of Jews. The very existence of Israel is presented as an affront to Islam. This idea - that Jewish people, by virtue of their mere existence on "Arab soil" are attacking Islam - is now used worldwide to foment Muslim fanaticism.
 

Sibi

Star
Joined
Aug 11, 2021
Messages
1,563
Will Disarming Israel Bring Peace in the Middle East?

Are Arabs fighting Israel are waging a classic struggle for national liberation? All they want is a state of their own in Judea and Samaria, otherwise known as the West Bank, and the Gaza Strip. Arab violence is viewed as stemming from supposed Israeli suppression of national aspirations, the hope is that if Israel showers Arabs with concessions, extremists will be isolated; moderates (once meaning Yasser Arafat and now meaning Mahmoud Abbas, otherwise known as Abu Mazen, President of the Palestinian Authority) will be empowered; peace will reign.

The so-called Palestinian movement is not an outgrowth of the history of Palestinian people, but an artificial creation of the Arab states, with much help, at various times, from Great Powers, such as the former Soviet Union, the United States, Britain and others. According to the Egyptian State Information Service, the PLO was formed in 1964 by 13 leaders of Arab states at an Arab League summit meeting:

“They approved many decisions, including holding the summit annually, establishing the unified supreme Arab command and forming an organization representing the Palestinian people.”​
-- From the Egyptian State Information Service’s history of Arab Summit meetings.​

The founding charter of the PLO:

“Article 24: This Organization does not exercise any territorial sovereignty over the West Bank in the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan, on the Gaza Strip or in the Himmah Area.”​

The national liberation movement is now claiming to be focused on the demand for a state in the West Bank and Gaza Strip included in its founding document an acknowledgement in principle that Palestinian sovereignty does not include the West Bank and Gaza Strip? The only part of historic Palestine, as the PLO calls it, that the PLO then demanded was the part then comprising Israel. If you look at the current charter of the PLO, you will search in vain for the above-quoted text. Why? Because the charter was rewritten in 1968. Article 24, as quoted above, excluding the West Bank and Gaza from Palestinian sovereignty, was removed.

What happened between 1964 and 1968 to transform historic Palestine? What happened was that the Arab states lost the 1967 war against Israel.

Consequently, Egypt and Jordan lost control of Gaza and the West Bank, respectively. That is, these areas went from being controlled by Arab regimes that were not, according to the PLO definition, ‘Palestinian,’ to being controlled by Jews, whereupon they entered the realm of ‘Palestinian’ sovereignty. The so-called Palestinian national liberation movement is, in fact, not a movement for liberation at all, but an attack force cloaked in the rhetoric of national liberation, a rhetoric chosen as a public relations device, because it has worldwide appeal? That this ‘movement’ was not created to strive for national liberation, but as a weapon against Jews?

Arabs live in Gaza; until now, Jews have lived there too. Gaza Jews built towns and villages out of what was previously considered un-farmable land. Junk land. In 1967, when Israel seized Gaza from Egypt, that land was inhabited by nobody. These are indisputable facts. Arab leaders tell the world that their struggle is not against Jews per se, but against a supposedly expansionist Israel. All they want is a state for the Palestinians; so, for national liberation, not against Jews.

If Arab organizations were really fighting for a positive (self-determination) and not a negative (against Jews), what would have been their attitude towards the Jews who lived in Gaza for 38 years? They would have welcomed Jewish individuals to stay. The Palestinian Authority would have published official documents guaranteeing protection of the rights of what would be, upon the departure of Israeli forces, a Jewish minority. And they would have guaranteed that attacks on Jewish people, prior to the proposed pullout, were punished as sharply as possible, thus making an international statement. This would be a brilliant stroke, creating the impression that Arab leaders were anti-racist. It would have weakened Jewish opposition to turning Gaza over to full Arab control.

Why haven’t Arab leaders taken this politically shrewd stand? There is a substantial Arab minority in Israel, with normal rights; indeed, Israeli Arabs enjoy more rights than those in any Arab state. For example, in what Arab state can Arabs organize and campaign for government office without fear of police repression? Israeli Jews who physically assault Israeli Muslims are subject to the extreme penalties of the law. In Israel it is a hate crime, and one that is actively prosecuted, to call for physical attacks on Muslims or make remarks considered insulting to Muslims.

So, even if the Arab Palestinian movement is based on hatred of Jews, it would have been smart for Arab leaders to welcome Gaza Jews to remain, thus telling the world that the Arab movement is just as humane as Jews.

No Arab leader invited Jews to stay; none promised to protect them from attack. Quite the contrary, prior to the implementation of ‘disengagement,’ every Palestinian Arab faction attacked the plan to evict Jews from Gaza as inadequate and insincere. Not only did no Arab faction ask Jewish residents to stay in Gaza, but none denounced the continuing attempts to murder them.

Palestinian Authority leaders sometimes suggested that these terrorist attacks should temporarily be halted lest they interfere with the planned evictions. But why would any terrorist group take such suggestions seriously when mass media continued to incite Arabs to murder Jews and laud those who did it?

Case in point: on Saturday, June 18th, CNN reported that Mahmoud Abbas, alias Abu Mazen, President of the Palestinian Authority, held a joint press conference with US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice. For months, Arab terrorists had been shooting at and launching rockets at Gaza Jews.

Ms. Rice told the assembled reporters about her meetings with Arab officials and spoke of the need for a “peaceful withdrawal,” not mentioning that rockets were targeting Jews and that Arab terrorists were trying to kill soldiers protecting the Jews. These were non-events.

As for Abbas, he was Orwellian. “We discussed with Dr Rice the issue of the calm in general and the Palestinian factions’ commitment to this calm. We will continue to maintain the calm to reach a favorable result, whereby everybody will be committed so as to move to other steps after the withdrawal.” -- Transcript of June 18th press conference.

Notice that Abbas spoke of “continu[ing] to maintain calm,” calling the assembled world media’s attention to “the Palestinian factions’ commitment to this calm.” So, War is Peace; Murdering Jews is Calm.

The world writes this off on the grounds that the attacks are supposedly the work of Hamas, which is supposedly the fringe of Arab politics. The idea is that supposed moderates, like Abbas, don’t dare to oppose Hamas terror, lest they isolate themselves. If this bizarre defense were accurate, it would mean that the Arab population in Gaza was so thoroughly indoctrinated to hate Jews that even with Israel about to pull all security forces out - and evict all Jewish residents - no Arab politician dared to say killing Jews is wrong, let alone welcome Jews as citizens in a future Arab state. And this despite the international political gain from making such statements, even if they were lies.

Al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigades is a terrorist group controlled by Fatah, which leads the PLO, and whose candidate in the Arab election was Abu Mazen, alias Mahmoud Abbas, now president of the Palestinian Authority. That is, the guy who spoke alongside Secretary Rice at the June 18th press conference.


Arab Liberation


The world has been conditioned to think it is perfectly acceptable for the Arab “liberation” movement to enthusiastically support killing Jews, even though it would be a political coup for them to pretend that they morally oppose such killings.

Thus has the once honorable idea of national liberation been transformed into its opposite - a license for race hate, the very thing national liberation was supposed to combat. Real national liberation movements work by embracing potential brothers, rather than organizing for their murder.

Egyptian sources pay lip service to preventing terrorist smuggling and attacks on Israel. But even in statements and articles expressing a half-hearted commitment, the Egyptians make clear they will offer at most a token effort to combat terror. For example, one Egyptian article on Egypt’s return to Gaza talks about maintaining security and combating Islamism, but then the article ends with a quote from Diaa Rashwan, described as an Egyptian security expert:

Incitement to murder Jews is routine on Palestine Authority TV and radio. For example, PA-controlled TV has weekly sermons preaching hatred and murder of Jews. As reported by MEMRI, which monitors the Arab media, "Each Khatib (preacher) is a paid employee of the Palestinian Authority (PA). The sermons are broadcast live every Friday at noon from mosques under control of the PA and are shown on PA television." The so-called Roadmap Plan supposedly requires the PA to suppress terror and incitement to terror, but these hate-sermons are still being broadcast. To read a recent sermon, go to http://tinyurl.com/76qv2 There you will also find a link to a streaming video of the sermon.

The revised PLO charter, which no longer excludes the Gaza Strip and West Bank from ‘Palestinian’ sovereignty, can be read at http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/mideast/plocov
 
Joined
May 18, 2018
Messages
4,046
Protocols of the Elder of Zion - A Fraud
In 1921, the London Times presented conclusive proof that the Protocols was a "clumsy plagiarism." The Times confirmed that the Protocols had been copied in large part from a.......
------
Actually the London Times published them in full in 1919 as a verified document, it was only after the Illuminati Astor family bought the Times in 1921 that they started publishing articles that they were a ”fraud”, when it’s clear they’re not.
————————————————————————————————————-
An Introduction to the "Jewish Protocols", by Henry Ford

The documents most frequently mentioned by those who are interested in the theory of Jewish World Power rather than in the actual operation of that power in the world today, are those 24 documents known as "The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion."
The Protocols have attracted much attention in Europe, having become the center of an important storm of opinion in England only recently, but discussion of them in the United States has been limited. These are the documents concerning which the Department of Justice was making inquiries more than a year ago, and which were given publication in London by Eyre and Spottiswoode, the official printers to the British Government.
Who it was that first entitled these documents with the name of the "Elders of Zion" is not known. It would be possible without serious mutilation of the documents to remove all hint of Jewish authorship, and yet retain all the main points of the most comprehensive program for world subjugation that has ever come to public knowledge.
Yet it must be said that thus to eliminate all hint of Jewish authorship would be to bring out a number of contradictions which do not exist in the Protocols in their present form. The purpose of the plan revealed in the Protocols is to undermine all authority in order that a new authority in the form of autocracy may be set up. Such a plan could not emanate from a ruling class which already possessed authority, although it might emanate from anarchists. But anarchists do not avow autocracy as the ultimate condition they seek. The authors might be conceived as a company of French Subversives such as existed at the time of the French Revolution and had the infamous Duc d'Orleans as their leader, but this would involve a contradiction between the fact that those Subversives have passed away, and the fact that the program announced in these Protocols is being steadily carried out, not only in France, but throughout Europe and very noticeably in the United States.
In their present form which bears evidence of being their original form, there is no contradiction. The allegation of Jewish authorship seems essential to the consistency of the plan.
If these documents were the forgeries which Jewish apologists claim them to be, the forgers would probably have taken pains to make Jewish authorship so clear that their anti-Semitic purpose could easily have been detected. But only twice is the term "Jew" used in them. After one has read much further than the average reader usually cares to go into such matters, one

comes upon the plans for the establishment of the World Autocrat, and only then it is made clear of what lineage he is to be.
But all through the documents there is left no doubt as to the people against whom the plan is aimed. It is not aimed against aristocracy as such. It is not aimed against capital as such. It is not aimed against government as such. Very definite provisions are made for the enlistment of aristocracy, capital and government for the execution of the plan. It is aimed against the people of the world who are called "Gentiles." It is the frequent mention of "Gentiles" that really decides the purpose of the documents. Most of the destructive type of "liberal" plans aim at the enlistment of the people as helpers; this plan aims at the degeneration of the people in order that they may be reduced to confusion of mind and thus manipulated. Popular movements of a "liberal" kind are to be encouraged, all the disruptive philosophies in religion, economics, politics and domestic life are to be sown and watered, for the purpose of so disintegrating social solidarity that a definite plan, herein set forth, may be put through without notice, and the people then molded to it when the fallacy of these philosophies is shown.
The formula of speech is not, "We Jews will do this," but "The Gentiles will be made to think and do these things." With the exception of a few instances in the closing Protocols, the only distinctive racial term used is "Gentiles."
To illustrate: the first indication of this kind comes in the first Protocol in this way:
"The great qualities of the people -- honesty and frankness -- are essentially vices in politics, because they dethrone more surely and more certainly than does the strongest enemy. These qualities are attributes of Gentile rule; we certainly must not be guided by them."
And again:
"On the ruins of the hereditary aristocracy of the Gentiles we have set up the aristocracy of our educated class, and over all the aristocracy of money. We have established the basis of this new aristocracy on the basis of riches, which we control, and on the science guided by our wise men."
Again:
"We will force up wages, which however will be of no benefit to workers, for we at the same time will cause a rise in the prices of prime necessities, pretending that this is due to the decline of agriculture and of cattle raising. We will also artfully and deeply undermine the sources of production by instilling in the workmen ideas of anarchy and encourage them in the use of alcohol, at the same time taking measures to drive all the intellectual forces of the Gentiles from the land."
(A forger with anti-Semitic malice might have written this any time within the last five years, but these words were in print at least 14 years ago according to British evidence, a copy having been in the British Museum since 1906, and they were circulated in Russia a number of years prior.)

The above point continues: "That the true situation shall not be noticed by the Gentiles prematurely we will mask it by a pretended effort to serve the working classes and promote great economic principles, for which an active propaganda will be carried on through our economic theories."
These quotations will illustrate the style of the Protocols in making reference to the parties involved. It is "we" for the writers, and "Gentiles" for those who are being written about. This is brought out very clearly in the Fourteenth Protocol:
"In this divergence between Gentiles and ourselves in ability to think and reason is to be seen clearly the seal of our election as the chosen people, as higher human beings, in contrast with the Gentiles who have merely instinctive and animal minds. They observe, but they do not foresee, and they invent nothing (except perhaps material things). It is clear from this that nature herself predestined us to rule and guide the world."
This, of course, has been the Jewish method of dividing humanity from the earliest times. The world was only Jew and Gentile; all that was not Jew was Gentile.
The use of the word Jew in the Protocol may be illustrated by this passage in the eighth section:
"For the time being, until it will be safe to give responsible government positions to our brother Jews, we shall entrust them to people whose past and whose characters are such that there is an abyss between them and the people."
This is the practice known as using "Gentile fronts," which is extensively practiced in the financial world today in order to cover up the evidences of Jewish control. How much progress has been made since these words were written is indicated by the occurrence at the San Francisco convention when the name of Judge Brandeis was proposed for President. It is reasonably to be expected that the public mind will be made more and more familiar with the idea of Jewish occupancy -- which will be really a short step from the present degree of influence which the Jews exercise -- of the highest office in the government. There is no function of the American Presidency in which the Jews have not already secretly assisted in a very important degree. Actual occupancy of the office is not necessary to enhance their power, but to promote certain things which parallel very closely the plans outlined in the Protocols now before us.
Another point which the reader of the Protocols will notice is that the tone of exhortation is entirely absent from the documents. They are not propaganda. They are not efforts to stimulate the ambitions or activity of those to whom they are addressed. They are as cool as a legal paper and as matter-of-fact as a table of statistics. There is none of the "Let us rise, my brothers" stuff about them. There is no "Down with the Gentiles" hysteria. These Protocols, if indeed they were made by Jews and confided to Jews, or if they do contain certain principles of a Jewish World Program, were certainly not intended for the firebrands but for the carefully prepared and tested initiates of the higher groups.
Jewish apologists have asked, "Is it conceivable that if there were such a world program on the part of the Jews, they would reduce it to writing and publish it?" But there is no evidence that

these Protocols were ever uttered otherwise than in spoken words by those who put them forth. The Protocols as we have them are apparently the notes of lectures which were made by someone who heard them. Some of them are lengthy; some of them are brief. The assertion which has always been made in connection with the Protocols since they have become known is that they are the notes of lectures delivered to Jewish students presumably somewhere in France or Switzerland. The attempt to make them appear to be of Russian origin is absolutely forestalled by the point of view, the reference to the times and certain grammatical indications.
The tone certainly fits the supposition that they were originally lectures given to students, for their purpose is clearly not to get a program accepted but to give information concerning a program which is represented as being already in process of fulfillment. There is no invitation to join forces or to offer opinions. Indeed it is specifically announced that neither discussion nor opinions are desired. ("While preaching liberalism to the Gentiles, we shall hold our own people and our own agents in unquestioning obedience." "The scheme of administration must emanate from a single brain * * * Therefore, we may know the plan of action, but we must not discuss
it, lest we destroy its unique character * * * The inspired work of our leader therefore must not be thrown before a crowd to be torn to pieces, or even before a limited group.")
Moreover, taking the Protocols at their face value, it is evident that the program outlined in these lecture notes was not a new one at the time the lectures were given. There is no evidence of its being of recent arrangement. There is almost the tone of a tradition, or a religion, in it all, as if it had been handed down from generation to generation through the medium of specially trusted and initiated men. There is no note of new discovery or fresh enthusiasm in it, but the certitude and calmness of facts long known and policies long confirmed by experiment.
This point of the age of the program is touched upon at least twice in the Protocols themselves. In the First Protocol this paragraph occurs:
"Already in ancient times we were the first to shout the words, 'Liberty, Equality, Fraternity,' among the people. These words have been repeated many times by unconscious poll-parrots, flocking from all sides to this bait, with which they have ruined the prosperity of the world and true personal freedom * * * The presumably clever and intellectual Gentiles did not understand the symbolism of the uttered words; did not observe their contradiction in meaning; did not notice that in nature there is no equality * * *"
The other reference to the program's finality is found in the Thirteenth Protocol: "Questions of policy, however, are permitted to no one except those who have
originated the policy and have directed it for many centuries."
Can this be a reference to a secret Jewish Sanhedrin, self-perpetuating within a certain Jewish
caste from generation to generation?
Again, it must be said that the originators and directors here referred to cannot be at present any ruling caste, for all that the program contemplates is directly opposed to the interests of such a caste. It cannot refer to any national aristocratic group, like the Junkers of Germany, for the

methods which are proposed are the very ones which would render powerless such a group. It cannot refer to any but a people who have no government, who have everything to gain and nothing to lose, and who can keep themselves intact amid a crumbling world. There is only one group that answers that description.
Again, a reading of the Protocols makes it clear that the speaker himself was not seeking for honor. There is a complete absence of personal ambition throughout the document. All plans and purposes and expectations are merged in the future of Israel, which future, it would seem, can only be secured by the subtle breaking down of certain world ideas held by the Gentiles. The Protocols speak of what has been done, what was being done at the time these words were given, and what remained to be done. Nothing like them in completeness of detail, in breadth of plan and in deep grasp of the hidden springs of human action has ever been known. They are verily terrible in their mastery of the secrets of life, equally terrible in their consciousness of that mastery. Truly they would merit the opinion which Jews have recently cast upon them, that they were the work of an inspired madman, were it not that what is written in the Protocols in words is also written upon the life of today in deeds and tendencies.
The criticisms which these Protocols pass upon the Gentiles for their stupidity are just. It is impossible to disagree with a single item in the Protocols' description of Gentile mentality and veniality. Even the most astute of the Gentile thinkers have been fooled into receiving as the motions of progress what has only been insinuated into the common human mind by the most insidious systems of propaganda.
It is true that here and there a thinker has arisen to say that science so-called was not science at all. It is true that here and there a thinker has arisen to say that the so-called economic laws both of conservatives and radicals were not laws at all, but artificial inventions. It is true that occasionally a keen observer has asserted that the recent debauch of luxury and extravagance was not due to the natural impulses of the people at all, but was systematically stimulated, foisted upon them by design. It is true that a few have discerned that more than half of what passes for "public opinion" is mere hired applause and booing and has never impressed the public mind.
But even with these clues here and there, for the most part disregarded, there has never been enough continuity and collaboration between those who were awake, to follow all the clues to their source. The chief explanation of the hold which the Protocols have had on many of the leading statesmen of the world for several decades is that they explain whence all these false influences come and what their purpose is. They give a clue to the modern maze. It is now time for the people to know. And whether the Protocols are judged as proving anything concerning the Jews or not, they constitute an education in the way the masses are turned about like sheep by influences which they do not understand. It is almost certain that once the principles of the Protocols are known widely and understood by the people, the criticism which they now rightly make of the Gentile mind will no longer hold good.
It is the purpose of future articles in this series to study these documents and to answer out of their contents all the questions that may arise concerning them.
Before that work is begun, one question should be answered -- "Is there likelihood of the

program of the Protocols being carried through to success?" The program is successful already. In many of its most important phases it is already a reality. But this need not cause alarm, for the chief weapon to be used against such a program, both in its completed and uncompleted parts, is clear publicity. Let the people know. Arousing the people, alarming the people, appealing to the passions of the people is the method of the plan outlined in the Protocols. The antidote is merely enlightening the people.
That is the only purpose of these articles. Enlightenment dispels prejudice. It is as desirable to dispel the prejudice of the Jew as of the Gentile. Jewish writers too frequently assume that the prejudice is all on one side. The Protocols themselves ought to have the widest circulation among the Jewish people, in order that they may check those things which are bringing suspicion upon their name.
[THE DEARBORN INDEPENDENT, issue of 24 July 1920]
 
Last edited:

Stucky

Star
Joined
May 17, 2020
Messages
3,451
Three posts by sibi. Three posts riddled, nay, infested, with propaganda. Regarding posts 145,146, 147. Back in 2012 or 2013 an Israeli judge said the following,

"Note that we are dealing with an attempt to prove a policy of incitement. It is reasonable to assume that if it is a policy, the PA leadership would make use of the most popular media – newspapers and television networks – to get its messages across. That is so because that’s obviously the way its messages would reach the largest and broadest audience. So the conclusion is that the plaintiffs did not prove the existence of a policy of incitement, though, as I already mentioned, they have proven conclusively the existence incitement in the Palestinian media, incitement which is often, as appears from the recording tendered here, nothing but nauseating slander.”

Regarding post 147 and specifically Nationalism. Palestinian nationalism has been around for at least 150 years and i think everyone interested in the subject will be WELL AWARE of Palestinian Nationalism during the 1920s'.

Then we have this absolute corker of a barefaced lie.


when Israel seized Gaza from Egypt, that land was inhabited by nobody. These are indisputable facts.
ROFL "indisputable facts"...what a clown!
 

Maldarker

Star
Joined
Mar 23, 2021
Messages
2,064
Maybe we can list Jews we kind of like. I kind of liked Bob Dylan when he made some good albums in the mid sixties. Honorable mention to Brian Epstein who managed the Beatles. Phil Ochs did his best to try and stop the Vietnam war but got bumped off by the CIA. Maybe we can make a game of this lol. Who can come up with Jews they like. Simon and Garfunkel made some music that was decent and worth listening to. That's about it off the top of my head LOL.
Okay
This is a song that uh
There's a lot of Christmas songs out there and uh
not too many Hanukkah songs
So uh
I wrote a song for all those nice little Jewish kids
who don't get to hear any Hanukkah songs
Here we go
Put on your yarmulke
Here comes Hanukkah
So much funukah
To celebrate Hanukkah
Hanukkah is the festival of lights
Instead of one day of presents, we have eight crazy nights
When you feel like the only kid in town without a Christmas tree
Here's a list of people who are Jewish just like you and me
David Lee Roth lights the menorah
So do James Caan, Kirk Douglas, and the late Dinah Shore-ah
Guess who eats together at the Carnegie Deli
Bowser from Sha Na Na and Arthur Fonzerelli
Paul Newman's half Jewish, Goldie Hawn's half too
Put them together, what a fine lookin' Jew
You don't need "Deck The Halls" or "Jingle Bell Rock"
'Cause you can spin a dreidel with Captain Kirk and Mr. Spock- both Jewish
Put on your yarmulke
It's time for Hanukkah
The owner of the Seattle Supersonicahs
Celebrates Hanukkah
O.J. Simpson, not a Jew
But guess who is? Hall of famer Rod Carew- he converted
We got Ann Landers and her sister Dear Abby
Harrison Ford's a quarter Jewish- not too shabby
Some people think that Ebenezer Scrooge is
Well he's not, but guess who is
All three Stooges
So many Jews are in showbiz
Tom Cruise isn't, but I heard his agent is
Tell your friend Veronica
It's time to celebrate Hanukkah
I hope I get a harmonicah
Oh this lovely, lovely Hanukkah
So drink your gin and tonicah
And smoke your marijuanikah
If you really, really wannakah
Have a happy, happy, happy, happy Hanukkah
Happy Hanukkah
Source: LyricFind
Songwriters: Kenny Gorelick / Walter Afanasieff
The Chanukah Song lyrics © Bluewater Music Corp., Sony/ATV Music Publishing LLC
 

FilthPig

Veteran
Joined
Jul 28, 2021
Messages
741
Okay
This is a song that uh
There's a lot of Christmas songs out there and uh
not too many Hanukkah songs
So uh
I wrote a song for all those nice little Jewish kids
who don't get to hear any Hanukkah songs
Here we go
Put on your yarmulke
Here comes Hanukkah
So much funukah
To celebrate Hanukkah
Hanukkah is the festival of lights
Instead of one day of presents, we have eight crazy nights
When you feel like the only kid in town without a Christmas tree
Here's a list of people who are Jewish just like you and me
David Lee Roth lights the menorah
So do James Caan, Kirk Douglas, and the late Dinah Shore-ah
Guess who eats together at the Carnegie Deli
Bowser from Sha Na Na and Arthur Fonzerelli
Paul Newman's half Jewish, Goldie Hawn's half too
Put them together, what a fine lookin' Jew
You don't need "Deck The Halls" or "Jingle Bell Rock"
'Cause you can spin a dreidel with Captain Kirk and Mr. Spock- both Jewish
Put on your yarmulke
It's time for Hanukkah
The owner of the Seattle Supersonicahs
Celebrates Hanukkah
O.J. Simpson, not a Jew
But guess who is? Hall of famer Rod Carew- he converted
We got Ann Landers and her sister Dear Abby
Harrison Ford's a quarter Jewish- not too shabby
Some people think that Ebenezer Scrooge is
Well he's not, but guess who is
All three Stooges
So many Jews are in showbiz
Tom Cruise isn't, but I heard his agent is
Tell your friend Veronica
It's time to celebrate Hanukkah
I hope I get a harmonicah
Oh this lovely, lovely Hanukkah
So drink your gin and tonicah
And smoke your marijuanikah
If you really, really wannakah
Have a happy, happy, happy, happy Hanukkah
Happy Hanukkah
Source: LyricFind
Songwriters: Kenny Gorelick / Walter Afanasieff
The Chanukah Song lyrics © Bluewater Music Corp., Sony/ATV Music Publishing LLC
Nothing beats this song though.
I like the "goyim has no soul" part the most.

 

TempestOfTempo

Superstar
Joined
Jan 29, 2018
Messages
8,076
The average IQ of Israel is 95, below average. https://brainstats.com/en/average-iq/israel
i dont have the stat, but Jews are also 20% of Harvard but only 2% of top SAT scorers. (Roughly, again I don’t have the stat, but I read about it a few years ago)
Your tribe doesn’t come to own 95% of world media, and the staff of all of them are majority Jewish because they all meritoriously happened to be the best in their field
View attachment 77064
Same with every Hollywood studio. It’s because of nepotism, or an intense in grip preference which I agree they evolutionarily adapted to have.
i dont accept that they were “forced” into the profession of usury, that their only option in the Middle Ages was to be immoral loan sharks en masse. That sounds a little too convenient, especially when in biblical times Jesus condemned them for money lending. They had full power over their kingdom at that time, no one was “forcing” them to usuriously lend money, just like no one is forcing them to control the fractional reserve banking system today.

I disagree that Jewish comedians succeeded because they were the best in their field for sure. It’s all marketing. I’ve seen comedians locally that are 100x funnier than those guys, but they’ll never get signed for a tv show. They’ll never have a manager working around the clock to market their shows so they sell out. There was one singer, I think Allanis Morissette (Jewish coincidentally), who was a nobody and wasn’t selling shows. Her manager plastered signs all around town saying, “Show Saturday:Sold out”, and through tactics like that managed to actually sell out big shows for her and get her a career when no one was interested.

Watch Seinfeld without the laugh track. It’s literally not funny. its all marketing and tv magic.
They the add the laugh track and NPCs react with the herd. In reality, it’s a show about 4 soulless psychopaths. You wouldn’t even crack a smile if you came across this and it didn’t have the laugh track. Just marketing and management.

Look at the jews staffing the Biden administration. (The trump, Obama, and Bush administrations etc were the same)
you really believe all these people happened to end up there, because given a blind test they were the best people in the country for the job? And being majority Jewish is just a coincidence. That seems really implausible. Especially with people like they have (richard Levine for eg)

Sure if you have a copyright dispute or want a transgender surgery, likely it’s going to be a Jewish lawyer or doctor helping you out. Notably, being a doctor changed from a very humble blue collar profession in the 18th and 19th centuries to an extremely high profit and gate kept industry, based on drugs made from petroleum instead of natural remedies while Jewish prominence steadily came to the fore there.

As Sam Hyde asked in his pop quiz 22:30
despite making up less than 1% of the population, jews absolutely dominate every important field, with most key figures in media, finance, and academia being “hardcore Jewish”.
This fact is
a)pure coincidence (racist question)
b) a testament to their hard work ethic
c)the endgame for the 6000 year Talmudic Jewish conspiracy

(answerer) c

interviewer- no you are racist, you don’t even get to hear the answer, your career is over, you are doxxed, you will never work in this town again.
the answer is a, this fact is pure coincidence, and even thinking about it is highly racist


So yeah, ethnocentrism,nepotism,collusion,usury and immoral business dealings having absolutely nothing to do with it, and
getting kicked out of 109 nations 359 times in 2000 years was all just goys being antisemitic for no reason, is unlikely in all senses.
"It’s literally not funny. its all marketing and tv magic"
Thank you so much for posting that. Totally proves your quote true.
 

TempestOfTempo

Superstar
Joined
Jan 29, 2018
Messages
8,076
Talmud is a touchy subject because its content is rather straight forward and cant be spinned.No wonder Sibi is pretending it dont exist. It's for the eyes of the Rabbis only and every non-jew who happens to read it must be put to death,no ?
Since he is calling me a troll i guess im gonna "troll" with some more facts.I kinda like it how upset they get when they encounter facts they cant spin or disprove. They just get mad and pretend those facts dont exist.
Trolololol ...








Although the Rabbi's may have issued that edict, there were plenty of Jewish heroes fighting for the US during WW2. Thats a good example of problems with the Jewish power structure, but also an example of how Jewish peoples as individuals can still stand tall.
 
Joined
Oct 31, 2021
Messages
629
Nothing beats this song though.
I like the "goyim has no soul" part the most.

Preposterous. Abhorrent.

The brainwashing is over the roof. Albeit, via staying over the roof, unfortunately, immense arrogance/ego it brought.

Only the understanding of TheCreator with a beard and white skin living somewhere in the sky can forcefully, but at the same time swiftly, instill/administer such kind of brainwashing.

The situation is so dire and hopeless that I wish the old man/male with a beard living in clouds were genuinely true.

Alas, as we sow, so shall we reap. No going around it. The OmniPresent, OmniPotent is exactly that, OmniPresent, OmniPotent.
 
Joined
Mar 30, 2017
Messages
3,578
Its Okay.
Don't make it personal.
Not surprisingly, Sibi's not being truthful. Jesus is mentioned in the Talmud, and clearly not with reverence:

"Talmud, Gittin 57a - Jesus is in hell where he is boiling in hot excrement."

Peter Schafer also discusses it in his book, "Jesus in the Talmud":

 
Last edited:
Joined
Oct 31, 2021
Messages
629
Not surprisingly, Sibi's not being truthful. Jesus is mentioned in the Talmud, and clearly not with reverence:

"Talmud, Gittin 57a - Jesus is in hell where he is boiling in hot excrement."

Paul Schafer also discusses it in his book, "Jesus in the Talmud":

I know blud. That is why you do not find any admittance/agreement in my response there.

For me, the problem is, merely the individual behind the handle Sibi accepting/not-accepting to anything, won't make any of a difference tbrh. (But that doesn't mean that I am supporting to what the individual behind the handle Sibi believe, either).

I am just understanding, taking in everything and seeing - mass anhiliation and devestation on the planet in the near future, if not too soon. That's all I can say really.
 
Top