I appreciate your thoughtful post and references @lightseeker
In my opening post
I made a distinction between the Jews that left Egypt and the "mixed multitude" who left with them.
- In the exodus from Egypt, a "mixed multitude" accompanied them. Those in that group were not Jews. Mixed multitude is also translated as rabble, non-Israelites from foreign nation, and other people. They are the ones who demanded meat instead of eating the miraculous manna. They are the ones that convinced the Jews to worship the golden calf.
- They disguise themselves as Jews.
- Revelation 2:9 “I know thy works, and tribulation, and poverty, (but thou art rich) and I know the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews, and are not, but are the synagogue of Satan.”
- Rabbi warns that the flock of Israel is now being ruled by an evil subset of the Jewish people known as the Erev Rav (Mixed Multitude), an unknown group of people who many believe has seized the positions of power in Israel today.
So yes you will find many of the mixed multitude with Jewish names and other names. Pol Pot was Cambodian. Mao Ze Dong Chinese. Idi Amin was Ugandan. Saddam Hussein was Arab/Iraqi. There are the real Jews and the imposters. Real Jews practice Judaism. They wear modest clothes. They eat kosher food. They go to the synagogues on the Sabbath. They are not atheists. These imposters are satanists who disguise themselves. They are the ones promoting homosexuality, adultery, sacrifice humans, and all the perverted and gross stuff. These activities are all against the Bible! The real Jews follow the Bible.
I am a Christian. Jesus Christ is MY Lord and Savior. Jesus was Jewish and the Jews are His chosen people. God did not want Jews to be destroyed for rejecting Christ. They ARE being punished by God for rejecting Christ Jewish history has a cycle. It shows everywhere they go they are rejected, tortured, murdered, forced to leave with no property. Then God leads them somewhere else and they have a period of peace and prosperity but the cycle starts again. I think what is bizarre about the violent hatred against Jews is that is not based on objective evidence. Not on research or critical thinking. The Jews come to a country with nothing, work hard, and become successful. I think it is jealousy. Also the Jews are God's "chosen" people. Chosen to do what? Keep the law he gave them to abide by.
There will be a new Jerusalem. When Jesus returns and the end comes we will see what happens to ALL religions when they see the truth.
It will be peace on earth.
I will look at this later.
Jewish neocons carried out the 9/11 attacks to start the fraudulent war on terror to fulfill the yinon plan and greater Israel project
you just jogged my memory-- i think handling the hard, sharp turn of the airplane trajectory might have been too extreme for most pilots, and the g-force could have been a problem. this helps the missile theory (or the theory that the plane was remotely steered). https://911pilots.org/ "The...
Joe Biden put it quite well in a speech praising Jews, to the Jewish heritage society in 2015
I think Joe Biden is in on it.
The Culture of Critique is a peer reviewed book from Berkeley that examines the influence of Jews in the 20th century.
“Earl Raab, former president of heavily Jewish Brandeis University makes the diversity argument in a slightly different way. Expressing his satisfaction with the prediction that by the middle of the next century whites will become a minority, he writes, “We have tipped beyond the point where a Nazi-Aryan party will be able to prevail in this country.” He is apparently prepared to displace the people and culture of the founding stock in order to prevent the theoretical rise of an anti-Jewish regime. Prof. Raab appears to see whites mainly as potential Nazis, and is willing to sacrifice their culture and national continuity in order to defuse an imagined threat to Jews. This passage takes for granted the continued future existence of Jews as a distinct community even as gentile whites decline in numbers and influence. "
In the same passage, Prof. Raab continues by noting that, “We [Jews] have been nourishing the American climate of opposition to bigotry for about half a century. That climate has not yet been perfected, but the heterogeneous nature of our population tends to make it irreversible...” – just as it tends to make the ultimate displacement of European culture also irreversible.
Earl Raab feels safe because the possibility of Nazis conquering the USA is less. He served in the US military during World War II
so..... maybe it is also the conquering American part? This quote shows more about the author and his imagined threat to by the Jews. Then Earl says Jews are opposed to bigotry and the heterogenuous (diverse) population makes it irreversible".
Jews are opposed to bigotry! That means the author can't express himself truthfully. Waaa. Whites appear to be declining in population because of mass influx of immigrants.
It is widely recognized that the German-Jewish immigrant Franz Boas (1858-1942) almost single-handedly established the current contours of anthropology, ridding it of all biological explanations for differences in human culture or behavior.
Are culture and behaviors driven by biology? Or is someone from ethnic group XXX lazy and ethnic group XOX hardworking? I think that was a positive shift there.
Jewish identification and the pursuit of perceived Jewish interests, particularly in advocating an ideology of cultural pluralism as a model for Western societies, has been the ‘invisible subject’ of American anthropology.”
So the evil Jewish plan was all about cultural pluralism? You mean different cultures should be
tolerated???? That's just wrong.
From this position of dominance they promoted the idea that race and biology are trivial matters, and that environment counts for everything. They completely recast anthropology so as to provide intellectual support for open immigration, integration, and miscegenation. They also laid the foundation for the idea that because all races have the same potential, the failures of non-whites must be blamed exclusively on white oppression. The ultimate conclusion of Boasian anthropology was that since environment accounts for all human differences, every inequality in achievement can be eliminated by changing the environment. This has been the justification for enormous and wasteful government intervention programs.
The proper environment is required to develop skills and abilities? And any race can succeed given the proper environment? How did white oppression get in there? Jews also brought in miscegenation (race mixing)? Integration instead of assimilation? Immigration! To the United States for the American dream. Government intervention programs are not all bad.
The entire “civil rights” movement can be seen as a natural consequence of the triumph of Boasian thinking. Since all races were equivalent, separation was immoral. The color line also sharpened white self-consciousness in ways that might make whites more aware of Jewish parochialism. Thus it was, according to Prof. MacDonald, that Jews almost single-handedly launched the desegregation movement. Without the leadership of Jews, the NAACP might never have been established, and until 1975 every one of its presidents was a Jew. Prof. MacDonald reports that in 1917, when the black separatist Marcus Garvey visited NAACP headquarters, he saw so many white faces that he stormed out, complaining that it was a white organization.
Jews believed people shouldn't be segregated? Heresy! The "color line" sharpened and whites became self conscious. I think reviewer Stanley is speaking his feelings here. "Boasian" thinking is that your race or biology does not impact your ability and potential.
The role of the anthropologist became one of criticizing everything about Western society while glorifying everything primitive. Prof. MacDonald notes that Boasian portrayals of non-Western peoples deliberately ignored barbarism and cruelty or simply attributed it to contamination from the West. He sees this as a deliberate attempt to undermine the confidence of Western societies and to make them permeable to Third World influences and people.
In order to open European-derived societies to the immigration that would transform them, it was necessary to discredit racial solidarity and commitment to tradition.
As Prof. MacDonald puts it, “Viewed at its most abstract level, a fundamental agenda is thus to influence the European-derived peoples of the United States to view concern about their own demographic and cultural eclipse as irrational and as an indication of psychopathology.” Needless to say, this project has been successful; anyone opposed to the displacement of whites is routinely treated as a mentally unhinged “hate-monger,” and whenever whites defend their group interests they are described as psychologically inadequate.
Israel Zangwill, author of the eponymous 1908 play The Melting Pot, was of the view that “there is only one way to World Peace, and that is the absolute abolition of passports, visas, frontiers, custom houses...” He was nevertheless an ardent Zionist and disapproved of Jewish intermarriage.
People traveling the world without documentation is bad? That would be nice if we could fly anywhere and not have to go through the process. That has nothing to with being a Zionist or wanting to preserve your culture.
In 1952, the American Jewish Congress argued in hearings on immigration that “our national experience has confirmed beyond a doubt that our very strength lies in the diversity of our peoples.” This, too, was at a time when U.S. immigration law was still explicitly designed to maintain a white majority.
Diversity bad; not white majority bad.
Jewish commitment to leftist causes has often been motivated by the hope that communism, especially, would be a tool for combating anti-Semitism, and by expectation that universalist social solutions would be yet another way to dissolve gentile loyalties that might exclude Jews. The appeal of univeralist ideologies is tied to the implicit understanding that Jewish particularism will be exempt: “At the extreme, acceptance of a universalist ideology by gentiles would result in gentiles not perceiving Jews as in a different social category at all, while nonetheless Jews would be able to maintain a strong personal identity as Jews.”
Jews don't want to discriminated against like anyone. "Dissolve gentile loyalties". Loyalty to what? Whites should remain racially pure? Whites should be at the top of all the organizations and successful, not non whites?
Moreover, since Marxism taught that all conflict was economic rather than ethnic, many Jews believed it heralded the end of anti-Semitism.
Jews don't want to be discriminated against like anyone. This is not bad.
“Many Communists, for example, state that they could never have married a spouse who was not a leftist. When Jews were asked if they could have married Gentiles, many hesitated, surprised by the question, and found it difficult to answer. Upon reflection, many concluded that they had always taken marriage to someone Jewish for granted.” Their commitment as Jews was even more fundamental and unexamined than their commitment to the left.
Jews marry other Jews because of the shared religion and community. It's not because they are racist. Any race can convert to Judaism.
Neoconservatives also support high levels of immigration and were active in excluding white racial identification from the “respectable” right.
White racial identification.
Prof. MacDonald concedes that many Jews are sincere in their support for liberal causes, but then escalates his indictment by arguing that “the best deceivers are those who deceive themselves.” In other words, many Jews who are actually working for Jewish interests have first convinced themselves otherwise. A Jew who mainly wants America to become less white may also have convinced himself that America benefits from a multitude of cultures. Having convinced himself he can more effectively convince others.
Those sneaky Jews, pretending to care, but secretly trying to bringing the numbers of whites down.
Many Jews, Prof. MacDonald argues, are not even conscious of the extent to which their Jewishness is central to their identities or their political views. He quotes Rabbi Abraham Joshua Heschel on his surprise at how passionately he embraced the Israeli side during the 1967 war: “I had not known how Jewish I was.” This is an arresting statement from a man who was thought to be perhaps the greatest Jewish spiritual leader of his time. And whether or not it affects their politics, Jews certainly appear to have a very vivid sense of peoplehood. Prof. MacDonald quotes theologian Eugene Borowitz as saying, “most Jews claim to be equipped with an interpersonal friend-or-foe sensing device that enables them to detect the presence of another Jew, despite heavy camouflage.” Always to think in terms of “friends or foe” is no insignificant matter.
The description of the sensing device made me laugh. You mean Jew-dar? There's also Gay-dar. It's a supernatural phenomenon only gifted to Jews and gays. Detecting friend or foe is pretty normal when encountering a new person.
Prof. MacDonald is therefore skeptical of Jewish disavowals: “Surface declarations of a lack of Jewish identity may be highly misleading.”
He notes that Jewish publications write about the power and influence of American Jews in language Jews would immediately denounce as “anti-Semitic” if used by gentiles. He agrees with Joseph Sobran, who has said “they want to be Jews among themselves but resent being seen as Jews by Gentiles. They want to pursue their own distinct interests while pretending that they have no such interests...”
Do "they" say the want those things? Or is the author a mind reader? Pretending not to have interests? Those sneaky Jews!
Prof. MacDonald argues that the success of Jewish-led intellectual movements has been possible only because their Jewish character was hidden. If multi-culturalism or mass immigration or The Authoritarian Personality had been promoted by Orthodox Jews in black coats the Jewish element would have been clear. Prof. MacDonald writes that in fact, “the Jewish political agenda was not an aspect of the theory and the theories themselves had no overt Jewish content. Gentile intellectuals approaching these theories were therefore unlikely to view them as aspects of Jewish-gentile cultural competition or as an aspect of a specifically Jewish political agenda.” Prof. MacDonald also claims that Jews have often tried to conceal the Jewish character of an intellectual movement by recruiting token gentiles for visible positions as spokesmen. He writes that this tactic was so common in the American Communist Party that gentiles often saw through it and resigned.
I don't think Orthodox Jews care. So.. the Jewish part of the Jewish led movements is hidden. There is a secret Jewish gentile cultural competition? Hmm... I can also not see the Jewish religion becoming dominant in the US.
But how can motives ever be completely known? Prof. MacDonald sets a difficult test: “The best evidence that individuals have really ceased to have a Jewish identity is if they choose a political option that they perceive as clearly not in the interest of Jews as a group. In the absence of a clearly perceived conflict with Jewish interests, it remains possible that different political choices among ethnic Jews are only differences in tactics for how best to achieve Jewish interests.”
Oh I see. Jews must cease to be Jewish and do something "clearly not in the interest of Jews as a group." So, to cause harm to other Jews will allow you in the white club? Hmmmm...... I don't think this author is a good guy....
This standard may seem unduly harsh – until it is applied to white gentiles. Third-World immigration, affirmative action, anti-discrimination laws, and forced integration are clearly not in the interests of whites, yet many whites embrace them, thus demonstrating how completely they have abandoned their racial identity.
White, white, white. White? White!
Finally, Prof. MacDonald raises the disturbing possibility that some Jews, because of centuries of conflict with gentiles, actively hate gentile society and consciously wish to destroy it: “a fundamental motivation of Jewish intellectuals involved in social criticism has simply been hatred of the gentile-dominated power structure perceived as anti-Semitic.” He describes the 19th century German-Jewish poet Heinrich Heine as “using his skill, reputation and popularity to undermine the intellectual confidence of the established order.”
He attributes a great deal to the average IQ of Jews – at 115, a full standard deviation above the white gentile average – and to “their hard work and dedication, their desire to make a mark on the world, and their desire to rise in the world, engage in personal promotion, and achieve public acclaim...” He also believes Jews have worked together unfailingly on any question they consider necessary for survival: “Intellectual activity is like any other human endeavor: Cohesive groups outcompete individual strategies.” He notes that there has never been a time when large numbers of white Americans favored non-white immigration; it was a cohesive, determined minority that beat down the disorganized resistance of the majority.
The gentile dominated power structure has
been anti-Semitic. Pogroms, exiles, confiscation of property, etc. Wanting to get rid of the bad parts of a power structure doesn't mean they want to destroy the "white race." The average Jew has a higher average IQ than whites. Jealous? Whites have always been against non white immigration, and Jews, a determined minority, beat down the majority, allowing non whites into America. This is bad? Is the goal to have an all white America and be racist?
The main topics explored are ways that certain intellectual and thereafter legal movements started by strongly identified group of Jews, changed western culture, and to advance Jewish interests
The main elements explored are Marxism, immigration, Freudian psychoanalysis, the Frankfurt school of sociology, and Boasian anthropology. The influence of these movements were vast and long lasting. I won’t try to summarize the whole book because those links did that.
Thanks for the link.
Freud was a crack addict and seen as a joke by psychologists today. He promoted cocaine as the cure for everything.
- To sum up of this article, Jewish interests are:
- End segregation
- Allow race mixing
- Immigration is good
- Protect themselves from discrimination
- Destroy the white race as revenge for mistreatment
- All races have the same potential given the right environment. Before that they though race & biology determined your potential. (Boasian anthropology)
- Create an organization to protect African Americans NAACP
- Civil Rights - People can participate in the civil and political life of society and the state without discrimination or repression.
It seems reviewer Stanley is a white supremacist, mindreading and projecting his fears of the white race extinction onto the Jews. He blames the Jews for the breakdown of the idea the white race identity and is superior. He doesn't think rights should be afforded to every race. He doesn't like race mixing. He does not want non white cultures or people in America.
The host page for this article is a white supremacist website. They have articles written by Adolf Eichmann and other garbage. Here is a quote from the article, What Jews Do - "Jews don’t miss a trick. If you think it’s bad to oppose them, you’ve been tricked."
I'm disappointed your source is a white supremacist. How did you end up there?
Some other ways Jews influence culture, if the Red Terror of Marxism, and Maoism, changing immigration perspectives and law, 9/11 and the war on terror aren’t enough, just look at Hollywood and the Fake news MSM media. These are Jewish dominated industries top to bottom and have an immense influence on culture. Gay marriage never would’ve been a thing without Jews slowly normalizing homosexuality since the 80s on TV.
False. Jews normalizing homosexuality since the 80's not true. It began in the 60's with the civil rights movement.
‘60s affected nearly all aspects of American life. Most pointedly, it was expressed in the social forces of the civil rights movement, antiwar activism, the counterculture and the emergent women’s movement. They came together in the fledgling gay-rights movement. One of the era’s singular expressions of rebellion was the infamous 1969 Stonewall riot in New York’s Greenwich Village. It revealed the growing militancy of a long-hidden, often closeted minority, “homosexuals,” whether dyke or fag. Their refusal to accept 2nd-class status exploded public consciousness. One consequence of the riot was that an increasing number of social institutions came under public scrutiny as to their treatment of gay people.
Changing immigration perspectives from the view of the article above is allowing nonwhites in. Are they still in charge of immigration policies? I believe 9/11 involved more than just Jews.
Marxism was created by the atheist Karl Marx. He was not a practicing Jew. Yes there were many non practicing Jews in the government in USSR. The killers in the Red Terror were polish, latvian, lithuanian. No Jews. Mao was a communist. Is that the only connection? Jews were kicked out of China by Mao.
Have you seen I Pet Goat? Here is George Bush when the attack was announced. The children say "Kite" "Hit" "Steal" "Must" "Plane". He also read "The Pet Goat" to them. It was all part of the plan!
I will read through this later. Hopefully no bigots.
Careful, goyim. The truth is "anti-semitic". https://www.europeandefenceleague.com/2018/03/17/jewish-control-of-the-media-in-the-united-states-and-therefore-around-the-world/ *waits for the usual puppets of judeo-bolshevism to arrive and take umbrage.... or will it be the servants of Jewish...
Heck, nudity in films never even would have been a thing. It was illegal. Do you know how Jews circumvented that law and started showing nudity in film? It was the movie The Pawnbroker, In the film, a Jewish pawn broker sees a woman’s nipples, and they give him a flashback to the Holocaust. Jews argued that it was art, it was nessesssary for this scene, it was anti Semitic to not let the Jew pawn broker see the nipples on film because of the Holocaust. Blah blah blah. That is how they started to wear that law away.
False. Nudity has been in films since 1896. The French began nudity in silent films - 1896, Le Bain de la Parisienne
by Eugène Pirou was the first.
Nudity in Films
History. A daughter of the gods
(1916) was the first hollywood film with nudity. Starring Annette Kellerman (french irish) was the first actress to be nude on film. Pawnbroker came out in 1964. So the issue was not the nudity it was that a Jewish pawn broker was seeing it?
I will read the article later.
How about the millions of “free” pornographic films, anotjer Jewish dominated industry, and actually a weapon used by Jews in war.Israel broadcast pornography into the homes of their enemies during a an invasion of the West Bank in 2002
Dvery major pornography company is owned by a parent company owned by Jews. Same with the mass media
Who do you thinkit was that advanced abortion law in an extremely Christian culture in the mid 20th c? It was Jews, obviously
Obviously, that one needs no proof at all, skip!
And today they are the most vocal advocates when roe v wade is overturned. Just google, “banning abortion violates Jewish law”, to find dozens of articles about how abortion is the Jewish religion.
The Messenger is a digital news media company that will launch this May.
Well if you google it specifically. Are they the most vocal? Stats please. Abortion is the Jewish religion?
Where do you get that from? What Jewish law really says about abortion. It is ok if the woman's life is endangered.
Not any other time. I have been hearing the abortion ban is the hardest on minorities, especially black women.
So that’s just off the top of my head, but it’s basically absurd to argue Jews don’t influence cultures to advance Jewish interests. Theres more instances than are possible for me to name.
I'd like to hear more instances. But not from a white supremacist please.
Every single person advancing Covid doesn’t have to be Jewish for it to be another Jewish dominated movement. What’s clear is they are vastly over represented as per the flyer. a Jew invented to poisonous vaccine, you just have to look at them bragging about it to find out.
Meet Mikael Dolsten, the Jewish immigrant leading Pfizer’s vaccine charge By Gabe Friedman (JTA) – When Mikael Dolsten, the head...
The flyer was propaganda! What is the Jew to non Jew ratio on Covid advancers? Seriously I would like the stats.
How about Jeffery Epstein and Ghislane Maxwells international black mail and child sex trafficking ring that they ran for israel. They we’re billionaires. I guess them enriching themselves was a good thing?
They did not practice Judaism they were Jewish in name. They were clear satanists. There is no link attached to your proof it was all for Israel. Of course its not good.
I will look at this one later.
Why don’t you read it and find out?
Z-Library single sign on | Z-Library. Download books for free. Find books