Violette
Star
- Joined
- Apr 18, 2017
- Messages
- 1,304
That’s hilarious coming from youNo no it’s not people who think with their heart. It’s called thinking with their ass
That’s hilarious coming from youNo no it’s not people who think with their heart. It’s called thinking with their ass
Pacifism might be moral but it’s for fools. Do you really think we can negotiate with terrorists like @Etagloc or his Christian counterpart in @Claire Rousseau ?I am an anarcho-pascifist.
There is no such thing as "pure" feminism. The fact that you even think there suggests that you don't actually know much about feminism. Feminism, like almost any ideology, is filled with a variety of ideas.You as an individual may be so..... but the fact remains that feminism is opposed to such things and has worked towards the destruction of the family, as the article mentions
Feminism has destabilized the American family
https://nypost.com/2018/07/07/feminism-has-destabilized-the-american-family/
honestly, from a feminist standpoint, you've been brainwashed by the patriarchal conspiracy into believing in such concepts and marriage and monogamy are plots against women
I mean.... you've taken a certain dose of feminism but you haven't taken a stronger dose..... if you take a strong enough dose, you'll entirely reject such concepts.... if the dose is strong enough, you might turn lesbian
such is feminism in pure form..... the topic is feminism, not a single individual... as such, the matter in question is feminism in itself
you might have women who are not pure feminists.... who have taken a certain dose but haven't taken the full dose
but the object of study is feminism in itself, as such
feminism as such is against marriage, family and monogamy. If you're not aware of it.... maybe you're just not very up on feminism. It's pretty well known that feminism is against those things.
Pacifism isn't submission. Pacifism isn't inherently against the use of violence, either in terms of self-defense or protecting others from harm. Pacifism, at least in the sense I (and some others) use it is the rejection of using violence (i.e.: harming other humans) as a means of political change.Pacifism might be moral but it’s for fools. Do you really think we can negotiate with terrorists like @Etagloc or his Christian counterpart in @Claire Rousseau ?
We fight or we die.
Pacifism isn't submission. Pacifism isn't inherently against the use of violence, either in terms of self-defense or protecting others from harm. Pacifism, at least in the sense I (and some others) use it is the rejection of using violence (i.e.: harming other humans) as a means of political change.