Hardly killing anyone??
Sure you can say it can't be proven that all these people died directly from the jab. Doctors are saying these figures are much, much higher than what is being reported. This is because people are dying days, weeks or months after their jabs as these blood clots form, and as these deadly spike proteins make their way through peoples bodies to create all kinds of sickness and disease.
The UK Government’s reporting system for COVID vaccine adverse reactions from the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency released their latest report today, July 1, 2021. The report covers data collected from December 9, 2020, through June 23, 2021, for the three experimental COVID...
healthimpactnews.com
View attachment 58339
The European database of suspected drug reaction reports is EudraVigilance, which also tracks reports of injuries and deaths following the experimental COVID-19 “vaccines.” A subscriber from Europe recently emailed us and reminded us that this database maintained at EudraVigilance is only for...
healthimpactnews.com
View attachment 58340
www.openvaers.com
View attachment 58341
You have to ask yourself then why is the medical establishment banning effective drugs like Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine? Ask yourself why social media platforms are censoring any mention of these drugs. Why is social media platforms censoring doctors for discussing the serious side effects of these experimental injections? Why are doctors and scientists being fired for speaking out?
Yes, I said hardly killing anyone. I don't trust random numbers thrown onto somebody's mood board. Nor am I going to let rando doctors have free reign over my mind. Especially since doctors are the same people who thought lobotomies were good medicine. Now, I hate to deploy such a low blow but come on. At least people aren't getting stabbed in the eye with an ice pick.
I looked at the info you cited and noticed some discrepancies worth mentioning. I identified two sources with completely different numbers. The first source (
https://www.adrreports.eu/) had zero information on deaths, at least I couldn't find any. So it's unclear how "healthimpactnews.com" got the death count for their "slick" graphic. Plus the vast majority of side effects for every jab came from the Netherlands. That seems strange to me, like why would one country have so much more reports than any other? More importantly, it's unclear how any of those side effects actually came about. I'll try to explain further in my next paragraph about your other source.
The second source (
https://www.openvaers.com/) actually did have some death data I could find. It even had detailed reports on some of the hospitalizations. One majorly problematic number I noticed was the majority of the deaths were people aged 66 and older. And over 2,000 deaths alone were 81+ years old. I'm not trying to sound cold or anything, but how many 81+ -year-olds are already living on borrowed time? So again, it's unclear what caused the side effects. Like where is the coroner's report? Where is at least a little data on all of these people's medical history, can't we rule out underlying medical conditions before we post it in a database?
As far as the hospitalization reports I read, the computer in my brain is still unmoved. Look if you go into the ER right now and say you have chest pain, the doctor will order an EKG and write down some diagnosis. So it goes back to what I brought up before about unnecessary medical procedures. Doctors have to go by the book and run whatever tests so they can charge an insurance company top dollar. That's mainly what I see happening here. The reported side effects are literally all over the map. How does that make any sense?
P.S The vax I got (J&J) somehow had vastly lower side effects and death reports. Can you explain any of these discrepancies at all?