So two groups of Muslims can and do fight each other for centuries, killing millions and laying waste to entire countries over what is called a stupid argument.
But the idea that a Muslim group like ISIS could really be the ones attacking Western targets and local kafirs is just too much to countenance (even though it's apparently completely understandable), and every time they drive a truck into a crowd, or shoot up an airport, or go on a knife rampage, it's a false flag or a fake Muslim, as if the same kind of crazed Muslim that will blow himself up in a market in Baghdad to kill someone who doesn't interpret the Quran the way he does just couldn't exist anywhere but in Islamic countries.
That's what we're being asked to believe.
Listen, when you really look for the devil you'll find the devil is in us all, it's our ego.
That doesn't change the fact of how the world works ie how the devil presents itself.
THIS is the leader of the global islamic caliphate LMFAO?
he looks like a waiter/
Seriously ask yourself how someone who had this appearance was actually made the central figure of an entire movement (ie assuming the movement was all legit in their intentions and genuinely wanted to establish an islamic caliphate).
I don't care what sect or how mad, muslims would select someone older.
oh and shias and sunnis weren't actually killing each other even close to the millions prior to western involvement in that whole region.
If this was the case, how did shias and sunnis live in one country (persia) for so long?
yazidis, kurds, turks, arab sunnis, persian shias, christians, jews, parsees, and even other smaller religions, they all existed and lived relatively close by for a long time......that would not be possible if they were slaughtering each other
wherever the devil rears it's ugly head, the problems begin. I
Can you get this right too?