Lleo Oneiro
Newbie
- Joined
- Aug 17, 2020
- Messages
- 8
Great how the bullshit corona bologna pony virus infected all the "truther" forums.
Wearing a Mask
- Thread starter A.J.
- Start date
Lleo Oneiro
Newbie
- Joined
- Aug 17, 2020
- Messages
- 8
Isn't this the internet? All it took was a boogey man on TV to neuter you cunts? If you think you're smart, a truther, ahead of the curve, and you're wearing a mask, KILLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL YOURSELF.
Yellowbunzz tasty
Established
- Joined
- Dec 30, 2019
- Messages
- 494
VIDEOS EXPOSING THE ENTERTAINMENT INDUSTRY
Guys as seen in the instructions above, no videos less then 10 minutes and you must only share videos. Unless you want to be muted from this thread. I think you should go back and make the fonts bigger and highlight and underline to get the message across. It is quite obvious (as seen in...
I posted a video of this man who talked to an Mkultra victim, who told him what their plan was which aligns with what's going on in America now.
polymoog
Superstar
- Joined
- Jun 17, 2017
- Messages
- 8,213
look, this is the 3rd time youve advertised your thread on posts where it does not belong. bump your thread if you want to, but stop disrupting thread continuity.VIDEOS EXPOSING THE ENTERTAINMENT INDUSTRY
Guys as seen in the instructions above, no videos less then 10 minutes and you must only share videos. Unless you want to be muted from this thread. I think you should go back and make the fonts bigger and highlight and underline to get the message across. It is quite obvious (as seen in...vigilantcitizenforums.com
I posted a video of this man who talked to an Mkultra victim, who told him what their plan was which aligns with what's going on in America now.
Yellowbunzz tasty
Established
- Joined
- Dec 30, 2019
- Messages
- 494
The video I posted is about the corona virus, my thread isn't only about the entertainment industry, it ranges from politics and corona is political. I wanted everyone to see the video I posted about a man who spoke to an Mk-ultra victim who said that there elites were planning on doing this.
Did you even look at my thread and to add onto that the whole point of VC is to bring knowledge to people about reality.
A Freeman
Superstar
- Joined
- Nov 11, 2019
- Messages
- 6,866
For those who may be interested in the truth about the Stefan Lanka case, please see the following from: https://learninggnm.com/SBS/documents/Lanka_Bardens_Trial_E.pdf
Measles Virus put to the test. Dr. Stefan Lanka wins in court…
German biologist Dr. Stefan Lanka has been at the forefront of challenging the medical theory stating that viruses are the cause of infectious diseases such as hepatitis, AIDS, the flu, polio, herpes, or measles. Caroline Markolin has presented Dr. Lanka’s activities in her lecture video “Virus Mania” in great details (watch Part 2 of the recordings on this website – starting at 08:08).
Based on his studies in virology, Dr. Lanka discovered that viruses are vital components of simple life-forms that do not exist in complex organisms such as humans, animals, or plants. His research shows that the viruses believed to cause “viral infections” are in reality ordinary cell particles that have been misinterpreted as constituents of the viruses in question. Dr. Lanka also determined that viruses don’t have a destructive effect on the host, as commonly believed. These findings are in full accordance with the discoveries of Dr. Ryke Geerd Hamer who demonstrated already in the 1980s that contrary to the standard theory, microbes do not harm the organism but play instead a supportive role during the healing process of diseases (see Fourth Biological Law of the New Medicine).
The “measles virus trial” between Dr. Stefan Lanka and German medical doctor David Bardens has by now received international attention (see the 2015 reports in CTV News Canada and BBC News). The court case has not only heated up the ongoing “virus debate”. It also fuelled the discussion about the justification of childhood vaccination and of vaccination in general.
Here is a brief overview of the court proceedings:
On November 24, 2011, Dr. Lanka announced on his website that he would offer a prize of € 100,000 to anyone who could prove the existence of the measles virus. The announcement read as follows: “The reward will be paid, if a scientific publication is presented, in which the existence of the measles virus is not only asserted, but also proven and in which, among other things, the diameter of the measles virus is determined.”
In January 2012, Dr. David Bardens took Dr. Lanka up on his pledge. He offered six papers on the subject and asked Dr. Lanka to transfer the € 100,000 to his bank account.
The six publications are:
1. Enders JF, Peebles TC. Propagation in tissue cultures of cytopathogenic agents from patients with measles. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1954 Jun;86(2):277–286.
2. Bech V, Magnus Pv. Studies on measles virus in monkey kidney tissue cultures. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand. 1959; 42(1): 75–85
3. Horikami SM, Moyer SA. Structure, Transcription, and Replication of Measles Virus. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 1995; 191: 35–50. 2
4. Nakai M, Imagawa DT. Electron microscopy of measles virus replication. J Virol. 1969 Feb; 3(2): 187–97.
5. Lund GA, Tyrell, DL, Bradley RD, Scraba DG. The molecular length of measles virus RNA and the structural organization of measles nucleocapsids. J Gen Virol. 1984 Sep;65 (Pt 9):1535– 42.
6. Daikoku E, Morita C, Kohno T, Sano K. Analysis of Morphology and Infectivity of Measles Virus Particles. Bulletin of the Osaka Medical College. 2007; 53(2): 107–14.
Dr. Lanka refused to pay the money since in his opinion these publications did not provide adequate evidence. Subsequently, Dr. Bardens took Dr. Lanka to court.
On March 12, 2015, the District Court Ravensburg in southern Germany ruled that the criteria of the advertisement had been fulfilled ordering Dr. Lanka to pay up. Dr. Lanka appealed the ruling.
On February 16, 2016, the Higher Regional Court of Stuttgart (OLG) re-evaluated the first ruling, judging that Dr. Bardens did not meet the criteria since he failed to provide proof for the existence of the measles virus presented in one publication, as asked by Dr. Lanka in his announcement. Therefore, Dr. Lanka does not have to pay the prize money.
On January 16, 2017, the First Civil Senate of the German Federal Court of Justice (BGH) confirmed the ruling of the OLG Stuttgart.
Critics of the judicial verdict argue that Dr. Lanka’s victory is solely based on how he had formulated the offer of reward, namely to pay the € 100,000 for the presentation of a single publication of evidence (which Dr. Bardens was unable to provide). This argument, however, distracts the attention from the essential points.
According to the minutes of the court proceedings (page 7/ first paragraph), Andreas Podbielski, head of the Department of Medical Microbiology, Virology and Hygiene at the University Hospital in Rostock, who was one of the appointed experts at the trial, stated that even though the existence of the measles virus could be concluded from the summary of the six papers submitted by Dr. Bardens, NONE of the authors had conducted any controlled experiments in accordance with internationally defined rules and principles of good scientific practice (see also the method of “indirect evidence”). Professor Podbielski considers this lack of control experiments explicitly as a “methodological weakness” of these publications, which are after all the relevant studies on the subject (there are no other publications trying to attempt to prove the existence of the “measles virus”). Thus, at this point, a publication about the existence of the measles virus that stands the test of good science has yet to be delivered.
Furthermore, at the trial it was noted that contrary to its legal remit as per § 4 Infection Protection Act (IfSG) the Robert Koch Institute (RKI), the highest German authority in the field of infectious diseases, has failed to perform tests for the alleged measles virus and to publish these. The RKI claims that it made internal studies on the measles virus, however, refuses to hand over or publish the results.
Dr. Lanka: “With the Supreme Court judgment in the measles virus trial any national and international statements on the alleged measles virus, the infectivity of measles, and on the benefit and safety of vaccination against measles, are since then of no scientific character and have thus been deprived of their legal basis.”
Measles Virus put to the test. Dr. Stefan Lanka wins in court…
German biologist Dr. Stefan Lanka has been at the forefront of challenging the medical theory stating that viruses are the cause of infectious diseases such as hepatitis, AIDS, the flu, polio, herpes, or measles. Caroline Markolin has presented Dr. Lanka’s activities in her lecture video “Virus Mania” in great details (watch Part 2 of the recordings on this website – starting at 08:08).
Based on his studies in virology, Dr. Lanka discovered that viruses are vital components of simple life-forms that do not exist in complex organisms such as humans, animals, or plants. His research shows that the viruses believed to cause “viral infections” are in reality ordinary cell particles that have been misinterpreted as constituents of the viruses in question. Dr. Lanka also determined that viruses don’t have a destructive effect on the host, as commonly believed. These findings are in full accordance with the discoveries of Dr. Ryke Geerd Hamer who demonstrated already in the 1980s that contrary to the standard theory, microbes do not harm the organism but play instead a supportive role during the healing process of diseases (see Fourth Biological Law of the New Medicine).
The “measles virus trial” between Dr. Stefan Lanka and German medical doctor David Bardens has by now received international attention (see the 2015 reports in CTV News Canada and BBC News). The court case has not only heated up the ongoing “virus debate”. It also fuelled the discussion about the justification of childhood vaccination and of vaccination in general.
Here is a brief overview of the court proceedings:
On November 24, 2011, Dr. Lanka announced on his website that he would offer a prize of € 100,000 to anyone who could prove the existence of the measles virus. The announcement read as follows: “The reward will be paid, if a scientific publication is presented, in which the existence of the measles virus is not only asserted, but also proven and in which, among other things, the diameter of the measles virus is determined.”
In January 2012, Dr. David Bardens took Dr. Lanka up on his pledge. He offered six papers on the subject and asked Dr. Lanka to transfer the € 100,000 to his bank account.
The six publications are:
1. Enders JF, Peebles TC. Propagation in tissue cultures of cytopathogenic agents from patients with measles. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1954 Jun;86(2):277–286.
2. Bech V, Magnus Pv. Studies on measles virus in monkey kidney tissue cultures. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand. 1959; 42(1): 75–85
3. Horikami SM, Moyer SA. Structure, Transcription, and Replication of Measles Virus. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 1995; 191: 35–50. 2
4. Nakai M, Imagawa DT. Electron microscopy of measles virus replication. J Virol. 1969 Feb; 3(2): 187–97.
5. Lund GA, Tyrell, DL, Bradley RD, Scraba DG. The molecular length of measles virus RNA and the structural organization of measles nucleocapsids. J Gen Virol. 1984 Sep;65 (Pt 9):1535– 42.
6. Daikoku E, Morita C, Kohno T, Sano K. Analysis of Morphology and Infectivity of Measles Virus Particles. Bulletin of the Osaka Medical College. 2007; 53(2): 107–14.
Dr. Lanka refused to pay the money since in his opinion these publications did not provide adequate evidence. Subsequently, Dr. Bardens took Dr. Lanka to court.
On March 12, 2015, the District Court Ravensburg in southern Germany ruled that the criteria of the advertisement had been fulfilled ordering Dr. Lanka to pay up. Dr. Lanka appealed the ruling.
On February 16, 2016, the Higher Regional Court of Stuttgart (OLG) re-evaluated the first ruling, judging that Dr. Bardens did not meet the criteria since he failed to provide proof for the existence of the measles virus presented in one publication, as asked by Dr. Lanka in his announcement. Therefore, Dr. Lanka does not have to pay the prize money.
On January 16, 2017, the First Civil Senate of the German Federal Court of Justice (BGH) confirmed the ruling of the OLG Stuttgart.
Critics of the judicial verdict argue that Dr. Lanka’s victory is solely based on how he had formulated the offer of reward, namely to pay the € 100,000 for the presentation of a single publication of evidence (which Dr. Bardens was unable to provide). This argument, however, distracts the attention from the essential points.
According to the minutes of the court proceedings (page 7/ first paragraph), Andreas Podbielski, head of the Department of Medical Microbiology, Virology and Hygiene at the University Hospital in Rostock, who was one of the appointed experts at the trial, stated that even though the existence of the measles virus could be concluded from the summary of the six papers submitted by Dr. Bardens, NONE of the authors had conducted any controlled experiments in accordance with internationally defined rules and principles of good scientific practice (see also the method of “indirect evidence”). Professor Podbielski considers this lack of control experiments explicitly as a “methodological weakness” of these publications, which are after all the relevant studies on the subject (there are no other publications trying to attempt to prove the existence of the “measles virus”). Thus, at this point, a publication about the existence of the measles virus that stands the test of good science has yet to be delivered.
Furthermore, at the trial it was noted that contrary to its legal remit as per § 4 Infection Protection Act (IfSG) the Robert Koch Institute (RKI), the highest German authority in the field of infectious diseases, has failed to perform tests for the alleged measles virus and to publish these. The RKI claims that it made internal studies on the measles virus, however, refuses to hand over or publish the results.
Dr. Lanka: “With the Supreme Court judgment in the measles virus trial any national and international statements on the alleged measles virus, the infectivity of measles, and on the benefit and safety of vaccination against measles, are since then of no scientific character and have thus been deprived of their legal basis.”
shankara
Star
- Joined
- Apr 23, 2018
- Messages
- 1,322
The Proof in Bardens vs. Lanka - Measles in Court - Pepijn van Erp
The list of six scientific articles Bardens sent to Lanka to claim the 100.000 euro's promised for a proof of the existence of the measles virus.
www.pepijnvanerp.nl
Disappointing outcome of Bardens vs. Lanka: measles proven to exist, but anti-vaxxer Lanka keeps his money - Pepijn van Erp
A victory for Stefan Lanka, only because of legal subtleties, not because the courts finds the proof for the existence of the virus lacking.
www.pepijnvanerp.nl
The first article makes the point that it is quite possible to have clear scientific knowledge through indirect processes, and this is indeed the only way of knowing certain things which are not easy to directly observe. If it was just one observation, or a small number of observations, we could say that viruses are an unproven hypothesis. However that is not the case, the existence of viruses is demonstrated by a huge number of observations which all go towards proving the hypothesis, meaning it is a very solid hypothesis. Of course nothing is ever "proved" in science, hypotheses are only disproved, but when there is a mountain of evidence for some particular view we can say that it's highly unlikely that such a view is majorly mistaken.
I'm still quite interested in the angle that the virus was created in some kind of laboratory. It's pretty complex work, but they do have the technology these days. This is much more plausible than believing that virologists in general are all completely delusional and medical science complete quackery. Of course there are problems, but medicine does work. Go catch the plague and don't take antibiotics if you don't believe it.
Funnily enough I'm writing this from a hospital bed, currently being tested for tuberculosis.
A Freeman
Superstar
- Joined
- Nov 11, 2019
- Messages
- 6,866
More from top virologists, microbiologists and M.D.s that what is referred to as HIV doesn't exist, nor does AIDS.
HIV=AIDS? Fact or Fraud?
Deadly Deception Lecture – Dr. Robert Willner
Do Infectious & Pathogenic Viruses Even Exist? - Dr. Nancy Turner Banks
HIV=AIDS? Fact or Fraud?
Deadly Deception Lecture – Dr. Robert Willner
Do Infectious & Pathogenic Viruses Even Exist? - Dr. Nancy Turner Banks
A Freeman
Superstar
- Joined
- Nov 11, 2019
- Messages
- 6,866
From: http://whale.to/c/willner_deadly_deception.html
The History of the AIDS Epidemic
excerpt from Deadly Deception 1994
HIV does not cause AIDS.... The point that everyone is missing is that all of those original papers Gallo wrote on HIV have been found fraudulent.... The HIV hypothesis was based on those papers. — Peter Duesberg
How the Lie Began
In 1980, Dr. Robert Gallo, a retrovirologist with the National Cancer Institute, discovered the first human retrovirus (HTLV-I). A retrovirus is distinguished from an ordinary virus by virtue of the fact that its RNA is converted to DNA by an enzyme called reverse transcriptase. Its replication and survival is totally dependent on the viability of the host cell. If the host cell dies, the virus is finished. Dr. Gallo knew this basic fact; however, he would soon purposely ignore this fact in order to serve his own needs by claiming that the virus was very "mysterious". Somehow it would mysteriously survive while mysteriously slaughtering T-cells by the millions (this has never been observed). He had contended in the past, but failed to prove, that the very same retrovirus (HTLV-I) caused a specific type of leukemia which was occuring in Japan. The power of position, that of being a top government official and scientist, has allowed the erroneous label of "leukemia virus" to remain intact even though it was rejected by the scientific community.
In 1981, it was proposed that an acquired immune deficiency was the basis for a new syndrome of diseases (AIDS) that appeared to be surfacing amongst promiscuous male homosexuals and intravenous drug users. Dr. David Durack, of Duke University, a recognized expert on infectious diseases and the immune system, though admitting the prevalence of drug use (particular "poppers" or amyl nitrites) and repeated multiple infections, ignored these well-known causes of immune deficiency and announced that this "truly new syndrome" must be due to "some new factor". Continuously this group of scientists has resorted to theory, not fact, as to how the AIDS virus supposedly accomplishes its dirty deeds. The words, "it is thought", are constantly used in casual conversations or in the non-scientific articles and popular magazines and books. In the scientific journals or at lectures the theory is presented as established fact although there are no facts involved. It is portrayed as an established truth and therefore is accepted as such by most scientists, including physicians. The so-called HIV virus is still referred to as a "new" virus in spite of the indisputable evidence to the contrary. Incorrectly, the virus has been characterized as "attacking" or "infiltrating" the immune system, when in reality this is impossible because it is not alive and does not invade. Retroviruses are engulfed by the cells and incorporated into the cell's life processes.
In 1983, Dr. Gallo embarked on a mission to convince his fellow scientists, in the absence of any scientific experimental proof whatsoever, that another virus he had discovered caused AIDS. At a widely publicized press conference held in Washington, D.C. on April 23, 1984, Dr. Gallo announced that he had discovered the cause of AIDS. He claimed the unearthing of a new retrovirus which he had named HTLV-III, thus inferring that it was a member of the family of retroviruses he had previously discovered. His claim was bolstered by Margaret Heckler, Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services, who was under great pressure to come up with some answer to the looming "epidemic". Heckler announced, "Today we add another miracle to the long honor roll of American medicine and science." She also promised that we would have a vaccine within two years, undoubtedly as a result of Dr. Gallo's grandiose urgings. That very day, Dr. Gallo filed a U.S. patent for an HIV test kit which was destined to make him very wealthy. Dr. Gallo, unquestionably very knowledgeable in retrovirology, chose to set aside the facts and became the quintessential intellectual whore. The benefits to Dr. Gallo are money and power; but the costs to humanity are suffering and countless unnecessary deaths. In contrast, street prostitutes are honest – you know what you're getting and you know the risks – and, by the way, AIDS is not one of them.
Margaret Heckler very quickly awarded the lucrative contract for AZT to Burroughs-Wellcome Pharmaceutical Company before the first scientific paper ever appeared in any U.S. journal. AZT was a drug in search of a disease. It had been sitting on the shelves of the National Institutes of Health since the 1960's. It was an experimental drug that had failed as a cancer remedy and had been declared too toxic to use. Retrovirology had gained importance because of Nixon's "War on Cancer" and the belief that a retrovirus might be the cause of cancer in humans. This approach seemed logical at the time, because retroviruses typically prompted cells to multiply – a characteristic of the cancer process. This is directly opposite to the cell destruction that normally occurs in viral infections. Not only did that war fail, AZT failed, and retrovirologists came up empty-handed after twenty years of intense and arduous research. Alas, a whole group of scientists without a reason d'etre! As you would expect, in 1986, The International Committee of Retrovirologists named HIV the cause of AIDS. By giving credence to the hypothesis in the absence of proof, they became party to the conspiracy. It is just what one would expect when frustrated unsuccessful foxes are left to guard the hen house.
Adding to Dr. Gallo's blatant disregard for all established scientific requirements for validation of his claims, it was eventually discovered that HTLV-III was a retrovirus that had been sent to Dr. Gallo more than a year before by Luc Montagnier of the Pasteur Institute in Paris. On several occasions, Montagnier had sent samples of the virus he had isolated in the blood of some AIDS patients for Gallo's evaluation. A scandal erupted and a battle ensued over the credit for the discovery and the rights to the patents. It took the intervention of the French Prime Minister Jacques Chirac and U.S. President Ronald Reagan in order to reach an agreement that resulted in the sharing of the proceeds and the credit for the discovery (recently challenged again by the French after Gallo admitted he may have made a mistake). It is truly characteristic of scoundrels to quarrel over the spoils of fraud.
We have known for more than half a century that we co-exist with many bacteria and viruses. We are well aware that potentially deadly organisms reside within us at all times, waiting only for the balance of health to be tipped in favor of "disease". Streptococcus, tuberculosis, and Pneumocystis carinii, the most common "components" of AIDS, are but a fraction of the infectious organisms that the majority of us live with constantly. Pneumocystis carinii are present in the lungs of virtually every individual on the surface of our planet. Yet, precious few of us ever get the disease they cause: pneumocystis pneumonia. This is just one of the most obvious examples of the basic and pervasive flaws in the guiding premises of "modern" medicine.
Consider, for the moment, the following questions:
When the great flu of 1919 took the lives of millions of people in the United States, Why didn't the entire population succumb?
When the great bubonic plague destroyed one-third of the population of Europe, Why didn't the other two-thirds die also?
Why didn't everyone die?
The answer:
When an epidemic destroys its susceptible population, it ceases to exist. In other words, it is the inability of the individual's immune system that determines the degree to which an individual "falls ill" or whether or not he becomes ill at all. As Pasteur is purported to have exclaimed on his deathbed, "It is not the organism; it is the terrain!" If this were not true, then everyone, in the examples cited above, would have gotten the plague or the flu and all would have died. In fact, the first disease on earth would have been the last! The deceivers of infamy have succeeded in creating a chain of events that have destroyed logic and common sense, and in their place, established the following "Commandments" for science, government, the press and the public:
The Ten Commandments of Fraud
The repeated use of these commandments by the conspirators prompted T. C. Fry to comment in his book, The Great AIDS Hoax, "...the presence of what they call HIV in the disease [AIDS] is no more proof of cause than the presence of flies in garbage proves that the flies are the cause of garbage." There could be an exception however, if you consider that the "AIDS Gang": Robert Gallo, Anthony Fauci, William Haseltine, Max Essex, James Curran, Flossie Wong-Staal, Dani Bolognesi, Margaret Fischl, Margaret Heckler, et al., are the flies; then indeed, the garbage was created by them!
A Glimmer of Light
During the past four years, the classical AIDS combination of characteristic features has been reported in individuals who tested negative for HIV, and the number is growing steadily. Of course, the charlatans were quick to "hypothesize" that there must be another "virus" causing it, lest their gambit be discovered. Still another attempt to divert attention from the most important and obvious, scientifically established causes – DRUGS.
They concede now that the virus can't do it alone; that the "co-factors" are necessary. However, we have known that the "co-factors" have caused immunodeficiency for many decades, by themselves, long before HIV was discovered. It is HIV that is not necessary for AIDS.
How Could They Get Away With This Incredible Fraud?
How could this happen? Surely, it's not possible that a fraud of this magnitude could ever escape the scrutiny of the thousands of scientists throughout the world who have been researching the many avenues of investigation into this "modern day plague". It all began with the retrovirologists whose area of expertise is so arcane that most scientists in other fields are quite unfamiliar with it. I, myself, read with complete acceptance the early articles in the medical journals, newspapers, and popular magazines. Who could doubt the declarations of the powerful and influential governmental departments, agencies, and scientific enclaves? Although the many claims made for the virus did not sit easily with me, it was several years before I, almost instinctively, began to doubt what I was reading. I guess it was because of two and a half decades of practicing medicine, that the gradual exposure to the failures and inconsistencies of establishment medicine and its resistance to deviation from the mandated dogmatic approach to disease, I learned to question the pabulum I had been trained to digest.
At first it was the insane, irrational, and contradictory therapy that I could not accept. But then, when I attended a dinner at which Dr. Margaret Fischl described her infamous "double-blind" study on AZT, the first drug presented for the treatment of AIDS, I knew something foul was going on. Finally, when I travelled to a meeting in Los Angeles during February 1989, dealing with alternative approaches to AIDS, at which I heard Dr. Peter Duesberg speak, I ultimately questioned the validity of the disease itself. I had finally become educated about retroviruses by the most knowledgeable man in the field. Until that time, I had been presented theory as fact. Like the rest of my colleagues, I assumed that what I had been taught was proven and therefore believed it to be true. The truth became apparent: AIDS was all supposition, theory, pseudo-scientific, and a scam. Because it was all based on less-than-scientific papers, the most fragile type of circumstantial evidence and self-serving hypotheses, HIV had been indicted, convicted and "sentenced" falsely of a "crime" it could not possibly have committed. What about the retrovirologists themselves? How could they have been fooled? In an article written for the magazine The Truth Seeker (September/October 1989), Dr. Duesberg explained the reasons:
"After a frustrating 20-year-long search for a human cancer virus, the club [the retrovirologists] was craving for some clinical relevance for the retrovirus and hence, happily adopted HIV – the AIDS virus – as the cause of AIDS." He went on to explain the impact of the powerful promotion that made the AIDS hypothesis "instant national dogma". The billions of dollars in funding, the economic interests of the biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies and the tremendous notoriety from the press which was too much to resist. In wondering why only a handful of scientists questioned the AIDS hypothesis, he cited, "...the conformist pressures on scientists, particularly young, untenured scientists, in the age of biotechnology. Their conceptual obedience to the establishment is maintained by controlled access to grants, journals, and positions, and rewarded by meeting engagements, personal prizes, consultantships, stocks and co-ownership in companies."
The National Institutes of Health, the National Cancer Institute, the Centers for Disease Control, the National Academy of Sciences, and the Food and Drug Administration have all seriously jeopardized their credibility and motives by their active participation or silence in the face of such an obvious fraud. In view of the fact that it is hard to believe that individuals at that level are that stupid (although anything is possible), one must assume that incredible government pressure was brought to bear. The most obvious and usual pressures are funding, perks, and the fear of dismissal. Take your choice: incompetence or corruption.
Duesberg is a good example of what can happen to one of the most respected scientists in the field. He is world-renowned, an elected member of the prestigious National Academy of Sciences, and recipient of the distinguished NIH "Outstanding Investigator Grant" (only 23 in the country). He also discovered the genes which cause cancer (oncogenes), and was recommended for a Nobel Prize. He is an international authority on retroviruses, and a Professor of Molecular Biology at the University of California at Berkeley. It is rumored that his $350,000 research grant was to be terminated last year, and his appeal is to be judged by a committee that includes Gallo's mistress, Dr. Flossie Wong-Staal; and Dr. Dani Bolognesi, now a wealthy patent-holder on HIV tests. These individuals have the ability to rob us of great talent.
Intimidation has been unrelenting and vicious. Duesberg wrote that he had been "...labelled a bigot for considering [the] daily administration of psychoactive and immunosuppressive chemicals more likely to be the cause of AIDS than a chronically dormant and almost chemically undetectable retrovirus. The nation's leading AIDS researcher accused me of being an advocate of promiscuity [to paraphrase it politely] for questioning the viral etiology of AIDS." Could it be that our scientists were more interested in fostering Puritan values than in presenting scientific truth? The facts will speak for themselves.
Instead of answering the sea of questions that shook the very foundations of the AIDS hypothesis, the vested establishment insulted their opponents, barred debate, and even cancelled a White House meeting, refusing to participate in order to demonstrate the "insanity" of even questioning HIV and AIDS. Their criminal arrogance is an affront to all of humanity. Initially, Gallo and his co-conspirators could have possibly been exonerated on the basis of ignorance and stupidity. However, to block open scientific discussion, to use political and economic power to silence opposing points of view, and to suppress or ignore basic scientific fact and logic, is irrefutable evidence of their criminal intent.
When you have finished reading the evidence, I am convinced that you will feel relieved in knowing that we are not all doomed to die AIDS, unless, of course, we all start taking AZT based on Gallo's scam and his fraudulent followers. If you are HIV positive, there is one thing you can be sure of: your body has successfully defended intself against an insignificant virus. So read on, and if you agree with the evidence, I ask you to pick up your pen and shout through the mails:
(continued at the link above, one brief excerpt below)
PROSPECTUS
When you have read this book completely, you must come to the conclusion that the following are basic facts and truths:
AIDS IS NOT CONTAGIOUS
AIDS IS NOT A SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED DISEASE AIDS CAN EASILY BE PREVENTED AND CURED
Dr. Gallo (the "discoverer" of the AIDS virus) and his cohorts are guilty of a conspiracy to intentionally commit criminal negligence.
They are guilty of fraud and manslaughter.
The so-called "AIDS test" is unreliable, invalid, and completely misleading; it inaccurately and undependably tests for immunity to an innocent virus.
On the basis of a meaningless test, individuals are subjected to the killer drug AZT.
All of the studies on AZT are fraudulent and misleading, including the first study which resulted in the licensing of this drug.
The Food and Drug Administration of the United States, which licensed AZT, is aware of this fact and has not recalled it; they are guilty of criminal negligence and genocide.
The AIDS hypothesis, its diagnostic tests, and its treatment are the..
DEADLY DECEPTION.
DEADLY DECEPTION (The Most Important Lies)
LIE I. AIDS is Caused by the HIV Virus.
LIE II. AIDS is Contagious.
LIE III. A Positive HIV Test Means Death by AIDS.
LIE IV. AZT is a Treatment for AIDS.
LIE V. AIDS Has No Cure.
THE FACTS (The Real Truth)
I. AIDS is caused by drugs and malnutrition (starvation) and the virus has nothing to do with it.
II. The test for HIV is completely inaccurate, predicts nothing, and can cause severe illness through intense fear.
III. AZT, the main drug used in treatment, causes AIDS.
The brainwashing has been so incredibly effective that your first impulse will be to think that this book is the product of one of those ridiculous tabloids. However, everything in this book is factually documented. Many of the best and brightest scientists now condemn the AIDS deception and it originators.
The perpetrators of the AIDS fraud are named. They dare not sue their accusers and go to court because their crime would be exposed and their growing tens of millions of dollars in profit would dry up. They have cleverly involved thousands of individuals and corporations, most of whom are decently motivated, in their despicable scheme. Worse, they have millions of scientists and physicians who, relatively ignorant in their arcane science, trustingly accept the deluge of fabricated, sophisticated, and wildly pseudo-scientific speculations as scientific fact. Then, with an army of duped and believing scientist followers, they back up their atrocious scam with the idiotic proposition that the proof of the AIDS hypothesis lies in the fact that so many believe in it.
Although 60 thousand papers have been written with money obtained from AIDS grants, not one of those papers proves scientifically that the virus causes AIDS.
The original papers UPON which the AIDS hypothesis was based are a sorry pretense of scientific investigation, based on the worst kind of circumstantial evidence and then presented to the scientific community and the world as proven facts.
After reading this book, some of you will, because of a ten-year media blitz of misinformation, still ask the question, "Then why are so many people dying of a disease we never heard of before?"
The answer:
I. AIDS is simply a new name for 25 diseases that have always existed.
II. The causes of acquired immune deficiency have been listed in medical texts for over 70 years. They are, in order of importance: malnutrition (starvation), drugs, radiation, and chemotherapy.
III. It appeared to be an epidemic at first, because the drug-addicted segment of the gay population began to suffer the effects from years of drug use. They became an identifiable
group when they came out of the closet just prior to the "epidemic".
IV. AIDS in Africa is what it has always been — slow starvation and malnutrition — and it hasn't changed at all, except for the name. Simply compare any AIDS patient with the appearance of a crack cocaine baby or the horrible television pictures of starving Somalians, or prisoners in the concentration camps of Bosnia-Herzgovena and Nazi Germany. The epidemic in Africa simply does not exist. It has been an invention based on completely false information provided by indigent families seeking funds from charitable agencies and also by AIDS workers seeking to protect lucrative jobs. The statistics released are all unverified estimates that have proven to be 91% wrong.
V. Hemophiliacs get AIDS in small numbers because of additives and contaminants in their frequent blood transfusions. This book gives you proof it is not HIV.
VI. AZT, a drug so toxic that it was discarded as a treatment for cancer, and which causes AIDS, is being given to individuals because they tested positive for antibodies to an innocent virus. They will die of an acquired immune deficiency caused by AZT — and many of them are perfectly healthy!
-------
We do not "catch" any disease; we simply succumb to our maladaptation to the environment, pollution of ourselves or pollution of the environment. If this were not true, then the first "epidemic" on earth would have been our last. The epidemics and plagues of history killed millions, but more lived than died—why? The survivors have always been those whose immune systems and defenses were intact.
A healthy individual is one who has adapted to all of the conditions and everything that occupies our planet. This includes not only bacteria and viruses, but the air, the water, the plants and all inhabitants, including our fellow human beings.
-------
Recently, more than 500 of the world's most prominent scientists banded together and formed the "Group for the Scientific Reappraisal of the HIV-AIDS Hypothesis". The founder of this group is Dr. Charles A. Thomas, a Harvard biologist.
The impetus for this action began in 1987 when the world's most knowledgeable and honored retrovirologist, Dr. Peter Duesberg of the University of California at Berkeley, challenged the KV-AIDS hypothesis in the journal, CANCER RESEARCH.
The History of the AIDS Epidemic
excerpt from Deadly Deception 1994
HIV does not cause AIDS.... The point that everyone is missing is that all of those original papers Gallo wrote on HIV have been found fraudulent.... The HIV hypothesis was based on those papers. — Peter Duesberg
How the Lie Began
In 1980, Dr. Robert Gallo, a retrovirologist with the National Cancer Institute, discovered the first human retrovirus (HTLV-I). A retrovirus is distinguished from an ordinary virus by virtue of the fact that its RNA is converted to DNA by an enzyme called reverse transcriptase. Its replication and survival is totally dependent on the viability of the host cell. If the host cell dies, the virus is finished. Dr. Gallo knew this basic fact; however, he would soon purposely ignore this fact in order to serve his own needs by claiming that the virus was very "mysterious". Somehow it would mysteriously survive while mysteriously slaughtering T-cells by the millions (this has never been observed). He had contended in the past, but failed to prove, that the very same retrovirus (HTLV-I) caused a specific type of leukemia which was occuring in Japan. The power of position, that of being a top government official and scientist, has allowed the erroneous label of "leukemia virus" to remain intact even though it was rejected by the scientific community.
In 1981, it was proposed that an acquired immune deficiency was the basis for a new syndrome of diseases (AIDS) that appeared to be surfacing amongst promiscuous male homosexuals and intravenous drug users. Dr. David Durack, of Duke University, a recognized expert on infectious diseases and the immune system, though admitting the prevalence of drug use (particular "poppers" or amyl nitrites) and repeated multiple infections, ignored these well-known causes of immune deficiency and announced that this "truly new syndrome" must be due to "some new factor". Continuously this group of scientists has resorted to theory, not fact, as to how the AIDS virus supposedly accomplishes its dirty deeds. The words, "it is thought", are constantly used in casual conversations or in the non-scientific articles and popular magazines and books. In the scientific journals or at lectures the theory is presented as established fact although there are no facts involved. It is portrayed as an established truth and therefore is accepted as such by most scientists, including physicians. The so-called HIV virus is still referred to as a "new" virus in spite of the indisputable evidence to the contrary. Incorrectly, the virus has been characterized as "attacking" or "infiltrating" the immune system, when in reality this is impossible because it is not alive and does not invade. Retroviruses are engulfed by the cells and incorporated into the cell's life processes.
In 1983, Dr. Gallo embarked on a mission to convince his fellow scientists, in the absence of any scientific experimental proof whatsoever, that another virus he had discovered caused AIDS. At a widely publicized press conference held in Washington, D.C. on April 23, 1984, Dr. Gallo announced that he had discovered the cause of AIDS. He claimed the unearthing of a new retrovirus which he had named HTLV-III, thus inferring that it was a member of the family of retroviruses he had previously discovered. His claim was bolstered by Margaret Heckler, Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services, who was under great pressure to come up with some answer to the looming "epidemic". Heckler announced, "Today we add another miracle to the long honor roll of American medicine and science." She also promised that we would have a vaccine within two years, undoubtedly as a result of Dr. Gallo's grandiose urgings. That very day, Dr. Gallo filed a U.S. patent for an HIV test kit which was destined to make him very wealthy. Dr. Gallo, unquestionably very knowledgeable in retrovirology, chose to set aside the facts and became the quintessential intellectual whore. The benefits to Dr. Gallo are money and power; but the costs to humanity are suffering and countless unnecessary deaths. In contrast, street prostitutes are honest – you know what you're getting and you know the risks – and, by the way, AIDS is not one of them.
Margaret Heckler very quickly awarded the lucrative contract for AZT to Burroughs-Wellcome Pharmaceutical Company before the first scientific paper ever appeared in any U.S. journal. AZT was a drug in search of a disease. It had been sitting on the shelves of the National Institutes of Health since the 1960's. It was an experimental drug that had failed as a cancer remedy and had been declared too toxic to use. Retrovirology had gained importance because of Nixon's "War on Cancer" and the belief that a retrovirus might be the cause of cancer in humans. This approach seemed logical at the time, because retroviruses typically prompted cells to multiply – a characteristic of the cancer process. This is directly opposite to the cell destruction that normally occurs in viral infections. Not only did that war fail, AZT failed, and retrovirologists came up empty-handed after twenty years of intense and arduous research. Alas, a whole group of scientists without a reason d'etre! As you would expect, in 1986, The International Committee of Retrovirologists named HIV the cause of AIDS. By giving credence to the hypothesis in the absence of proof, they became party to the conspiracy. It is just what one would expect when frustrated unsuccessful foxes are left to guard the hen house.
Adding to Dr. Gallo's blatant disregard for all established scientific requirements for validation of his claims, it was eventually discovered that HTLV-III was a retrovirus that had been sent to Dr. Gallo more than a year before by Luc Montagnier of the Pasteur Institute in Paris. On several occasions, Montagnier had sent samples of the virus he had isolated in the blood of some AIDS patients for Gallo's evaluation. A scandal erupted and a battle ensued over the credit for the discovery and the rights to the patents. It took the intervention of the French Prime Minister Jacques Chirac and U.S. President Ronald Reagan in order to reach an agreement that resulted in the sharing of the proceeds and the credit for the discovery (recently challenged again by the French after Gallo admitted he may have made a mistake). It is truly characteristic of scoundrels to quarrel over the spoils of fraud.
Keep in mind that Gallo and his cohorts have been getting away with the most elementary and unscientific ploy one could imagine. They have avoided performing scientific controlled studies that would be universally accepted as proof. Such studies would unmask their fraud. They have instead relied on fear, intimidation, sensationalism, greed, ambition, envy and the need for recognition. In this way they have coerced and stupefied an army of followers into believing what, in the past, would have been laughed at, or dismissed as coincidence and/or "anecdotal". HIV has been made the scapegoat for incompetence, and a gateway to the lifestyle of the rich, famous and powerful, for unscrupulous, immoral and incompetent scoundrels. The blitzkrieg of misinformation has obliterated from consideration even the most elementary knowledge, logic and evidence in research and disease.
We have known for more than half a century that we co-exist with many bacteria and viruses. We are well aware that potentially deadly organisms reside within us at all times, waiting only for the balance of health to be tipped in favor of "disease". Streptococcus, tuberculosis, and Pneumocystis carinii, the most common "components" of AIDS, are but a fraction of the infectious organisms that the majority of us live with constantly. Pneumocystis carinii are present in the lungs of virtually every individual on the surface of our planet. Yet, precious few of us ever get the disease they cause: pneumocystis pneumonia. This is just one of the most obvious examples of the basic and pervasive flaws in the guiding premises of "modern" medicine.
Consider, for the moment, the following questions:
When the great flu of 1919 took the lives of millions of people in the United States, Why didn't the entire population succumb?
When the great bubonic plague destroyed one-third of the population of Europe, Why didn't the other two-thirds die also?
Why didn't everyone die?
The answer:
When an epidemic destroys its susceptible population, it ceases to exist. In other words, it is the inability of the individual's immune system that determines the degree to which an individual "falls ill" or whether or not he becomes ill at all. As Pasteur is purported to have exclaimed on his deathbed, "It is not the organism; it is the terrain!" If this were not true, then everyone, in the examples cited above, would have gotten the plague or the flu and all would have died. In fact, the first disease on earth would have been the last! The deceivers of infamy have succeeded in creating a chain of events that have destroyed logic and common sense, and in their place, established the following "Commandments" for science, government, the press and the public:
The Ten Commandments of Fraud
- Coincidence is proof of cause and effect.
- Circumstantial evidence is direct evidence.
- One example proves the rule.
- One guess supported by another guess creates a fact.
- Saying it is so, makes it so.
- Don't confuse the issue with facts.
- Proof is unncessary and should be avoided.
- Lie, lie, lie, and they'll believe it.
- Silence, ignore and suppress the truth.
- Replace reason with dogma, fraud and blindfolded fear.
The repeated use of these commandments by the conspirators prompted T. C. Fry to comment in his book, The Great AIDS Hoax, "...the presence of what they call HIV in the disease [AIDS] is no more proof of cause than the presence of flies in garbage proves that the flies are the cause of garbage." There could be an exception however, if you consider that the "AIDS Gang": Robert Gallo, Anthony Fauci, William Haseltine, Max Essex, James Curran, Flossie Wong-Staal, Dani Bolognesi, Margaret Fischl, Margaret Heckler, et al., are the flies; then indeed, the garbage was created by them!
A Glimmer of Light
In 1987, the light of truth had begun to pierce their facade. For these conspirators, it was the harbinger of their downfall (if justice prevails). It began when Dr. Peter Duesberg, an international authority on retroviruses, published an article in Cancer Research which shook the very foundations of the HIV/AIDS theory. Many scientists were stunned by his position, but impressed by its truth. Others were relieved that someone had the courage to finally speak up. The powerbrokers and vested interests counter-attacked, not with scientific argument and fact, but with name-calling, character assassination, vitriolic insinuations, denigration, and political and economic reprisal. Their actions and their words only verified their guilt. Then, in February 1989, Dr. Duesberg submitted a masterful comprehensive analysis to The Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. This prestigious group has ignored this document and taken no action. In the political and scientific worlds, this is usually the safest way of covering your assets. If you are eventually found out, you can always claim that there wasn't convincing evidence. Meanwhile, millions have died!
During the past four years, the classical AIDS combination of characteristic features has been reported in individuals who tested negative for HIV, and the number is growing steadily. Of course, the charlatans were quick to "hypothesize" that there must be another "virus" causing it, lest their gambit be discovered. Still another attempt to divert attention from the most important and obvious, scientifically established causes – DRUGS.
They concede now that the virus can't do it alone; that the "co-factors" are necessary. However, we have known that the "co-factors" have caused immunodeficiency for many decades, by themselves, long before HIV was discovered. It is HIV that is not necessary for AIDS.
How Could They Get Away With This Incredible Fraud?
How could this happen? Surely, it's not possible that a fraud of this magnitude could ever escape the scrutiny of the thousands of scientists throughout the world who have been researching the many avenues of investigation into this "modern day plague". It all began with the retrovirologists whose area of expertise is so arcane that most scientists in other fields are quite unfamiliar with it. I, myself, read with complete acceptance the early articles in the medical journals, newspapers, and popular magazines. Who could doubt the declarations of the powerful and influential governmental departments, agencies, and scientific enclaves? Although the many claims made for the virus did not sit easily with me, it was several years before I, almost instinctively, began to doubt what I was reading. I guess it was because of two and a half decades of practicing medicine, that the gradual exposure to the failures and inconsistencies of establishment medicine and its resistance to deviation from the mandated dogmatic approach to disease, I learned to question the pabulum I had been trained to digest.
At first it was the insane, irrational, and contradictory therapy that I could not accept. But then, when I attended a dinner at which Dr. Margaret Fischl described her infamous "double-blind" study on AZT, the first drug presented for the treatment of AIDS, I knew something foul was going on. Finally, when I travelled to a meeting in Los Angeles during February 1989, dealing with alternative approaches to AIDS, at which I heard Dr. Peter Duesberg speak, I ultimately questioned the validity of the disease itself. I had finally become educated about retroviruses by the most knowledgeable man in the field. Until that time, I had been presented theory as fact. Like the rest of my colleagues, I assumed that what I had been taught was proven and therefore believed it to be true. The truth became apparent: AIDS was all supposition, theory, pseudo-scientific, and a scam. Because it was all based on less-than-scientific papers, the most fragile type of circumstantial evidence and self-serving hypotheses, HIV had been indicted, convicted and "sentenced" falsely of a "crime" it could not possibly have committed. What about the retrovirologists themselves? How could they have been fooled? In an article written for the magazine The Truth Seeker (September/October 1989), Dr. Duesberg explained the reasons:
"After a frustrating 20-year-long search for a human cancer virus, the club [the retrovirologists] was craving for some clinical relevance for the retrovirus and hence, happily adopted HIV – the AIDS virus – as the cause of AIDS." He went on to explain the impact of the powerful promotion that made the AIDS hypothesis "instant national dogma". The billions of dollars in funding, the economic interests of the biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies and the tremendous notoriety from the press which was too much to resist. In wondering why only a handful of scientists questioned the AIDS hypothesis, he cited, "...the conformist pressures on scientists, particularly young, untenured scientists, in the age of biotechnology. Their conceptual obedience to the establishment is maintained by controlled access to grants, journals, and positions, and rewarded by meeting engagements, personal prizes, consultantships, stocks and co-ownership in companies."
The National Institutes of Health, the National Cancer Institute, the Centers for Disease Control, the National Academy of Sciences, and the Food and Drug Administration have all seriously jeopardized their credibility and motives by their active participation or silence in the face of such an obvious fraud. In view of the fact that it is hard to believe that individuals at that level are that stupid (although anything is possible), one must assume that incredible government pressure was brought to bear. The most obvious and usual pressures are funding, perks, and the fear of dismissal. Take your choice: incompetence or corruption.
Duesberg is a good example of what can happen to one of the most respected scientists in the field. He is world-renowned, an elected member of the prestigious National Academy of Sciences, and recipient of the distinguished NIH "Outstanding Investigator Grant" (only 23 in the country). He also discovered the genes which cause cancer (oncogenes), and was recommended for a Nobel Prize. He is an international authority on retroviruses, and a Professor of Molecular Biology at the University of California at Berkeley. It is rumored that his $350,000 research grant was to be terminated last year, and his appeal is to be judged by a committee that includes Gallo's mistress, Dr. Flossie Wong-Staal; and Dr. Dani Bolognesi, now a wealthy patent-holder on HIV tests. These individuals have the ability to rob us of great talent.
Intimidation has been unrelenting and vicious. Duesberg wrote that he had been "...labelled a bigot for considering [the] daily administration of psychoactive and immunosuppressive chemicals more likely to be the cause of AIDS than a chronically dormant and almost chemically undetectable retrovirus. The nation's leading AIDS researcher accused me of being an advocate of promiscuity [to paraphrase it politely] for questioning the viral etiology of AIDS." Could it be that our scientists were more interested in fostering Puritan values than in presenting scientific truth? The facts will speak for themselves.
Instead of answering the sea of questions that shook the very foundations of the AIDS hypothesis, the vested establishment insulted their opponents, barred debate, and even cancelled a White House meeting, refusing to participate in order to demonstrate the "insanity" of even questioning HIV and AIDS. Their criminal arrogance is an affront to all of humanity. Initially, Gallo and his co-conspirators could have possibly been exonerated on the basis of ignorance and stupidity. However, to block open scientific discussion, to use political and economic power to silence opposing points of view, and to suppress or ignore basic scientific fact and logic, is irrefutable evidence of their criminal intent.
Although an impressive cadre of well-known scientists has formed the "Group for the Scientific Reappraisal of the HIV/AIDS Hypothesis", which was started by Dr. Charles A. Thomas, Jr., a Harvard biologist, it is necessary that there be an outcry from the public demanding an investigation. Several Congressmen have taken interest in this matter; amongst them are William Dannemyer and Ron Dellums. Send a copy of this book to your Senator and Congressman. Their names and addresses are available at your local library or through your newspaper. These courageous, honorable and incorruptible scientists have earned, and need, your support!
When you have finished reading the evidence, I am convinced that you will feel relieved in knowing that we are not all doomed to die AIDS, unless, of course, we all start taking AZT based on Gallo's scam and his fraudulent followers. If you are HIV positive, there is one thing you can be sure of: your body has successfully defended intself against an insignificant virus. So read on, and if you agree with the evidence, I ask you to pick up your pen and shout through the mails:
(continued at the link above, one brief excerpt below)
PROSPECTUS
When you have read this book completely, you must come to the conclusion that the following are basic facts and truths:
AIDS IS NOT CONTAGIOUS
AIDS IS NOT A SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED DISEASE AIDS CAN EASILY BE PREVENTED AND CURED
Dr. Gallo (the "discoverer" of the AIDS virus) and his cohorts are guilty of a conspiracy to intentionally commit criminal negligence.
They are guilty of fraud and manslaughter.
The so-called "AIDS test" is unreliable, invalid, and completely misleading; it inaccurately and undependably tests for immunity to an innocent virus.
On the basis of a meaningless test, individuals are subjected to the killer drug AZT.
All of the studies on AZT are fraudulent and misleading, including the first study which resulted in the licensing of this drug.
The Food and Drug Administration of the United States, which licensed AZT, is aware of this fact and has not recalled it; they are guilty of criminal negligence and genocide.
The AIDS hypothesis, its diagnostic tests, and its treatment are the..
DEADLY DECEPTION.
DEADLY DECEPTION (The Most Important Lies)
LIE I. AIDS is Caused by the HIV Virus.
LIE II. AIDS is Contagious.
LIE III. A Positive HIV Test Means Death by AIDS.
LIE IV. AZT is a Treatment for AIDS.
LIE V. AIDS Has No Cure.
THE FACTS (The Real Truth)
I. AIDS is caused by drugs and malnutrition (starvation) and the virus has nothing to do with it.
II. The test for HIV is completely inaccurate, predicts nothing, and can cause severe illness through intense fear.
III. AZT, the main drug used in treatment, causes AIDS.
The brainwashing has been so incredibly effective that your first impulse will be to think that this book is the product of one of those ridiculous tabloids. However, everything in this book is factually documented. Many of the best and brightest scientists now condemn the AIDS deception and it originators.
The perpetrators of the AIDS fraud are named. They dare not sue their accusers and go to court because their crime would be exposed and their growing tens of millions of dollars in profit would dry up. They have cleverly involved thousands of individuals and corporations, most of whom are decently motivated, in their despicable scheme. Worse, they have millions of scientists and physicians who, relatively ignorant in their arcane science, trustingly accept the deluge of fabricated, sophisticated, and wildly pseudo-scientific speculations as scientific fact. Then, with an army of duped and believing scientist followers, they back up their atrocious scam with the idiotic proposition that the proof of the AIDS hypothesis lies in the fact that so many believe in it.
Although 60 thousand papers have been written with money obtained from AIDS grants, not one of those papers proves scientifically that the virus causes AIDS.
The original papers UPON which the AIDS hypothesis was based are a sorry pretense of scientific investigation, based on the worst kind of circumstantial evidence and then presented to the scientific community and the world as proven facts.
After reading this book, some of you will, because of a ten-year media blitz of misinformation, still ask the question, "Then why are so many people dying of a disease we never heard of before?"
The answer:
I. AIDS is simply a new name for 25 diseases that have always existed.
II. The causes of acquired immune deficiency have been listed in medical texts for over 70 years. They are, in order of importance: malnutrition (starvation), drugs, radiation, and chemotherapy.
III. It appeared to be an epidemic at first, because the drug-addicted segment of the gay population began to suffer the effects from years of drug use. They became an identifiable
group when they came out of the closet just prior to the "epidemic".
IV. AIDS in Africa is what it has always been — slow starvation and malnutrition — and it hasn't changed at all, except for the name. Simply compare any AIDS patient with the appearance of a crack cocaine baby or the horrible television pictures of starving Somalians, or prisoners in the concentration camps of Bosnia-Herzgovena and Nazi Germany. The epidemic in Africa simply does not exist. It has been an invention based on completely false information provided by indigent families seeking funds from charitable agencies and also by AIDS workers seeking to protect lucrative jobs. The statistics released are all unverified estimates that have proven to be 91% wrong.
V. Hemophiliacs get AIDS in small numbers because of additives and contaminants in their frequent blood transfusions. This book gives you proof it is not HIV.
VI. AZT, a drug so toxic that it was discarded as a treatment for cancer, and which causes AIDS, is being given to individuals because they tested positive for antibodies to an innocent virus. They will die of an acquired immune deficiency caused by AZT — and many of them are perfectly healthy!
-------
We do not "catch" any disease; we simply succumb to our maladaptation to the environment, pollution of ourselves or pollution of the environment. If this were not true, then the first "epidemic" on earth would have been our last. The epidemics and plagues of history killed millions, but more lived than died—why? The survivors have always been those whose immune systems and defenses were intact.
A healthy individual is one who has adapted to all of the conditions and everything that occupies our planet. This includes not only bacteria and viruses, but the air, the water, the plants and all inhabitants, including our fellow human beings.
-------
Recently, more than 500 of the world's most prominent scientists banded together and formed the "Group for the Scientific Reappraisal of the HIV-AIDS Hypothesis". The founder of this group is Dr. Charles A. Thomas, a Harvard biologist.
The impetus for this action began in 1987 when the world's most knowledgeable and honored retrovirologist, Dr. Peter Duesberg of the University of California at Berkeley, challenged the KV-AIDS hypothesis in the journal, CANCER RESEARCH.
polymoog
Superstar
- Joined
- Jun 17, 2017
- Messages
- 8,213
Lady Knocks Face Mask Fascists Off Their Perch
153news.net
this woman is AWESOME!!!!!
this is her YT channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCo27rVfopwkMMBTnMgV7C9A
Lady Knocks Face Mask Fascists Off Their Perch
Coronavirus: Lady Knocks Face Mask Fascists Off Their Perch [MIRROR] from Ang Walker Hibbett Sports PT 2/ Rue 21 PT 1: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S8J-vhkETqs Ang Walker Youtube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCo27rVfopwkMMBTnMgV7C9A
this woman is AWESOME!!!!!
this is her YT channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCo27rVfopwkMMBTnMgV7C9A
polymoog
Superstar
- Joined
- Jun 17, 2017
- Messages
- 8,213
UK Experts Mask Advice Previous Statements Covid-19 Coronavirus Pandemic Lockdown Quarantine
153news.net
3 1/2 minute compilation of the "experts" saying not to bother with masks.
when "tens of thousands!!!" of people were "literally dying in the streets!!", they said not to wear the mask.
now we only hear of "cases!!!", yet mask obedience is demanded by our rulers.
DO NOT QUESTION AUTHORITY.
UK Experts Mask Advice Previous Statements Covid-19 Coronavirus Pandemic Lockdown Quarantine
UK Experts Mask Advice Previous Statements Covid-19 Coronavirus Pandemic Lockdown Quarantine https://youtu.be/5kGdwFVCJk0?t=2274
3 1/2 minute compilation of the "experts" saying not to bother with masks.
when "tens of thousands!!!" of people were "literally dying in the streets!!", they said not to wear the mask.
now we only hear of "cases!!!", yet mask obedience is demanded by our rulers.
DO NOT QUESTION AUTHORITY.
polymoog
Superstar
- Joined
- Jun 17, 2017
- Messages
- 8,213
Hello everybody
Put your masks ON. Not sure when this video was made but everyone I see is wearing a mask in public in mandatory face mask areas. My advice is take the mask OFF.
well, that convinced me!! LOL
"...and please can be do something <sob!> with the assault <sob!> weapons?" -christine leinonen
Last edited:
A Freeman
Superstar
- Joined
- Nov 11, 2019
- Messages
- 6,866
THE ALLOPATHIC MEDICINE RACKET 1 (MEDICAL MAFIA, BIG PHARMA)
THE ALLOPATHIC MEDICINE RACKET (MEDICAL MAFIA)
"No matter how paranoid you are, what they're actually doing is worse than you can possibly imagine." ~ Ralph J. Gleason
whale.to
elsbet
Superstar
- Joined
- Jun 4, 2017
- Messages
- 5,122
so...:
A Freeman
Superstar
- Joined
- Nov 11, 2019
- Messages
- 6,866
Blaylock: Face Masks Pose Serious Risks To The Healthy
Dr. Russell Blaylock warns that not only do face masks fail to protect the healthy from getting sick, but they also create serious health risks to the wearer. The bottom line is that if you are not sick, you should not wear a face mask.
www.technocracy.news
As for the scientific support for the use of face mask, a recent careful examination of the literature, in which 17 of the best studies were analyzed, concluded that, “ None of the studies established a conclusive relationship between mask/respirator use and protection against influenza infection.”1 Keep in mind, no studies have been done to demonstrate that either a cloth mask or the N95 mask has any effect on transmission of the COVID-19 virus. Any recommendations, therefore, have to be based on studies of influenza virus transmission. And, as you have seen, there is no conclusive evidence of their efficiency in controlling flu virus transmission.
Tidal
Star
- Joined
- Mar 4, 2020
- Messages
- 3,803
Well unless I've misunderstood this graph, the virus has pretty much petered out here in Britain-
A Freeman
Superstar
- Joined
- Nov 11, 2019
- Messages
- 6,866
Excerpt below from: http://www.whale.to/c/disease_theory_summary.html
DISEASE THEORY (Summary)
"The Drug Medical System cannot bear examination. To explain it would be to destroy it, and to defend it even is to damage it."---R.T. Trall M.D.
[This is to demolish vaccination upon which the Drug Medical System sits (Allopathy Inc), more will be added in due course.]
a) Pleomorphism
b) Word game
c) Toxemia
d) Fever
e) Positive effects
f) Toxicology
g) Virology
h) Nutrition
i) Diet
j) Sanitation
They vanished into thin air, Pleomorphism, Toxemia & Cleansing, Toxicology (Toxic air), Nutritional Medicine, and diet, in the cause and cure of infections, and ran with their false germ theory, essential for the vaccine racket.
a). Vax is based on the false Monomorphic Pasteur Germ theory. It isn't a good sign that he was a fraudster and plagiarist of Bechamp who came up with the correct Pleomorphism/Cellular disease theory, seen side by side here: GERM THEORY (Pasteur) vs CELLULAR THEORY (Bechamp).
"Rife showed that by altering the environment and food supply, friendly bacteria such as colon bacillus could be converted into varied "pathogenic" bacteria. For example, Rife also observed that bacillus coli could in time be modified into the bacterial agent associated with typhus, and the process actually reversed. In Rife's words:
In reality, it is not the bacteria themselves that produce the disease, but we believe it is . . . the unbalanced cell metabolism of the human body that in actuality produce the of disease. We also believe if the metabolism of the human body is perfectly balanced . . . it is susceptible to no disease.
This observation closely parallels Alexis Carrel's earlier research at the Rockefeller Institute where he was able to control the rates and levels of infectious disease mortality among mice. Beginning with the standard diet he observed a corresponding death rate of 52 percent. By making specific dietary improvements he was able to reduce mortality rates downward to 32 percent, then 14 percent, and finally to a rate of 0. "----Dr. Raymond Obomsawin
"Intensive research during the past twelve years on the relationship between diet and susceptibility to infection, not only in polio but also in common respiratory infections and tuberculosis, has convinced me that the human organism can protect itself against infection virtually completely by proper nutrition."--Benjamin P. Sandler, M.D.
DISEASE THEORY (Summary)
"The Drug Medical System cannot bear examination. To explain it would be to destroy it, and to defend it even is to damage it."---R.T. Trall M.D.
[This is to demolish vaccination upon which the Drug Medical System sits (Allopathy Inc), more will be added in due course.]
a) Pleomorphism
b) Word game
c) Toxemia
d) Fever
e) Positive effects
f) Toxicology
g) Virology
h) Nutrition
i) Diet
j) Sanitation
They vanished into thin air, Pleomorphism, Toxemia & Cleansing, Toxicology (Toxic air), Nutritional Medicine, and diet, in the cause and cure of infections, and ran with their false germ theory, essential for the vaccine racket.
a). Vax is based on the false Monomorphic Pasteur Germ theory. It isn't a good sign that he was a fraudster and plagiarist of Bechamp who came up with the correct Pleomorphism/Cellular disease theory, seen side by side here: GERM THEORY (Pasteur) vs CELLULAR THEORY (Bechamp).
"Rife showed that by altering the environment and food supply, friendly bacteria such as colon bacillus could be converted into varied "pathogenic" bacteria. For example, Rife also observed that bacillus coli could in time be modified into the bacterial agent associated with typhus, and the process actually reversed. In Rife's words:
In reality, it is not the bacteria themselves that produce the disease, but we believe it is . . . the unbalanced cell metabolism of the human body that in actuality produce the of disease. We also believe if the metabolism of the human body is perfectly balanced . . . it is susceptible to no disease.
This observation closely parallels Alexis Carrel's earlier research at the Rockefeller Institute where he was able to control the rates and levels of infectious disease mortality among mice. Beginning with the standard diet he observed a corresponding death rate of 52 percent. By making specific dietary improvements he was able to reduce mortality rates downward to 32 percent, then 14 percent, and finally to a rate of 0. "----Dr. Raymond Obomsawin
"Intensive research during the past twelve years on the relationship between diet and susceptibility to infection, not only in polio but also in common respiratory infections and tuberculosis, has convinced me that the human organism can protect itself against infection virtually completely by proper nutrition."--Benjamin P. Sandler, M.D.
A Freeman
Superstar
- Joined
- Nov 11, 2019
- Messages
- 6,866
Excerpt below from: The Poisoned Needle - Suppressed Facts About Vaccination by Eleanor McBean, 1957
Dr. Walter James, of Philadelphia said:
"VACCINATION DOES NOT STAY THE SPREAD OF DISEASE OR EVEN MODIFY IT in those cases who get it after vaccination. IT DOES INTRODUCE INTO THE SYSTEM TUBERCULOSIS, CANCER, AND LEPROSY. It does just what inoculation did — cause the spread of disease."
Annie Riley Hale, (researcher for Congressmen) stated:
"The Surgeon-General of the United States Army innocently recorded in the 1918-1919 report that ‘for all officers and enlisted men, Americans and native troops in all countries where U.S. troops were serving, tuberculosis of the lungs was the leading cause for discharge; and among American troops at home and abroad there were 31,106 hospital admissions for pulmonary tuberculosis with 1,114 deaths, in the period of this country’s participation in the First World War.’" (Medical Voodoo, p. 27)
No tubercular men were inducted into the Army. It was after the blood poisoning vaccinations at camp that diseases of every description developed. Then the men were invalided home by the thousands and dumped on society as physical and mental wrecks. Many of these men had never been in battle nor had even left American soil.
Dr. E. C. Rosenow, an experimentalist at the Mayo Clinic, recorded in the Mayo Collected Papers (Vol. II, p. 92) that he found "the vaccine serums injected into guinea pigs tended to localize in the lungs."
Edward Jenner inoculated his 18 months old son with swine-pox, on November 1791 and again in April, 1798 with cow-pox. The boy was never very well after that and died of tuberculosis at the age of 21.
In Baron’s Life of Jenner, (Vol. II, p. 304) we learn that, "On the 14th of May, 1796 . . . Jenner vaccinated James Phipps, a boy about eight years old, with the matter taken from the hand of a dairymaid infected with casual cow-pox.
After waiting six weeks Jenner inoculated this boy on both arms with smallpox matter, taken from the arm of a boy with smallpox. Several months later Phipps was again inoculated with the variolous matter (smallpox pus) but no effect was produced."
The inoculation didn’t "take" so on the strength of this one experiment and its questionable interpretation, Jenner based his claim that one vaccination would "forever secure a person from smallpox." No time had elapsed to prove whether it would last a lifetime or a month or at all; but without any proof or any scientific basis or evidence for its practice, the doctors and the government adopted it and made it compulsory, no doubt, seeing the gold mine in profits that it would yield.
James Phipps was declared immune to smallpox but be too, died of tuberculosis at the age of 20.
In Baron’s Life of Jenner, the author refers to Phipps condition as follows:
"While walking with a friend one day they passed young Phipps, when Jenner exclaimed, ‘Oh, there is poor Phipps; I wish you could see him; he has been very unwell lately and I am afraid he has got tuberculosis on his lungs. He was recently inoculated for smallpox, I believe for the 20th time, and all without effect.’"
As was previously stated, neither Jenner, with all his fanfare and praise, nor the obscure Jesty, was the discoverer of inoculation. It was a "carry-over" from very ancient times when superstitious fear and guess-work dominated the healing field.
An idea of its ancient origin may be gathered from the "Lecture Memoranda,"XVII International Congress of Medicine, London, 1913, which states:
"The practice of inoculation for the prevention of disease is one of considerable antiquity. The period of its discovery can only be conjectured..."
"Dhanwantari, the Vedic Father of Medicine, and the earliest known Hindu physician, who lived about 1,500 B.C., is supposed to have been the first to practice inoculation for smallpox. It is even stated that the ancient Hindus employed a vaccine, which they prepared by the transmission of the smallpox virus through a cow." (History of Inoculation and Vaccination, pp. 6, 13)
This common practice of disease transmission of both ancient and modern tunes, undoubtedly, has a strong relationship to the plagues and epidemics that sweep those countries where vaccination is still practiced.
If this method of disease prevention had ever been successful, smallpox would have been eliminated from the world centuries ago, but smallpox persists in localities where vaccination is compulsory and declines where it is abandoned in favor of sanitation and hygienic measures.
The practice of inoculation spread like a noxious weed, from the savage tribes of the forgotten past into the civilizations of Africa, Arabia, Tibet, India and finally into Europe and America.
Dr. Clements in his pamphlet, "A Superstitious Custom" traces the inoculation practices through the various modern countries previous to Jenner’s day. He writes:
"In 1673 inoculation against smallpox appeared in Denmark; and in 1778, on recommendation of the medical fraternity, two inoculation houses were established by the king in the capitol.
"In Italy, inoculation was secretly practiced by the Neapolitans from early times. It was freely performed by nurses, who inoculated infants, entrusted to their care, without the knowledge of the parents.
"In 1722, Dr. Wright, a surgeon of Wales refers to inoculation against smallpox in the British Isles as ‘a very ancient custom.’ (Jenner didn’t begin his vaccinations until 1796). One William Allen, then 99 years old, said inoculation had been known and used during his entire lifetime, and he well remembered his mother stating that it had been commonly done all her life, and that she got smallpox that way.
"The first record of inoculation in France appears in 1712, and in 1763 a fatal epidemic of smallpox occurred in that country that wiped out a large part of the population; it was attributed to inoculation and for a time the Government prohibited the practice. Five years later, on the insistence of the medical faculties, this decree was rescinded and by the latter part of the 18th century inoculation was again commonly practiced in that country.
"The first record of inoculation in Ireland appears in 1723, when a medical doctor in Dublin inoculated 25 persons. Three of these died as a result, and the custom was abandoned for some time.
‘Inoculation appears to have been first introduced in Germany in 1724. It soon fell into disfavor, however, because of the many deaths in Berlin from smallpox, as a result of it. After many years of diligent medical propagandizing, the doctors were able to get the people to accept it again.
"In 1754, Peverani introduced inoculation for smallpox into Rome, but smallpox soon began to spread and opposition rose to such a pitch that the practice was discontinued, until the medical profession, after years of labor, persuaded the people to again submit to it.
"One hundred forty-two years later, Carlo Ruta, Professor of Materia Medica at the University of Perugia, Italy, protested against the deadly custom in these scathing words:
"Vaccination is a monstrosity, a misbegotten offspring of error and ignorance; and, being such, it should have no place in either hygiene or medicine....Believe not in vaccination, it is a world-wide delusion, an unscientific practice, a fatal superstition with consequences measured today by tears and sorrow without end.’
"In Ancient Greece and Rome, the MIGHTY NATIONS OF MIGHTY MEN, there was no inoculation — no vaccination — and no smallpox." These nations have been known down through history as being famous for their general habits of health, cleanliness and stability as well as their vigor and strength. Among the Greeks and Romans smallpox was unknown until it was carried there by the inoculators from other countries.
TUBERCULOSIS CAUSED BY VACCINATION
Dr. Walter James, of Philadelphia said:
"VACCINATION DOES NOT STAY THE SPREAD OF DISEASE OR EVEN MODIFY IT in those cases who get it after vaccination. IT DOES INTRODUCE INTO THE SYSTEM TUBERCULOSIS, CANCER, AND LEPROSY. It does just what inoculation did — cause the spread of disease."
Annie Riley Hale, (researcher for Congressmen) stated:
"The Surgeon-General of the United States Army innocently recorded in the 1918-1919 report that ‘for all officers and enlisted men, Americans and native troops in all countries where U.S. troops were serving, tuberculosis of the lungs was the leading cause for discharge; and among American troops at home and abroad there were 31,106 hospital admissions for pulmonary tuberculosis with 1,114 deaths, in the period of this country’s participation in the First World War.’" (Medical Voodoo, p. 27)
No tubercular men were inducted into the Army. It was after the blood poisoning vaccinations at camp that diseases of every description developed. Then the men were invalided home by the thousands and dumped on society as physical and mental wrecks. Many of these men had never been in battle nor had even left American soil.
Dr. E. C. Rosenow, an experimentalist at the Mayo Clinic, recorded in the Mayo Collected Papers (Vol. II, p. 92) that he found "the vaccine serums injected into guinea pigs tended to localize in the lungs."
Edward Jenner inoculated his 18 months old son with swine-pox, on November 1791 and again in April, 1798 with cow-pox. The boy was never very well after that and died of tuberculosis at the age of 21.
In Baron’s Life of Jenner, (Vol. II, p. 304) we learn that, "On the 14th of May, 1796 . . . Jenner vaccinated James Phipps, a boy about eight years old, with the matter taken from the hand of a dairymaid infected with casual cow-pox.
After waiting six weeks Jenner inoculated this boy on both arms with smallpox matter, taken from the arm of a boy with smallpox. Several months later Phipps was again inoculated with the variolous matter (smallpox pus) but no effect was produced."
The inoculation didn’t "take" so on the strength of this one experiment and its questionable interpretation, Jenner based his claim that one vaccination would "forever secure a person from smallpox." No time had elapsed to prove whether it would last a lifetime or a month or at all; but without any proof or any scientific basis or evidence for its practice, the doctors and the government adopted it and made it compulsory, no doubt, seeing the gold mine in profits that it would yield.
James Phipps was declared immune to smallpox but be too, died of tuberculosis at the age of 20.
In Baron’s Life of Jenner, the author refers to Phipps condition as follows:
"While walking with a friend one day they passed young Phipps, when Jenner exclaimed, ‘Oh, there is poor Phipps; I wish you could see him; he has been very unwell lately and I am afraid he has got tuberculosis on his lungs. He was recently inoculated for smallpox, I believe for the 20th time, and all without effect.’"
VACCINATION IS OF VERY ANCIENT ORIGIN
As was previously stated, neither Jenner, with all his fanfare and praise, nor the obscure Jesty, was the discoverer of inoculation. It was a "carry-over" from very ancient times when superstitious fear and guess-work dominated the healing field.
An idea of its ancient origin may be gathered from the "Lecture Memoranda,"XVII International Congress of Medicine, London, 1913, which states:
"The practice of inoculation for the prevention of disease is one of considerable antiquity. The period of its discovery can only be conjectured..."
"Dhanwantari, the Vedic Father of Medicine, and the earliest known Hindu physician, who lived about 1,500 B.C., is supposed to have been the first to practice inoculation for smallpox. It is even stated that the ancient Hindus employed a vaccine, which they prepared by the transmission of the smallpox virus through a cow." (History of Inoculation and Vaccination, pp. 6, 13)
This common practice of disease transmission of both ancient and modern tunes, undoubtedly, has a strong relationship to the plagues and epidemics that sweep those countries where vaccination is still practiced.
If this method of disease prevention had ever been successful, smallpox would have been eliminated from the world centuries ago, but smallpox persists in localities where vaccination is compulsory and declines where it is abandoned in favor of sanitation and hygienic measures.
The practice of inoculation spread like a noxious weed, from the savage tribes of the forgotten past into the civilizations of Africa, Arabia, Tibet, India and finally into Europe and America.
Dr. Clements in his pamphlet, "A Superstitious Custom" traces the inoculation practices through the various modern countries previous to Jenner’s day. He writes:
"In 1673 inoculation against smallpox appeared in Denmark; and in 1778, on recommendation of the medical fraternity, two inoculation houses were established by the king in the capitol.
"In Italy, inoculation was secretly practiced by the Neapolitans from early times. It was freely performed by nurses, who inoculated infants, entrusted to their care, without the knowledge of the parents.
"In 1722, Dr. Wright, a surgeon of Wales refers to inoculation against smallpox in the British Isles as ‘a very ancient custom.’ (Jenner didn’t begin his vaccinations until 1796). One William Allen, then 99 years old, said inoculation had been known and used during his entire lifetime, and he well remembered his mother stating that it had been commonly done all her life, and that she got smallpox that way.
"The first record of inoculation in France appears in 1712, and in 1763 a fatal epidemic of smallpox occurred in that country that wiped out a large part of the population; it was attributed to inoculation and for a time the Government prohibited the practice. Five years later, on the insistence of the medical faculties, this decree was rescinded and by the latter part of the 18th century inoculation was again commonly practiced in that country.
"The first record of inoculation in Ireland appears in 1723, when a medical doctor in Dublin inoculated 25 persons. Three of these died as a result, and the custom was abandoned for some time.
‘Inoculation appears to have been first introduced in Germany in 1724. It soon fell into disfavor, however, because of the many deaths in Berlin from smallpox, as a result of it. After many years of diligent medical propagandizing, the doctors were able to get the people to accept it again.
"In 1754, Peverani introduced inoculation for smallpox into Rome, but smallpox soon began to spread and opposition rose to such a pitch that the practice was discontinued, until the medical profession, after years of labor, persuaded the people to again submit to it.
"One hundred forty-two years later, Carlo Ruta, Professor of Materia Medica at the University of Perugia, Italy, protested against the deadly custom in these scathing words:
"Vaccination is a monstrosity, a misbegotten offspring of error and ignorance; and, being such, it should have no place in either hygiene or medicine....Believe not in vaccination, it is a world-wide delusion, an unscientific practice, a fatal superstition with consequences measured today by tears and sorrow without end.’
"In Ancient Greece and Rome, the MIGHTY NATIONS OF MIGHTY MEN, there was no inoculation — no vaccination — and no smallpox." These nations have been known down through history as being famous for their general habits of health, cleanliness and stability as well as their vigor and strength. Among the Greeks and Romans smallpox was unknown until it was carried there by the inoculators from other countries.
shankara
Star
- Joined
- Apr 23, 2018
- Messages
- 1,322
So put your money where your mouth is and go get some blood from an HIV-infected person infused into you.
Frank Badfinger
Superstar
- Joined
- Aug 4, 2019
- Messages
- 15,812