Lisa
Superstar
- Joined
- Mar 13, 2017
- Messages
- 20,288
Check the title of the thread genius........Those were the only 2 cases in the article you quoted...
View attachment 26349
I was replying to your article and that’s what it was talking about..if it wasn’t what you were wanting to say, maybe you shouldn’t have linked to it?Check the title of the thread genius........
The threads topic is regarding the militarized, mercenary police forces across the nation which have devolved into shock troops to guard areas with enough affluence to demand their services. Thats what posters here are trying to discuss. When presented with the information you ask for concerning he topic, you commence to mumbling with your fingers and asking more questions. Your posts speak for themselves.I was replying to your article and that’s what it was talking about..if it wasn’t what you were wanting to say, maybe you shouldn’t have linked to it?
Then why add that article when it was totally talking about the race of the people instead of the militarization of the police? Didn’t you read it before you posted it?The threads topic is regarding the militarized, mercenary police forces across the nation which have devolved into shock troops to guard areas with enough affluence to demand their services. Thats what posters here are trying to discuss. When presented with the information you ask for concerning he topic, you commence to mumbling with your fingers and asking more questions. Your posts speak for themselves.
You dont really understand how words work, do you?Then why add that article when it was totally talking about the race of the people instead of the militarization of the police? Didn’t you read it before you posted it?
Why do you say that? The article totally mentions the race of the cops and the victims..which led me to believe that was their main goal.You dont really understand how words work, do you?