Twelve Tribes of Israel info & research thread

A Freeman

Star
Joined
Nov 11, 2019
Messages
2,561
Exhibit 10


The Form and Order of Service that is to be performed and the Ceremonies that are to be observed in

The Coronation of Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II in the Abbey Church of St. Peter, Westminster, on Tuesday, the second day of June, 1953


I. The Preparation

In the morning upon the day of the Coronation early, care is to be taken that the Ampulla be filled with Oil for the anointing, and, together with the Spoon, be laid ready upon the Altar in the Abbey Church.

The LITANY shall be sung as the Dean and Prebendaries and the choir of Westminster proceed from the Altar to the west door of the Church.

The Archbishops being already vested in their Copes and Mitres and the Bishops Assistant in their Copes, the procession shall be formed immediately outside of the west door of the Church, and shall wait till notice be given of the approach of her Majesty, and shall then begin to move into the Church.

And the people shall remain standing from the Entrance until the beginning of the Communion Service.


II. The Entrance into the Church

The Queen, as soon as she enters at the west door of the Church, is to be received with this Anthem:

Psalm 122, 1–3, 6, 7.
I was glad when they said unto me:
We will go into the house of the Lord.
Our feet shall stand in thy gates:
O Jerusalem.
Jerusalem is built as a city:
that is at unity in itself.
O pray for the peace of Jerusalem:
they shall prosper that love thee.
Peace be within thy walls:
and plenteousness within thy palaces.

The Queen shall in the mean time pass up through the body of the Church, into and through the choir, and so up the steps to the Theatre; and having passed by her Throne, she shall make her humble adoration, and then kneeling at the faldstool set for her before her Chair of Estate on the south side of the Altar, use some short private prayers; and after, sit down in her Chair.

The Bible, Paten, and Chalice shall meanwhile be brought by the Bishops who had borne them, and placed upon the Altar.

Then the Lords who carry in procession the Regalia, except those who carry the Swords, shall come from their places and present in order every one what he carries to the Archbishop, who shall deliver them to the Dean of Westminster, to be placed by him upon the Altar.


III. The Recognition

The Archbishop, together with the Lord Chancellor, Lord Great Chamberlain, Lord High Constable, and Earl Marshal (Garter King of Arms preceding them), shall then go to the East side of the Theatre, and after shall go to the other three sides in this order, South, West, and North, and at every of the four sides the Archbishop shall with a loud voice speak to the People: and the Queen in the mean while, standing up by King Edward's Chair, shall turn and show herself unto the People at every of the four sides of the Theatre as the Archbishop is at every of them, the Archbishop saying:

Sirs, I here present unto you
Queen ELIZABETH,
your undoubted Queen:
Wherefore all you who are come this day
to do your homage and service,
Are you willing to do the same?

The People signify their willingness and joy, by loud and repeated acclamations, all with one voice crying out,

GOD SAVE QUEEN ELIZABETH.

Then the trumpets shall sound.


IV. The Oath

The Queen having returned to her Chair (her Majesty having already on Tuesday, the fourth day of November, 1952, in the presence of the two Houses of Parliament, made and signed the Declaration prescribed by Act of Parliament), the Archbishop standing before her shall administer the Coronation Oath, first asking the Queen,

Madam, is your Majesty willing to take the Oath?

And the Queen answering,

I am willing,


The Archbishop shall minister these questions; and the Queen, having a book in her hands, shall answer each question severally as follows:

Archbishop: Will you solemnly promise and swear to govern the Peoples of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, the Union of South Africa, Pakistan and Ceylon, and of your Possessions and other Territories to any of them belonging or pertaining, according to their respective laws and customs?

Queen: I solemnly promise so to do.

Archbishop: Will you to your power cause Law and Justice, in Mercy, to be executed in all your judgements?

Queen: I will.

Archbishop: Will you to the utmost of your power MAINTAIN THE LAWS OF GOD and the true profession of the Gospel?

Will you to the utmost of your power maintain in the United Kingdom the Protestant Reformed Religion established by law?

Will you maintain and preserve inviolably the settlement of the Church of England, and the doctrine, worship, discipline, and government thereof, as by law established in England?

And will you preserve unto the Bishops and Clergy of England, and to the Churches there committed to their charge, all such rights and privileges, as by law do or shall appertain to them or any of them?

Queen: All this I promise to do.

Then the Queen arising out of her Chair, supported as before, the Sword of State being carried before her, shall go to the Altar, and make her solemn Oath in the sight of [The Bible to be brought.] all the people to observe the premisses: laying her right hand upon the Holy Gospel in the great Bible (which was before carried in the procession and is now brought from the altar by the Archbishop, and tendered to her as she kneels upon the steps), and saying these words:

The things which I have here promised, I will perform, and keep. So help me God.

[And a Silver Standish.]Then the Queen shall kiss the Book and sign the Oath.

The Queen having thus taken her Oath, shall return again to her Chair, and the Bible shall be delivered to the Dean of Westminster.


V. The Presenting of the Holy Bible

When the Queen is again seated, the Archbishop shall go to her Chair; and the Moderator of the General Assembly of the Church of Scotland, receiving the Bible from the Dean of Westminster, shall bring it to the Queen and present it to her, the Archbishop saying these words:

Our gracious Queen:
to keep your Majesty ever mindful of the law and the Gospel of God
as the Rule for the whole life and government of Christian Princes,
we present you with this Book,
the most valuable thing that this world affords.

And the Moderator shall continue:
Here is Wisdom;
This is the royal Law;
These are the lively Oracles of God.


Then shall the Queen deliver back the Bible to the Moderator, who shall bring it to the Dean of Westminster, to be reverently placed upon the Altar. This done, the Archbishop shall return to the Altar.
 






A Freeman

Star
Joined
Nov 11, 2019
Messages
2,561
The Heraldic Symbolism of the Unicorn on the British Coat-of-Arms.


1577621298491.png


The British Coat-of-Arms is the Coat-of-Arms of the 12-tribed Kingdom of Israel and Christ their Rightful KING.

The TRUE Israel People have, on their "Coat-of-Arms", a Lion and a Unicorn which is shown as a white horse "rampant" with one horn. The amber Lion "rampant" on the left-side is the emblem of the two-tribed "House of Judah" and the Unicorn or white Wild-Ox "rampant" on the right-side is the emblem of the ten-tribed "House of Israel", collectively making the 12-tribed "Kingdom of Israel".

The word British is Hebrew. It means "the People of the Covenant" or in other words "the People Israel", whose written Constitution; under that Covenant, that they have rejected to their own loss; is written in the Bible (Israel's Book) that they still swear on to tell the Truth, but whose Constitution, under which there are no poor people, is then foolishly rejected by almost everyone, in favour of inferior and unjust, man-made laws and economics which cause poverty and therefore also crime brought about by deprivation and desperation.

The Israelite tribe of Joseph (of the coat of many Colours/Coats-of-Arms) to whom Jacob/Israel gave his new name Israel and his Unicorn-Emblem (Deuteronomy 33:16-17) and the "Coat of Many Colours (many Coats-of-Arms*)", is, in fact, divided into two:- Ephraim and Manasseh.

King of kings’ Bible - Deuteronomy 33:16 And for the precious things of the earth and fullness thereof, and [for] the good Will of Him that dwelt in the bush: let ["The Blessing"] come upon the head of Joseph, and the CROWN upon the head of him [that was] separated from his brethren (Gen. 49:10 & 22-24).
33:17 His glory [is like] the firstling of his bullock, and his horns [are like] the horns of UNICORNS: with them he shall push the people together to the ends of the earth: and they [are] the ten thousands of Ephraim, and they [are] the thousands of Manasseh.

* To see the "Colours" from which Joseph's coat was made, please read my Booklet called "Gibraltar - British or Spanish? The TRUE Historical FACTS will surprise you" http://i.am/jah/britspan.htm

Joseph had two sons, called Ephraim and Manasseh, whose descendants, today, are the English and English-Americans respectively and they are the TRUE Israel, because Jacob/Israel gave them alone the name Israel, and the sole Right to use the name Israel (Genesis 48:16):-

Genesis 48:16 The Angel which redeemed me from all evil, bless the lads; and let my name [Israel] be named on them (let Ephraim and Manasseh be called Israel), and the name of my fathers Abraham and Isaac; and let them grow into a multitude in the midst of the earth. Note well that Jacob/Israel did not give his name Israel to Judah/Jew-dah or any of his other sons.

Abraham, Joseph's great-grandad, was told by God that, "in Isaac shall your seed be called" (Genesis 21 v 12) - Isaac's sons - Saac's sons - Saxons. The British-English and the English-Americans are Engel-o'-Saxons or Anglo-Saxons. God's Word is ever TRUE.

The Unicorn-white horse (Engel) represents the horse upon which God's Witnesses (Rev./Apoc. 1 v 5) (Isaiah 43 v 12; Rev./Apoc. 11:3) ride, as in Revelation/Apocalypse 19 v 11. In England there are white horses that have been carved into hillsides, etc.

The Unicorn in Scriptural Code-language:-

HORN is the code-word for kingdom.

UNICORN symbolizes a Unique horn - "One Kingdom , world without end" - God's Kingdom on Earth - soon.

On the Coat-of-Arms, the belt surrounding the shield; with which the people were to gird up their loins with great strength; has written on it, "Honi soit qui mal y pense".

"Honi soit qui mal y pense" is Old French and it is one of God's rules concerning His advice and Divine-Justice and means "Evil be to him who thinks it".

Under it, in French, is written "Dieu et Mon Droit" - "God and My Right" - the Birth-Right of Israel (the British and related-nations), given to Ephraim - the Engel-ish.

The Unicorn (or Wild-ox - the Engel) has the Crown of Israel around its neck so that it is not possible to remove it. The crown is chained to the words "Mon Droit", which means "My Right" and refers to the Birthright given to Ephraim, which, like the crown to which it and the Unicorn (Engel) is chained, can never be removed from Ephraim - the Engel-ish.

The Lion "rampant" represents the "House of Judah" wearing a crown that can and will be removed, when Shiloh (from Ephraim) takes His Rightful* British Throne (Genesis 49:10, 22-24), soon, from the "House of Windsor", which is, like Elizabeth 2, descended from the "House of Judah" and the royal-line of David:-

King of kings’ Bible - Genesis 49:10 The sceptre shall not depart from Judah [to Joseph], nor a law-giver from between his feet, UNTIL Shiloh comes [from Joseph-Ephraim v 22-24]; and unto him [shall] the gathering of the people [be].

49:22 Joseph [is] a fruitful bough, [even] a fruitful bough by a well; [whose] branches run over the wall:
49:23 The archers have sorely grieved him, and shot [at him], and hated him:
49:24 But his bow abode in strength, and the arms of his hands were made strong by the hands of the mighty [God] of Jacob; (from THERE [is] The Shepherd, The [Corner] Stone of Israel:)(Daniel 2:34-5; 45)

* Ezekiel 21:26 Thus saith the Lord "I AM"; Remove the diadem (sovereignty), and take off the crown: this [shall] not [be] the same: exalt [him that is] low (Line of Judah/Zarah), and abase [him that is] high (Line of Judah/Pharez).
21:27 I will overturn (1), overturn (2), overturn (3), it: and it shall be no [more], [overturned] UNTIL he come whose Right it is; and (4) I will give it [him - Shiloh/Christ (Genesis 49 v 10)].

1. From Judah/Pharez in Jerusalem to Judah/Zarah (of the "Red Hand" - Genesis 38:28-30) at Tara, County Royal Meath, Ireland, constituting the abasing of the high ones (Pharez) and the exalting of the low ones (Zarah).

2. From Tara to Scotland and Fergus the Great.

3. From Scotland to England, with Edward "Longshanks".

4. The fourth overturn began on 25/12/50 when Ian Hamilton and friends kindly removed the Stone of Destiny from Westminster Abbey and took it from David, who was from both the Judah line of David (Gen. 49:10) and also was called prince David, who had become king Edward the 8th and outlived his stand-in - George the 6th, fulfilling, exactly, Christ's own prophecy to his Apostle John in his Revelation to John:-

King of kings’ Bible – Revelation 22:16 I Jesus have sent mine angel to testify unto you these things in the communities. I am the root (source) and the successor of David (Ezekiel 21:27), [and] the bright and Morning Star.

The Silver Lion standing firmly on all four feet - Supreme on top of the king's crowned-helmet and wearing a crown higher than all the others, symbolizes Christ the Rightful King of Israel, who on the Second-Coming, as Prophesied by God, will use a new body from the tribe of Ephraim - the Engel-ish.

The helmet itself with the king's crown on it and Christ standing upon the top of it, to guide the wearer's thoughts, symbolizes the "Helmet of Salvation" referred to in Paul's letter to the Ephesians in chapter 6 verse 17.

Ephesians 6:17 "And take the Helmet of Salvation, and the Sword of the Spirit, which is the Word of God (John 1:14):"

The shield which is surrounded by the belt, shows, in the bottom left-hand quarter, the Harp of David who was king of Israel and whose harp has been adopted by Ireland, the inhabitants of which are a mixture of Danites and Judah/Zarahites of the Red hand (Gen. 38:28, 30) that is superimposed on the "Star of David", which is superimposed on the "Cross of Sacrifice", on the Northern Ireland flag. The Irish people have been wrongfully divided by their "blind" priests with their Organised, Ritualised Religions even though they are both descended from Jacob's sons and are therefore both Israelite nations and brothers and both claim allegiance to Christ.

The shield also shows, in the top right-hand quarter, the Red lion "rampant" of Scotland, which country is named after Scota their mother, who was a princess from Judah/Zarah of the Red hand. The Scots are descended from the same stock as the Northern Irish people of Judah/Zarah, who migrated from Ireland to Scotland.

The lion emblem, as already explained, is the emblem of Judah, who had twin sons called Pharez, and, Zarah of the Red hand. Therefore it is only logical that the lion emblem, when used by Judah/Zarah of the Red hand, should also be Red in colour.

The shield shows, in the top left-hand and bottom right-hand quarters, six lions "couchant" symbolizing England; Wales* and all the young lions of the British Commonwealth.

* Wales also adopted the Harp of David as an emblem and their national musical-instrument. Another "Sign" of the British-Hebrew/Israelite ancestry and heritage is the fact that, as in Hebrew, Berit or Brit means "Covenant" in the Welsh language.


All Bible references quoted are from my newly completed "King of kings' Bible" – http://jahtruth.net/kofkad.htm .

The King of kings' Bible may also be viewed for free at:- http://jahtruth.net/kofk-free/Bible.

Copyright © JAH - 1998. All rights reserved
 






Joined
Jul 29, 2018
Messages
2,053
Huh? You cant point to a time period where the modern European was Torah observant AT ALL. While Elijah Middlebrook Haines(to name one person) wrote that the American Indians had Hebrew like customs.
The Torah Law was instituted in ancient Ireland by Jeremiah the Prophet and queen Teia Tephi (Jeremiah ) and it brought peace and prosperity. Sadly for the Irish, although The Law was instituted and taught for a period of time, it did not last.

Now, the wait continues for The Law to become re-instituted in the isles once again:

Isaiah
42:3 A bruised reed he shall not break, and the smoking flax he shall not quench: he shall bring forth True Judgment.
42:4 He shall not fail nor be discouraged, until he hath set True Judgment in the earth: and the isles shall wait for His Law.

Problem is that we cant seem to find any stone tablets of the commandments elsewhere. So like my analogy to "Free"man said, its like they came here and left remnants of them being here, but in the middle east,their HOME, left nothing. Where are the stone tablets there where their homebase allegedly was? And no the hearsay "Ark of the covenant" being in Ireland doesnt count either.
The original stone tablets with the Ten Commandments on them that were given to Moses to put in the Ark are located in Ireland and kept underneath the Mound of the Hostages, inside the Ark of the Covenant which is also buried there along with the bones of queen Teia Tephi.

Cairn T, at Loughcrew, nr. Oldcastle, Royal Meath in Ireland is the Tomb of Jeremiah the Bible Prophet who was commissioned by God to tear down; uproot (from Jerusalem) and plant (in Ireland) the daughter (the Tender Twig - Teia Tephi), from the line of David (symbolised in Scripture as the High Cedar), of king Zedekiah, in c. 588 B.C.; the Throne of Israel - the Lia Fail / Bethel Stone and The Ark of The Covenant.
Jeremiah 1:10 See, I have this day set thee over the nations and over the kingdoms, to root out, and to pull down, and to destroy, and to throw down, to build, and to plant.

The proof of the fact, that this cairn is the tomb of Jeremiah, is "written in stone" in hieroglyphics, on the stones within the cairn itself.

At the top of the sacred tymboglyphics, on the stone, to the left, there is an eagle with a twig in its beak and Teia Tephi is referred to in the Bible Book of Ezekiel (Ezekiel is the Zulkifl referred to in the Koran) as a tender twig. There is also a Bible reference to God cropping off the tender twig and carrying it to safety and planting it.
Ezekiel 17:4 He (Nebuchadnezzar) cropped off the top of his young twigs, and carried it into a land of traffick; he set it in a city of merchants (Babylon).


17:22 Thus saith the Lord "I AM"; I will also take of the highest branch of the high cedar, and will set [it]; I will crop off from the top of his young twigs a tender one (female - Teia Tephi), and will plant [it (her)] upon an high mountain and eminent (in the British Isles):
17:23 In the mountain of the height of Israel will I plant it (at Tara): and it shall bring forth boughs, and bear fruit, and be a goodly cedar: and under it shall dwell all fowl of every wing; in the shadow of the branches thereof shall they dwell.
17:24 And all the trees of the field shall know that I the "I AM" have brought down the high tree (Pharez in Jerusalem), have exalted the low tree (Zarah in Ireland), have dried up the green tree (the 2 tribed House of Judah)*, and have made the dry tree (the 10 tribed House of Israel) to flourish: I the "I AM" have spoken and have done [it].
 






Last edited:
Joined
Mar 17, 2017
Messages
2,094
If you wish to indulge in your ridiculous fantasy that God was lying to Abraham, and that He was lying about Israel becoming a nation and a company/multitude/commonwealth of nations, and that He was lying about Israel becoming a multitude in the midst of the earth that would number as "the stars of heaven",
I didnt say He was lying. I said YOU'RE lying when you say He gave it to Israel while they werent, and still arent, obeying the Torah. Not only that, but I dont believe the caucasian we see ruling Europe now, ALWAYS ruled Europe. So when you point to sources and say "SEE!?!?" Im already of the understanding that its not just automatically a caucasian. And thats based on what i've brought to the table already with even more out there

You cannot honestly claim to be looking at ALL of the historical evidence, while ignoring the overwhelming majority of it and calling
This is you projecting a problem you have, onto me. Its YOU who isnt looking at all of the historical evidence. You simply want to say "Europe" and think that everyone is a laymen and will automatically think "Caucasian". No buddy. There were black people in Europe before the caucasians rulership started. I've already shown you Spain and Germany and havent even went to Scotland with it yet. And we can but you seem to have some trouble addressing what has already been brought... Here is Spain and Germany again:






The German tapestry clearly shows a black king and queen defending themselves from "wildmen". The Incan list of kings clearly depicts King Charles, HOLY ROMAN EMPEROR, who was King of Spain, as a man of color...And as time goes on in the list you can see that, for whatever reason (i.e. a change in power), the kings become lighter. So essentially what Im saying is that when you say "European" its not automatically caucasian. And its nothing to jump from Spain and Germany here, to Ireland either. But you guys seem to have trouble even addressing this...
 






Joined
Mar 17, 2017
Messages
2,094
The Torah Law was instituted in ancient Ireland by Jeremiah the Prophet and queen Teia Tephi
Yea how about the last 300 years? Anything besides following the Roman way every step yet taking credit for colonizing the world?

The original stone tablets with the Ten Commandments on them that were given to Moses to put in the Ark are located in Ireland
In other words, no there arent any stone tablets found anywhere in the world except the Americas...
 






elsbet

Star
Joined
Jun 4, 2017
Messages
4,685
Lol I didnt mean anything by it btw

And we kinda were. He was saying that "ruddy" fits the British while I was arguing that the "British" gave the color of "ruddy" to a dark brown/reddish type of color when naming the "ruddy duck/cow".
Ah... gotcha. No worries.

The aquamarine beak is a nice touch. :)
 






Joined
Jul 29, 2018
Messages
2,053
Yea how about the last 300 years? Anything besides following the Roman way every step yet taking credit for colonizing the world?

In other words, no there arent any stone tablets found anywhere in the world except the Americas...
This is where we are at now:

'God has always defended them and you, until now, because of His Promise to Abraham, but that promise has already been fulfilled, so has now run out, and He is going to punish them and you for your idolatry, and defying Him, rejecting Christ as your King, breaking His Commandments and your Covenant with Him, to be His demonstration people to the rest of the world, about how wonderful it is to live under His Commandments and Perfect Royal Law of Liberty, and His Blessings that accompany obedience. Log on to -JAHTruth.net/abraham; and JAHTruth.net/blescur.

During the previous two World Wars and previous wars, He sank the Spanish Armada that Sir Francis Drake mopped-up after, and gave the British and Americans the best weapons' technology with which to defeat their enemies, but now
He is giving it to Russia, China and Iran instead, so that they will win WW3, and the UK and USA will lose.'



The UK and USA are the 'Two Witnesses' who are going to be defeated and killed at Armageddon:

 






Last edited:

A Freeman

Star
Joined
Nov 11, 2019
Messages
2,561
I didnt say He was lying. I said YOU'RE lying when you say He gave it to Israel while they werent, and still arent, obeying the Torah. Not only that, but I dont believe the caucasian we see ruling Europe now, ALWAYS ruled Europe. So when you point to sources and say "SEE!?!?" Im already of the understanding that its not just automatically a caucasian. And thats based on what i've brought to the table already with even more out there
Please show us ANY nation on earth that has ever, or currently is obeying The Law (the Torah) that God gave us. You can't, can you?

Even Israel, under the reigns of king David and king Solomon only marginally kept The Law and, while they were blessed for it for a time for doing so, Israel was eventually punished for their lawlessness/sinfulness. But God DID make David an UNCONDITIONAL promise about the Throne of Israel, just as He made to Abraham about Israel becoming a nation and a company/multitude/commonwealth of nations (among many other things). So anyone who is trying to claim otherwise is calling God a liar, whether they realize it or admit it.

You keep on talking about what you believe or don't believe, which is irrelevant. It's the evidence and scriptural references describing Israel (their "marks") that matter. Your "evidence" has thus far really only been your opinion, which is sorely lacking any credibility and has absolutely zero Biblical support.
 






Joined
Mar 17, 2017
Messages
2,094
This is where we are at now:
The problem is you ignore HOW we got here. Its akin to someone 300 years from now looking at the Muslims that they are pushing into err... that are immigrating to Europe and saying they were the British of modern times. And when someone like you tried to explain that during the 2000's Caucasians were ruling, they'd say "Well, this is where we're at now" continuing onto explain things with the understanding that the Muslim that may be there 300 years from now, was always there and ruling...

This promise:

Genesis 15
13 Then the Lord said to him, “Know for certain that for four hundred years your descendants will be strangers in a country not their own and that they will be enslaved and mistreated there. 14 But I will punish the nation they serve as slaves, and afterward they will come out with great possessions

Hasnt been fulfilled yet as there was no captivity (biblically) that lasted 400 years. There is this that Trump passed though:

HR 1242 (400 Years of African-American History Commission Act)
This bill establishes the 400 Years of African-American History Commission to develop and carry out activities throughout the United States to commemorate the 400th anniversary of the arrival of Africans in the English colonies at Point Comfort, Virginia, in 1619.


Do you think this is exaggerating?
Yes because I dont think you understand that its the Roman Empire running things. Thats why all the colonization you point to implemented their ways. Whether its holy day errr.. "holidays" or the way they denote time. And also, like alot of modern Europeans, you dont acknowledge (or even know about)the people who ruled BEFORE you. Europe wasnt always caucasian and no amount of avoidance from you will ever change that. So you cant simply post up European history and say it applies to the modern caucasian as if no one else was once ruling in that same area.
 






Last edited:
Joined
Mar 17, 2017
Messages
2,094
Please show us ANY nation on earth that has ever, or currently is obeying The Law (the Torah) that God gave us. You can't, can you?
You mean show you something I already did? I mean other than me already pointing out people who pointed at certain Indigenous Americans that had Hebrew customs? The tribe that built the mounds with Hebrew symbols in Ohio? It was never about finding the perfect nation who obeys without failure. But you cant even point out ANY Hebrew customs of your people without reverting back to a time period that, again, had black/people of color ruling in Europe during that same time period. And you wont address it because deep down, you know whats up. And so does your cult leader...

Even Israel, under the reigns of king David and king Solomon only marginally kept The Law and, while they were blessed for it for a time for doing so, Israel was eventually punished for their lawlessness/sinfulness.
Notice that King David didnt get into power then give the land over to someone pretending to be his family like you say the modern Brit royal family did with the Balfour declaration:confused:

But God DID make David an UNCONDITIONAL promise about the Throne of Israel, just as He made to Abraham about Israel becoming a nation and a company/multitude/commonwealth of nations (among many other things). So anyone who is trying to claim otherwise is calling God a liar, whether they realize it or admit it.

You keep on talking about what you believe or don't believe, which is irrelevant. It's the evidence and scriptural references describing Israel (their "marks") that matter. Your "evidence" has thus far really only been your opinion, which is sorely lacking any credibility and has absolutely zero Biblical support.
Look, my answer isnt going to change.The modern European wasnt always the only one ruling over Europe. And when you look at what the European put black people thru in America, the picture becomes even clearer. The Most High used the modern Euro to punish Israelites. And that’s what the Bible supports too
 






rainerann

Star
Joined
Mar 18, 2017
Messages
4,524
@KoncreteMind

I have only skimmed this thread, so I am not sure whether you have included this in your current discussion, but I figured it is a related topic so I will ask anyway. I can remember you suggesting that you don't think the current location of Israel is where Israel existed historically, but that you wouldn't disclose where you thought Israel existed even if you have an idea in mind. Although, I'm not sure if you have said where you think Israel was historically in another thread.

I was watching this video and it reminded me of this and I am wondering if a large portion of southern Africa would be where you imagine the original location to have been?

This video was very convincing and had me thinking since I believe there is conclusive evidence showing that Israel did not exist historically where they are currently saying it did. Although, I did notice that you are asserting that the reference to Egypt is accurate. In the video, the presenter suggests that Egypt is actually ancient Babylon, which in my opinion, would work with the prophecy concerning Babylon.

It would also make a lot of sense that this is where the captivity of Judah took place for a couple of reasons. The first would be the presence of the Elephantine Jews which is the first mention of Jews anywhere near the middle east. The Elephantine Jews are near the location where the presenter says ancient Babylon could have been represented on old maps of Egypt.

The second thing it would explain is the development of the Maccabean wars in the area of the middle east following a circumnavigation of Africa commissioned by Egypt according to Herodotus. It says that the Phoenicians circled around the perimeter of Africa around 500 to 600 BC and then they basically go extinct. Some people say there is no evidence they existed in reality either, but they are mentioned by Herodotus.

This circumnavigation of Africa would have given the Phoenicians access to the true location of ancient Israel. This would have then resulted in the Phoenicians being reidentified as the Maccabees and claiming this identity for themselves. Then, they would come into the picture forcing conversion and growing their new religion according to The Invention of the Jewish People in the region of the Middle East where there is no evidence that this identity existed before them unless you include the Jews in the Elephantine region. Then, the Septuagint is completed in Greek with no reference to the earlier source that this came from. It was mystically written or it was stolen on this expedition and therefore could not be referenced.

Technically, scripture says the captivity of Judah took place because Hezekiah showed the Babylonian envoys all the treasures of Israel in 2 Kings 20:12-21 and seems to fit with this reference of circumnavigation. Therefore, it would make sense that mystery Babylon would represent the results of this captivity.

Mystery Babylon would essentially be the recipient of treasures that did not belong to them that were taken because someone thought they could rich with them. So a couple of the names of places were changed or you could even say that someone tried to change the times and season like Daniel 7:25 says. Then, you already have something that makes a lot more sense before you start doing more thorough research of this area. There is already more evidence than there has ever been for the area that we are currently told is the historic location of Israel.

So I think there is a lot of potential to what this presenter is saying about the origin of the twelve tribes of Israel and I was wondering what your thoughts were on this. I would also like to ask if you or anyone else has any suggestions for books on the history of ancient Africa that aren't "whitewashed" I guess you could say. I would be very interested in hearing anything that might help me narrow my search down on this subject that I am not too familiar with.

 






Last edited:

rainerann

Star
Joined
Mar 18, 2017
Messages
4,524
BS you're seriously off the mark. British Isrealism nonsense is so far from true world history. This is a made-up fantasy novel and sadly I see a strong affiliation with white-supremacy. There is no tie between modern Anglo-Saxons and the Ancient Israelites outside of BI thievery and probably echoes of the first African pygmies that inhabited the British Isles. "Semitic" peoples 3 thousand years ago, same as the Abyssinians Sumerians, Chaldeans, Phoenicians, etc. were people of direct African phenotype- no two ways about it.

I've given you links about the original inhabitants of Europe- the same people who erected "cycolpean" monuments across the entire planet, but I'm not sure you care about facts:




How do you not realize that your group has copied and stolen for your own devices...directly from the African, Abrahamic culture of Rastafari? Brother look at it- The Solomonic Dynasty, the Ark of the Covenant, the Nazarene vow, all these elements that are established, historic FACTS in the land of ETHIOPIA, your people deny, disrespect, then try to impersonate. They thief the symbol for their shields and crest but the Lion only lives in Africa, remember that! :

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solomonic_dynasty



Authentic Ethopian Falshas (Beta Israel):



Rock-Hewn Churches of Lalibela:



Thank you for sharing this. I totally missed this when I was looking through this thread. I just happened upon some information on Rastafarianism today and I find this post very interesting. I honestly think that this subject is just scratching the surface of its full potential right now. One very significant reason for this potential is that the Rastafarian movement didn't claim to become aware of a Hebrew identity and form a military. Can't really wrap my mind around how people don't see the development of nuclear weapons as a major red flag that people are not acting in the will of God, but will frown upon a group because they got excited about a black king and independence in Ethiopia. Some of these Rastafarian documentaries demonstrate the character that I would expect from people claiming to be called to return to God as people who were called to him from an earlier time.

There are some angry people in this Hebrew Israelite movement, but I can still see this as more of an awakening than anything I have seen so far. Archeology in any part of Africa besides Egypt is so limited as well. Another 50 years and we could really see some big changes in many of the things we take for granted as fact right now.

Have you seen some of the old maps of Africa? Some of them claim that Ethiopia took up a major portion of Africa and was identified as lower and upper Ethiopia. Although, Ethiopia is a Greek word, which further demonstrates how much information has been lost about large parts of Africa. We don't actually know what this area that is identified as Ethiopia was called originally.



I think it is even really interesting to consider things like how Africa is much more accommodating of giants like Goliath than the small area considered Israel in the middle east. But, it is really even simple things like the account of David dancing in the street when the ark is returned that seems to fit so much better with what I already know about African culture than cultures formed on other continents. Most cultures formalized dancing for group activities and there is very limited freeform dancing throughout history in other cultures outside Africa. I find this even more convincing than some of the arguments about skin color.

There is even a brief mention to an ancient ruin referred to as the great Zimbabwe that is south of what we call Ethiopia, but would have been in Ethiopia according to an old map. An 19th century geologist said, "I do not think that I am far wrong if I suppose that the ruin on the hill is a copy of Solomon’s Temple on Mount Moriah and the building in the plain a copy of the palace where the Queen of Sheba lived during her visit to Solomon." I bet Israel Finklestein wishes he could say something close to this by now. So there's something that looks like a "copy" of Solomon's temple in southeastern Africa and still nothing that looks remotely close to the real thing in "Israel" yet.

This is all with the most minimal effort towards investigation in this area compared with the 200 years of intensive research in the areas of Israel and Egypt that have turned up nothing close to anything that could be considered evidence. If you have any more information on this subject, I would love to hear it.
 






Last edited:

DavidSon

Star
Joined
Jan 10, 2019
Messages
1,382
Thank you for sharing this. I totally missed this when I was looking through this thread. I just happened upon some information on Rastafarianism today and I find this post very interesting. I honestly think that this subject is just scratching the surface of its full potential right now. One very significant reason for this potential is that the Rastafarian movement didn't claim to become aware of a Hebrew identity and form a military. Can't really wrap my mind around how people don't see the development of nuclear weapons as a major red flag that people are not acting in the will of God, but will frown upon a group because they got excited about a black king and independence in Ethiopia. Some of these Rastafarian documentaries demonstrate the character that I would expect from people claiming to be called to return to God as people who were called to him from an earlier time.

There are some angry people in this Hebrew Israelite movement, but I can still see this as more of an awakening than anything I have seen so far. Archeology in any part of Africa besides Egypt is so limited as well. Another 50 years and we could really see some big changes in many of the things we take for granted as fact right now.

Have you seen some of the old maps of Africa? Some of them claim that Ethiopia took up a major portion of Africa and was identified as lower and upper Ethiopia. Although, Ethiopia is a Greek word, which further demonstrates how much information has been lost about large parts of Africa. We don't actually know what this area that is identified as Ethiopia was called originally.



I think it is even really interesting to consider things like how Africa is much more accommodating of giants like Goliath. But, it is really even simple things like the account of David dancing in the street when the ark is returned that seems to fit so much better with what I already know about African culture than cultures formed on other continents. Most cultures formalized dancing for group activities and there is very limited freeform dancing throughout history in other cultures outside Africa. I find this even more convincing than some of the arguments about skin color.

There is even a brief mention to an ancient ruin referred to as the great Zimbabwe that is south of what we call Ethiopia, but would have been in Ethiopia according to an old map. An 19th century geologist said, "I do not think that I am far wrong if I suppose that the ruin on the hill is a copy of Solomon’s Temple on Mount Moriah and the building in the plain a copy of the palace where the Queen of Sheba lived during her visit to Solomon." I bet Israel Finklestein wishes he could say something close to this by now. So there's something that looks like a "copy" of Solomon's temple in southeastern Africa and still nothing that looks remotely close to the real thing in "Israel" yet.

This is all with the most minimal effort towards investigation in this area compared with the 200 years of intensive research in the areas of Israel and Egypt that have turned up nothing close to anything that could be considered evidence. If you have any more information on this subject, I would love to hear it.
There are exciting connections, I agree! You bring up some great points. Israel and the Western institutions have invested only minuscule resources searching anywhere outside Palestine. What about the (50,000) Lemba in Zimbabwe that you mentioned, or Igbo in Nigeria, "Jews" in Ethiopia, Ghana, or Arabia? We've read the story of Abraham and the "Yudas" originating in the East, but what if India, S.Africa, the Levant, etc. were all outposts of the same religious culture? The tradition of shepherd-kings may be older than imagined. Evidence of a proto-semitic language spoken in the horn of Africa 10,000 years ago leads us to the possibility of a much earlier civilization. An older source could be related to the direction @KoncreteMind is exploring. We almost need a new paradigm, away from the limited Eurocentric mindset, to get to the truth of history.

True, the people of the "God of Peace" would only exhibit those godly characteristics, that's only natural. :)

I'm far from an authority on the African presence in the prehistoric, ancient, and modern world- it is an unending subject. A funny thought you reminded me of is that people forget the major epithet of the top Greek God Zeus: Zeus-Aethiops! Another interesting piece of history regarding Ethiopia is the middle-age European legend of Prester John, a mythical Christian kingdom said to be in India. Just as the map you highlighted, Europeans had multiple ideas of where Ethiopia was. In this instance it was believed there were two Ethiopia's (east and west). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prester_John

There are several great sites exploring the "half that's never been told". Most I've linked before or made threads about but I hope these are helpful:

https://thedarksideofhistory.files.wordpress.com/2011/08/anacalypsis_v_1-godfrey_higgins-1927-786pgs-rel-sml.pdf
http://afroasiatics.blogspot.com/
http://igbohebrewhistory.over-blog.com/2016/06/igbos-hebrew-biafra-adama-priesthood-shrine-can-only-be-found-in-igboland.html
http://realhistoryww.com/index.htm
https://geneticliteracyproject.org/2017/04/18/ethiopian-jewry-genetics-beta-israel-muddied-historical-slave-ownership/
https://www.academia.edu/36957797/Black_Moses_the_DNA_evidence
https://www.academia.edu/32962122/THE_ARK_OF_THE_COVENANT_EVIDENCE_SUPPORTING_THE_ETHIOPIAN_TRADITIONS?email_work_card=view-paper
 






Joined
Mar 17, 2017
Messages
2,094
@KoncreteMind

I have only skimmed this thread, so I am not sure whether you have included this in your current discussion, but I figured it is a related topic so I will ask anyway. I can remember you suggesting that you don't think the current location of Israel is where Israel existed historically, but that you wouldn't disclose where you thought Israel existed even if you have an idea in mind. Although, I'm not sure if you have said where you think Israel was historically in another thread.

I was watching this video and it reminded me of this and I am wondering if a large portion of southern Africa would be where you imagine the original location to have been?

This video was very convincing and had me thinking since I believe there is conclusive evidence showing that Israel did not exist historically where they are currently saying it did. Although, I did notice that you are asserting that the reference to Egypt is accurate. In the video, the presenter suggests that Egypt is actually ancient Babylon, which in my opinion, would work with the prophecy concerning Babylon.

It would also make a lot of sense that this is where the captivity of Judah took place for a couple of reasons. The first would be the presence of the Elephantine Jews which is the first mention of Jews anywhere near the middle east. The Elephantine Jews are near the location where the presenter says ancient Babylon could have been represented on old maps of Egypt.

The second thing it would explain is the development of the Maccabean wars in the area of the middle east following a circumnavigation of Africa commissioned by Egypt according to Herodotus. It says that the Phoenicians circled around the perimeter of Africa around 500 to 600 BC and then they basically go extinct. Some people say there is no evidence they existed in reality either, but they are mentioned by Herodotus.

This circumnavigation of Africa would have given the Phoenicians access to the true location of ancient Israel. This would have then resulted in the Phoenicians being reidentified as the Maccabees and claiming this identity for themselves. Then, they would come into the picture forcing conversion and growing their new religion according to The Invention of the Jewish People in the region of the Middle East where there is no evidence that this identity existed before them unless you include the Jews in the Elephantine region. Then, the Septuagint is completed in Greek with no reference to the earlier source that this came from. It was mystically written or it was stolen on this expedition and therefore could not be referenced.

Technically, scripture says the captivity of Judah took place because Hezekiah showed the Babylonian envoys all the treasures of Israel in 2 Kings 20:12-21 and seems to fit with this reference of circumnavigation. Therefore, it would make sense that mystery Babylon would represent the results of this captivity.

Mystery Babylon would essentially be the recipient of treasures that did not belong to them that were taken because someone thought they could rich with them. So a couple of the names of places were changed or you could even say that someone tried to change the times and season like Daniel 7:25 says. Then, you already have something that makes a lot more sense before you start doing more thorough research of this area. There is already more evidence than there has ever been for the area that we are currently told is the historic location of Israel.

So I think there is a lot of potential to what this presenter is saying about the origin of the twelve tribes of Israel and I was wondering what your thoughts were on this. I would also like to ask if you or anyone else has any suggestions for books on the history of ancient Africa that aren't "whitewashed" I guess you could say. I would be very interested in hearing anything that might help me narrow my search down on this subject that I am not too familiar with.

Personally, and Im not an authority on the subject either, I feel that Israel was somewhere in the Americas. So I think when I said I wouldnt discuss where, I meant the specifics of exactly where but I could be mistaken on that. As far as the video, I watched about 30 ,minutes or so and think that where he's mistaken, is that he conflates where Israel may have traveled (forcibly by slave trade or willingly) with where their homebase was. I believe @DavidSon pointed to the Igbos in Nigeria who have many Hebrew names in their cities/villages and theres also a map I posted earlier in the thread where Europeans put"Judah" in that same area. And In this same area is a slave port that we are told slaves were taken from and brought to America (I believe it happened in reverse). So personally I dont think Israelites are from Africa but are from the Americas.

So with that, I also believe Egypt and Babylon to have been somewhere in the Americas as well. I'll finish watching the vid another time tho. The only book on Africa Im somewhat familiar with is "From Babylon to Timbuktu"
 






rainerann

Star
Joined
Mar 18, 2017
Messages
4,524
Personally, and Im not an authority on the subject either, I feel that Israel was somewhere in the Americas. So I think when I said I wouldnt discuss where, I meant the specifics of exactly where but I could be mistaken on that. As far as the video, I watched about 30 ,minutes or so and think that where he's mistaken, is that he conflates where Israel may have traveled (forcibly by slave trade or willingly) with where their homebase was. I believe @DavidSon pointed to the Igbos in Nigeria who have many Hebrew names in their cities/villages and theres also a map I posted earlier in the thread where Europeans put"Judah" in that same area. And In this same area is a slave port that we are told slaves were taken from and brought to America (I believe it happened in reverse). So personally I dont think Israelites are from Africa but are from the Americas.

So with that, I also believe Egypt and Babylon to have been somewhere in the Americas as well. I'll finish watching the vid another time tho. The only book on Africa Im somewhat familiar with is "From Babylon to Timbuktu"
This book sounds like the rabbit hole I was looking for. Thank you.
 






rainerann

Star
Joined
Mar 18, 2017
Messages
4,524
There are exciting connections, I agree! You bring up some great points. Israel and the Western institutions have invested only minuscule resources searching anywhere outside Palestine. What about the (50,000) Lemba in Zimbabwe that you mentioned, or Igbo in Nigeria, "Jews" in Ethiopia, Ghana, or Arabia?
You know when I was mentioning Zimbabwe, I had not heard the Lemba tribe yet. Have you ever heard of Tudor Parfitt? He has a book that seems interesting based on his investigation of what the Lemba refer to as "Sanna". I guess they say that this is where they expect to return one day. This is all new information to me so I might not be transferring it that well. This was a good article that is more focused on this in a brief way. https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/israel/parfitt.html

The suggestion Parfitt investigated is whether or not Sanna exists in western Yemen. Originally, I began looking at this subject because of an Egyptian writer who published a book questioning the exodus account and suggesting the same thing. However, recently I have realized that looking at linguistic similarities might not be the best approach to this subject. If there is no evidence of the exodus taken place in Egypt or Solomon's temple in the areas we are told they existed in ancient times, then there is no reason to believe that we have access to the original language either. So making comparisons to this, might not be that useful. What we need to do is pick a new site to begin archeological investigations.

Nevertheless, even while Parfitt's investigation supports the direction I was going in originally if we are to use the Lemba term for the purpose of linguistic comparison, there is the possibility of a connection between the term Sanna and the term Sio on older maps surrounding the area of Mt. Kenya. Currently, this information is being used to make a connection between sio and Zion and while I don't really like linguistic comparisons. I thought I would still mention this. It would be an amazing thing if someone was able to investigate this area with the same degree of effort that has been done in the middle east.


It is unfortunate that this may be all that will be able to be found of value without corroborating archeology because it seems like their oral history is already being contaminated with the attempt to make comparisons between their history and what is perceived as being Jewish. It will take a while for people to realize that without archeological evidence proving anything in the middle east, even dna comparison is useless. It doesn't matter at all if the Lemba do or do not have a genetic connection. They have successfully maintained an oral history while living in relative isolation.

However, it is interesting that some dna studies suggest that there is a large portion of the Lemba tribe that have shown a connection to a Cohen marker or what is presently considered the remnant of the priestly class. One study said over 50% of the tribe shares this connection. This is interesting because they have also successfully maintained an oral tradition that would corroborate this possibility. It is also interesting to consider how this would produce "lost tribes," which would then be any tribe that was not able to preserve the oral history the way the priestly class would have been able to do, which the Lemba successfully demonstrate.

I had never heard of Igbo in Nigeria, but was just watching a documentary about the history of the Benin bronze casters of Nigeria. The first thing that came to mind when I was watching them walk through this ancient technique was the verse about skillful workers from Exodus 36:2 who would help build the tabernacle, which included metalwork.

"So Moses summoned Bezalel, Oholiab, and every skilled person in whose heart the Lord had placed wisdom, everyone whose heart moved him, to come to the work and do it."

So there is another group in Nigeria that does not have a clear story of where they came from, that maintain an ancient practice of metalwork near the Igbo. This would be better evidence of being a "lost tribe" than anything I have seen so far.

I'm thinking that this has something to do with not mentioning the Pharoah in the Old Testament as well. The Lemba only seems to use the first five books of the Old Testament. I'm thinking there was an error in translation and it is possible that the term Pharoah in the oral history was never meant to translate into a story of geographic history and that the writers of the Septuagint changed this oral history into a geographic one, which has created all of the problems. Basically, I think that a group of people used this oral history to create something they could use to achieve political control. It is their language that we are using for linguistic comparison, not the original language that is being used to maintain oral histories even to this day. Judaism is descended from Herod.

Overall, it reiterates my opinion that when the Bible says to come out of her my people, it is trying to communicate to come out what we call Zionism in the modern world evidenced by how it is contaminating the purity of groups like the Lemba.

Thank you for the links as well.
 






Last edited:

A Freeman

Star
Joined
Nov 11, 2019
Messages
2,561
Jeremiah's Tomb.
(The Tomb of Ollamh Fodhla)
by JAH.
Cead Mile Failte
(A Hundred Thousand Welcomes).


Welcome to the Tomb of Jeremiah
the Bible Prophet.

Cairn T, at Loughcrew, nr. Oldcastle, Royal Meath in Ireland is the Tomb of Jeremiah the Bible Prophet who was commissioned by God to tear down; uproot (from Jerusalem) and plant (in Ireland) the daughter (the Tender Twig - Teia Tephi), from the line of David (symbolised in Scripture as the High Cedar), of king Zedekiah, in c. 588 B.C.; the Throne of Israel - the Lia Fail / Bethel Stone and The Ark of The Covenant.
Jeremiah 1:10 See, I have this day set thee over the nations and over the kingdoms, to root out, and to pull down, and to destroy, and to throw down, to build, and to plant.

The proof of the fact, that this cairn is the tomb of Jeremiah, is "written in stone" in hieroglyphics, on the stones within the cairn itself.

So how did Jeremiah come to, and end up being buried in Ireland, when he was a native of Anathoth near Jerusalem?

Jeremiah was the Prophet sent by God to king Zedekiah of Jerusalem, who had broken God's Covenant, to warn him to return to keeping The Covenant or God would send king Nebuchadnezzar of Babylon to lay siege to and destroy Jerusalem. Zedekiah did not like God's Message and so decided to punish the messenger and put him in prison. However, that did not prevent the prophecy from being fulfilled, it only made its fulfillment more certain. Nebuchadnezzar sent his army and laid siege to The City, whose inhabitants became so hungry that they ate their own children. The City fell and was burned and Solomon's Temple on Mount Moriah - The Holy Place - was also destroyed.

Nebuchadnezzar; who was sent by God to punish Zedekiah; honoured Jeremiah as God's Prophet; released him from prison and gave him free rein to do as he was commanded by God.

Zedekiah and all of his sons were captured; taken to Babylon* where all of his sons were slain in front of Zedekiah's eyes and then he was blinded, so that the execution of his sons would be the last thing he ever saw. He himself died in prison, in Babylon, and all of this was because he betrayed God; broke The Covenant and caused his people to suffer poverty under his own laws, instead of prosperity under God's Laws in The Covenant that is written in The Torah, which is the collective name for the five Books given to Moses at Horeb in Sinai, for the world, and means The Law.

*Ezekiel 17:4 He cropped off the top of his young twigs, and carried it into a land of traffick; he set it in a city of merchants (Babylon).

Jeremiah hid with Zedekiah's daughter Teia Tephi in a cave under The Holy Temple, built by Solomon, on the site where Abraham had offered to sacrifice Isaac, where The Ark of The Covenant was hidden along with Jacob's Pillar, the Bethel / Lia Fail Stone, which is king David's Throne of Israel. He did this to protect Teia Tephi and The Ark from being found, and so that no-one would know where The Ark was being taken. The Ark of The Covenant is the special box inside which The Torah and The Stone Tablets, on which The Ten Commandments were written, are kept.



Bethel - The Lia Fail - Stone of Destiny - Jacob's Pillar

Once the coast was clear, Jeremiah took the princess and God's Treasures and went first to Mizpah and then to Tanis in Egypt for safety, before coming to Ireland, via Gibraltar.
Towards the end of the nineteenth century, Cairn T, was realised to be the tomb of Ollamh Fodhla; which is not a name, but a title; meaning wise sage. The tomb was excavated; the hieroglyphics were traced and drawings made of them. Since that time, with the opening of the tomb to the elements and the corrosive-effects of the pollution in the atmosphere increasing drastically over the last fifty years, some of the hieroglyphics have deteriorated a little, but they are still legible.

Writing in 1873, Eugene Conwell was certain that "some successful student in archaic sculptures would discover the key to unlock the mysteries contained in the 'curious', and at present mystic, characters inscribed upon the stones" -(Discovery of the Tomb of Ollamh Fodhla, 1873).

However, in order to decipher the hieroglyphics, one needs to be an expert on both Scriptural Prophecy and Bible history; not archaic sculpture. So Eugene Conwell was right about whose tomb it is, but wrong about who would have the "Key" to unlock the meaning of the hieroglyphics. Studying the Divinely-inspired autobiographical "Book of Tephi Queen of Tara and Gibraltar", and then cross-referencing her Book with the rest of the Holy Scriptures gives us the "Key"; makes the understanding of the hieroglyphics not only possible, but much easier and corroborates the story written on the stones with perfect accuracy, as only the Divinely-inspired is capable of doing; which in turn proves the authenticity of her Book.

Once the Divine "Key" has been found, it is then possible to unlock the mystery written on the second stone on the left, just inside the entrance to Cairn T, at Loughcrew, which is inscribed with hieroglyphics depicting Jeremiah's journey from Jerusalem, via Tanis in Egypt, to Gibraltar, in a ship of Tyre, with four companions. Then, leaving one of his companions in Gibraltar, he is shown taking another boat, a Greek ship with three companions, to Ireland, where they arrived in 583 B.C.
 






A Freeman

Star
Joined
Nov 11, 2019
Messages
2,561

Second stone on the left inside Jeremiah's Tomb

Jeremiah took king Zedekiah of Jerusalem's three daughters, with their three handmaidens and his secretary Baruch, from Judaea to Tanis in Egypt (which is why; in the famous blockbuster film, made by George Lucas and Steven Spielberg, called "Raiders of The Lost Ark"; they say that Tanis is the last-known resting-place of The Ark and that is why they start to look for The Lost Ark, in Tanis).
After Jeremiah's party arrived in Egypt the pharaoh adopted Zedekiah's daughters as his own daughters and gave them a palace at Tanis, still called today, "Quasr bint el Jehudi" (the palace of the daughter of Judah), where they stayed for some time, until Jeremiah was warned by God that Nebuchadnezzar was going to attack Egypt and that they must leave.

Jeremiah 46:14 Declare ye in Egypt, and publish in Migdol, and publish in Noph and in Tahpanhes (Tanis): say ye, Stand fast, and prepare thee; for the sword shall devour round about thee.

44:24 Moreover Jeremiah said unto all the people, and to all the women, Hear the Word of the "I AM", all Judah that [are] in the land of Egypt:
44:25 Thus saith the "I AM" Lord of hosts, the God of Israel, saying; Ye and your wives have both spoken with your mouths, and fulfilled with your hand, saying, We will surely perform our vows that we have vowed, to burn incense to the queen of heaven, and to pour out drink offerings unto her: ye will surely accomplish your vows, and surely perform your vows.
44:26 Therefore hear ye the Word of the "I AM", all Judah that dwell in the land of Egypt; Behold, I have sworn by My great name, saith the "I AM", that My name shall no more be named in the mouth of any man of Judah in all the land of Egypt, saying, The Lord "I AM" Liveth.
44:27 Behold, I will watch over them for evil, and not for good: and all the men of Judah that [are] in the land of Egypt shall be consumed by the sword and by the famine, until there be an end of them.
44:28 Yet a small number that escape the sword shall return out of the land of Egypt into the land of Judah (Judah/Zarah of the "Red Hand" - Genesis 38:28-30* - in Ireland), and all the remnant of Judah, that are gone into the land of Egypt to sojourn there, shall know whose words shall stand, Mine, or theirs.
44:29 And this [shall be] a sign unto you, saith the "I AM", that I will punish you in this place, that ye may know that My words shall surely stand against you for your evil [in worshipping the queen of heaven (verse 25 above)]:
44:30 Thus saith the "I AM"; Behold, I will give Pharaohhophra king of Egypt into the hand of his enemies, and into the hand of them that seek his life; as I gave Zedekiah king of Judah (Teia Tephi's dad) into the hand of Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon, his enemy, and that sought his life.

* Genesis 38:28 And it came to pass, when she travailed, that [the one] put out [his] hand: and the midwife took and bound upon his hand a scarlet thread, saying, This came out first.
38:29 And it came to pass, as he drew back his hand, that, behold, his (twin) brother came out: and she said, How hast thou broken forth? Why has thou made [this] breach against thee? Therefore his name was called Pharez (Breach).
38:30 And afterward came out his (twin) brother, that had the scarlet thread upon his hand: and his name was called Zarah (Scarlet).


Judah/Zarah (Scarlet) lost his birthright and went into exile, sojourning through Spain and ending up in Ireland where Eochaidh mac Duach / Dui from the line of Zarah was heremon (Ard ri - high king), when Teia Tephi left Egypt to go to Ireland, where, shortly after her arrival on the 18th, she married Eochaidh at Tara on the 21st of June in 583 B.C.

The uprooting and planting, done by Jeremiah, fulfilled God's prophecy to His Prophet Ezekiel in chapter 21:26 where God promised to: "exalt him that is low (line of Zarah - Eochaidh) and abase him that is high (line of Pharez - Zedekiah)."

The marriage-union of Teia Tephi and Eochaidh mac Duach also ensured the fulfillment of God's Promise to David given in the Bible:-

Psalm 89:36 "His (David's) seed shall endure forever, and his throne as the 'sun' before Me."

Teia Tephi's two sisters loved the fleshpots of Egypt more than they loved God and wanted to remain there, so were slain and did remain, as they desired, in Egypt, where they were buried.


To continue reading, click here: Jeremiah's Tomb (The Tomb of Ollamh Fodhla) Cairn T, Loughcrew, nr. Oldcastle, Co. Meath, Ireland
 






rainerann

Star
Joined
Mar 18, 2017
Messages
4,524
I found some interesting pieces this week. It looks like the book of Jubilees that was found among the dead sea scrolls is almost verbatim to the version that is part of the Ethiopian canon. There is evidence to suggest that the book of Jubilees found among the dead sea scrolls is from before 100 BC.

The book of Jubilees is also called lesser Genesis because it details many of the early stories in Genesis without some of the pieces that would otherwise be connected to other writings from the surrounding area from what I can tell superficially. However, I also just found a book called Plato and the creation of the Hebrew Bible, and I'm not sure how this information will integrate with what I have been researching already.

I still think that there is a root to all this that has been buried. It is covered in dross so to speak because interestingly enough, they use a Semitic language called Amharic in Ethiopia. This is apparently derived from an older version of this language that is still used as a liturgical language called Ge'ez. The dead sea scroll version of Enoch is also older than any existing version of most of the books that are part of the Christian canon today with few exceptions.

The traditional story of the Ethiopian community says that Enoch was originally written in Ge'ez which is an earlier Ethiopian Semitic language. Speculation is that this language was used as early as 400 BC, possibly earlier. I think there is a possibility that this is an original language rather than the language we usually consider as the original that is actually based on the Masoretic text from the 9th century.

The Damascus document also provides insight into the identity of the original members of the 12 tribes of Israel as well. It is speculated that the Damascus document was written somewhere between 100BC and the first few years of the next century.

It says, "And to observe the Sabbath according to its true meaning and the feasts and the day of the Fast according to the utterances of them who entered into the New Covenant in the land of Damascus:"

Outside of the obvious reference to the New Covenant, what is interesting about this passage is the reference to Damascus in connection with this New Covenant, when you consider the history of the Samaritans in Damascus until the time of the Ottoman empire. The Samaritans have long claimed to be from the tribe of Ephraim and Manassah. The Samaritan Pentateuch is also considered to mirror what the earliest fragments of the Septuagint say. However, the oldest Masoretic version varies considerably from these versions.

The version of Judaism that we currently understand is obviously nowhere near the original. The history of the version that we have probably never happened the way we have been told either. There is evidence that contradicts the story that we have been told and different parts of the world are starting to tell this story after being silenced for too many years. The earth itself is sharing the truth. The only real conclusion I have based on this information is that it would probably be a good idea to start thinking about embracing change soon.
 






Top