bible_student
Star
- Joined
- Jul 29, 2018
- Messages
- 2,040
And we were also talking about God using other nations to punish Israel when they don't obey him, which has happened already several times in the past, as the Bible records it.Umm but we're talking about Israelites.
They certainly did not give absolute obedience to The Law, and at times went away from it and were punished, but they still kept it better than the Gentiles would have done if it had been given to them, and so, because they were still the best out of the bunch at keeping it, they were helped to colonize the world.And its not the view of scripture that Israelites would get to colonize the world despite being disobedient to the covenant they made with the Creator.
"It cannot be concluded, however, that the nation gave absolute obedience to the Divine Law. Yet, as a result of even a partial obedience, the nation, under the reigns of king David and king Solomon, came to the zenith of its glory in exceeding great blessing and prosperity and peace and security. Such was the effect upon the other nations, that some of them sent representatives to enquire into the secret of Solomon’s great wisdom, and the glory of Israel. The Queen of Sheba was one of these, and what she saw and heard left her quite breathless — to quote, "there was no more spirit in her."
THE MASTERS PLAN
JAHTruth.net
Sura
6:154. Moreover, We gave Moses the Book (Torah), COMPLETING [Deuteronomy 4:2] (Our favour) to those who would do right, and explaining ALL things IN DETAIL,- and a GUIDE and a MERCY, that they might believe in the meeting with their Lord.
6:155. And this (Torah) is a Book which We have revealed as a BLESSING: so follow it and be righteous, that YE may receive mercy (Sura 32:23):
6:156. Lest YE should say: "The Book (Torah - The Covenant) was sent down to two Peoples before us, and for our part, we remained unacquainted with all that they learned by careful study:"
6:157. Or lest YE should say: "If the Book (Torah - The Covenant) had only been sent down to US, we should have FOLLOWED its guidance BETTER than they (Sura 32:23)." Now then hath come unto YOU a clear (Sign) from your Lord,- and a GUIDE and a MERCY: then who could do MORE WRONG than one who rejecteth "I AM"'s Signs (and Torah - Bible), and turneth away therefrom? In good time shall We requite those who turn away from Our Signs, with a dreadful penalty, for their turning away.
16:84. One Day We shall raise from all Peoples a Witness: then will NO excuse be accepted from Unbelievers, nor will they receive any favours.
It's about both - human (body) + being (soul).Yea theres no need to again go into how Englishmen chose a dark brown/reddish color to designate ruddy when name animals of a specific color or how Genesis says the damsel was fair as in beautiful, not that she had fair (pale) skin. We already did that. Im just pointing out that in your last post now its "color blindness" and we're "really just spirits" when before it was "hey these white guys are Israelites and heres why"
human+being
Being born in a racial Israelite body should be seen as a reward and sign of God's Grace as it comes with great benefits (growing up in better/more blessed and prosperous Israelite countries, like Great Britain, etc.) but with it also in fact comes also a greater responsibility.
You have kept trying to claim that "fair" means beautiful only (and act as if it cannot possibly mean white under any circumstance, like it does not fit within the realm of possibility in your paradigm), when that is plain and simply not the truth, and the dictionary definition you quoted proves this because it also says "white", yet you seem to be wanting to avoid that fact desperately which shows you are not open minded, but biased against it. In your mind, they absolutely cannot possibly have been white/fair skinned, so it can and must only mean "beautiful", which is actually the SECONDARY meaning (nr. 2). The primary meaning is white, fair skin, fair complexion. Here is the dictionary definition again, that you quoted previously (only, I removed the word "hence", that you decided needed to be added in, but which is not in the actual dictionary definition - and why did you feel you needed to add it? See the bold text, from the dictionary definition that you quoted):
"free from dark hue"1. Clear; free from spots; free from a dark hue; white; as a fair skin; a fair complexion.
2. Beautiful; handsome; properly, having a handsome face.
Thou art a fair woman to look upon. Genesis 12:11
"white"
"as a fair skin"
"a fair complexion"
And yes, it secondarily can and does also mean beautiful or handsome.
Do a web search for any of these and see what you get. Seriously, stop trying to argue that black is white and white is black. White means white. As in fair, fair skinned, a fair complexion, fair hair. etc.
Read your own dictionary definition and don't skip the words you don't seem to want to be there.
It's not a new belief. A soul gets the body it deserves. Being born into an Israelite body is a blessing and that comes with the added responsibility and accountability, of having to keep The Law and be a demonstration people, of how wonderful it is to live under God's Law, to the rest of the world, so they would then want to keep The Law as well.What should I be making of these other than it contradicts your "its about the soul not body" new belief?
Agreed.Its speaking of seed and how Israelites married themselves into other seeds.
The Israelites however were not even supposed to marry outside of their own tribe, as the text from Numbers shows below, regarding the daughters of Zelophehad, so that the inheritance of the land would not leave the tribe it came from, but remain within it for the Jubile.And the problem with that wasnt "race" based but culture based as them marrying into other cultures would have them following other gods and not the Creator. Aaron and Miriam had a problem with Moses marrying an Ethiopian not because of skin color/appearance but because of culture.
Numbers
36:3 And if they be married to any of the sons of the [other] tribes of the children of Israel, then shall their inheritance be taken from the inheritance of our fathers, and shall be put to the inheritance of the tribe whereunto they are received: so shall it be taken from the lot of our inheritance.
36:4 And when The Jubile of the children of Israel shall be, then shall their inheritance be put unto the inheritance of the tribe whereunto they are received: so shall their inheritance be taken away from the inheritance of the tribe of our fathers.
36:5 And Moses commanded the children of Israel according to the Word of the "I AM", saying, The tribe of the sons of Joseph hath said well.
36:6 This [is] the thing which the "I AM" doth command concerning the daughters of Zelophehad, saying, Let them marry to whom they think best; only to the family of the tribe of their father shall they marry.
36:7 So shall not the inheritance of the children of Israel remove from tribe to tribe: for every one of the children of Israel shall keep himself to the inheritance of the tribe of his fathers.
36:8 And every daughter, that possesseth an inheritance in any tribe of the children of Israel, shall be wife unto one of the family of the tribe of her father, that the children of Israel may enjoy every man the inheritance of his fathers.
36:9 Neither shall the inheritance remove from [one] tribe to another tribe; but every one of the tribes of the children of Israel shall keep himself to his own inheritance.
If the Israelites were dark skinned as some want to try and maintain (to be politically correct), rather than fair and ruddy (which is what the Bible says), then why does it say in Jeremiah:
Jeremiah
13:23 Can the Ethiopian change his skin, or the leopard his spots? [then] may ye also do good, that are accustomed to do evil.
Why can the Ethiopian, and not can the Israelite, if Israel was dark skinned (except for when the women were fair-beautiful)? There is obviously a contrast being made to the Ethiopian, indicating that the Israelites did not look alike to the Ethiopians.
Last edited: