Twelve Tribes of Israel info & research thread

Joined
Jul 29, 2018
Messages
2,040
Umm but we're talking about Israelites.
And we were also talking about God using other nations to punish Israel when they don't obey him, which has happened already several times in the past, as the Bible records it.
And its not the view of scripture that Israelites would get to colonize the world despite being disobedient to the covenant they made with the Creator.
They certainly did not give absolute obedience to The Law, and at times went away from it and were punished, but they still kept it better than the Gentiles would have done if it had been given to them, and so, because they were still the best out of the bunch at keeping it, they were helped to colonize the world.

"It cannot be concluded, however, that the nation gave absolute obedience to the Divine Law. Yet, as a result of even a partial obedience, the nation, under the reigns of king David and king Solomon, came to the zenith of its glory in exceeding great blessing and prosperity and peace and security. Such was the effect upon the other nations, that some of them sent representatives to enquire into the secret of Solomon’s great wisdom, and the glory of Israel. The Queen of Sheba was one of these, and what she saw and heard left her quite breathless — to quote, "there was no more spirit in her."

Sura
6:154. Moreover, We gave Moses the Book (Torah), COMPLETING [Deuteronomy 4:2] (Our favour) to those who would do right, and explaining ALL things IN DETAIL,- and a GUIDE and a MERCY, that they might believe in the meeting with their Lord.
6:155. And this (Torah) is a Book which We have revealed as a BLESSING: so follow it and be righteous, that YE may receive mercy (Sura 32:23):
6:156. Lest YE should say: "The Book (Torah - The Covenant) was sent down to two Peoples before us, and for our part, we remained unacquainted with all that they learned by careful study:"
6:157. Or lest YE should say: "If the Book (Torah - The Covenant) had only been sent down to US, we should have FOLLOWED its guidance BETTER than they (Sura 32:23)." Now then hath come unto YOU a clear (Sign) from your Lord,- and a GUIDE and a MERCY: then who could do MORE WRONG than one who rejecteth "I AM"'s Signs (and Torah - Bible), and turneth away therefrom? In good time shall We requite those who turn away from Our Signs, with a dreadful penalty, for their turning away.
16:84. One Day We shall raise from all Peoples a Witness: then will NO excuse be accepted from Unbelievers, nor will they receive any favours.

Yea theres no need to again go into how Englishmen chose a dark brown/reddish color to designate ruddy when name animals of a specific color or how Genesis says the damsel was fair as in beautiful, not that she had fair (pale) skin. We already did that. Im just pointing out that in your last post now its "color blindness" and we're "really just spirits" when before it was "hey these white guys are Israelites and heres why"
It's about both - human (body) + being (soul).
human+being

Being born in a racial Israelite body should be seen as a reward and sign of God's Grace as it comes with great benefits (growing up in better/more blessed and prosperous Israelite countries, like Great Britain, etc.) but with it also in fact comes also a greater responsibility.

You have kept trying to claim that "fair" means beautiful only (and act as if it cannot possibly mean white under any circumstance, like it does not fit within the realm of possibility in your paradigm), when that is plain and simply not the truth, and the dictionary definition you quoted proves this because it also says "white", yet you seem to be wanting to avoid that fact desperately which shows you are not open minded, but biased against it. In your mind, they absolutely cannot possibly have been white/fair skinned, so it can and must only mean "beautiful", which is actually the SECONDARY meaning (nr. 2). The primary meaning is white, fair skin, fair complexion. Here is the dictionary definition again, that you quoted previously (only, I removed the word "hence", that you decided needed to be added in, but which is not in the actual dictionary definition - and why did you feel you needed to add it? See the bold text, from the dictionary definition that you quoted):

1. Clear; free from spots; free from a dark hue; white; as a fair skin; a fair complexion.

2. Beautiful; handsome; properly, having a handsome face.

Thou art a fair woman to look upon. Genesis 12:11
"free from dark hue"
"white"
"as a fair skin"
"a fair complexion"

And yes, it secondarily can and does also mean beautiful or handsome.

Do a web search for any of these and see what you get. Seriously, stop trying to argue that black is white and white is black. White means white. As in fair, fair skinned, a fair complexion, fair hair. etc.

Read your own dictionary definition and don't skip the words you don't seem to want to be there.
What should I be making of these other than it contradicts your "its about the soul not body" new belief?
It's not a new belief. A soul gets the body it deserves. Being born into an Israelite body is a blessing and that comes with the added responsibility and accountability, of having to keep The Law and be a demonstration people, of how wonderful it is to live under God's Law, to the rest of the world, so they would then want to keep The Law as well.
Its speaking of seed and how Israelites married themselves into other seeds.
Agreed.
And the problem with that wasnt "race" based but culture based as them marrying into other cultures would have them following other gods and not the Creator. Aaron and Miriam had a problem with Moses marrying an Ethiopian not because of skin color/appearance but because of culture.
The Israelites however were not even supposed to marry outside of their own tribe, as the text from Numbers shows below, regarding the daughters of Zelophehad, so that the inheritance of the land would not leave the tribe it came from, but remain within it for the Jubile.

Numbers
36:3 And if they be married to any of the sons of the [other] tribes of the children of Israel, then shall their inheritance be taken from the inheritance of our fathers, and shall be put to the inheritance of the tribe whereunto they are received: so shall it be taken from the lot of our inheritance.
36:4 And when The Jubile of the children of Israel shall be, then shall their inheritance be put unto the inheritance of the tribe whereunto they are received: so shall their inheritance be taken away from the inheritance of the tribe of our fathers.
36:5 And Moses commanded the children of Israel according to the Word of the "I AM", saying, The tribe of the sons of Joseph hath said well.
36:6 This [is] the thing which the "I AM" doth command concerning the daughters of Zelophehad, saying, Let them marry to whom they think best; only to the family of the tribe of their father shall they marry.
36:7 So shall not the inheritance of the children of Israel remove from tribe to tribe: for every one of the children of Israel shall keep himself to the inheritance of the tribe of his fathers.
36:8 And every daughter, that possesseth an inheritance in any tribe of the children of Israel, shall be wife unto one of the family of the tribe of her father, that the children of Israel may enjoy every man the inheritance of his fathers.
36:9 Neither shall the inheritance remove from [one] tribe to another tribe; but every one of the tribes of the children of Israel shall keep himself to his own inheritance.

If the Israelites were dark skinned as some want to try and maintain (to be politically correct), rather than fair and ruddy (which is what the Bible says), then why does it say in Jeremiah:

Jeremiah
13:23 Can the Ethiopian change his skin, or the leopard his spots? [then] may ye also do good, that are accustomed to do evil.

Why can the Ethiopian, and not can the Israelite, if Israel was dark skinned (except for when the women were fair-beautiful)? There is obviously a contrast being made to the Ethiopian, indicating that the Israelites did not look alike to the Ethiopians.
 
Last edited:

Robin

Veteran
Joined
Jun 26, 2019
Messages
583
Got it. So the convo's over I guess?
Seems so, yes.

Got it. You have no vested interest in the topic to properly investigate it so then theres really no need to continue right?
Yep. Something that wouldn't have been a problem if you had just given me the sources yourself but evidently not. And seeing as you still haven't addressed the Roman question, that pretty much kills any interest I had left.

The "which" isnt relevant to my question though. My point was that the Egyptians and Israelites looked similar. And when you have an American biblical publisher saying Negroes (which in America is a term solely used for black Americans)arent from Ham like other dark (African)nations are, that shows that they too, believed that the Egyptians and Negroes looked similar. But that doesnt mean Negroes are Israelites though because them not being Ham, still leaves either Shem or Japheth.
I had to ask because other sources cite ALL dark races as having come from Ham. That's why I asked how they were able to determine which groups fit into which category because the bible again makes no real comparative mention of skin colour. Of course that term would only be used for black Americans . . . .it stems from the Latin word "niger" meaning black. It wasn't even originally a slur but I'm sure (and correct me if I'm wrong here) that ANY black person who entered America at the time wouldve been labelled as such. And again, if races are only grouped together because of skin colour or can be said to look similar beause of their Hamitic/Semitic/Japhethic links then do your depictions of native Americans look like the other Semitic people groups they are grouped with? In fact, seeing as we mentioned the word "niger", what about:

Acts 13-1 Now there were in the church that was at Antioch certain prophets and teachers; as Barnabas, and Simeon that was called Niger, and Lucius of Cyrene, and Manaen, which had been brought up with Herod the tetrarch, and Saul.

Calling Simeon black based on him being black would only have made sense if the church at Antioch in which he taught and the other disciples, Israelites, that were with him were themselves not black.

This rather than supporting the belief that the Israelites were black would rather make it the exception. This then is the epitome of the token black guy.

No we didnt look at how ancient Egypt allowed foreigners into their nation to the extent where the original Egyptian was unrecognizable. When did this happen,who were these foreigners and where did they come from? I doubt you can be specific.
I didn't once say the original Egyptian was unrecognizable. Wow. I said that if they (Egypt) were including foreigners into even their royal families then seeing a non-Egyptian wielding Egyptian influence would not be a shocker to the surrounding nations. I said that empirical evidence has shown Egyptins were not focused on skin colour but national contribution. Not to mention the multiple dynasties in which foreign powers ruled Egypt which almost no doubt led to intermixing.

"How do we define a ‘foreigner today? Most people would say it is a person who is born in or comes from a country other than one's own.

Ancient Egyptians had a completely different definition of who they regarded to be a foreigner.

They considered that anyone who could be integrated into their society was one of them. This means that ancient Egyptians never applied the term “foreigner” to persons living in Egypt, but only to foreigners beyond the borders of Egypt.

If a person from abroad lived on Egyptian territory and spoke Egyptian, he or she were treated as members of the Egyptian society.

However, people who resided beyond Egyptian borders were believed to be so different that they couldn’t possibly adopt the Egyptians’ way of thinking, their values and anything related to their culture. These were the true foreigners by ancient Egyptian definition.

Egyptian ideology was based on Maat, the most essential religious concept of the Egyptian view of the world. It was a concept of order of the world that the gods, pharaohs and ordinary people had to obey
."

The Egyptians were not homogenous -skin color varied between the peoples of Lower Egypt, Upper Egypt, and Nubia, who in various eras rose to power in Ancient Egypt.
Reference: Bard, Kathryn A; Shubert, Steven Blake (1999). Encyclopedia of the Archaeology of Ancient Egypt. p. 329.

Taharqa, the Nubian king of Napata who came from the Kushite tribe in Nubia, (modern Sudan). He was a pharaoh of the Ancient Egyptian 25th dynasty and king of the Kingdom of Kush, which was located in Northern Sudan. He reigned between 690 and 664 BC.
References:
Clayton, Peter A. Chronicle of the Pharaohs: The Reign-by-Reign Record of the Rulers and Dynasties of Ancient Egypt. Thames & Hudson. p.190. 2006.


Ammu Ahotepre was a minor Hyksos pharaoh of Dynasty XIV of ancient Egypt
Which means it was somewhere between 75 (c. 1725–1650 BC) and 155 years (c. 1805–1650 BC). Hykos is located in Western Asia.
References:
Hayes, William C. (1973). "Egypt: From the death of Ammenemes III to Seqenenre II". The Cambridge Ancient History.

Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
.Ryholt, K. S. B. (1997), The Political Situation in Egypt during the Second Intermediate Period, c. 1800 - 1550 BC, Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press, ISBN 87-7289-421-0

The relationship between Egypt and Levant went as far back in ancient times.

And the (Semitic) Hyksos, who invaded and conquered Egypt from 1750-1675 BC.
images (6).jpeg
And Moses is, according to Rabbinical Judaism, calculated a lifespan corresponding to what . . . 1391–1271 BC? Which means there was most likely racial diversity in Egypt at the time of his story. Given Egypt's attitude to assimilated foreigners and the clear evidence of people of both darker and lighter complexion residing in Egypt and holding offices of significance, it's not that big of a jump to assume that one could be considered Egyptian despite not looking like one.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jul 29, 2018
Messages
2,040
And Moses is, according to Rabbinical Judaism, calculated a lifespan corresponding to what . . . 1391–1271 BC? Which means there was most likely racial diversity in Egypt at the time of his story. Given Egypt's attitude to assimilated foreigners and the clear evidence of people of both darker and lighter complexion residing in Egypt and holding offices of significance, it's not that big of a jump to assume that one could be considered Egyptian despite not looking like one.
The Bible record clearly shows that there was racial diversity in Egypt during the time of Moses. In Exodus 12:38 it is stated that a mixed multitude left Egypt along with Moses and the children of Jacob/Israel (the Israelites) -

Exodus
12:36 And the "I AM" gave the people favour in the sight of the Egyptians, so that they lent unto them [such things as they required]. And they spoiled the Egyptians.
12:37 And the children of Israel journeyed from Rameses to Succoth, about six hundred thousand on foot [that were] men, beside children.
12:38 And a mixed multitude went up also with them; and flocks, and herds, [even] very much cattle.
12:39 And they baked unleavened cakes of the dough which they brought forth out of Egypt, for it was not leavened; because they were thrust out of Egypt, and could not tarry, neither had they prepared for themselves any victual.
12:40 Now the sojourning of the children of Israel, who dwelt in Canaan and Egypt, [was] four hundred and thirty years.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jul 29, 2018
Messages
2,040
Locate the Throne of David and you have located Israel.

"Edward the 1st of England (Edward "Longshanks" in the film Braveheart) invaded Scotland and removed the Stone to England in 1296 A.D. Edward took The Lia Fail to London where it was placed in Westminster Abbey and all of the kings of England right up to and including George the 6th were crowned on The Stone of Destiny.

In Westminster Abbey Edward's Chair, in which the succeeding kings and queens of the realm have been inaugurated, is in height six feet and seven inches, in breadth at the bottom thirty-eight inches, and in depth twenty-four inches; from the seat to the bottom is twenty-five inches; the breadth of the seat within the sides is twenty-eight inches, and the depth eighteen inches. At nine inches from the ground is a board, supported at the four corners WITH AS MANY LIONS [SYMBOL OF JUDAH]. Between the seat and this board is ENCLOSED A STONE, commonly called JACOB'S, or THE FATAL (Lia Fail) MARBLE STONE, which is an oblong of about twenty-two inches in length, thirteen inches broad and eleven inches deep; of a steel colour, mixed with some veins of red. HISTORY RELATES THAT THIS IS THE STONE WHEREON THE PATRIARCH JACOB LAID HIS HEAD IN THE PLAINS OF LUZ (BETHEL). Genesis 35:6 So Jacob came to Luz, which [is] in the land of Canaan, that [is], Bethel,"



* - the last monarch to be officially crowned on it was George the 6th (see the link above to learn why).
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jul 29, 2018
Messages
2,040

Music: Zadok the Priest HWV258 by George Frideric Handel

(Zadok the Priest and Nathan the Prophet anointed Solomon king over The United Kingdom Of Israel.)




The Throne of David:



This stone is the one upon which David was crowned followed by Solomon.

1 kings
1:39 And Zadok the priest took an horn of oil out of the Tabernacle, and anointed Solomon. And they blew the trumpet; and all the people said, God save king Solomon.
2:12 Then sat Solomon upon the throne of David his father; and his kingdom was established greatly.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Mar 17, 2017
Messages
2,342
And we were also talking about God using other nations to punish Israel when they don't obey him, which has happened already several times in the past, as the Bible records it.

They certainly did not give absolute obedience to The Law, and at times went away from it and were punished, but they still kept it better than the Gentiles would have done if it had been given to them, and so, because they were still the best out of the bunch at keeping it, they were helped to colonize the world.
Theres nothing in scripture that says God would use Israel to "colonize the world" even when they were disobeying the covenant.He said that once they disobeyed the covenant that THEY'D be colonized. Thats not what happened in your scenario though..

It's about both - human (body) + being (soul).
human+being

Being born in a racial Israelite body should be seen as a reward and sign of God's Grace as it comes with great benefits (growing up in better/more blessed and prosperous Israelite countries, like Great Britain, etc.) but with it also in fact comes also a greater responsibility.
You mean Great Britain, who sponsored the false state of Israel(according to you?), who then put up freemasonry symbols on their "promised land"? Your and Great Britain's "god" is different than the Creator in the old testament thats for sure.

You have kept trying to claim that "fair" means beautiful only (and act as if it cannot possibly mean white under any circumstance, like it does not fit within the realm of possibility in your paradigm), when that is plain and simply not the truth, and the dictionary definition you quoted proves this because it also says "white", yet you seem to be wanting to avoid that fact desperately which shows you are not open minded, but biased against it. In your mind, they absolutely cannot possibly have been white/fair skinned, so it can and must only mean "beautiful", which is actually the SECONDARY meaning (nr. 2). The primary meaning is white, fair skin, fair complexion. Here is the dictionary definition again, that you quoted previously (only, I removed the word "hence", that you decided needed to be added in, but which is not in the actual dictionary definition - and why did you feel you needed to add it? See the bold text, from the dictionary definition that you quoted):



"free from dark hue"
"white"
"as a fair skin"
"a fair complexion"

And yes, it secondarily can and does also mean beautiful or handsome.

Do a web search for any of these and see what you get. Seriously, stop trying to argue that black is white and white is black. White means white. As in fair, fair skinned, a fair complexion, fair hair. etc.

Read your own dictionary definition and don't skip the words you don't seem to want to be there.
But Im the one that brought the definition to the table so how can I be ignoring what fair can mean? Why would I bring the definition of it being pale along with the other definition meaning beautiful, if I was trying to ignore it also meaning pale? And didnt I say that the writers of the dictionary attributed the "fair" in Genesis 12 with being beautiful not having pale skin? And that thats why they put the verse after the second definition of beautiful and not the first definition of pale? Yea Im pretty sure I did. You then pretended to not know how to read a dictionary and said they werent suggesting it was beautiful if Im not mistaken lol.. But while we're back on skin color again for whatever reason (though I thought it was "color blindness" now), why are the Dutch "Israelites" dressing up in black face? You didnt answer that yet:

1577139594064.jpeg

Who are they paying homage to again? And What holy day in the bible is it that they're celebrating because I cant seem to find it anywhere (or any biblical holiday they follow)...


The Israelites however were not even supposed to marry outside of their own tribe, as the text from Numbers shows below, regarding the daughters of Zelophehad, so that the inheritance of the land would not leave the tribe it came from, but remain within it for the Jubile.

Numbers
36:3 And if they be married to any of the sons of the [other] tribes of the children of Israel, then shall their inheritance be taken from the inheritance of our fathers, and shall be put to the inheritance of the tribe whereunto they are received: so shall it be taken from the lot of our inheritance.
36:4 And when The Jubile of the children of Israel shall be, then shall their inheritance be put unto the inheritance of the tribe whereunto they are received: so shall their inheritance be taken away from the inheritance of the tribe of our fathers.
36:5 And Moses commanded the children of Israel according to the Word of the "I AM", saying, The tribe of the sons of Joseph hath said well.
36:6 This [is] the thing which the "I AM" doth command concerning the daughters of Zelophehad, saying, Let them marry to whom they think best; only to the family of the tribe of their father shall they marry.
36:7 So shall not the inheritance of the children of Israel remove from tribe to tribe: for every one of the children of Israel shall keep himself to the inheritance of the tribe of his fathers.
36:8 And every daughter, that possesseth an inheritance in any tribe of the children of Israel, shall be wife unto one of the family of the tribe of her father, that the children of Israel may enjoy every man the inheritance of his fathers.
36:9 Neither shall the inheritance remove from [one] tribe to another tribe; but every one of the tribes of the children of Israel shall keep himself to his own inheritance.

If the Israelites were dark skinned as some want to try and maintain (to be politically correct), rather than fair and ruddy (which is what the Bible says), then why does it say in Jeremiah:

Jeremiah
13:23 Can the Ethiopian change his skin, or the leopard his spots? [then] may ye also do good, that are accustomed to do evil.

Why can the Ethiopian, and not can the Israelite, if Israel was dark skinned (except for when the women were fair-beautiful)? There is obviously a contrast being made to the Ethiopian, indicating that the Israelites did not look alike to the Ethiopians.
It doesnt say the Ethiopian can change his skin and the Israelite cant (what would that even mean lol). Its saying that the Ethiopian and the leopard CANT change their spots so on the same note, those that are accustomed to do evil cant change to do good. It has nothing to do with the skin color of the Israelites.
 

DavidSon

Star
Joined
Jan 10, 2019
Messages
2,024
I'm reading about Yemeni Jews, known as the Teman. They were "discovered" in 1901.





Another photo of elders studying in Palestine. There are many photos that show the Yemeni are of mixed races (though a majority with predominantly African features).



What is strange and honestly creepy is that between 1949-50 Israel moved around 50,000 Teman to Israel on planes in a secret mission called Operation Magic Carpet. The reasons for offering "refuge" I have my own suspicions, and there is still criticism today:

"Children were often separated from their parents for hygienic reasons, or taken away to hospitals for treatment, but often, parents only received notification, often by loudspeaker, they had died. According to some testimony, there was a suspicion that the state kidnapped healthy Yemeni children, for adoption, and then informed the parents they had died. As a result, some decades later, the Yemenite Children Affair exploded, in which it was rumoured that something of the order of 1,000 children had gone missing."

" [it was argued]... that economic motivations also had a role in the massive emigration of Yemeni Jews, which began prior to 1948."

 
Joined
Jul 29, 2018
Messages
2,040
Theres nothing in scripture that says God would use Israel to "colonize the world" even when they were disobeying the covenant.He said that once they disobeyed the covenant that THEY'D be colonized. Thats not what happened in your scenario though..
God's Blessing to the seed of Abraham was completely unconditional to them keeping The Mosaic Covenant (which only came later and in addition) because of what Abraham had done:

Genesis
22:16 And said, By Myself have I sworn, saith the "I AM", for because thou hast done this thing, and hast not withheld thy son, thine only [son]:
22:17 That in blessing I will bless thee, and in multiplying I will multiply thy seed as "the stars of the heaven", and as the sand which [is] upon the sea shore; and thy descendants shall possess the (sea) gates of their enemies;
22:18 And in thy seed shall all the nations of the earth be blessed; because thou hast obeyed My voice.

The Mosaic Covenant which follows this, then has additional and conditional Blessings in it, in addition to the unconditional Blessings that God promised to the seed of Abraham. The wholly unconditional Blessing promised by God to Abraham's seed, was passed down to Isaac:

Genesis
21:12 And God said unto Abraham, Let it not be grievous in thy sight because of the lad, and because of thy bondwoman; in all that Sarah hath said unto thee, hearken unto her voice; for in Isaac shall thy seed be called [(I)saac's sons - Saxons].
21:13 And also of the son of the bondwoman will I make a nation, because he [is] thy seed.

The unconditional Blessing was then passed down to Jacob:

27:30 And it came to pass, as soon as Isaac had made an end of blessing Jacob, and Jacob was yet scarce gone out from the presence of Isaac his father, that Esau his brother came in from his hunting.

And Esau (Edom) hated Jacob (Israel) over this.

27:41 And Esau hated Jacob because of the blessing wherewith his father blessed him: and Esau said in his heart, The days of mourning for my father are at hand; then will I slay my brother Jacob.

But, even so, the Promised Blessing to Abraham's seed went to Jacob/Israel nonetheless:

28:1 And Isaac called Jacob, and blessed him, and charged him, and said unto him, Thou shalt not take a wife of the daughters of Canaan.
28:2 Arise, go to Padanaram, to the house of Bethuel thy mother's father; and take thee a wife from thence of the daughters of Laban thy mother's brother.
28:3 And God Almighty bless thee, and make thee fruitful, and multiply thee, that thou mayest be a multitude of people;
28:4 And give thee the blessing of Abraham, to thee, and to thy seed with thee; that thou mayest inherit the land wherein thou art a stranger, which God gave unto Abraham.

Then, this wholly unconditional Blessing of God's Promise to Abraham (which was to inherit all of the land that God had promised to Abraham) was then passed down to the twelve tribes/sons of Jacob/Israel, according to how their father prophesied to them:

49:28 All these [are] the twelve tribes of Israel: and this [is it] that their father spoke unto them, and blessed them; every one according to his blessing he blessed them.

And the CROWN was promised to Joseph and his descendants - his two sons (Ephraim and Manasseh and their seed - their descendants - The English and American Anglo-Saxons):

49:22 Joseph [is] a fruitful bough, [even] a fruitful bough by a well; [whose] branches run over the wall:
49:23 The archers have sorely grieved him, and shot [at him], and hated him:
49:24 But his bow abode in strength, and the arms of his hands were made strong by the hands of the mighty [God] of Jacob; (from THERE [is] The Shepherd, The [Corner] Stone of Israel: )(1 Cor. 10:4; Daniel 2:34-5; 45)
49:25 [Even] by the God of thy father, Who shall help thee; and by the Almighty, Who shall bless thee with blessings of heaven above, blessings of the deep that lieth under, blessings of the breasts, and of the womb:
49:26 The blessings of thy father have prevailed above the blessings of my progenitors unto the utmost bound of the everlasting hills: they (the blessings) shall be on the head of Joseph, and THE CROWN [of Israel] on the head of him that was separate from his brethren (ch. 37:7-11).


And they, and ONLY they, were given the NAME "Israel" - them ONLY, meaning it (the NAME Israel) was not given to Judah.

Genesis
48:15 And he blessed Joseph, and said, God, before Whom my fathers Abraham and Isaac did walk, the God which fed me all my life long unto this day,
48:16 The Angel which redeemed me from all evil, bless the lads; and let my name [Israel] be named on them (let Ephraim and Manasseh be called Israel), and the name of my fathers Abraham and Isaac; and let them grow into a multitude in the midst of the earth.

All of that is part of the Blessing even before we come to the Mosaic Covenant and it's additional Blessings (which are additional to the above and which ARE conditional on keeping The Law in the Torah).

But, the above, which includes the promise of being multiplied and spreading (colonizing) to the West, and to the East, and to the North, and to the South (in that order) and colonizing is ALL part of the wholly unconditional promise that God made to Abraham about his seed and what they would do.

Jacob/Israel's dream and vision from God, that he experienced in Bethel, while Jacob slept with his head on the stone that became the Throne of David (see the official photograph of it - the stone /Throne of David - above):


That is a photograph of Jacob's Pillar/Pillow stone from Bethel that the Israelites carried with them on a pole throughout the Bible and that David and then Solomon were crowned on and it (the Stone of Destiny - The Davidic Throne) is located in GREAT BRITAIN (Israel), and not in Palestine (where the Pharez branch of the House of Judah is).

28:12 And he dreamed, and behold a ladder set up on the earth, and the top of it reached to heaven: and behold the angels of God ascending and descending on it.
28:13 And, behold, the "I AM" stood above it, and said, I [am] the "I AM" God of Abraham thy father, and the God of Isaac: the land whereon thou liest, to thee will I give it, and to thy seed;
28:14 And thy seed shall be as "the dust of the earth", and thou shalt spread abroad to the West, and to the East, and to the North, and to the South: and in thee and in thy seed shall all the families of the earth be blessed.
28:15 And, behold, I [am] with thee, and will keep thee in all [places] where thou goest, and will bring thee again into this land; for I will not leave thee, until I have done [that] which I have spoken to thee of.

Jacob/Israel's Anglo-Saxon (Isaac'son) descendants The British spread abroad to the West (to America), and to the East (Australasia), and to the North (Canada), and to the South (Africa) in that order, EXACTLY as God promised to Abraham that they would.

There is no other nation on Earth that even comes close to fitting all of this AND who has THE CROWN AND the Throne of David (Jacob's Pillar/Pillow stone) upon which all their monarchs (except QE2) have been sucessively crowned.

ALL of the above is part of the unconditional promise and Blessing to the seed of Abraham.

Genesis 28:15 And, behold, I [am] with thee, and will keep thee in all [places] where thou goest, and will bring thee again into this land; for I will not leave thee, until I have done [that] which I have spoken to thee of.

That was God's Promise to Abraham and He kept it by causing it to happen and it was NOT conditional on them keeping The Mosaic Covenant.

The Blessings from the Mosaic Covenant (Law of Moses) are ADDITIONAL to the above Blessings and these Promises (in the Mosaic Covenant - the Blessings and the Curses) ARE conditional upon keeping The Covenant.


But the Blessings that God promised to Abraham, were NOT conditional on keeping The Covenant.

You mean Great Britain, who sponsored the false state of Israel(according to you?), who then put up freemasonry symbols on their "promised land"?
Yes, them.

But Im the one that brought the definition to the table so how can I be ignoring what fair can mean? Why would I bring the definition of it being pale along with the other definition meaning beautiful, if I was trying to ignore it also meaning pale?
Only you could answer that.
And didnt I say that the writers of the dictionary attributed the "fair" in Genesis 12 with being beautiful not having pale skin? And that thats why they put the verse after the second definition of beautiful and not the first definition of pale? Yea Im pretty sure I did.
Ok.
You then pretended to not know how to read a dictionary and said they werent suggesting it was beautiful if Im not mistaken lol.. But while we're back on skin color again for whatever reason (though I thought it was "color blindness" now), why are the Dutch "Israelites" dressing up in black face? You didnt answer that yet:

You mean Swarte Piet? That is part of their Pagan Sinterklaas (Yuletide XMAS) tradition. Swarte Piet being the sidekick for Sinterklaas.

"Zwarte Piet is the companion of Saint Nicholas in the folklore of the Low Countries."

Who are they paying homage to again?
More like making fun of.
And What holy day in the bible is it that they're celebrating because I cant seem to find it anywhere (or any biblical holiday they follow)...
It's not, it's a pagan Roman tradition that Christ hates:

Revelation 2:6 But this thou hast, that thou hatest the deeds of the Nicolaitanes (followers of Santa [Ni]-Claus - Yuletide, Easter [Ishtar - a goddess of fertility - eggs a symbol of fertility] etc.),which I also hate.

It doesnt say the Ethiopian can change his skin and the Israelite cant (what would that even mean lol).
What I was asking, is if the Israelites were dark skinned, then why does it say "can the Ethiopian" and not "can the Israelite". The Ethiopians are dark skinned.

Its saying that the Ethiopian and the leopard CANT change their spots so on the same note, those that are accustomed to do evil cant change to do good.
Agreed.
It has nothing to do with the skin color of the Israelites.
It has to do with it as well. If they (the Israelites) themselves were dark skinned, then it does not make sense to do this comparison to the Ethiopians, who are dark skinned.

With the Israelites being fair skinned and ruddy (being able to blush, unless they can't anymore because of being accustomed to doing evil) however, then it does make perfect sense for making the comparison to the Ethiopians, who look different.

Jeremiah
30:5 For thus saith the "I AM"; We have heard a voice of trembling, of fear, and not of peace.
30:6 Ask ye now, and see whether a man doth travail with child? wherefore do I see every man with his hands on his loins, as a woman in travail, and all faces are turned into paleness?
30:7 Alas! for that day [is] great, so that none [is] like it: it [is] even the time of Jacob's trouble; but he shall be saved out of it.

Although dark skinned people such as Ethiopians might also look pale when frightened, this (going pale from fright) is something that is much more noticeable when it comes to already fair complexioned people, they go really white and pale, when frightened.

Jeremiah 6:15 Were they ashamed when they had committed abomination? nay, they were not at all ashamed, neither could they blush: therefore they shall fall among them that fall: at the time [that] I visit them they shall be cast down, saith the "I AM".

Jeremiah 8:12 Were they ashamed when they had committed abomination? nay, they were not at all ashamed, neither could they blush: therefore shall they fall among them that fall: in the time of their punishment they shall be cast down, saith the "I AM".

Ezra 9:6 And said, O my God, I am ashamed and blush to lift up my face to Thee, my God: for our iniquities are increased over [our] head, and our trespass is grown up unto the heavens.

Book of Tephi (king Zedekiah of Jerusalem's daughter)
6:4 Three hours ere set of the sun we came to the strong-built wall,
Then the Prophet of God cried forth, and Elier came at his call,
And knelt on the ground and answered of all that he had prepared,
How his heart had leaped within him, and now as a wand lay bared
And stripped in our sight; and his sons knelt by him on either hand,
That the Man of God might bless them as he set his feet on their land.
But he craved my blessing also, that chieftain (Elier) hoary and grim,
So I set my palm to his forehead, and cried on the Name of Him (YHWH)
Who had chosen me out of Jesse,

16:3...
"On this Stone I am set for ever. In Egypt anointed queen
Of the Hebrews. My throne in Jesse hath come to these hills so green
For a little space, ere it wander, but wheresoever it roam
Jesse shall seek and find it, until he come to his home
In the City of David wherein his sons shall rule upon earth,
When the House of the Lord be builded with praise and blessing and mirth."

17:1 Now soon my heart contracted, for a damsel stately and fair,
Broad-browed, full-eyed, and gracious beneath the crown of her hair,
Large-limbed and nobly shapen, tall to a chieftain's height,
Drew from the throngs before us, and now with a queenly right
Took my bridegroom's head in her palms and kissed him upon the lips.
Whilst cold went through me which passed from heart unto finger tips;
But my husband smiled, and said, "My queen, yet thy servant's bride,
Behold the chief of thine handmaids, my sister Maistiv, whose pride
Is Dan, Achaia and Eriu, who in her give fealty to thee
Of the silver stem of Jesse, the golden flower of his tree (the Cedar)."
Thus shamed I my doubt with blushes,

stem of Jesse (the line of David)

 
Last edited:
Joined
Mar 17, 2017
Messages
2,342
God's Blessing to the seed of Abraham was completely unconditional to them keeping The Mosaic Covenant (which only came later and in addition) because of what Abraham had done:
The scriptures are clear. When Israel disobeyed, they'd be the ones getting colonized, not doing the colonizing. When they disobeyed, they'd be getting ruled over, not ruling over others. Thats what the Most High plainly stated in the old testament.

Jacob/Israel's Anglo-Saxon (Isaac'son) descendants The British spread abroad to the West (to America), and to the East (Australasia), and to the North (Canada), and to the South (Africa) in that order, EXACTLY as God promised to Abraham that they would.

There is no other nation on Earth that even comes close to fitting all of this AND who has THE CROWN AND the Throne of David (Jacob's Pillar/Pillow stone) upon which all their monarchs (except QE2) have been sucessively crowned.

ALL of the above is part of the unconditional promise and Blessing to the seed of Abraham.

Genesis 28:15 And, behold, I [am] with thee, and will keep thee in all [places] where thou goest, and will bring thee again into this land; for I will not leave thee, until I have done [that] which I have spoken to thee of.

That was God's Promise to Abraham and He kept it by causing it to happen and it was NOT conditional on them keeping The Mosaic Covenant.

The Blessings from the Mosaic Covenant (Law of Moses) are ADDITIONAL to the above Blessings and these Promises (in the Mosaic Covenant - the Blessings and the Curses) ARE conditional upon keeping The Covenant.


But the Blessings that God promised to Abraham, were NOT conditional on keeping The Covenant.
Getting to rule over themselves and others WAS conditional on keeping the covenant. And thats right there in Deuteronomy 28.

Ok.

You mean Swarte Piet? That is part of their Pagan Sinterklaas (Yuletide XMAS) tradition. Swarte Piet being the sidekick for Sinterklaas.

"Zwarte Piet is the companion of Saint Nicholas in the folklore of the Low Countries."


More like making fun of.


It's not, it's a pagan Roman tradition that Christ hates:

Revelation 2:6 But this thou hast, that thou hatest the deeds of the Nicolaitanes (followers of Santa [Ni]-Claus - Yuletide, Easter [Ishtar - a goddess of fertility - eggs a symbol of fertility] etc.),which I also hate.
"Imitation is the finest form of flattery" ;)

And heres the thing. You cant find the people you claim are Israelites doing ANYTHING Hebraic. 300 years of ruling the majority of the world and what do you have to show for it? Your months/days are named after pagan gods. Your countries celebrate pagan holidays. Your countries put pagan monuments in their land. I mean theres nothing Hebraic to show for it.

While on the otherhand Antonio de Montezinos said he encountered "Indians" in South America reciting the Shema in the 1600s. Elijah Haines, an American politician from the 1800s, wrote a book about the similarity of American Indian and Hebrew customs. "Eldad the Danite" in the 9th century reported that there were lost tribes living in East Africa. Is the argument going to be that any of these groups are also white? I mean the proofs in the pudding my guy. And while the people you say are Israelites were in Europe NOT obeying the covenant or engaging in ANY Hebraic customs (that wasnt tied to christianity that is), here is a mound the American Indian (Hopi) were building...



See the Hebrew symbols?
What I was asking, is if the Israelites were dark skinned, then why does it say "can the Ethiopian" and not "can the Israelite". The Ethiopians are dark skinned.

It has to do with it as well. If they (the Israelites) themselves were dark skinned, then it does not make sense to do this comparison to the Ethiopians, who are dark skinned.

With the Israelites being fair skinned and ruddy (being able to blush, unless they can't anymore because of being accustomed to doing evil) however, then it does make perfect sense for making the comparison to the Ethiopians, who look different.

Jeremiah
30:5 For thus saith the "I AM"; We have heard a voice of trembling, of fear, and not of peace.
30:6 Ask ye now, and see whether a man doth travail with child? wherefore do I see every man with his hands on his loins, as a woman in travail, and all faces are turned into paleness?
30:7 Alas! for that day [is] great, so that none [is] like it: it [is] even the time of Jacob's trouble; but he shall be saved out of it.

Although dark skinned people such as Ethiopians might also look pale when frightened, this (going pale from fright) is something that is much more noticeable when it comes to already fair complexioned people, they go really white and pale, when frightened.

Jeremiah 6:15 Were they ashamed when they had committed abomination? nay, they were not at all ashamed, neither could they blush: therefore they shall fall among them that fall: at the time [that] I visit them they shall be cast down, saith the "I AM".

Jeremiah 8:12 Were they ashamed when they had committed abomination? nay, they were not at all ashamed, neither could they blush: therefore shall they fall among them that fall: in the time of their punishment they shall be cast down, saith the "I AM".

Ezra 9:6 And said, O my God, I am ashamed and blush to lift up my face to Thee, my God: for our iniquities are increased over [our] head, and our trespass is grown up unto the heavens.

Book of Tephi (king Zedekiah of Jerusalem's daughter)
6:4 Three hours ere set of the sun we came to the strong-built wall,
Then the Prophet of God cried forth, and Elier came at his call,
And knelt on the ground and answered of all that he had prepared,
How his heart had leaped within him, and now as a wand lay bared
And stripped in our sight; and his sons knelt by him on either hand,
That the Man of God might bless them as he set his feet on their land.
But he craved my blessing also, that chieftain (Elier) hoary and grim,
So I set my palm to his forehead, and cried on the Name of Him (YHWH)
Who had chosen me out of Jesse,

16:3...
"On this Stone I am set for ever. In Egypt anointed queen
Of the Hebrews. My throne in Jesse hath come to these hills so green
For a little space, ere it wander, but wheresoever it roam
Jesse shall seek and find it, until he come to his home
In the City of David wherein his sons shall rule upon earth,
When the House of the Lord be builded with praise and blessing and mirth."

17:1 Now soon my heart contracted, for a damsel stately and fair,
Broad-browed, full-eyed, and gracious beneath the crown of her hair,
Large-limbed and nobly shapen, tall to a chieftain's height,
Drew from the throngs before us, and now with a queenly right
Took my bridegroom's head in her palms and kissed him upon the lips.
Whilst cold went through me which passed from heart unto finger tips;
But my husband smiled, and said, "My queen, yet thy servant's bride,
Behold the chief of thine handmaids, my sister Maistiv, whose pride
Is Dan, Achaia and Eriu, who in her give fealty to thee
Of the silver stem of Jesse, the golden flower of his tree (the Cedar)."
Thus shamed I my doubt with blushes,

stem of Jesse (the line of David)

Well to repeat, it wasnt about the Ethiopians specific skin color but the lack of ability that the Ethiopian (and any nationality dark or light skinned that could have been interchanged there) had to change his "spots". I mean your logic is because the Most High chose to use Ethiopia there that it means Israel wasnt dark skinned which isnt logic at all.

And also the right (HEBREW)word you're looking for there is "kalam" which doesnt mean "to blush" but "to be humiliated".
 
Joined
Jul 29, 2018
Messages
2,040
The scriptures are clear. When Israel disobeyed, they'd be the ones getting colonized, not doing the colonizing. When they disobeyed, they'd be getting ruled over, not ruling over others. Thats what the Most High plainly stated in the old testament.



Getting to rule over themselves and others WAS conditional on keeping the covenant. And thats right there in Deuteronomy 28.



"Imitation is the finest form of flattery" ;)

And heres the thing. You cant find the people you claim are Israelites doing ANYTHING Hebraic. 300 years of ruling the majority of the world and what do you have to show for it? Your months/days are named after pagan gods. Your countries celebrate pagan holidays. Your countries put pagan monuments in their land. I mean theres nothing Hebraic to show for it.

While on the otherhand Antonio de Montezinos said he encountered "Indians" in South America reciting the Shema in the 1600s. Elijah Haines, an American politician from the 1800s, wrote a book about the similarity of American Indian and Hebrew customs. "Eldad the Danite" in the 9th century reported that there were lost tribes living in East Africa. Is the argument going to be that any of these groups are also white? I mean the proofs in the pudding my guy. And while the people you say are Israelites were in Europe NOT obeying the covenant or engaging in ANY Hebraic customs (that wasnt tied to christianity that is), here is a mound the American Indian (Hopi) were building...



See the Hebrew symbols?


Well to repeat, it wasnt about the Ethiopians specific skin color but the lack of ability that the Ethiopian (and any nationality dark or light skinned that could have been interchanged there) had to change his "spots". I mean your logic is because the Most High chose to use Ethiopia there that it means Israel wasnt dark skinned which isnt logic at all.

And also the right (HEBREW)word you're looking for there is "kalam" which doesnt mean "to blush" but "to be humiliated".
While those symbols are interesting, if you're just going to ignore the scripture that was shown about the unconditional Blessings God Promised to Abraham's descendants, then there seems to be little point in continuing with that discussion.

The Hopi and other Native American tribes are interesting and have their own prophecies about these times:

 
Last edited:
Joined
Jul 29, 2018
Messages
2,040
Question: Why is the Throne of David located in the British Isles, afar off?


The Throne of David

Answer:
Jeremiah 31:10 Hear the Word of the "I AM", O ye nations, and declare [it] in the isles afar off, and say, He that scattered Israel will gather him, and keep him, as a shepherd [doth] his flock.
 
Last edited:

elsbet

Superstar
Joined
Jun 4, 2017
Messages
5,122
Joined
Jul 29, 2018
Messages
2,040
Isn't that actually a rock?

Stone of Destiny
It is.

(Don't be fooled by the wikipedia disinfo though, into believing the "royal" cover-up of the truth about what happened with the stone, which they maintain to try and hide their colossal embarrassment, from the public.)


Note the obvious difference in colour, of the Coronation Stone pre 1950's:


The British Throne of David

VS. the very obvious much lighter colour of the Scottish sandstone replica (fake) stone that the Scots gave back to them in 1951, which is not the real stone and is the one which Elizabeth was then fraudulently crowned upon:


Post 1950 fake, completely different colour sandstone replica; not the genuine stone.
Which means her 1953 coronation was a complete fraud and she is not the monarch.

During the WW2 bombings of London, when they still had the genuine Stone of Destiny, it (the stone/rock) was valued above the crown jewels and was assigned "National Treasure Nr.1" and was hidden and protected more securely than even the crown jewels were, as the movie which will be posted after this discusses.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jul 29, 2018
Messages
2,040
The Truth about
The Stone of Destiny
aka
The Coronation Stone



This movie proves that an elaborate and extremely dangerous hoax concerning The Stone of Destiny; which (the hoax) has dire consequences for the British people; has been perpetrated on the British people by the House of Mountbatten.

It is compiled from selected and corrected footage from "The Coronation Stone" by W. H. D. Freeman; the "Stone of Destiny" by E. Raymond Capt and JAH's research that can be found throughout this site, and, in great detail, at the following link:-
The Lia Fail - Bethel - Stone of Destiny - Jacob's Pillar

As a direct result of that hoax and evil deception, perpetrated by the House of Mountbatten, the British people, who consequently refused to accept Christ's Sovereignty over them in 1988, are going to be defeated at Armageddon (Har-Megiddo in Israel) in the Middle-East, and either be killed or enslaved, as a punishment from God. This punishment is for their treachery and treason against Him and His Anointed, in accordance with Psalm 2; Luke 19:27; Revelation 11:7-10 and other Bible prophecies.
 
Joined
Jul 29, 2018
Messages
2,040
I mean your logic is because the Most High chose to use Ethiopia there that it means Israel wasnt dark skinned which isnt logic at all.

And also the right (HEBREW)word you're looking for there is "kalam" which doesnt mean "to blush" but "to be humiliated".
Lamentations
4:6 For the punishment of the inequity of the daughter of my people is greater than the punishment of the sin of Sodom, that was overthrown as in a moment, and no hands stayed on her.
4:7 Her Nazarites were purer than snow, they were whiter than milk, they were more ruddy in body than rubies, their polishing [was] of sapphire:

1 Samuel 17:42 And when the Philistine looked about, and saw David, he scorned him: for he was [but] a youth, and ruddy, and of a fair countenance.


Definition of fair-faced. 1 : having a light complexion : beautiful of countenance. 2 British, of a brick wall : not plastered.
Fair-faced | Definition of fair-faced by Merriam-Webster
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jul 29, 2018
Messages
2,040
And heres the thing. You cant find the people you claim are Israelites doing ANYTHING Hebraic. 300 years of ruling the majority of the world and what do you have to show for it? Your months/days are named after pagan gods. Your countries celebrate pagan holidays. Your countries put pagan monuments in their land. I mean theres nothing Hebraic to show for it.
There is a reason for this. The following paragraphs briefly explain what happened to the the 12 Tribes, including how the Northern 10-Tribed Nation of Israel lost their Sabbath-sign:

Jacob-Israel had twelve sons, who fathered the Twelve Tribes of Israel, the fifth of whom was called Dan and he fathered the Tuatha de Danaan (the Tribe of Dan), from whom the Irish and Danish people are descended. The eleventh of Jacob’s twelve sons was called Joseph, to whom Jacob/Israel gave the famous "Coat of Many Colours". Israel’s fourth son, Judah from whom the Jews claim descent and who sold his brother Joseph into slavery in Egypt, had twin sons called Zarah and Pharez, as is recorded in The Old Testament Book of Genesis chapter 38:27-30 of The Holy Bible.

When Judah’s twins were about to be born, the midwife; who knew that there were twins in the womb; had prepared herself with a scarlet cord to mark the firstborn. Today the same thing is done with a plastic name-tag placed around a baby’s wrist. Zarah (meaning ‘Scarlet’ in Hebrew) put his hand out of the womb first and the midwife tied the scarlet cord around his wrist to identify him as the firstborn. He then pulled his hand back into the womb and his twin brother Pharez was born first, thereby breaching his brother Zarah’s birthright and so he was named Pharez which means ‘Breach’ in Hebrew.

Contrary to the commonly-held belief that all Israelites are Jews and before anyone jumps to the wrong conclusion that therefore the Danites are Jews, I must explain that the word Jew and Israelite are not synonymous and do not mean the same or refer to the same people, no matter what your dictionary might say. They refer to two related but different peoples, as any honest and well-informed rabbi. will admit and studying a Bible will confirm.

Long before the birth of Teia Tephi; back in 997 B.C. under David’s grandson Rehoboam, the son of Solomon; the twelve tribes of Israel fell-out with each other and split-up into two separate kingdoms, with two separate kings and they lived side by side but in two separate countries, called Israel and Judaea. The twelve tribes divided into the ten-tribed "House of Israel" who lived in Israel in the northern section of the Holy Land under king Jeroboam and the two-tribed "House of Judah" who lived in Judaea, in the South of the Holy Land, under the sovereignty of Solomon’s son, king Rehoboam.

The Northern kingdom was called Israel and its capital city was Samaria. The Southern kingdom was called Judaea and its capital was Jerusalem. The tribe of Dan was one of the ten tribes of the northern ten-tribed kingdom called Israel and those ten tribes are the same tribes who later became the "Ten Lost Tribes of Israel", so the Danites are therefore Israelites who are not Jewish.

The Jewish people claim their descent from the two-tribed "House of Judah" (Jew-dah), hence their name Jew. All true racial Jews are Israelites but not all Israelites are Jews. Just as, for example, all Scottish people are British but not all of the British people are Scottish.

Returning now to the story; Pharez, having taken the birthright from his brother Zarah, carried the tribal (family) name of Judah, from which came king David, the shepherd boy who slew the giant Goliath with a stone from his sling and became king of Israel. The Royal line of David descends from Pharez and their emblem is an amber/golden lion, rampant, with a crown on its head.

The descendants of his brother, Zarah of the ‘Red Hand’, having lost the Birthright, went into exile and migrated to Heberia (now known as Iberia or Spain). There they built the city of Zaragoza. Zaragoza (originally Zarah-gassa) means the "Stronghold of Zarah" and the city is still called Zaragoza today, even though the Israelites’ traditional enemy, Babylon and Rome, invaded Heberia and drove the Zarahites out to the northern coastlands of Spain. From there many of them fled across the water to Ireland (Hebernia – the Hebrews’ new-land and the Hebrides - Hebrew’s Isles). Some of their descendants migrated from Ireland to Scotland, and, once there, decided to use their own Judah Zarah version of the Judahite emblem, which is the red lion rampant, just as Judah Pharez use the amber lion rampant (rampant is a word used in heraldry. and it means that an animal is shown standing-up on its back legs, on a coat-of-arms).



Tribal Standard of Judah

Centuries after Zarah first left Judaea to go into exile abroad, and the ten-tribed "House of Israel" had been taken out of Israel, the northern kingdom, to Assyria as slaves in 722 B.C., as punishment for breaking The Covenant, Jeremiah the Bible Prophet was sent to king Zedekiah of Jerusalem in the southern kingdom, who had, by then, also broken God’s Covenant, to warn him to return to keeping The Covenantor God would punish the two-tribed "House of Judah", as he had previously punished the ten-tribed "House of Israel". Jeremiah warned king Zedekiah of Jerusalem that, if he did not keep The Covenant, God would send king Nebuchadnezzar of Babylon to lay siege to and destroy Jerusalem. Zedekiah did not like God’s Message so he decided to ignore it and punish God’s messenger by putting him in prison. However that did not prevent the prophecy from being fulfilled, it only made its fulfillment more certain.

Nebuchadnezzar sent his army and laid siege to Jerusalem whose inhabitants became so hungry that they ate their own children. The City was not only taken but was also laid-waste and burned. God’s House, the Holy Temple, that had been built for Him by Solomon and Hiram, was also destroyed, along with The City.

Nebuchadnezzar, who was sent by God to punish Zedekiah and the two-tribed "House of Judah"; just as the Assyrians had been used in 722 B.C. to punish the ten-tribed "House of Israel"; honoured Jeremiah as God’s Prophet; released him from prison and gave him free reign to do as he was commanded by God.

Zedekiah, who was descended from the royal line of David of the Pharez branch of the tribe of Judah, and all of his sons were captured and taken from Jerusalem to Babylon, where his sons were slain in front of Zedekiah’s eyes and then he was blinded, so that the execution of his sons would be the last thing he ever saw. He himself died in prison, in Babylon, and all of this was because he betrayed God and his people; broke The Covenant and caused his people to suffer poverty under his own laws, instead of prosperity under God’s Laws in The Covenant that is written in The Torah. The Torahis the collective name for the Five Books given to Israel through Moses at Horeb in Sinai and it means The Law.

The inhabitants of Judaea were also taken captive and were removed from Judaea into Babylon to become slaves to their captors, as punishment for allowing themselves to be misled by their rulers, just as the ten-tribed "House of Israel" had previously been punished and taken off their land Israel, into slavery, before them. The "House of Israel" were taken to Assyria in 722 B.C., from where they never returned home to Israel. The "House of Israel" and the "House of Judah" were both punished for the same reason; that is that they broke The Covenant and allowed their rulers to make up their own poverty-creating selfish laws; economic policies and taxes in contravention of God’s Commandments and prophetical-warnings to His People.

At the time Nebuchadnezzar was king of Babylon, the Assyrians were no longer the world super-power that had defeated the ten-tribed "House of Israel" and had themselves been defeated and driven-out of Assyria, so they were no longer in a position to keep the ten-tribed "House of Israel" as slaves and they all migrated to the North-West of the Holy Land. The Assyrians stopped in what is now called Germany and eventually became the Germans of today with their German Military Cross that is identical to the ancient Assyrian Knight’s Cross.

The ten-tribed "House of Israel" had been slaves in Assyria since 722 B.C. and therefore had learned to speak Assyrian; which is why there are Assyrian (Germanic) words in the English and other North-European languages today. They also lost their Sabbath Sign, that told them who they were, having changed their Sabbath day from the true Sabbath which is the seventh day of the week (Saturday) to the Assyrian and Babylonian Sun-worship religions’ worship-day of Sunday, and so had begun to lose their true history; Mosaic Laws in The Torah and also their identity as Israelites.

Finally being free from domination by the Assyrians, most of the "House of Israel" separated themselves from them and continued on their long trek, to the North-West coastlands and Islands, of what is now Europe, exactly as it was prophesied that they would do.

 
Joined
Mar 17, 2017
Messages
2,342
While those symbols are interesting, if you're just going to ignore the scripture that was shown about the unconditional Blessings God Promised to Abraham's descendants, then there seems to be little point in continuing with that discussion.

The Hopi and other Native American tribes are interesting and have their own prophecies about these times:

Huh? I didnt even disagree with what you said about there being promises to Abraham that are unconditional. I said that the Israelites ruling over themselves and others WAS conditional on them obeying the covenant. Obey, they rule over themselves and others. Disobey, and they get ruled over oppressively. Your view has the modern Euros ruling over themselves and others for centuries DESPITE disobeying the covenant from start to finish. Theres no match...

And yea you can actually see Hebraic customs in the Indigenous American way of life. In their monuments. And there have been TWO stone tablets of the commandments found in America, which you cant say about anywhere else in the world. Everything points to the Americas and nowhere else...
 
Top