Cisgender isn't a new term btw. It's a medical term that's been around since (1940s I think) to refer to an individual who is in harmony with their biologically assigned sex.
Odd.The earliest reference to the term that I could find was the 1990s.
Etymology and terminology
German sexologist Volkmar Sigusch used the neologism cissexual (zissexuell in German) in a peer-reviewed publication. In his 1998 essay "The Neosexual Revolution", he cites his two-part 1991 article "Die Transsexuellen und unser nosomorpher Blick" ("Transsexuals and our nosomorphic view") as the origin of the term.[3] He also used the term in the title of a 1995 article, "Transsexueller Wunsch und zissexuelle Abwehr" (or: "Transsexual desire and cissexual defense").[4]
Can't really find it being used before then
So you had to accept that you are female? Or did you just never truly feel like you were a male? I think most people never truly feel like the opposite sex, so there's nothing to accept, they already feel normal and comfortable being cisgender because that's who they are.Because most people just accept the reality of who they are and they don't focus on projecting the perception of reality they've created for themselves
Well experiences are definitely influenced by gender because people treat people differently based on gender. But I don't think gender plays such a huge part in what an individual likes. I think personality and preferences stem more from someone's soul and intrinsic personal feelings rather than their biology or chromosomes. It's more of an individual thing.Please explain how experience and personality isn't influenced by gender.
Why are there inherit characteristics in men which aren't as common in women, and vice versa?
You love to complicate such a simple thing.So you had to accept that you are female? Or did you just never truly feel like you were a male? I think most people never truly feel like the opposite sex, so there's nothing to accept, they already feel normal and comfortable being cisgender because that's who they are. But transgender people truly identify as the opposite sex. Of course they have to accept that biology is unchangeable and their chromosomes will define them as a male or a female biologically, but they still have an intrinsic part of themselves that makes them identify as the opposite of what they were born as.
I agree with the personality and preferences point, these are from our soul and we gravitate towards things which please our natureWell experiences are definitely influenced by gender because people treat people differently based on gender. But I don't think gender plays such a huge part in what an individual likes. I think personality and preferences stem more from someone's soul and intrinsic personal feelings rather than their biology or chromosomes.
I'm not complicating it... I think it's pretty simple. I actually love to simplify things.You love to complicate such a simple thing.
Yeah, that's what I said.If you don't have any issues with your perception of gender, you don't have to accept anything.
I don't know what you mean. Transgender people have a gender identity that doesn't match their biological sex.How can you identify with something other than what has already been established?
I'm sure transgender people believe this as well, they didn't choose the be transgender, it's just how they are. If gender identity is in every fiber of one's being, does that not mean that there's more to it than just biology? (Especially in the case of intersex people)We don't choose our gender, it's there in every fibre of our being.
True.mainstream media has hijacked the idea of transgenderism and propelled it into the realm of children and young people
Maybe more people are talking about it now so they want cash in on it and exploit these people for money and ratings.t just makes no sense why it's all been propelled into the media.
if we don't pull back now
how ? it is already in front of us in open air.......expose these Satanist scumbags
That's stupid. I don't see how using the words male and female are even offensive to trans people. They're not hateful words lol.They are actually considering banning the words 'male' and 'female' in sex education
Deny reality, ignore obvious differences to make tiny minority groups feel less excluded.This transgender debate is getting out of hand here in Australia. They are actually considering banning the words 'male' and 'female' in sex education in schools to make it inclusive for transgender students. FFS!
https://au.news.yahoo.com/sa/a/37323662/same-sex-marriage-opponents-slam-genderless-school-sex-ed-calls/
Yes. That's the kicker of it all- the exploitation under the guise of being inclusive kind of disgusts me.True.
Maybe more people are talking about it now so they want cash in on it and exploit these people for money and ratings.
That's pretty telling. Gender reassignment is such a RADICAL procedure, I guess it makes sense that it doesn't always work the way so many people imagine it will.Read an intereresting article about a Dr. Miroslav Djordevic, a urologist, in Belgrade. He's been treating transgenders in a clinic for over 10 years now and he's seeing a large increase in the number of patients opting for reversal of their transgender surgeries. He blames it on those people who have not have sufficient psychiatric screening and guidance before making their decision the first time. He has performed 7 reversals in the past five years with another 8 in consultation or undergoing operations. He says most are those wanting to reattach male genitalia at a cost of about $20,000. He claims there is a stigma attached to the reversal surgery and that may be a factor in others not coming forward with a formal request despite an initial inquiry as to whether it's possible. More often, an insurance company will now pay the gender reassignment but one has to wonder if they should also pay for the reversals. That would not be fair to the rest of us having to shore up the cost of providing medical coverage with our premiums. I've checked him online and google has a lot of items confirming the existence of his clinic and his credentials. Just wanted to check it out to make sure it wasn't fake news.
Insurance most definitely doesn't cover GRS. Most insurance will pay for HRT (it only costs ~$40 a month out of pocket anyway)Read an intereresting article about a Dr. Miroslav Djordevic, a urologist, in Belgrade. He's been treating transgenders in a clinic for over 10 years now and he's seeing a large increase in the number of patients opting for reversal of their transgender surgeries. He blames it on those people who have not have sufficient psychiatric screening and guidance before making their decision the first time. He has performed 7 reversals in the past five years with another 8 in consultation or undergoing operations. He says most are those wanting to reattach male genitalia at a cost of about $20,000. He claims there is a stigma attached to the reversal surgery and that may be a factor in others not coming forward with a formal request despite an initial inquiry as to whether it's possible. More often, an insurance company will now pay the gender reassignment but one has to wonder if they should also pay for the reversals. That would not be fair to the rest of us having to shore up the cost of providing medical coverage with our premiums. I've checked him online and google has a lot of items confirming the existence of his clinic and his credentials. Just wanted to check it out to make sure it wasn't fake news.