This is how they lower our males testosterone

[Cintra]

I think I am a bit jewish.
Should I do anything about it?

 

[Artful Revealer]

I think I am a bit jewish.
Should I do anything about it?

Apparently it depends whether you're a religious Jew or a Zionist Jew, former being ok, the latter being not ok, even though the latter exists only because of the former.

In reality it depends on your position towards Christ. Not hating Him would be good enough.

 

[pescatarian09]

In my eyes the charge against Judaism became a grave one the moment I discovered the Jewish activities in the Press, in art, in literature and the theatre. All unctuous protests were now more or less futile. One needed only to look at the posters announcing the hideous productions of the cinema and theatre, and study the names of the authors who were highly lauded there in order to become permanently adamant on Jewish questions. Here was a pestilence, a moral pestilence, with which the public was being infected. It was worse than the Black Plague of long ago. And in what mighty doses this poison was manufactured and distributed. Naturally, the lower the moral and intellectual level of such an author of artistic products the more inexhaustible his fecundity. Sometimes it went so far that one of these fellows, acting like a sewage pump, would shoot his filth directly in the face of other members of the human race. In this connection we must remember there is no limit to the number of such people. One ought to realize that for one, Goethe, Nature may bring into existence ten thousand such despoilers who act as the worst kind of germ- carriers in poisoning human souls. It was a terrible thought, and yet it could not be avoided, that the greater number of the Jews seemed specially destined by Nature to play this shameful part.
And is it for this reason that they can be called the chosen people?
I began then to investigate carefully the names of all the fabricators of these unclean products in public cultural life. The result of that inquiry was still more disfavourable to the attitude which I had hitherto held in regard to the Jews. Though my feelings might rebel a thousand time, reason now had to draw its own conclusions.

The fact that nine-tenths of all the smutty literature, artistic tripe and theatrical banalities, had to be charged to the account of people who formed scarcely one per cent. of the nation - that fact could not be gainsaid. It was there, and had to be admitted. Then I began to examine my favourite ‘World Press’, with that fact before my mind.

The deeper my soundings went the lesser grew my respect for that Press which I formerly admired. Its style became still more repellent and I was forced to reject its ideas as entirely shallow and superficial. To claim that in the presentation of facts and views its attitude was impartial seemed to me to contain more falsehood than truth. The writers were - Jews.


...


Jewry has always been a nation of a definite racial character and never differentiated merely by the fact of belonging to a certain religion. At a very early date, urged on by the desire to make their way in the world, the Jews began to cast about for a means whereby they might distract such attention as might prove inconvenient for them. What could be more effective and at the same time more above suspicion than to borrow and utilize the idea of the religious community? Here also everything is copied, or rather stolen; for the Jew could not possess any religious institution which had developed out of his own consciousness, seeing that he lacks every kind of idealism; which means that belief in a life beyond this terrestrial existence is foreign to him. In the Aryan mind no religion can ever be imagined unless it embodies the conviction that life in some form or other will continue after death. As a matter of fact, the Talmud is not a book that lays down principles according to which the individual should prepare for the life to come. It only furnishes rules for a practical and convenient life in this world.

The religious teaching of the Jews is principally a collection of instructions for maintaining the Jewish blood pure and for regulating intercourse between Jews and the rest of the world: that is to say, their relation with non-Jews. But the Jewish religious teaching is not concerned with moral problems. It is rather concerned with economic problems, and very petty ones at that. In regard to the moral value of the religious teaching of the Jews there exist and always have existed quite exhaustive studies (not from the Jewish side; for whatever the Jews have written on this question has naturally always been of a tendentious character) which show up the kind of religion that the Jews have in a light that makes it look very uncanny to the Aryan mind. The Jew himself is the best example of the kind of product which this religious training evolves. His life is of this world only and his mentality is as foreign to the true spirit of Christianity as his character was foreign to the great Founder of this new creed two thousand years ago. And the Founder of Christianity made no secret indeed of His estimation of the Jewish people. When He found it necessary He drove those enemies of the human race out of the Temple of God; because then, as always, they used religion as a means of advancing their commercial interests. But at that time Christ was nailed to the Cross for his attitude towards the Jews; whereas our modern Christians enter into party politics and when elections are being held they debase themselves to beg for Jewish votes. They even enter into political intrigues with the atheistic Jewish parties against the interests of their own Christian nation.


...


Were not morals and public decency made to look ridiculous and classed as out- of-date and banal, until finally our people also became modernized? By means of persistent attacks, did not the Press keep on undermining the authority of the State, until one blow sufficed to bring this institution tottering to the ground? Did not the Press oppose with all its might every movement to give the State that which belongs to the State, and by means of constant criticism, injure the reputation of the army, sabotage general conscription and demand refusal of military credits, etc. - until the success of this campaign was assured?

The function of the so-called liberal Press was to dig the grave for the German people and Reich. No mention need be made of the lying Marxist Press. To them the spreading of falsehood is as much a vital necessity as the mouse is to a cat. Their sole task is to break the national backbone of the people, thus preparing the nation to become the slaves of international finance and its masters, the Jews.
And what measures did the State take to counteract this wholesale poisoning of the public mind? None, absolutely nothing at all. By this policy it was hoped to win the favour of this pest - by means of flattery, by a recognition of the ‘value’ of the Press, its ‘importance’, its ‘educative mission’ and similar nonsense. The Jews acknowledged all this with a knowing smile and returned thanks.

 

[Artful Revealer]

@pescatarian09

What's your point? That you agree with Hitler when it comes to Catholicism being a destroyer / suppressor of European identity, but not when it comes to his observations on Jews?

 

[pescatarian09]

@pescatarian09

What's your point? That you agree with Hitler when it comes to Catholicism being a destroyer / suppressor of European identity, but not when it comes to his observations on Jews?

No. My point is that his views are no different to yours.

 

[Artful Revealer]

No. My point is that his views are no different to yours.

But no different than yours and Gnome's on Catholicism in Europe. So what's your point?

 

[pescatarian09]

I have never claimed that Catholicism was a destroyer of European identity.

My point was that his hatred blinded him, and led him to perpetrate great evil.

 

[Cintra]

Apparently it depends whether you're a religious Jew or a Zionist Jew, former being ok, the latter being not ok, even though the latter exists only because of the former.

In reality it depends on your position towards Christ. Not hating Him would be good enough.

Wow...
I don't believe in christ, or god, or any deity.

I did some geneology, found a bunch of people with jewish sounding names. back in the 1700s.
Just wondered about them with all this wierd jewish talk going on at the moment.

 

[Artful Revealer]

I have never claimed that Catholicism was a destroyer of European identity.

My point was that his hatred blinded him, and led him to perpetrate great evil.

It did not prevent you from supporting Gnome who did claim that.

Regardless, here's some of Hitler's thoughts, from his Table Talk containing records of private conversations:



Interesting to note that Hitler would demonize Bolsheviks while being just as anticlerical as they were.

Goebbels even went beyond calling Hitler anticlerical:

The Führer is deeply religious, though completely anti-Christian. He views Christianity as a symptom of decay. Rightly so. It is a branch of the Jewish race. This can be seen in the similarity of their religious rites. Both (Judaism and Christianity) have no point of contact to the animal element, and thus, in the end they will be destroyed.

— Goebbels Diaries, 29 December 1939



Christianity was the heaviest blow against humanity in human history and Islam is deemed a necessity born from the Christian religion. If one reads between the lines, he's saying the religion that overthrew pre-Rabbinic Judaism is bad, and that the world would've been a better place if it had remained pagan.

Next, Hitler would've preferred an Islamic Germany:






And Hitler here thought Christianity was Europe's biggest blight next to the pox. It's almost as if Gnome wrote that.

And just like Muslims, he thinks St. Paul corrupted the teachings of Jesus.

What about Nazi theologian Sigrid Hunke, who wrote Allah's Sun over the Occident, in which she "extols the superiority of Islam over Christianity" (Gouguenheim), stating that: "the influence exerted by the Arabs on the West was the first step in freeing Europe from Christianity"?

I suppose all of the latter is more in your line of thinking? Are you going to perpetrate great evil now because it partially agrees with the mind of a madman?

 

[pescatarian09]

I suppose all of the latter is more in your line of thinking? Are you going to perpetrate great evil now because it partially agrees with the mind of a madman?

Of course not. Nor did I accuse you of having the inclination towards perpetrating great evil.
But laying all blame at the feet of Jews, and finding in them the pinnacle of all the evil of human nature, cannot help but lead to such thinking as that of Hitler's fixations on racial purity, and the desire for the expunging of their presence and influence from the nucleus of the European world. As Alexander Solzhenitsyn said, if only there were a group that were responsible for all the evils of the world, that could simply be separated from the rest of us, and destroyed. But there is no such group. The dividing line between good and evil cuts through the soul of every human being. And yes, there is more evil in some places than in others. But more often than not, it is we that are responsible for the evils that befall us. Are there no Christians that commit great evils, or Muslims that commit great evils just as there are Jews that commit great evils? To lay the blame of all the evil that befalls one at the feet of a single group may hold some allure, because it absolves oneself of all responsibility and culpability. But it is only to keep one from thinking of the abyss of darkness and evil in oneself that cannot be admitted. Instead of blaming it all on the Jews, let us look deeper into ourselves, and into our histories. Man's desire to pursue pleasure and expedience, at the price of our morals, is what caused the downfall of the Christian civilization [Edom] and the Islamic world [the Ottoman Empire]. Were we, those who call ourselves believers in God, upholders of His law, we would not be in the abased state in which we find ourselves today. As the Quran says, whatever good befalls you, is from God, and what evil befalls you, is from what your own hands have wrought. We have no one to blame but ourselves.

 

[lightseeker]

Alexander Solzhenitsyn said, if only there were a group that were responsible for all the evils of the world, that could simply be separated from the rest of us, and destroyed

have you read 200 years together, his final book?

i think you are overblowing the position. Jews are responsible in large part for pornography and changing what was known as Christian morality in the west. Al Goldstein, explains why “The only reason that Jews are in pornography is that we think that Christ sucks. Catholicism sucks. We don't believe in authoritarianism. Pornography thus becomes a way of defiling Christian culture and, as it penetrates to the very heart of the American mainstream (and is no doubt consumed by those very same WASPs), its subversive character becomes more charged. "

you don’t need to say Jews are evil by nature, which is obviously untrue and racist. But certain European Jews feel antagonistic to European culture having lived as an out group in that culture for so long, and feeling wronged by it. When Europeans think of their history as cathedrals, advancements, art, reason, beauty, jews historically can see pogroms, the holocaust,suffering etc. Between this and peddling vice as an easy way to make money for a people who felt themselves to be without land to plow, wanderers, they turned to usury, vice, and other things to make money, which were predatory to the cultures they lived in. It’s simply a pattern, which doesn’t implicate every Jewish individual, but speaking about vast populations, their psychology, history, is different.

 

[pescatarian09]

have you read 200 years together, his final book?

i think you are overblowing the position. Jews are responsible in large part for pornography and changing what was known as Christian morality in the west. Al Goldstein, explains why “The only reason that Jews are in pornography is that we think that Christ sucks. Catholicism sucks. We don't believe in authoritarianism. Pornography thus becomes a way of defiling Christian culture and, as it penetrates to the very heart of the American mainstream (and is no doubt consumed by those very same WASPs), its subversive character becomes more charged. "

you don’t need to say Jews are evil by nature, which is obviously untrue and racist. But certain European Jews feel antagonistic to European culture having lived as an out group in that culture for so long, and feeling wronged by it. When Europeans think of their history as cathedrals, advancements, art, reason, beauty, jews historically can see pogroms, the holocaust,suffering etc. Between this and peddling vice as an easy way to make money for a people who felt themselves to be without land to plow, wanderers, they turned to usury, vice, and other things to make money, which were predatory to the cultures they lived in. It’s simply a pattern, which doesn’t implicate every Jewish individual, but speaking about vast populations, their psychology, history, is different.

It is not only Jews that peddle pornography.
Why did the Christian world not put up a fight? It is only because they accepted evil that it was able to take root.

 

[pescatarian09]

Correlation does not equal causation.
It may be that as Christianity declined, a tiny cabal of Zionists with a certain agenda asserted themselves opportunistically for the purposes of subversion (as well as other groups). But it is not they that caused the decline in the first instance. The decline was instrumented from within the Christian world, when it turned away from God, and in Leopold Weiss' words, saw all the solutions to the problems of humanity solved in factories, laboratories, and on the desks of statisticians. The materialist and empiricist worldviews were rooted in Enlightenment thinking.

God says in the Quran: Those who have forgotten us, we will make them forget themselves.

 

[Artful Revealer]

Speaking of Devon Stack, here's his latest analysis of the Jewish antichristian spirit coming out of Hollywood with the movie Saved!.

 

[lightseeker]

It is not only Jews that peddle pornography.
Why did the Christian world not put up a fight? It is only because they accepted evil that it was able to take root.

They did. It took a long time and a lot of propaganda, baby steps, legal battles, and it took place over 3 generations so nobody could see the extent of what was happening

 

[Artful Revealer]

Of course not. Nor did I accuse you of having the inclination towards perpetrating great evil.
But laying all blame at the feet of Jews, and finding in them the pinnacle of all the evil of human nature, cannot help but lead to such thinking as that of Hitler's fixations on racial purity, and the desire for the expunging of their presence and influence from the nucleus of the European world. As Alexander Solzhenitsyn said, if only there were a group that were responsible for all the evils of the world, that could simply be separated from the rest of us, and destroyed. But there is no such group. The dividing line between good and evil cuts through the soul of every human being. And yes, there is more evil in some places than in others. But more often than not, it is we that are responsible for the evils that befall us. Are there no Christians that commit great evils, or Muslims that commit great evils just as there are Jews that commit great evils? To lay the blame of all the evil that befalls one at the feet of a single group may hold some allure, because it absolves oneself of all responsibility and culpability. But it is only to keep one from thinking of the abyss of darkness and evil in oneself that cannot be admitted. Instead of blaming it all on the Jews, let us look deeper into ourselves, and into our histories. Man's desire to pursue pleasure and expedience, at the price of our morals, is what caused the downfall of the Christian civilization [Edom] and the Islamic world [the Ottoman Empire]. Were we, those who call ourselves believers in God, upholders of His law, we would not be in the abased state in which we find ourselves today. As the Quran says, whatever good befalls you, is from God, and what evil befalls you, is from what your own hands have wrought. We have no one to blame but ourselves.

It's ironic that you keep using Solzhenitsyn against me. As lightseeker brought up, have you read some of his later work?


“We cannot state that all Jews are Bolsheviks. But without Jews, there would never have been Bolshevism. For a Jew, nothing is more insulting than the truth. The blood maddened Jewish terrorists have murdered sixty-six million in Russia from 1918 to 1957.”
― Alexander Solschenizyn


“You must understand. The leading Bolsheviks who took over Russia were not Russians. They hated Russians. They hated Christians. Driven by ethnic hatred they tortured and slaughtered millions of Russians without a shred of human remorse. The October Revolution was not what you call in America the ‘Russian Revolution.’ It was an invasion and conquest over the Russian people. More of my countrymen suffered horrific crimes at their bloodstained hands than any people or nation ever suffered in the entirety of human history. It cannot be understated. Bolshevism was the greatest human slaughter of all time. The fact that most of the world is ignorant of this reality is proof that the global media itself is in the hands of the perpetrators.”
― Alexander Solschenizyn


Are you going to use Solzhenitsyn's own words against him now?

I'm getting annoyed by your condescending explanations about evil not being tied to an ethnicity, as if I ever made such a statement, or that I'm too barbaric to realise such a thing.

On the other hand, you're saying we're to blame ourselves, yet when one explains where the deliberate corruptive moral subversions came from (ie. the Jewish antichristian spirit) to raise awareness of what we have to look out for as a civilization, it's not okay either. You think it's not okay to say what I say, but people saying "Zionists are most responsible for the problems in the Middle east (or even the world)" is somehow different? It's not. Both identifiers are ideological, whether Zionist or Jewish. Stop acting like calling out one is worse than the other because of a psychological terror concept known as antisemitism.


PS: sorry for the major derail, Vixy. I'll see if we can move it to a different thread.

 

[Karlysymon]

Years ago I heard that aluminium may be connected to alzheimers.

I don't know if there is any connection between the two things, but I stopped using aluminium cookware. Bought stainless steel instead.

I read somewhere that it is appearing more now in under-50yr olds. I also repeatedly hear complaints from older people about young people being "too forgetful these days"...maybe the phones (putting it next to the brain) have something to do with it??
Nevertheless, while it's commendable on your part to get rid of aluminum cookware, we have the problem of aluminum raining from the skies through chemtrails.

...because sexual liberation is a form of control.

This is a truth that alot of people do not want to voice or acknowledge. True freedom is never injurious to a person's mental, physical, spiritual or emotional well-being. Sexual liberation (as it's advocated) is a "freedom" that carries/brings chains. (borrowing a phrase from a Dixie Chicks song).

 

[lightseeker]

True freedom is never injurious to a person's mental, physical, spiritual or emotional well-being. Sexual liberation (as it's advocated) is a "freedom" that carries/brings chains

Profoundly true. People/propaganda wants to say that freedom is freedom from what? Ethics? Freedom for a thief is being able to steal with liberty, freedom for a drug dealer is being able to sell people drugs without being hassled. Nobody wants to accept that freedom means enhancing, dignifying a persons well being, which means bringing the dimension of morality to sexuality, which people want to say exists in a moral vacuum, and the effects of a persons sexual behaviour end in their bedroom. Nobody wants to admit that “the type and degree of a persons sexuality reaches to the utmost levels of the Being” (Nietzsche paraphrase)

 

[Artful Revealer]

And not least, freedom lies in truth (John 8:32). The first thing on the road to enslaving others without violence, is to lie. Second step is to inverse the truth and sell the enslavement as freedom as if freedom itself has any value without specifying that which restrains it.

 

[Gnome]

Clearly someone didn't read the linked article, written by Professsor Nathan Abrams (︎), Lecturer of Modern American History.

Some snippets:

A story little told is that of Jews in Hollywood’s seedier cousin, the adult film industry. Perhaps we’d prefer to pretend that the ‘triple-exthnics’ didn’t exist, but there’s no getting away from the fact that secular Jews have played (and still continue to play) a disproportionate role throughout the adult film industry in America. Jewish involvement in pornography has a long history in the United States, as Jews have helped to transform a fringe subculture into what has become a primary constituent of Americana. These are the ‘true blue Jews’.​

​

Though Jews make up only two per cent of the American population, they have been prominent in pornography. Many erotica dealers in the book trade between 1890 and 1940 were immigrant Jews of German origin. According to Jay A. Gertzman, author of Bookleggers and Smuthounds:The Trade in Erotica, 1920-1940 (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1999), ‘Jews were prominent in the distribution of gallantiana [fiction on erotic themes and books of dirty jokes and ballads], avant-garde sexually explicit novels, sex pulps, sexology, and flagitious materials’.​

​

Jewish involvement in porn, by this argument, is the result of an atavistic hatred of Christian authority: they are trying to weaken the dominant culture in America by moral subversion. Astyr remembers having ‘to run or fight for it in grammar school because I was a Jew. It could very well be that part of my porn career is an “up yours” to these people’. Al Goldstein, the publisher of Screw, said (on lukeford.net), ‘The only reason that Jews are in pornography is that we think that Christ sucks. Catholicism sucks. We don’t believe in authoritarianism.’ Pornography thus becomes a way of defiling Christian culture and, as it penetrates to the very heart of the American mainstream​

​

It is a case of the traditional revolutionary/radical drive of immigrant Jews in America being channelled into sexual rather than leftist politics. Just as Jews have been disproportionately represented in radical movements over the years, so they are also disproportionately represented in the porn industry. Jews in America have been sexual revolutionaries. A large amount of the material on sexual liberation was written by Jews. Those at the forefront of the movement which forced America to adopt a more liberal view of sex were Jewish. Jews were also at the vanguard of the sexual revolution of the 1960s. Wilhelm Reich, Herbert Marcuse and Paul Goodman replaced Marx, Trotsky and Lenin as required revolutionary reading. Reich’s central preoccupations were work, love and sex, while Marcuse prophesied that a socialist utopia would free individuals to achieve sexual satisfaction. Goodman wrote of the ‘beautiful cultural consequences’ that would follow from legalizing pornography: it would ‘ennoble all our art’ and ‘humanize sexuality’.​

​

In light of the relatively tolerant Jewish view of sex, why are we ashamed of the Jewish role in the porn industry? We might not like it, but the Jewish role in this field has been significant and it is about time it was written about seriously.​

The Walt Disney of p*rn:

Reuben Sturman - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

The one known for normalizing pornography in the US:

Al Goldstein - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

“The only reason that Jews are in pornography is that we think that Christ sucks. Catholicism sucks. We don’t believe in authoritarianism.”


The "Donald Trump of p*rn", founder and chairman of the Vivid Entertainment Group, top producer of adult content in the US for decades:

Steven Hirsch - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

The Pawnbroker, first movie that neglected the Motion Picture Production Code restricting explicit nudity, and released the movie without the Production Code seal, not unsurprisingly promoting pornographic content in combination with their other profitable Shoah industry.

The Pawnbroker (film) - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Starring Rod Steiger (︎), directed by Sidney Lumet (︎), produced by Ely Abraham Landau (︎).

Hays Code - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

In 1964, the Holocaust film The Pawnbroker, directed by Sidney Lumet and starring Rod Steiger, was initially rejected because of two scenes in which the actresses Linda Geiser and Thelma Oliver fully expose their breasts, as well as due to a sex scene between Oliver and Jaime Sánchez described as "unacceptably sex suggestive and lustful". Despite the rejection, the film's producers arranged for Allied Artists to release the film without the Production Code seal, with the New York censors licensing the film without the cuts demanded by Code administrators. The producers appealed the rejection to the Motion Picture Association of America. On a 6-3 vote, the MPAA granted the film an exception, conditional on "reduction in the length of the scenes which the Production Code Administration found unapprovable". The requested reductions of nudity were minimal; the outcome was viewed in the media as a victory for the film's producers.​

​

The Pawnbroker was the first film featuring bare breasts to receive Production Code approval. The exception to the code was granted as a "special and unique case" and was described by The New York Times at the time as "an unprecedented move that will not, however, set a precedent". In Pictures at a Revolution, a 2008 study of films during that era, Mark Harris wrote that the MPAA approval was "the first of a series of injuries to the Production Code that would prove fatal within three years"​

So once again, you have an inability to answer the question and avoid confronting anything I said.

If, according to you, porn is all the Jews fault.
Which one? the Ethnic Jews? the Religious Jews? the Zionists?

And remember you claimed defensively:

I obviously have no issues with ethnic Jews.