Yes, the 12% is if migration ceases. However, I did not only cite 12%. I cited the higher statistic as well which was about 17% in 2050.
Can you imagine how Westernized those Muslims will be? Right now they're denying the ruling on apostasy which has been a part of Islam for over a thousand years. I am not for it myself but I don't deny that it's the most orthodox interpretation.
The fact is if Muslims want to avoid becoming Westernized they need to refuse to make concessions on doctrine. However, they make concessions, concessions, concessions. The path of concessions will not end until they reach apostasy. I doubt their grandchildren will be Muslims and I think the grandchildren will be sort of embarrassed of the Islamic heritage.... they will see Islam as out-dated and be ashamed of it not being PC.
So yes France will have a segment of cultural Muslims who are super Westernized.
Having less than 20%- and the higher statistic is about 17%- Muslims.... that doesn't exactly indicate Islamization to me. I mean that's not exactly Saudi or Sudan.
The higher statistic was 17%- not double of 12%.... but suppose I'm generous and we both accept a figure of 24%.... is that really making France an Islamic country?
France having a segment of 24% of Westernized people who are of Muslim cultural heritage...... I mean.... I just don't see what is wrong about this.
I mean I don't really care that they are of Muslim cultural heritage...... as far as society, I suppose this introduces race mixing. I think the real issue of concern to the people who are trying to make this into an issue.... I think the real issue they have is some sort of concern over the mixing of races. Their Islam is mutable.... they'll sell their Islam. Their Islam won't last. Their race.... is their race.
So there will be race mixing. Do I really care about the "racial purity" of France? Am I concerned about the "mongrelization" of France's racial composition?
Not really. If you're a white person who is some form of white nationalist, you're free to worry about such things.... but I am not a white person and it's absurd to expect non-white people to care about such things. And the white nationalists are not exactly concerned about the well-being of the darker races so there is no reason for me to care about their concerns. From my angle, it is perfectly reasonable and logical for me to laugh about such things. You can get mad at for me understanding and caring about my own interest but I have no incentive to care about the interests of white nationalism and it is useless to try to get anyone but a certain limited segment of white people to care about such things.
I'm no nationalist in principle, but it seems the logical opposition to globalist imperialism. Globalism seeks to dissolve all boundaries (except one) so nationalism is a normal organic reaction for any people that have some awareness of collective identity left . One shouldn't look much farther to understand recent political trends sweeping Europe and the US. So yes, I side with nationalism under the current circumstances, but I wouldn't be a nationalist in principle, ie. support the nation regardless of the circumstances.
However, I would consider myself Christian to the bone in face of anything and I see the leftovers of Christian civilisation being deliberately handed out to non-Christian populations (not only Islamic) and I find that tragic. The once shining light of the world is being dimmed before our waking eyes. And I have no problems with adherents of other world views claiming the same about their respective civilizations and their desire to keep them intact. Islamic populations should decide for themselves if their countries remain Islamic. Japan should have the right to remain Shinto or Buddhist. So too do the people of Europe have the right to determine their own nature and destiny without having it being taken away or imposed upon them.
With regards to your prospect of Muslims adapting to western custom ...
First of all, would you prefer that? Do you think pious Muslims would prefer that? I as a Christians do not revel in the idea of Christians becoming secular for multiple reasons, one of which being what we're discussing now, ie: a population sharing a Christian identity would not tolerate its own demise, which is what we're seeing to a certain extent in Poland, Hungary and other nations still identifying as Christian.
Secondly, what do you mean with them being ashamed of Islam, deeming it outdated? Is there something about Islam to be ashamed of? Is becoming westernized an improvement for an orthodox Muslim?
That you would predict Muslims becoming more westernized, the facts do not support it. There seems to be a radicalizing trend every two generations of muslims. Fourth generation Muslims are more radicalized than the first. Has a lot to do with how external Jihad has been getting media attention, how it has manifested and spread through Jihad proxies sponsored by shekels and petrodollars, but it doesn't look like this trend is going to die out soon.
With regards to your less than 20% muslims ....
There has been no historical precedent of a civilization preventing or stopping itself from becoming Islamic after the 16% treshold of Muslim minority has been reached unless with the use of violence (cf. Reconquista). By that standard, France's destiny is already set in stone, or sand more like. There's one, maybe two, big differences though. One, the Islamisation is not principally enabled by an Islamic thirst for conquest but migration policies of our own treasonous political class and geopolitical engineers. Two, we have the internet and are no longer dependent on what we're being told without having the possibility to peer past the layers of deception and seek for the truth on the matter and connect with one another.
Thus, the internet, in Christ-like fashion, could potentially become the liberator baptising the world once again. I wouldn't have the right to call myself Christian and not participate in it.