Etagloc
Superstar
- Joined
- Mar 26, 2017
- Messages
- 5,291
This is something I wonder about. I will try to put it into words and hopefully people see my meaning.
So let's take John A. John A is born in the projects...... his early life is horrifying. He becomes addicted to drugs and at the age of 23 he is murdered while selling drugs.
Now let's take John B. John B is born into privilige. He has everything handed to him. He commits less sin in a way than John B. However he had much less struggle.
Now..... suppose they both are believers- although imperfect- in the correct religion (Islam if you're Muslim, Christian if you're Christian)
is it possible that a person can objectively committ more sin and be more rewarded by God in the afterlife than someone who objectively committed less sin because the person who committed more sin also was objectively exposed to more suffering and temptation?
I say this because look at how poor people are often trapped in evil cycles like addiction and such things.... but the crack addict who is smoking crack..... if God is just, God has to take into account why they ended up in such a way. Because the rich person might be a saint on the outside and the poor person might be seen as evil (it is incredible how in these times of Republican Jesus it is now normal for people to hate the poor...... it is shameful and the mark of a coward to go after the vulnerable- it is a weak person trait- a strong person defends the weak) but the poor person might actually have a much better heart and the rich person might be rotten on the inside.
This is the Jesus I was taught:
It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle, than for a rich man to enter into the kingdom of God. -Mark 10:25
So let's take John A. John A is born in the projects...... his early life is horrifying. He becomes addicted to drugs and at the age of 23 he is murdered while selling drugs.
Now let's take John B. John B is born into privilige. He has everything handed to him. He commits less sin in a way than John B. However he had much less struggle.
Now..... suppose they both are believers- although imperfect- in the correct religion (Islam if you're Muslim, Christian if you're Christian)
is it possible that a person can objectively committ more sin and be more rewarded by God in the afterlife than someone who objectively committed less sin because the person who committed more sin also was objectively exposed to more suffering and temptation?
I say this because look at how poor people are often trapped in evil cycles like addiction and such things.... but the crack addict who is smoking crack..... if God is just, God has to take into account why they ended up in such a way. Because the rich person might be a saint on the outside and the poor person might be seen as evil (it is incredible how in these times of Republican Jesus it is now normal for people to hate the poor...... it is shameful and the mark of a coward to go after the vulnerable- it is a weak person trait- a strong person defends the weak) but the poor person might actually have a much better heart and the rich person might be rotten on the inside.
This is the Jesus I was taught:
It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle, than for a rich man to enter into the kingdom of God. -Mark 10:25