Damien50
Star
- Joined
- Apr 22, 2017
- Messages
- 1,788
I am in no way perfect and quick to ask questions to things I don't understand. I am no fair weather Christian caught in the flights of fancy regarding scripture when I regard it and quite honestly prefer to not be called one.
This thread is for those like me or possibly not yet it still is. This is not the thread to coddle, give soft biblical explanations, proselytize, be ransacked by those who aren't generally trying to understand but argue and all other forms of derailing that aren't conducive to discussion.
It shall be assumed that the writings within the bible are authentic and corruption possibly present yet not the focus of this thread.
Nothing against anyone but coming in to discredit Paul to discredit a faith as a whole or arguing the Trinity for any negative purposes. This isn't to create some neat box of bias but create formidable discussions. Anyone is welcome to participate but I will have this locked when derailing for the sake of things like the above occur. Please understand I am not discriminating but am jaded.
The wrong questions seem to be asked frequently and seem to generally lead to partial answers. These partial answers lead to discrepancies where there should really be none but yet there are.
So I shall ask.
Does salvation only entail freedom from our sins and the ability to possibly enter heaven or is there more?
What are the physical and spiritual aspects of salvation?
What relevant verses make this a permanent process?
In being saved, what is the moral and ethical code that one should follow?
Upon reaching the judgement seat, is my eternal place in Heaven guaranteed or does hell become a possibility?
If hell isn't a possibility, how shall God punish a deserving sinner?
What separates opinion from God given inspiration in the bible?
How does one identify and properly place opinion versus the words and wisdom of God?
Did Jesus die only physically and was it only for mankind's sin?
I don't particularly expect any one person to answer these all at once but full bodied responses are preferred with scripture to support your stance. I humbly invite @Todd @Thunderian @Scott Christopher Shuman @Karlysymon @KoncreteMind (though I know you aren't Christian yet perspective greatly appreciated) @Artful Revealer @rainerann
Anyone may participate.
This thread is for those like me or possibly not yet it still is. This is not the thread to coddle, give soft biblical explanations, proselytize, be ransacked by those who aren't generally trying to understand but argue and all other forms of derailing that aren't conducive to discussion.
It shall be assumed that the writings within the bible are authentic and corruption possibly present yet not the focus of this thread.
Nothing against anyone but coming in to discredit Paul to discredit a faith as a whole or arguing the Trinity for any negative purposes. This isn't to create some neat box of bias but create formidable discussions. Anyone is welcome to participate but I will have this locked when derailing for the sake of things like the above occur. Please understand I am not discriminating but am jaded.
Anyways...
The wrong questions seem to be asked frequently and seem to generally lead to partial answers. These partial answers lead to discrepancies where there should really be none but yet there are.
So I shall ask.
Does salvation only entail freedom from our sins and the ability to possibly enter heaven or is there more?
What are the physical and spiritual aspects of salvation?
What relevant verses make this a permanent process?
In being saved, what is the moral and ethical code that one should follow?
Upon reaching the judgement seat, is my eternal place in Heaven guaranteed or does hell become a possibility?
If hell isn't a possibility, how shall God punish a deserving sinner?
What separates opinion from God given inspiration in the bible?
I was thinking about this question yesterday. Personally, I don't believe that it is possible for man to produce a book without errors. Therefore, I do not believe that it is possible for their to be any Holy book that is completely perfect and without error. It is just not possible. To say it is would be superstition. People are often much more superstitious in religion than we like to believe even though I identify as a religious person myself.
There is a site that says, "The Bible is inspired, but is it inerrant, that is without errors? The reason for a positive answer is simple: The Bible is the Word of God, and God cannot err; therefore, the Bible cannot err. To deny the inerrancy of the Bible one must either affirm that God can err or else that the Bible is not the Word of God." https://www.namb.net/apologetics/the-inerrancy-of-the-bible
The problem with this is that man can err, man does err, the Bible tells us this over and over and over again. This doesn't prove that the Bible isn't true. This doesn't prove that it wasn't inspired. It only proves that it is impossible for any Holy book to be completely perfect and without error. They all are, some of them moreso than others because knowing what is true and what is not, is testable like a science. It is not a superstitious endeavor. Choosing a Holy book is not like choosing the right book of magic spells. Knowing truth is no different than being a scientist in a lab. Truth should be tested. This is how you know something is true. This doesn't require perfection. To know truth does not require it to be written a certain way, which cannot be changed. People say things that are true everyday.
So what separates opinion from God given inspiration in the Bible is anointing. It is basically that there were men who wanted to serve God, and God's presence was with them. They wrote the part of the Bible they were responsible for and God said it was good and I will use this to teach others. It is this anointing that gives the Bible it's place in history. This anointing is demonstrated by it presence throughout the world in the same that David was known for His anointing. However, even this should be tested. A person should never believe something is true just because someone said it is true. They should believe because in believing there is evidence of it being true.
Finally, it is this evidence that manifests by faith that separates the Bible as God given inspiration and not merely the opinion of man.
How does one identify and properly place opinion versus the words and wisdom of God?
Did Jesus die only physically and was it only for mankind's sin?
I don't particularly expect any one person to answer these all at once but full bodied responses are preferred with scripture to support your stance. I humbly invite @Todd @Thunderian @Scott Christopher Shuman @Karlysymon @KoncreteMind (though I know you aren't Christian yet perspective greatly appreciated) @Artful Revealer @rainerann
Anyone may participate.
Last edited: