The Top 10 Myths that Dominate "Islam"

Daze

Veteran
Joined
Jun 28, 2020
Messages
675
Take that !

a person who is not expert in Arabic says understands Arabic Quran and Muslims, whether Arab or non-Arab and since 1400 years, do not understand something written in Arabic.
I don't think it has to do with reading Arabic as he doesn't even try. Like i mentioned before, those who spell Quran as Koran while claiming an understanding of Arabic is like someone who claims to understand English yet spells Cookies as Kookies.

Imagine seeing an American / European spelling Champagne as Shampange or Chef as Shef. I'm sure children make these mistakes when learning English but adults don't.

C is not K as Kaf is not Qaf. These people can't claim to argue Arabic because obviously they have zero understanding of it.

I think Freeman just copies talking points from his jahtruth websites or whatever that is then attempts to pass it on as his knowledge.
 






recure

Established
Joined
Oct 16, 2020
Messages
161
Like i mentioned before, those who spell Quran as Koran while claiming an understanding of Arabic is like someone who claims to understand English yet spells Cookies as Kookies.
According to the rules of English grammar, whenever the letter Q is followed by the letter U is it pronounced /kw/ as in quiet, quest, quote, query, etc. You will also notice that word-initial "Qu-" is always followed by a vowel, the only exception being the nonsensical translation "Quran". Moreover, the phoneme for Arabic ق (qaf) is not present in English, so to equate it with the Q which has the same pronunciation as K and C as thought it expresses some kind of Neoplatonic metaphysical reality in relation to Arabic is absurd. The older spellings of Coran and Koran are more grammatically correct, and that you keep stating otherwise in order to refute others' knowledge of Arabic is quite literally retarded.
 






Daze

Veteran
Joined
Jun 28, 2020
Messages
675
According to the rules of English grammar, whenever the letter Q is followed by the letter U is it pronounced /kw/ as in quiet, quest, quote, query, etc. You will also notice that word-initial "Qu-" is always followed by a vowel, the only exception being the nonsensical translation "Quran". Moreover, the phoneme for Arabic ق (qaf) is not present in English, so to equate it with the Q which has the same pronunciation as K and C as thought it expresses some kind of Neoplatonic metaphysical reality in relation to Arabic is absurd. The older spellings of Coran and Koran are more grammatically correct, and that you keep stating otherwise in order to refute others' knowledge of Arabic is quite literally retarded.
Amazing how you feel the need to argue everything.

My point stands. Koran is wrong and every one with an ounce of Arabic knowledge would agree.

Since you have so much time why don't you make us a "proofs of Christianity" thread? Tangible proofs even an atheist would need to reconsider. Kinda like my thread that you're so desperate to derail.

I was wondering earlier if there even are any? You seem like the one to take on such a task since you have all this free time to debate others.
 






Lil axe

Established
Joined
May 11, 2020
Messages
440
english is a bit quirky

usa - check (money)
canada - cheque (money)
tire - tyre
neighbor - neighbour
color - colour
and on, and on

i always wondered why people argued about which religion was correct, heck even in my own upbringing, one side of my family baptist, other side anglican, they would disagree, even the catholic , jehova witness, friends of mine, would disagree, and that was all in one style of religion, christianity, feels like organized religion is used to divide, same as status or race,
meh just my 2 cents
 






friend

Veteran
Joined
Jul 26, 2017
Messages
757
english is a bit quirky

usa - check (money)
canada - cheque (money)
tire - tyre
neighbor - neighbour
color - colour
and on, and on

i always wondered why people argued about which religion was correct, heck even in my own upbringing, one side of my family baptist, other side anglican, they would disagree, even the catholic , jehova witness, friends of mine, would disagree, and that was all in one style of religion, christianity, feels like organized religion is used to divide, same as status or race,
meh just my 2 cents
when you translate something you have to consider the smallest of details to avoid wrong translation and misguidance.
 






recure

Established
Joined
Oct 16, 2020
Messages
161
when you translate something you have to consider the smallest of details to avoid wrong translation and misguidance.
I agree. If only this applied to English translations of the Qur'an since they make no bones about incorrectly translating words or making parenthetical insertions into the text in order to misguide the reader, especially to avoid embarrassment.

For example, Sura 66:12 reads: "And [the example of] Mary, the daughter of 'Imran, who guarded her chastity, so We blew into [her garment] through Our angel, and she believed in the words of her Lord and His scriptures and was of the devoutly obedient." (Sahih International)

The word translated here as "her chastity" is فرجها (farjaha) which is composed of the masculine noun فرج (farjun) + the feminine possessive singular suffix ها (ha). But when you put the word into Google Translate, it does not say "her chastity" but "her vagina". Likewise, if you translate the word "chastity" into Arabic, the word farj does not appear at all. I have also referred to Almaany and Lane's Lexicon and they say the same thing - "The sexual organs especially of a woman".

Also the Arabic word translated as "into [her garment]" is فيه (fīhi), composed of the word في ("in") + the masculine possessive singular suffix ه ("him" or "it), thereby connecting it to the previous masculine noun in the verse which is farj. Yet translators not only neglected to translate the suffix in this case, but inserted the words "her garment" in parentheses making it nothing short of a misleading contrivance that is not supported by the text.

In another verse it says the following: "Tell the believing men to reduce [some] of their vision and guard their private parts. That is purer for them. Indeed, Allah is Acquainted with what they do." (Sura 24:30)

The word translated as "their private parts" is فروجهم (furūjahum), which is the plural form of the word farj + the masculine possessive plural suffix هم (hum). So why the inconsistency in translating this word as "chastity" in one verse and "private parts" in another verse? Is it because one is plural while the other is singular? If that's the case, then the singular form should be translated as vulva. Some versions, such as Yusuf Ali, also translate the plural form as "their chastity" or "modesty", but there is no such thing as a plural form of chastity.
 






Last edited:

A Freeman

Star
Joined
Nov 11, 2019
Messages
2,835
Take that !

a person who is not expert in Arabic says understands Arabic Quran and Muslims, whether Arab or non-Arab and since 1400 years, do not understand something written in Arabic.
You're still attacking the messenger rather than addressing the message of truth from THE God.

Neither the Bible nor the Koran was written for humans, which is why NO human can understand them nor ever has. ALL Scripture was written for spirit-Beings (Souls) and can only be properly understood by a truly awakened Soul.

John 3:3-7
3:3 Jesus answered and said unto him, Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born from above, he cannot SEE The Kingdom of God.
3:4 Nicodemus saith unto him, How can a man be born when he is old? Can he enter the second time into his mother's womb, and be born?
3:5 Jesus answered, Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born of water (human) and then is born (later) from above as his spirit-"Being" (his REAL self which is NOT human), he can NOT enter into The Kingdom of God (Who is a Spirit-"Being").
3:6 That which is born of the flesh is human; and that which is born of the Spirit is spirit (a spirit-"Being") - (a human+Being).
3:7 Marvel not that I said unto thee, Ye must be born again.
 






friend

Veteran
Joined
Jul 26, 2017
Messages
757
Here's a very deep question: Who, the hell cares? Why not discuss what you agree on instead of what you don't? Otherwise, you're simply waving your flags at each other. That accomplishes nothing.
Say, O Prophet, “O People of the Book! Let us come to common terms: that we will worship none but God, associate none with Him, nor take one another as lords instead of God.” But if they turn away, then say, “Bear witness that we have submitted ˹to Allah alone.”
Chapter 3, verse 36
 






friend

Veteran
Joined
Jul 26, 2017
Messages
757
For example, Sura 66:12 reads: "And [the example of] Mary, the daughter of 'Imran, who guarded her chastity, so We blew into [her garment] through Our angel, and she believed in the words of her Lord and His scriptures and was of the devoutly obedient." (Sahih International)

The word translated here as "her chastity" is فرجها (farjaha) which is composed of the masculine noun فرج (farjun) + the feminine possessive singular suffix ها (ha). But when you put the word into Google Translate, it does not say "her chastity" but "her vagina". Likewise, if you translate the word "chastity" into Arabic, the word farj does not appear at all. I have also referred to Almaany and Lane's Lexicon and they say the same thing - "The sexual organs especially of a woman".
you have used modern dictionaries which give you those meanings which are commonly used today (google translate etc...) but to translate Quran and Hadith you need to use classic Arabic dictionaries. for example:
- Lisān al-ʿArab
- Al-Qamus al-Muhit
 






A Freeman

Star
Joined
Nov 11, 2019
Messages
2,835
Amazing how you feel the need to argue everything.
Isn't that rather hypocritical of you, since you have contributed absolutely nothing to this thread other than insults? Your inability to refute even a single point that's been shared stands as proof of the truth being shared in the article, for everyone's benefit (including yours).

My point stands. Koran is wrong and every one with an ounce of Arabic knowledge would agree.
You don't really have a point though, do you? Is this really cause for concern or simply your "self" arguing more utter nonsense.

All of the terms in other, European languages are transliterations of the original Arabic, based upon what letters in those languages are felt to best transfer the pronunciation of the word. Same as there are transliterations of Hebrew and Greek for the Old Covenant and New Covenant (which the Koran/Quran COMMANDS us to read). A few examples below:

English: Koran (also Quran, Qur'an)
Danish: Koranen
French: Coran
Icelandic: Kóraninn
Italian: Corano
Portuguese: Alcorão
Turkish: Kuran

It is perhaps noteworthy, that 25-30 years ago, most English-speaking people used the word Koran, because it was felt the "k" sound better represented the original Arabic and because the Arabic "Qaf" doesn't really have a counterpart in English. That makes the very similar sounds of the Arabic "Kaf" and "Qaf" more difficult to distinguish in English, which is why they're sometimes used interchangeably in English.

Similarly noteworthy is that the Arabic "Ba" (B in English) and "Meem" (M in English) sound nothing alike and are NEVER used interchangeably in either Arabic or English. So why have so many "Muslims" been hoodwinked into such an obvious lie as to believe "Bakkah" ("Baca" transliterated from the original Hebrew) is somehow "Makkah", which itself is NOT "Mecca"? So they can continue believing in lies rather than in the truth that neither Abraham nor Ishmaei EVER went to the area that over 2000 years later became Mecca?

It can be said, with absolute certainty, that God does NOT care whether the English transliteration "Koran" or "Quran" or "Qur'an" is used to refer to the third part of the Book (His-Story); what He cares about is whether people read its contents and DO what it COMMANDS them to do for our own benefit. And what does the Koran (Quran) tell us to do? It tells us to read, accept and obey The Law and the Gospel, and to NOT be in doubt of them reaching us (Sura 32:32) or ever being corrupted, which is impossible (Sura 15:9-10).

If everyone was doing THAT, we would have long ago become one brotherhood of believers.

Anyone who is still clinging to their evil organized (or organised if you prefer) religion (Talmudic Judaism, "Christianity" or "Islam", or any of the other polytheistic religions, including atheism) instead of returning to the true religion of truth (which is doing God's Will and keeping His Law) on Judgment Day will burn for it, just as the Koran (Quran) warns at least 300 times.

THAT is what God really cares about, and why He is profoundly saddened by the insanity here on Earth, where Lucifer/Satan/Iblis is able to so easily con people into believing in his corporate fictional religious superstitions and nonsense, instead of in the truth (Sura 7:16-17, Sura 15:39-40, Sura 17:62-64).

If you don't have anything of substance to add to this discussion, then please refrain from letting Lucifer/Satan/Iblis continue to so easily use you to mindlessly attack others. Concern yourself instead with addressing your own ignorance, asking God for His Guidance in everything you do, and being open and receptive to the truth He sends you in whatever form He sees fit.

He is the Best of Planners, Most Merciful and Oft-Forgiving.
 






A Freeman

Star
Joined
Nov 11, 2019
Messages
2,835
No one needs to translate the Hadith. Every copy of the Hadith should be pulped and recycled into copies of the Koran (Quran), exactly as Mohammad (peace be upon him) specified.

Ibn Saeed Al-Khudry reported that God's messenger had said:
"Do not write anything from me EXCEPT QURAN. Anyone who wrote anything other than the Quran shall erase it."

From Ibn Hanbal: Zayd Ibn Thabit (The apostle's closest revelation writer) visited the Khalifa Mu'aawiyah (more than 30 years after the apostle's death), and told him a story about the apostle. Mu'aawiyah liked the story and ordered someone to write it down. But Zayd said:
"the messenger of God ORDERED us NEVER to write anything of his hadith"

Again, in the book "Taq-yeed Al-Ilm", Abu Saeed Al-Khudry said:
"I asked the messenger of God a permission to write his hadiths, BUT HE REFUSED TO GIVE ME A PERMISSION."
 






friend

Veteran
Joined
Jul 26, 2017
Messages
757
No one needs to translate the Hadith. Every copy of the Hadith should be pulped and recycled into copies of the Koran (Quran), exactly as Mohammad (peace be upon him) specified.

Ibn Saeed Al-Khudry reported that God's messenger had said:
"Do not write anything from me EXCEPT QURAN. Anyone who wrote anything other than the Quran shall erase it."

From Ibn Hanbal: Zayd Ibn Thabit (The apostle's closest revelation writer) visited the Khalifa Mu'aawiyah (more than 30 years after the apostle's death), and told him a story about the apostle. Mu'aawiyah liked the story and ordered someone to write it down. But Zayd said:
"the messenger of God ORDERED us NEVER to write anything of his hadith"

Again, in the book "Taq-yeed Al-Ilm", Abu Saeed Al-Khudry said:
"I asked the messenger of God a permission to write his hadiths, BUT HE REFUSED TO GIVE ME A PERMISSION."
At-Tirmidhi (2658) narrated from ‘Abdullah ibn Mas‘ood that the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) said: “May Allah beautify a man who hears a saying of mine, so he understands it, remembers it and conveys it. There may be one who conveys knowledge to someone who understands it better than he does.”

Al-Bazzaar (3416) narrated from Muhammad ibn Jubayr ibn Mut‘im, from his father (may Allah be pleased with him), from the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) that he said: “May Allah beautify a man who hears a saying of mine, so he memorises it and conveys it as he heard it.”
 






Just following orders

Established
Joined
Jul 3, 2020
Messages
389
The reason it felt so uncomfortable is because only heathens and hypocrites go to churches, synagogues, mosques, temples, etc. to be seen by others, according to God and His Christ.

Matthew 6:5-8
6:5 And when thou prayest, thou shalt NOT be as the hypocrites [ARE]: for they love to pray standing in the churches and in the corners of the streets, that they may be seen by men. Verily I say unto you, They have their reward (they have been seen by men, but God will not answer them).
6:6 But thou, when thou prayest, enter into thy closet, and WHEN THOU HAST SHUT THY DOOR, pray to thy Father IN PRIVATE (Enoch 56:5; Sura 7:55); and thy Father which seeth in secret shall reward thee openly (by answering you).
6:7 But when ye pray, use NOT vain repetitions, as the heathen [DO]: for they think that they shall be heard for their much speaking.
6:8 Be NOT ye therefore like unto them: for your Father knoweth what things ye have need of, BEFORE ye ask Him.


Of course the disciples and apostles reiterated Christ's condemnation of the churches, etc., with their priests, pastors, rabbis and imams (fake teachers).

Acts 7:48 Howbeit the Most High dwelleth not in temples made with hands; as saith the prophet,

Acts 17:24 God that made the world and all things therein, seeing that He is Lord of heaven and Earth, dwelleth not in temples made with hands;


As does the Koran (Quran):

Sura 4:142. The Hypocrites - they think they are over-reaching God, but He will over-reach them: when they stand up to prayer, they stand without earnestness, to be seen by men (Matt. 6:5), only little do they hold God in remembrance;

Sura 7:55. Call on your Lord with HUMILITY and in PRIVATE (Enoch 56:5; Matt. 6:6): for "I AM" loveth not those who trespass beyond bounds.

Sura 9:107-111
9:107. And there are those who put up mosques (churches; synagogues; etc.), by way of mischief and BETRAYAL - to disunite the Believers - and in preparation for one who warred against "I AM" (Revelation 12:7) and His Messenger aforetime. They will indeed swear that their intention is nothing but good; but "I AM" doth declare that they are certainly LIARS.
9:108. NEVER stand thou forth therein. There is an Holy Place (Mt. Moriah) whose foundation was laid from the first day on piety; it is more worthy of the standing forth (for prayer) therein. In it are men who love to be purified; and "I AM" loveth those who make themselves pure.
9:109. Which then is best? - he that layeth his foundation on piety (a Rock - Matthew 7:24-27) to "I AM" and His Good Pleasure? - or he that layeth his foundation on an undermined sand-cliff ready to crumble to pieces? And it doth crumble to pieces with him, into The Fire of Hell. And "I AM" guideth not people that do wrong (if they are doing wrong Satan is guiding them).
9:110. The foundation of those who so build is never free from suspicion and shakiness in their hearts, until their hearts are cut to pieces. And "I AM" is All-Knowing, Wise.
9:111. "I AM" hath purchased from the Believers their persons and their goods; for theirs (in return) is The Garden (of Bliss): they fight in His Cause, and slay and are slain: a promise binding on Him in Truth, through The Law (The Torah), The Gospel (New Testament/Covenant), and The Koran: and who is more faithful to His Covenant (in the Bible) than "I AM"? Then rejoice in the bargain which ye have concluded (to fulfill The Covenant of "I AM" written in the Bible): that is the achievement supreme.

Sura 33:33. And stay quietly IN YOUR HOUSES (Sura 9:107-111), and make not a dazzling display, like that of the former Times of Ignorance (Sura 4:142, Sura 7:55); and establish constant Prayer (1 Thes. 5:17), and give regular Charity (Matt. 6:1-8); and obey "I AM" and His Messenger. And "I AM" only wishes to remove all abomination from you, ye Members of the Family, and to make you pure and spotless (Matt. 5:8).

Sura 107:5-6
107:5. Who are neglectful of their Prayers,
107:6. Those who (want only) to be seen (by men - Matt. 6:5),

Interesting note about the title "Jesus": it means "Saviour" or, more specifically "YHWH Saves".

John 5:30 I can of mine own self do nothing: as I hear, I judge: and my judgment is just; because I seek not mine own will, but the Will of the Father which hath sent me.
I too found this uncomfortable. always put it down to being a fraud / lazy Christian so too ashamed to attend.

only realising now that God never intended or wanted us to go to ‘church’. He wanted us to speak to him directly.
 






Last edited:
Joined
May 12, 2019
Messages
1,413
No one needs to translate the Hadith. Every copy of the Hadith should be pulped and recycled into copies of the Koran (Quran), exactly as Mohammad (peace be upon him) specified.

Ibn Saeed Al-Khudry reported that God's messenger had said:
"Do not write anything from me EXCEPT QURAN. Anyone who wrote anything other than the Quran shall erase it."

From Ibn Hanbal: Zayd Ibn Thabit (The apostle's closest revelation writer) visited the Khalifa Mu'aawiyah (more than 30 years after the apostle's death), and told him a story about the apostle. Mu'aawiyah liked the story and ordered someone to write it down. But Zayd said:
"the messenger of God ORDERED us NEVER to write anything of his hadith"

Again, in the book "Taq-yeed Al-Ilm", Abu Saeed Al-Khudry said:
"I asked the messenger of God a permission to write his hadiths, BUT HE REFUSED TO GIVE ME A PERMISSION."
You copied that from submission.org just like you did in the five prayers thread. Why don't you quote the references too? Or did you realise that you can't at once claim that the hadeeth are false, and then quote hadeeth themselves to evidence that claim? So you can't say 'Muhammad (peace be upon him) specified', because by diregarding ahadeeth you don't know what he ﷺ specified.

On the other hand, if you're referring to what Muslims believe to be true, not what you believe to be true, you would know that the term hadeeth is not merely about writing; it is also about discussion, memorization and narration of the Prophet's words and actions. If you had checked the references of the hadeeth above, you would have realised that not all the narration is being quoted, only a selected part of it, and that in quoting only part of the hadeeth, its entire message is misconstrued.

The full hadith from Abu Said al Khudri (the third one) is from Sahih Muslim, Book 42, Number 7417 (alternatively Sahih Muslim 3004) and states
Abu Sa'id Khudri reported that Messenger of Allah ﷺ said: Do not take down anything from me, and he who took down anything from me except the Qur'an, he should efface that and narrate from me, for there is no harm in it and he who attributed any falsehood to me-and Hammam said: I think he also said:" deliberately" -he should in fact find his abode in the Hell-Fire.
A distinction is drawn between writing hadeeth and narrating hadeeth; the former is forbidden at this point in time, the latter is permitted. Thus the prohibition on the writing of hadeeth is not on account of negating its authority - that would be a non-sequitur assumption.

As for the second hadeeth about Zaid bin Thabit and Muaawiya, you quoted it in the five prayers thread too, but what is quoted is not even a hadeeth. Zaid bin Thabit never met Muaawiya. The reasons are as follows:
  1. Prophet Muhammed (pbuh) died in the year 633;
  2. Zaid bin Thabit died in the year 660;
  3. Muaawiya came in power and became the leader in the year 661;
  4. According to hadith rejecters this incident took place in the year 663.
How could Zaid bin Thabit meet Muaawiya if he had passed away by this time? Perhaps it is not impossible since, as you have stated, reincarnation is "an irrefutable fact."

As for the first narration it is simply a restatement of of the third hadeeth.

The fact that the Prophet forbade writing of hadeeth in the earliest part of Prophethood is not hidden. It is in fact well-known. At the beginning of the revelation of the Quran, the companions were not familiar with the Quranic style, nor was the Quran compiled in separate book form. Some companions would write ahadeeth along with the Quranic text, and this writing was thus prohibited by the Prophet in order to avoid mixing of the two. The Prophet ordered that the ahadeeth be preserved in other ways:

1. By memorization:
Narrated Abdullah bin Amr RA, the Prophet ﷺ said: Convey (my teachings) to the people even if it were a single sentence.” Sahih Bukhari 3461

2. By discussion:

Screen Shot 2021-03-18 at 12.28.47.png
at Tirmidhi 2669

Screen Shot 2021-03-18 at 12.30.24.png
Sunan abi Dawood 3659

Screen Shot 2021-03-18 at 12.33.09.png
at Tirmidhi 2649

3. By practice: The Sunnah is not merely theoretical knowledge, it relates to practical life. The companions acted upon the teachings of the Prophet, and spared no effort in doing so. The Sunnah was a living practice that every companion strove to embody.

When the companions became fully conversant with the style of the Quran and writing paper became available, the transitory measure of precaution was taken back, because the danger of mixing between the Quran and hadeeth no longer existed. Writing of the hadeeth became encouraged, and were compiled in pamphletsc called sahifa.

Screen Shot 2021-03-18 at 12.41.53.png
Sunan abi Dawood 3646

Screen Shot 2021-03-18 at 12.47.07.png
at Tirmidhi 2667

Screen Shot 2021-03-18 at 12.51.05.png
Sahih Muslim 3004

In compliance with this last hadeeth Abdullah ibn Amr wrote a large number of hadeeth and compiled them into book form which he name Al Sahifa as Sadiqah
 






Last edited:

A Freeman

Star
Joined
Nov 11, 2019
Messages
2,835
At-Tirmidhi (2658) narrated from ‘Abdullah ibn Mas‘ood that the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) said: “May Allah beautify a man who hears a saying of mine, so he understands it, remembers it and conveys it. There may be one who conveys knowledge to someone who understands it better than he does.”

Al-Bazzaar (3416) narrated from Muhammad ibn Jubayr ibn Mut‘im, from his father (may Allah be pleased with him), from the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) that he said: “May Allah beautify a man who hears a saying of mine, so he memorises it and conveys it as he heard it.”
Sura 5:4. Forbidden to you (for food) are: dead meat (Lev. 22:8, Deut. 14:21), blood (Lev. 3:17, Lev. 17:10-11), the flesh of swine (Deut. 14:8), and that on which hath been invoked the name of other than "I AM" (Num. 25:1-3); that which hath been killed by strangling, or by a violent blow, or by a headlong fall, or by being gored to death; that which hath been (partly) eaten by a wild animal (Lev. 22:8); unless ye are able to slaughter it (in due form) that which is sacrificed on stone (altars); (forbidden) also is the division (of meat) by raffling with arrows: that is impiety. This day have those who reject Faith given up all hope of your religion: yet fear them not, but fear Me (Matt. 10:28). THIS DAY* I have perfected your religion for you, COMPLETED My favour upon you, and have chosen for YOU, submission to My will, as your religion (Matt. 6:9-13). But if any is forced by hunger, with no inclination to transgression, "I AM" is indeed Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful.

*This leaves absolutely NO wiggle room for men to fabricate additional sayings allegedly attributed to Muhammad AFTER the Koran, like Muhammad al-Bukhari “compiled” over 200 years after Muhammad Mustafa's death.

As previously quoted, God even made sure that if someone did read the Hadith they would find Muhammad specifically instructed those around him NOT to write anything from him, except the Koran (Quran).

Anyone who believes the satanic, fabricated Hadith instead of (or tries to partner it with) God and His Holy Koran (Quran) will burn. There will be absolutely NO exceptions.
 






Last edited:
Joined
May 12, 2019
Messages
1,413
Then why do you insist on disobeying him? Do you have a death wish?
If we are to believe what you copied from that website, Zayd bin Thabit would have met Muaawiya three years after he had died. How that's possible, I don't know. But since you believe that reincarnation is an irrefutable fact, taught by both the Bible and the Quran, perhaps you can explain. Also, respond to every point, not one selection that you're taking out of the context of my argument. If you actually read what I said, the prohibition on writing was later lifted; but the practices of narration, dictations, discussion and practice were always occurring, and ordered by the Prophet. Do you learn something and not act on it?
 






Daze

Veteran
Joined
Jun 28, 2020
Messages
675
Isn't that rather hypocritical of you, since you have contributed absolutely nothing to this thread other than insults? Your inability to refute even a single point that's been shared stands as proof of the truth being shared in the article, for everyone's benefit (including yours).
Why would i contribute to a thread of ignorance? I mean seriously. I rather loathe posting here because it pushes it back up top.
Just like Kias thread "who Muslims really worship". Lots of ignorance there too, but for me to refute it only pushes it back up for all to see.

I''d rather a thread such as this one get no replies and just die in obscurity to be perfectly honest.

Why are you attacking Islam? Not Hinduism, Sikhism, Shintoism, Buddhism, (insert 50 other ism's here). What is your goal Freeman? I could attack many religions but there is no gain in it. What is your purpose with this thread? Do you really think you can misguide those being lead by the Almighty? Clearly you do. Preach about your own faith, what do you hope to gain by attacking others?


I am interested in this one however.
Screenshot_2021-03-18 The Top 10 Myths that Dominate Islam .png

Think you can elaborate on the 2nd quote? That is without making a dozen quotes from scripture making the post essentially unreadable. Clear and concise, use the KISS principle.

If revelation was not made for mankind, then for who is it intended for?
 






Top