I think this is shifting the discussion away somewhat, but we might as well address it.
First, the words here seem very similar to the KJV.
Second, if you consider the implications of your interpretations of this passage, it leads to doctrines which seem at odds to other clearly stated passages.
The most obvious thing is that your reading of it appears to be “one strike and you’re out (with no hope of return)”.
I may have misunderstood you here on previous occasions but can you resolve the unrepentant Corinthian sleeping with his stepmother and getting thrown out of the Church by Paul, yet in the second letter Paul tells the church to restore him?
Peter betraying Jesus and cursing?
Peter and the other disciples returning to the fishing trade?
I could go on to Philemon and Onissimus, or even countless modern testimonies of people who made an early choice to follow Jesus then fell away for many years, only to be restored?
What about the parable of the lost sheep and the lost coin? Both the sheep and coin belonged to the owner, who went looking for them.
Finally, I think Andy Woods makes a very clear alternative reading of the Hebrews passage in question. I offer it for wider consideration...