I think 9 11 is never far from my mind on some level. 9 11 I think is permanently in the back of my mind because it was formative.
However, 9 11 does not bother me and I simply accept it. The ultimate concerns aren't of this world.
However, if I think about it consciously 9/11 does bother me because I think it was a greater trend of terrorization of society.
David McGowan talked about serial killers and the programming of them. I think 9/11 was sort of an extension of what McGowan talked about in Born to Kill but on a different scale.
I think there is a sort of normalization and institutionalization of violence. Antifa and types like this
I mean that sort of thing and lethal terrorism are on the same spectrum..... 9 11 is just a million times higher on the particular spectrum
I think the ones to normalize terrorism will be leftists and I think leftists are more of a terrorist threat than Muslims.....
I saw BLM get into terrorism with my own eyes.... I never had anything to do with them........
so I think there will be a steady flow of leftist terrorism and eventually it will grow more intense
I am convinced Trump will get into a second term and then we'll get a leftist... and I saw the leftists get more intense during Obama.....
so they actually become more intense during such times.......
and so I think leftists are more the terrorist threat than Muslims.........
however, I don't expect them to get into things as big as 9 11 anytime soon
but I do expect them to cause trouble
terrorism originated with the French Revolution and during times like 1900 was more associated with anarchism and extreme left until much later when suddenly they started funding "Islamic" terrorism
before our times, people like this is what such stuff looked like
Luigi Galleani
I honestly think Mussolini is made to look so bad because... look at Mussolini
that man does not look like he is the type to tolerate the behavior of a Galleani....
I'm not saying Mussolini was a good guy but he wasn't entirely evil and the forces that were behind the French Revolution, the Bolsheviks, etc. are more powerful than someone like Mussolini (that being said, there is a book that seems to be saying he was
involved with the Illuminati
)
"After Mussolini came to power in 1922, the anarchist was charged with sedition and sentenced to 14 months in prison."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luigi_Galleani
I'm not against anarchists who are peaceful but someone like Galleani deserved to be put in prison
"By all accounts, Galleani was an extremely effective speaker and advocate of his policy of revolutionary violence. Carlo Buda, the brother of Galleanist bombmaker
Mario Buda, said of him, "
You heard Galleani speak, and you were ready to shoot the first policeman you saw"."
Remembering the Left-Wing Terrorism of the 1970s
https://www.thenation.com/article/remembering-left-wing-terrorism-1970s/
“People have completely forgotten that in 1972 we had over nineteen hundred domestic bombings in the United States.” — Max Noel, FBI (ret.)
"Recently, I had my head torn off by a book: Bryan Burrough’s
Days of Rage, about the 1970s underground. It’s the most important book I’ve read in a year. So I did a series of running tweetstorms about it, and Clark asked me if he could collect them for posterity. I’ve edited them slightly for editorial coherence.
Days of Rage is important, because this stuff is forgotten and it shouldn’t be. The 1970s underground wasn’t small. It was hundreds of people becoming urban guerrillas. Bombing buildings: the Pentagon, the Capitol, courthouses, restaurants, corporations. Robbing banks. Assassinating police. People really thought that revolution was imminent, and thought violence would bring it about."
https://status451.com/2017/01/20/days-of-rage/
I am not necessarily so much trying to make a point about the left but I am talking about leftist terrorism because I think the Islamic terrorism actually comes from the Leftist terrorism and is an offshoot.... hence, for example, the theory that "Islamic" terrorism actually derives from Leninism in some way
"The Leninist Revolutionary Manifesto of Sayyid Qutb"
http://www.takfiris.com/takfir/articles/qyowp-the-leninist-revolutionary-manifesto-of-sayyid-qutb.cfm
"
Chapter 2 of
The 9/11 Commission Report (2004), "The Foundation of the New Terrorism," cites Qutb for influencing Osama Bin Laden's worldview in these terms:
[Qutb] dismissed Western achievements as entirely material, arguing that 'nothing will satisfy its own conscience and justify its existence.'[n. 12]
[111]
Three basic themes emerge from Qutb's writings. First, he claimed that the world was beset with barbarism, licentiousness, and unbelief (a condition he called jahiliyya, the religious term for the period of ignorance prior to the revelations given to the Prophet Mohammed). Qutb argued that humans can choose only between Islam and jahiliyya. Second, he warned that more people, including Muslims, were attracted to jahiliyya and its material comforts than to his view of Islam; jahiliyya could therefore triumph over Islam. Third, no middle ground exists in what Qutb conceived as a struggle between God and Satan. All Muslim – as he defined them – therefore must take up arms in this fight. Any Muslim who rejects his ideas is just one more nonbeliever worthy of destruction.
[112]"
I see "Islamic" terrorism as really just an extension of leftist terrorism (which is unfortunately a leftist "tradition" since at least the French Revolution) and not actually properly belonging to Islam (that being said, I don't know if Qutb really was in favor of terrorism but I think terrorists could have twisted his writings to promote it.... personally, I don't think Qutb really was in favor of terrorism and I think he's been slandered but I could definitely see his ideas being twisted by khawarij.... I think we must strive against the modern world as both Qutb and Julius Evola expressed in different ways.... however, I think we should revolt against being dumbed down and educate ourselves.. I think Qutb was a lot like Evola or even Spengler but from a Muslim perspective)
this has some fascinating stuff (although I don't agree with all of it)
the idea that modernity has some not so great aspects and we should seek to rectify the evils of modernity is just a fact of life and if people twist that into a rationalization for wickedness then frankly it's their own fault.... however, it is really a behavior which comes from desire and only hijacks ideas but originates with desires and not ideas