I certainly hope it is a treatment that mainstream medicine was wrong about for your sake.
I remember in nursing lectures (very early 90s) how stress was to blame for stomach ulcers and that damaged nerves couldn't be healed.
Thank you for your concern and you bring up an interesting point about oxidative stress research. This research is what started the antioxidant fad because it was believed that neutralizing the oxidative stress was going to be beneficial.
There is a lot more information on the reality that this did not create the solution that was expected than hydrogen peroxide therapies at the moment, and it has been proven more or less that antioxidants created a solution to the experience of oxidative stress.
"Several decades of dietary research findings suggested that consuming greater amounts of antioxidant-rich foods might help to protect against diseases. Because of these results, there has been a lot of research on antioxidant supplements. Rigorous trials of antioxidant supplements in large numbers of people have not found that high doses of antioxidant supplements prevent disease. This section describes the preliminary research findings, the results of the clinical trials, and possible explanations for the differences in study results."
https://nccih.nih.gov/health/antioxidants/introduction.htm
If anything, neutralizing the oxidative stress response might actually be removing the solution since oxidative stress is caused by eating too much sugar, fat, exposure to pollution, excess bacteria in the system. The body responds to this imbalance with the oxidative stress response in order to assist in detoxing the body from these excess substances.
If you neutralize this process, then you are essentially right back where you started with excess sugar, fat, or whatever else is causing the response. However, if you assist the oxidative response in order to remove the source of the problem rather than trying to neutralize the body's own method of coping with the imbalance so that it cannot function, then the oxidative response is completed and the body is not exposed to hydrogen peroxide over an extended period of time, which is what studies on oxidative stress say is the cause of the damage to the body.
Therefore, if you were able to define parameters so that the oxidative response could complete a cycle so to speak rather than trying to neutralize the process without removing the source of the problem, there is the possibility of achieving better outcomes than antioxidants have been able to achieve.
So I think the study of oxidative stress offers more reason to believe that hydrogen peroxide therapy should be studied as a potential treatment. For example, Candida overgrowth is a very common fungal infection that will stimulate oxidative stress. If you don't get rid of the Candida, then you will never stop the oxidative stress response. Hydrogen peroxide could be able to clear the system of Candida, which would stop the oxidative stress.
I found a really interesting study on oxidative stress responses and fungal pathogens that suggests that a fungus like Candida has evolved over time to become immune to the systems oxidative stress response. Therefore, it could be a possibility that this is contributing the bodies inability to resolve this condition without intervention.
"In addition, the recent findings that C. albicans is exquisitely sensitive to combinations of stress that are encountered following phagocytosis represent a new unchartered area in the field of stress signalling. A key question for the future is how do combinations of stress imposed by the phagosome inhibit oxidative stress adaptation and survival of C. albicans? "
http://www.mdpi.com/2218-273X/5/1/142/htm
Essentially, what is happening is that Candida is resolved by the oxidative stress response. However, it is able to adapt to this response in order to survive so that the response continues for an extended period of time, and the condition is not resolved. In many cases, people don't notice that this is happening until they have already developed a condition in response to the experience suggesting that it is not the exposure that oxidative stress that is the problem, but the prolonged exposure in combination with an unresolved condition like Candida.
While this article does not suggest that hydrogen peroxide therapy could be used as an oxidative stress approach to address something like this, it does seem reasonable to assume that it would be a possibility if the healthcare community were open to change. A lot of times, healthcare seems to be prone to be stuck in old ways of doing things and resistant to change.
Unfortunately, the healthcare community has really become the gatekeeper over a collection of harmful substances with the ability to exert the authority to say which ones are harmful and which ones are not. Chemo is terrible. Chemo is literally poisoning the body, but when there are parameters defined by a doctor, this is fine with people and everyone assumes they know what they are doing. Penicillin is harvested from mold. Thimerosal is mercury that is apparently safe in low doses.
So if all these otherwise harmful substances can be consumed within parameters and are even considered beneficial under precise conditions, it would seem reasonable to assume that a substance that is naturally produced by the body in order to remove pathogens like Candida could be consumed under certain conditions and found to be beneficial to alleviate the source of the oxidative stress response.
However, like I said, I do appreciate your concern and the opportunity it has provided to clarify my position on the subject. I do not advocate for anyone to take anything they don't feel comfortable taking and have not researched. Originally, I posted this information with the expectation that someone else might have their own experience to share and that is all this would end up leading to is shared experiences. This is Vigilant Citizen after all. We talk about UFO's and all sorts of things that are alternative to the mainstream narrative.