The "Man In The Dress" Gimmick In Entertainment Continues......

heyyor

Rookie
Joined
Mar 14, 2017
Messages
87
The whole "Dresses, feminine clothes, shoes and accessories for men" is such a blatant agenda push just based on the fact that there's no chance at all that it could be a profitable fad that would catch on with the masses. No self-respecting straight(and I imagine a lot of gay) man is going to wear a dress or women's shoes unless forced to, which is basically the conditions under which the majority of these celebrities and models do it. It's part of their job, and even then, I imagine they're very reluctant and face a lot of pressure to do it.
Besides the fact that it just goes against a dude's base instinct to not make a huge attention grabbing spectacle of himself in an embarrassing way, his basic non-interest to revulsion spectrum of reaction at feminizing himself and degrading his own masculinity, especially in front of others; there's also the whole impractical aspect of it all. Why would any guy that's not a drag queen want to learn how to walk in high heels just to follow a fashion trend? It's absurd to think they would, it's a wonder women put up with it. On to the dresses and miniskirts: there's a good reason men's clothing evolved over the years to crotch and thigh covering pants and shorts. It's because the vast majority of the public does not want to see men's junk dangling out in everyday life. It's probably why shorts have evolved to being longer on the leg, because you could even run into that same problem with too high-cut of shorts: getting an unwanted glimpse of some dude's junk in public
 






UnderAlienControl

Superstar
Joined
Mar 27, 2017
Messages
7,156
I remember that there was a significance/symbolism to what color laces you'd wear in your Doc Martin boots within certain circles n scenes like the punk rock shows I'd go to as a young preteen and teen. I wonder if there's a significance to "one yellow lace, one white and grey(?) lace" that this dude's wearing?
Isn't that DWade and Gabrielle Union?
 






irrationalNinja

Established
Joined
Apr 26, 2017
Messages
250
The whole "Dresses, feminine clothes, shoes and accessories for men" is such a blatant agenda push just based on the fact that there's no chance at all that it could be a profitable fad that would catch on with the masses. No self-respecting straight(and I imagine a lot of gay) man is going to wear a dress or women's shoes unless forced to, which is basically the conditions under which the majority of these celebrities and models do it. It's part of their job, and even then, I imagine they're very reluctant and face a lot of pressure to do it.
Besides the fact that it just goes against a dude's base instinct to not make a huge attention grabbing spectacle of himself in an embarrassing way, his basic non-interest to revulsion spectrum of reaction at feminizing himself and degrading his own masculinity, especially in front of others; there's also the whole impractical aspect of it all. Why would any guy that's not a drag queen want to learn how to walk in high heels just to follow a fashion trend? It's absurd to think they would, it's a wonder women put up with it. On to the dresses and miniskirts: there's a good reason men's clothing evolved over the years to crotch and thigh covering pants and shorts. It's because the vast majority of the public does not want to see men's junk dangling out in everyday life. It's probably why shorts have evolved to being longer on the leg, because you could even run into that same problem with too high-cut of shorts: getting an unwanted glimpse of some dude's junk in public
As @Trenton mentioned the thread from the previous board "The Dude In A Dress Phenomenon," DIAD (Dude in a dress), imho, is a much more apt description considering no self-respecting man would ransom his masculinity by humiliating himself on that level. Only a male who has allowed his hypothetical balls be removed / held ransom from him (a dude) would volunteer to be emasculated and thrown on the pyre of feminist desire to end all things masculine (e.g. forcing men and women to accept masculinity is toxic and a feminist's responsibility to "teach" men and society how they feel men need to conduct themselves).

Imho... DIAD is one weapon used in the culture war (currently being exposed in the wake of Trump's rise to power) aimed at subtly eroding masculinity in the male population and devaluing femininity in the female population; semi-subliminal programming designed to foster acceptance of deviant ideas.

While appearing as a "gimmick," DIAD is the embodiment of the ideological sickness SJWs are infected with - a desire to subvert "the evil patriarchy." Considering it's frequency of use purportedly across all media platforms, DIAD should appear as a solid example of a semi-subliminal technique showcasing the ideology driving feminist, transgender, and homosexual agendas (a Cultural Marxist wet dream) - heavily promoted and endorsed by the entertainment industry for a considerably long time.
 






Devine

Star
Joined
Mar 20, 2017
Messages
3,501
As @Trenton mentioned the thread from the previous board "The Dude In A Dress Phenomenon," DIAD (Dude in a dress), imho, is a much more apt description considering no self-respecting man would ransom his masculinity by humiliating himself on that level. Only a male who has allowed his hypothetical balls be removed / held ransom from him (a dude) would volunteer to be emasculated and thrown on the pyre of feminist desire to end all things masculine (e.g. forcing men and women to accept masculinity is toxic and a feminist's responsibility to "teach" men and society how they feel men need to conduct themselves).

Imho... DIAD is one weapon used in the culture war (currently being exposed in the wake of Trump's rise to power) aimed at subtly eroding masculinity in the male population and devaluing femininity in the female population; semi-subliminal programming designed to foster acceptance of deviant ideas.

While appearing as a "gimmick," DIAD is the embodiment of the ideological sickness SJWs are infected with - a desire to subvert "the evil patriarchy." Considering it's frequency of use purportedly across all media platforms, DIAD should appear as a solid example of a semi-subliminal technique showcasing the ideology driving feminist, transgender, and homosexual agendas (a Cultural Marxist wet dream) - heavily promoted and endorsed by the entertainment industry for a considerably long time.
totally agree with you
 






Top