You've only defended the ME when it suited your agenda. Let's not pretend like you're a fan of Muslims.
My agenda? What would that look like?
And it's fine if you don't like Muslims but don't pretend like you defended the ME out of the goodness of your heart.
Can you quit the straw man, please? I understand you're going after my moral integrity since I called you out on your immoral view, but you're being irrational. I defended the ME based on moral principles, ie. the non-aggression principle and the right to self-determination. If you don't like that I apply the same to the actions and beliefs of other peoples and civilisations, then that's your problem.
There's also the aspect of empathy. This guilt complex among western people has manifested due to the feminisation of society and the accompanying increase of empathy. Not intrinsically a bad thing, but it's an explanation why western people participate more in collective self-criticism of failing to reach the standards they expect to achieve. People who empathise and self-criticise too much in the face of others who do not return the empathy are destined to lose. Moreover, people who empathise too much with other people are most vulnerable for exploitation and this is exactly what's happening. Other peoples with less to no empathy and self-criticism are exploiting the guilt complex of the more empathic peoples and are doing it in order to extract resources. It's a one-way stream and all groups are queuing up to hit that white guilt button like an ATM to get their handouts. It's one of the lowest, disrespectful and greediest forms of leeching and I literally despise anyone who participates in it.
There's plenty of good things about the West. I love the West and that's why I criticize the bad aspects of it because I would like to see it change. I would love to see the values and culture in which my grandpa grew up return back to Canada once again even if they were classified as Christian values. Believe it or not AR I believe genuine Christian values to be very similar to that of the Muslims and good values like that can only better society.
Yet you still didn't mention any accomplishment. What values and what aspects of our lost culture?
Obviously there are common grounds between Christian and Islamic values. They are both conservative views with more emphasis on universal morals, family, tradition, but that doesn't mean there aren't any incompatible differences.
Western civilization isn't crumbling because of Muslim immigration but because of declining moral values and devaluation of their money and resources.
I specifically said "not because of immigration alone", but immigration
is the major factor that will make the change irreversible. Moral relativism is at the basis of decadence and the destruction of spiritual unity, but if we can reverse this and spread more philosophy and Christianity to people we could possibly restore what we've lost. But when you replace the people with a different philosophy and world view that does contain a universal moral code and is spiritually more united, that reversal becomes very unlikely.
I guess without all the stealing and pillaging the West can't really stand on its own. And no, I don't believe there to be this r*pe epidemic. I believe that's all propaganda.
What research have you done to believe it is all propaganda?
I'm sensitive to the suffering of all races. Injustice is injustice regardless of race. Read my signature for crying out loud.
Didn't know it was that simple. I'll change my signature into "I Love Muslims" so we can finally argue the actual points without being distracted by emotions towards racism.
Enslavement is only one aspect of colonialism. There's more layers to it than just bringing in slaves. Also, I have said countless times that Arabs and Africans have done some some pretty evil things but in terms of modernity it pales in comparison to what the whites have done. The whites did everything the Arabs and Africans did but on a much larger scale.
I'm gonna need you to clear up the vagueness. What are you comparing? What do you mean with "in terms of modernity"'? What did the whites do that the Africans and Arabs did but on a larger scale?
Because .........
They were Jews nonetheless. They bombed people while specifically targeting English officials. Hypocrisy is hypocrisy regardless of how you perceive it. Jews are told nothing while Muslims are told they have to integrate. The moment whites hold Jews to the same standard as they do the Muslims then you might have a case.
Most Jews
are integrated. They are almost everywhere on television and radio with most people being clueless that they're Jewish. If you're talking about the orthodox Jews, they are entitled to live as they wish since we live in a secular society with freedom of religion. They are not becoming such a large part of the population that our society is turning Jewish. Neither do these Jews want our society to become Jewish since Jewishness is an ethno-religious elitarian identity that they are not keen on sharing. If you're going to continue with false equivalence, just let it drop. Take a plane to Luton, Malmö or Molenbeek and check it out for yourself, since you're clearly arguing from a place of ignorance.
The reason there's no immigration of Jews is because their population is extremely small and further more whites took land that belonged to the Arabs and who had no involvement in what happened during the second World War and let the Jews colonize it. And whites did this by giving them arms and money. Like I said the ME in a long time has never been free from Western intervention and the minute whites stop interfering with the ME the immigration will stop as well. It's quite simple really.
It is not that simple. You're not taking into account that this migration into the West is desired by Soros-like individuals and organisations and politicians go along with the current because of this toxic age of political correctness, voter gaining and the welfare state which expands the reach of government. The replacement of the native populations of Europe is
designed and coming to fruition as we speak.
From the godfather of the European Union:
"The man of the future will be of mixed race. Today's races and classes will gradually disappear owing to the vanishing of space, time, and prejudice. The Eurasian-Negroid race of the future, similar in its appearance to the Ancient Egyptians, will replace the diversity of peoples with a diversity of individuals. [...]
Instead of destroying European Jewry, Europe, against its own will, refined and educated this people into a future leader-nation through this artificial selection process. No wonder that this people, that escaped Ghetto-Prison, developed into a spiritual nobility of Europe. Therefore a gracious Providence provided Europe with a new race of nobility by the Grace of Spirit. This happened at the moment when Europe's feudal aristocracy became dilapidated, and thanks to Jewish emancipation."
Practical Idealism, Richard von Coudenhove-Kalergi, 1925
More precisely how are these millions of Muslims getting into Europe and who's allowing them in?
Right now the Red Cross is picking up migrants in Libya by plane. They used to be transferred with one of the many NGO ferry services in the Mediterranean, until both the Italian and Libyan governments accused those NGOs of human trafficking. They were caught exchanging equipment with actual smugglers, but anyone with half a brain already knew that they were at least facilitating human trafficking. And I'm not sure if you're really trying to understand my point. I've said on numerous occasions that this migration wave is largely not organic, but organised, with the specific purpose to replace the native population and further dechristianise western civilisation. Am I not explaining it well?
If you don't accept academic scholarly peer reviewed work from several of the people I had quoted at the time then there's nothing more to say. Regardless of what you think giving a black man a longer jail sentence than a white man for the exact same crime is down right discriminatory and racist. Are you a racist by any chance? Actually ignore that question not like you'll answer it truthfully.
If you want me to ignore that question you wouldn't have posted it. And again, it's not about accepting scholarly peer reviewed works, but about facts. There are scholarly peer reviewed works that contradict each other. If you can't bring up facts than just admit that. If you can, show them instead of complaining about me not accepting your theories.
Sorry if I don't accept your ludicrous evidence that surveyors went into parts of war torn areas in the ME to ask what religion each person followed lol. Not like those people had anything better to do like try to runaway from bombs, militias, famine, and etc.
That's not how it works. They are estimates based on casualties and displacements of peoples. They're not gonna take polls in jihadi territory.
I don't relish in anything. I'm simply telling it like it is. Just seeing the way things have developed around the world I've come to believe that many people who consider themselves to be white and conservative in nature are closeted racists. I'm not saying you right now, but that opinion is slowly changing due to your statements in the past and especially now, many white conservatives want the good ole colonial and imperial years to come back where every other ethnicity that isn't white know their place in the "civilized" world.
Say it as it is then. I can tell that you think I'm a racist, since you even think rainerann is a racist, but truth be told, if I was a neutral and objective newcomer to this forum, void of indoctrination, I'd single you out as the biggest racist in this thread. You will defend any position that accuses whites (not ideology or phenomena) but the actual white race and deflect any negative commentary that is directed to non-white ideologies or trends. And I don't care what people think racism is, they've raped that word sideways that it has lost all meaning.