The Hidden Face of Terrorism.

Karlysymon

Superstar
Joined
Mar 18, 2017
Messages
6,840

holmes

Rookie
Joined
Apr 23, 2018
Messages
49
I had to laugh.

The fact:
Pompeo(CIA) in Jordan (where ISIS fighters were trained)

The fable:
Pompeo reiterated that the US goal is to defeat the Daesh terror group.
"We must not let Syria again become a safe haven for the Islamic State* [Daesh] or for any other terrorist group,"
Awesome find.

Cheney, Rothschild, and Fox News’ Murdoch to drill for oil in Syria, violating international law
https://www.nationofchange.org/2017/01/15/cheney-rothschild-fox-news-murdoch-drill-oil-syria-violating-international-law/


Genie Energy Ltd
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genie_Energy


Which brings up another interesting twist between what comes out of their mouths & what they are actually planning.

The Rothschilds Own Israel - And Direct It's Genocidal Policy
http://freedom-articles.toolsforfreedom.com/the-rothschilds-own-israel/

Hack exposes billionaire Soros' support of anti-Israel agenda
http://www.israelhayom.com/2017/07/20/hack-exposes-billionaire-soros-support-of-anti-israel-agenda/


'Kissinger said Israel won't exist in 10 years'
http://www.israelhayom.com/2012/09/27/kissinger-said-israel-wont-exist-in-10-years/

16 US Intelligence agency report agrees with Kissinger, Israel will fall
https://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2012/08/28/us-preparing-for-a-post-israel-middle-east/

Since when have the masters of propaganda been so quick to concede defeat to perceived future public opinion?

Report: CIA sees end of Israel by 2022
http://www.israeltoday.co.il/NewsItem/tabid/178/nid/23278/Default.aspx?article=related_stories

Union for the Mediterranean
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Union_for_the_Mediterranean


McCain, Kissinger & Rothschild
https://www.mccaininstitute.org/initiatives/kissinger-fellowship/
(It's password protected but it doesn't work - just keep hitting "cancel" until it disappears)
 

Karlysymon

Superstar
Joined
Mar 18, 2017
Messages
6,840
Awesome find.

Cheney, Rothschild, and Fox News’ Murdoch to drill for oil in Syria, violating international law
https://www.nationofchange.org/2017...-drill-oil-syria-violating-international-law/
I was actually watching news and there he was, with the Jordanian minister, essentially lying to my face. I laughed because it was all so absurd. As a former cia director, one cannot claim that he is ignorant of the document.

As for Murdoch, that just goes to show that one will never get the truth about the Syrian conflict from his channels or papers because his interests are at stake.
 

Karlysymon

Superstar
Joined
Mar 18, 2017
Messages
6,840
Look who's talking...

“The Iranian regime is the leading state sponsor of terror,” Trump said. “It exports dangerous missiles, fuels conflicts across the Middle East, and supports terrorist proxies and militias Hezbollah, Hamas, the Taliban, and al-Qaeda.”

Either Trump actually believes what he said, or he is purposefully lying, or someone put a gun to his head and forced him to say that. You decide.
 

Awoken2

Superstar
Joined
Jan 22, 2018
Messages
6,234
Look who's talking...

“The Iranian regime is the leading state sponsor of terror,” Trump said. “It exports dangerous missiles, fuels conflicts across the Middle East, and supports terrorist proxies and militias Hezbollah, Hamas, the Taliban, and al-Qaeda.”

Either Trump actually believes what he said, or he is purposefully lying, or someone put a gun to his head and forced him to say that. You decide.
Talk about the pot calling the kettle black? Unbelievable!
 

holmes

Rookie
Joined
Apr 23, 2018
Messages
49
Look who's talking...

“The Iranian regime is the leading state sponsor of terror,” Trump said. “It exports dangerous missiles, fuels conflicts across the Middle East, and supports terrorist proxies and militias Hezbollah, Hamas, the Taliban, and al-Qaeda.”

Either Trump actually believes what he said, or he is purposefully lying, or someone put a gun to his head and forced him to say that. You decide.
Just as a reminder, the Rothschilds swing a deal with Murdoch to sew up the conservative news network in Syria & Cheney has still got his grubby hands in the war pot:

Cheney, Rothschild, and Fox News’ Murdoch to drill for oil in Syria, violating international law
https://www.nationofchange.org/2017/01/15/cheney-rothschild-fox-news-murdoch-drill-oil-syria-violating-international-law/

Genie Energy Ltd.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genie_Energy

I don't know who Ole Dammegard's "Guest Author" is but let's assume for a moment that they are correct:

"The only countries left in 2011 without a Central Bank owned or controlled by the Rothschild Family are:
  1. Cuba
  2. North Korea
  3. Iran"
https://www.lightonconspiracies.com/only-three-countries-left-without-a-rothschild-central-bank/

As I recall, the deal was to Make America Great Again, not to play GloboCop for the Usury Boys & their holdings. Of course you are going to have to iron out a few trade deals but the focus seems way too bent on the international scene to make Trump look a whole lot different than his predecessors and this is looking too "Rise & Fall of Rome"ish for me to feel comfortable with.

Only an idiot would buy the first sarin gas attack as an excuse for war. Even an idiot wouldn't buy the third. We have more than enough trouble in our little corner of the universe that needs fixing, we don't need to go looking for more. Trump said he wanted to build up the military on the campaign trail, which was always a concern for me. The US has the largest military budget in the world.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_military_expenditures

As a matter of fact, I can think of a couple of reasons why too large of a military budget can be as dangerous as too small of one, if not more so. We can't even get a handle on our own intelligence agencies. According to American Intelligence Media, Lockheed Martin has their own intelligence agency, larger than the CIA. Lockheed Martin had ties to Nazi Germany. Lockheed Martin is a third party contractor that is funded by US taxpayers yet they are not held accountable to the public. Intelligence agencies often operate above the law. That's bad news enough. Having a corporate intelligence agency that is answerable to no one & paying for it is like juggling nitroglycerin - a bad idea before you even get started.

About 30 minutes in:

 

Karlysymon

Superstar
Joined
Mar 18, 2017
Messages
6,840
That's true. To always ask, cui bono?

For example, what does ISIS actually gain from the attacks it supposedly carries out in Europe? It had large swathes of the Levant under its control, why terrorize the European populace? It will never politically take over the continent, so there isn't any real short or long term gain to warrant the attacks. Does it just want to spill blood, maybe. On the other hand, the attacks are always a god-send for the ruling elite, to further oppress the common man, and that is alittle too convinient.




"A. U.S. Navy psychologist claims that the Office of Naval Intelligence had taken convicted murderers from military prisons,used
behavior modification techniques on them, and then relocated them in American embassies throughout the world... The Navy psychologist was Lt. Commander Thomas Narut of the U.S. Regional Medical Center in Naples, Italy. The information was divulged at an Oslo NATO conference of 120 psychologists from the eleven nation alliance. . .The Navy provided all the funding necessary, according to Narut. Dr. Narut, in a question and answer session with reporters from many nations, revealed how the Navy was secretly programming large numbers of assassins. He said that the men he had worked with for the Navy were being prepared for commando-type operations, aswell as covert operations in U.S. embassies worldwide. He described the men who went through his program as ‘hit men and assassins’ who could kill on command. Careful screening of the subjects was accomplished by Navy psychologists through the military records. . .and many were convicted murderers serving military prison sentences."
(Programmed to Kill)

That conference took place in July 1975!
Paris attack latest: Isis claims responsibility for multiple stabbing in Opera district
 

Karlysymon

Superstar
Joined
Mar 18, 2017
Messages
6,840
The Ideological Origins of the War on Terror

".....in 1979, in his brother’s memory, Netanyahu founded the Jonathan Institute to study geopolitical issues such as terrorism.
In July 1979 the Jonathan Institute held its first conference – the Jerusalem Conference on International Terrorism. Around 700 people attended the week-long conference – almost entirely American, British and Israeli, with some other Western Europeans. Key speakers included Benjamin Netanyahu and George HW Bush. It is at this conference that the entire ideology of the modern war on terror was laid out. This was not widely reported at the time, and several years later Netanyahu published a book called International Terrorism: Challenge and Response, containing the main speeches and some of the question and answer sessions.
This is on google books, not in its entirety but enough to give you a good idea of what’s in the full book and it is well worth your time to read some pieces from it because there is a lot of eyebrow-raising moments. Just the list of people who attended tells you something – we have the father of the Netanyahu brothers Benzion, Simon Peres, Henry M Jackson, Richard Pipes, Lord Chalfont, Brian Crozier, Ray Cline, Midge Decter and Major General George Keegan. Basically it’s a cross section of people who were either NATO hawks or Zionists, and who work in the political, intelligence and/or journalistic and media industries....

According to Netanyahu’s book an unnamed speaker said, ‘we should establish a non-stop source of media in order to pump our ideas, our information into the world’s free press… If this Institute will consider such a center for effective psychological warfare, maybe the media would be successful in influencing leaders and legislators.’

Once again, notice the doublethink – whoever is saying this is talking about the ‘free press’ but has no respect for the freedom of the ‘free press’ because they just want to use it to ‘pump our ideas and information’ for ‘effective psychological warfare’ purposes."
 

holmes

Rookie
Joined
Apr 23, 2018
Messages
49
The Ideological Origins of the War on Terror

Once again, notice the doublethink – whoever is saying this is talking about the ‘free press’ but has no respect for the freedom of the ‘free press’ because they just want to use it to ‘pump our ideas and information’ for ‘effective psychological warfare’ purposes."
Speaking of psychological warfare, it begins in the home.

Bertrand Russell, 1930:
"This applies in particular to the family relations. A man's part in the care of children is little more than financial, and his financial obligations will been forced by the law if necessary, so that they make little demand upon his personal sense of duty. A woman, if she is vigorous and intelligent, is likely to feel that the truncated maternal duties remaining to her are inadequate as a career, the more so as most of them can be performed more scientifically by experts. This feeling would operate much more widely but for the lingering feeling on the part of men that they like their wives to be financially dependent upon them. This is, however, a kind of feeling surviving from an earlier age; it is already much weakened and likely to disappear before very long.

All these developments have diminished the reasons which led people to avoid divorce. As divorce becomes more frequent and more easy the family is still further weakened, since in effect it usually results in a child having only one parent.

For all these and other reasons set forth in Dr. Watson's contribution, it seems inevitable, for good or evil, that the family as a unit should more and more fade away, leaving no group to interpose its authority between the individual and the State. This does not apply so much to the well-to-do, who may continue to employ special nurseries, special schools, special doctors, and all the expensive mechanisms of private enterprise; but for wage earners thecost of such individualism is prohibitive. Where their children are concerned it is inevitable that any functions no longer performed by parents must come to be undertaken by the State. As regards the immense majority, therefore, the choice lies, not between parental care and the care of experts selected by parents, but between parents and the State."

https://www.utilitarian.org/texts/newgeneration.html

If anyone doubts the effectiveness of propaganda & indoctrination, take a good look at what has happened to the family since 1930. They like to attribute it to societal moral decay but everything they do is to advance the afore mentioned agenda. Doublethink.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doublethink

This is the equivalent of blaming the victim:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Victim_blaming
 

Awoken2

Superstar
Joined
Jan 22, 2018
Messages
6,234
The Ideological Origins of the War on Terror

".....in 1979, in his brother’s memory, Netanyahu founded the Jonathan Institute to study geopolitical issues such as terrorism.
In July 1979 the Jonathan Institute held its first conference – the Jerusalem Conference on International Terrorism. Around 700 people attended the week-long conference – almost entirely American, British and Israeli, with some other Western Europeans. Key speakers included Benjamin Netanyahu and George HW Bush. It is at this conference that the entire ideology of the modern war on terror was laid out. This was not widely reported at the time, and several years later Netanyahu published a book called International Terrorism: Challenge and Response, containing the main speeches and some of the question and answer sessions.
This is on google books, not in its entirety but enough to give you a good idea of what’s in the full book and it is well worth your time to read some pieces from it because there is a lot of eyebrow-raising moments. Just the list of people who attended tells you something – we have the father of the Netanyahu brothers Benzion, Simon Peres, Henry M Jackson, Richard Pipes, Lord Chalfont, Brian Crozier, Ray Cline, Midge Decter and Major General George Keegan. Basically it’s a cross section of people who were either NATO hawks or Zionists, and who work in the political, intelligence and/or journalistic and media industries....

According to Netanyahu’s book an unnamed speaker said, ‘we should establish a non-stop source of media in order to pump our ideas, our information into the world’s free press… If this Institute will consider such a center for effective psychological warfare, maybe the media would be successful in influencing leaders and legislators.’

Once again, notice the doublethink – whoever is saying this is talking about the ‘free press’ but has no respect for the freedom of the ‘free press’ because they just want to use it to ‘pump our ideas and information’ for ‘effective psychological warfare’ purposes."
I'd strongly recommend you watch this when you have time. It validates your post perfectly.

It's a fascinating documentary that taught me a lot.

At the 12 minute mark you will see how relatively small numbers of crisis actors, when strategically placed, can manipulate the behaviours of large numbers of people.

 

saintroserosalia

Established
Joined
Apr 25, 2018
Messages
256
I'd strongly recommend you watch this when you have time. It validates your post perfectly.

It's a fascinating documentary that taught me a lot.

At the 12 minute mark you will see how relatively small numbers of crisis actors, when strategically placed, can manipulate the behaviours of large numbers of people.

Thank you for recommending this documentary. I have gained a lot of new baby cells because of this !
It made so much sense as to why the world is like what it is today ! Too many people emphasize on being individualists (including yours truly) - which ironically leads into a plethora of unnecessary products and unconscious desires/lusts. All of this is just addiction of feeling of being special which really means nothing. Scary. This is really nothing but mass manipulation and a huge lie that successfully works over decades...
 

Awoken2

Superstar
Joined
Jan 22, 2018
Messages
6,234
It's good to hear that you got something out of it.
Thank you for recommending this documentary. I have gained a lot of new baby cells because of this !
It made so much sense as to why the world is like what it is today ! Too many people emphasize on being individualists (including yours truly) - which ironically leads into a plethora of unnecessary products and unconscious desires/lusts. All of this is just addiction of feeling of being special which really means nothing. Scary. This is really nothing but mass manipulation and a huge lie that successfully works over decades...
As sobering as it is, it does give you a much broader perspective on things doesn't it?
 
Last edited:

saintroserosalia

Established
Joined
Apr 25, 2018
Messages
256
It's good to hear that you got something iu


As sobering as it is, it does give you a much broader perspective on things doesn't it?
Indeed, it does. And I really need that. Am currently watching another Adam Curtis documentary, HyperNormalisation. This man is probably my fave docu filmmaker (even he's heavily associated with BBC) to date. All thanks to you :)
 

Karlysymon

Superstar
Joined
Mar 18, 2017
Messages
6,840
UnderAlienControl said:
You can thank the West along with Israel and Saudi Arabia for the rise of these groups. It's been well proven by now. After all, haven't you realized yet that the War on Terror was never meant to be won. It's gonna run until geopolitical realignment occurs and as much money as possible is made. Please do a bit of research on terror and security as an industry. Very Machiavellian...
In other words, between now and the realignment, we have an assembly line of terrorists (a new one always arrests the attention), and their acts which have become a staple, more destabilisation, deaths and immigration, to push us all to edge psychologically till we break because:
"Terrorism is the purposeful display of chaos and fear that arises from
the radical disturbance of the normal, daily patterns and social routines of the enemy with the intent of achieving an alteration in the psyche of the target populace."
 

UnderAlienControl

Superstar
Joined
Mar 27, 2017
Messages
8,033
"That is simple," Franklin replied. "In the Colonies we issue our own money. It is called Colonial Scrip. We issue it in proper proportion to make the products pass easily from the producers to the consumers. In this manner, creating ourselves our own paper money, we control its purchasing power, and we have no interest to pay to no one.""
“If Congress,"
Jackson said, "has a right under the Constitution to issue paper money, it was given them to use by themselves, not to be delegated to individuals or corporations."
See: Lincoln and the Greenback and we all know how that ended...
 

Awoken2

Superstar
Joined
Jan 22, 2018
Messages
6,234
There are a few threads here I could post this.


They want the people to revolt...so they can restore order.



 

Karlysymon

Superstar
Joined
Mar 18, 2017
Messages
6,840
"In his State of the Union address earlier this year, President Trump declared that we’re living in the “age of terrorism.” His solution: wielding “unmatched power,” loosening the rules of engagement, and establishing an unfettered ability to detain, question, and “annihilate” terrorists.
All of these tactics have, however, been part of the Pentagon’s playbook since 2001 and, according to the military’s best guess at the future, will lead to an increase in terror groups and terror attacks while terror networks and terrorist ideologies will grow in strength, resilience, and appeal. Almost two decades in, it seems we’re still only in the opening days of the “age of terrorism” and, if the Pentagon’s war-gamers are to be believed, far worse is yet to come."

Link
 

Lurker

Star
Joined
Mar 14, 2017
Messages
3,783
"In his State of the Union address earlier this year, President Trump declared that we’re living in the “age of terrorism.” His solution: wielding “unmatched power,” loosening the rules of engagement, and establishing an unfettered ability to detain, question, and “annihilate” terrorists.
All of these tactics have, however, been part of the Pentagon’s playbook since 2001 and, according to the military’s best guess at the future, will lead to an increase in terror groups and terror attacks while terror networks and terrorist ideologies will grow in strength, resilience, and appeal. Almost two decades in, it seems we’re still only in the opening days of the “age of terrorism” and, if the Pentagon’s war-gamers are to be believed, far worse is yet to come."

Link
The biggest problem I see here is that "terrorist", to the best of my knowledge, has not been clearly defined.
 
Top