The Fascists have infilitrated "the Left"

Joined
Feb 22, 2020
Messages
1,173
This is something I have been looking at for a while, but am going to take a serious investigation into this topic.

Its no secret that Hitler used "leftist" talking points to gain power and give himself a "populist" appearance.

During the 2016 election Donald Trump outflanked Hillary Clinton on many issues, which helped to solidify his "anti-establishment" credentials. Of course it was all a ruse to get elected, but an effective strategy none the less.

In the age of Trump I have seen an explosion of "leftist" commentators and journalists who have made it their agenda to try and minimize the crimes and actions of Donald Trump, while focusing almost entirely on "Democratic corruption/hypocrisy" While it is true that the Democrats are corrupt and hypocrital, the hyper focus on this, while ignoring or whitewashing the greater crimes of the Trump regime, by those calling themselves "leftists" and "progressives" shows that there is a well planned out agenda to target a "leftist" or "progressive" audience with far right wing fascist propaganda, and ultimately a defacto support of the current Trump regime and agenda.

This was most apparent during "Russiagate" and virtually all of the "leftist/progressive" commentators/journalists who have been engaging in the subtle defence of Trump, were fully engaged in the Cover up of the Trump/Russia collusion. They were working completely LOCK STOCK AND BARREL in coordination with the Trump campaign propaganda to downplay or dismiss the collusion between Russia and the Trump campaign.

Another unifying factor of many of these "leftist" operatives or dupes, was not only their soft hands on Trump, but also their soft hands and often praise of Fox News host Tucker Carlson, who is the main conduit for fascist propaganda on mainstream news.

You will find that the left wing has been heavily infiltrated by fascists. The outreach of the fascists is massive, and they target different audiences and demographics very differntly, but ultimately they are attempting to convert as many as possible to the different forms of their propaganda.

They are not just preaching to the choir, they are not just talking to conservatives. They are trying to manipulate "leftists" and bring them into the fold, and are doing so by employing a network of '"leftist" commentators/journalists to spread fascist propaganda in ways that speak specifically to progressives.
 






Joined
May 18, 2018
Messages
1,539
Who exactly are you talking about? Leftists that were subtly pro trump and covered up his Russian collusion connections? The leftist media talked about it for years and it went away because the “Russian connections” were the Israeli Russian oligarchs like Roman abramovich. Trump colluded with Israel and the Zionist lobby to get elected. I suppose you could say Zionism is fascism or Hillary Clinton is a neo con. Not seeing the specifics in what you’re saying
 






Joined
Feb 22, 2020
Messages
1,173
Many people are not going to like where this is going, but I dont care, the truth needs to be told, and these operatives need to be called out for what they are.

I'm going to look first at Krystal Ball of the Hill is Rising, who has really gained popularity with her show where she is partnered with Saagar Enjeti. Enjeti of course used to work for Tucker Carlson, so right there you should at least be mildly suspicious of this show.

Tucker Carlson's website Daily Caller of course is funded by the billionaire Foster Freiss.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Daily_Caller

Freiss is a member of the far right wing think tank COUNCIL FOR NATIONAL POLICY. If you dont know about this group you need to catch up and look at some info in this thread.

https://vigilantcitizenforums.com/threads/the-council-for-national-policy-right-wing-organization-youve-never-heard-of.7171/#post-274596

Now the purpose of the Hill is Rising show seems to be to create a false equivalence between "right wing populism" and "left wing populism" while pushing the idea that Donald Trump and Bernie Sanders are the representatives of each.

This is a false premise.

Donald Trump is not really a populist. He is an elitist who uses right wing "culture wars" to pacify his base. So while he pursues the economic and foreign policy of typical Republicans, he hides this establishment agenda behind divisive culture war issues such as immigration, gun rights, political correctness. Add to this that he is always contradicting himself, and this confuses his die hard followers into believing whatever half of his contradictions they want to believe.

Trump was constructed by elites as an "anti-establishment" politician. This is what the CNP has done, and has been doing for decades.

Anybody who goes along with the false narrative of Trump being "a populist" or a "nationalist" needs to be called out.

Krystall Ball co wrote a book with Saagar "Populists guide to 2020"


Now why really would you co-write a book with a guy who used to work for Tucker Carlson, who is not only promoting Trump as a psuedo "populist/nationalist" but also pushing white nationalist propaganda ?

Again the overarching idea of this book is that its

populism vs establishment politics

and either right wing or left wing populism (characterized by either Bernie Sanders or Donald Trump) is better than "establishment politics"

Well Bernie Sanders is now gone, so the subtle conclusion is SUPPORT DONALD TRUMP.

Well Krystal doesn't need to come out and tell her fans "Vote for Trump" But she can spend all of her time attacking Joe Biden, telling us how Trump "is bad, but not as bad as the MSM makes him out to be" and thus at the very least convince them to stay at home instead of voting, WHICH IS A DEFACTO VOTE FOR TRUMP.

Now wouldn't this explain why Krystal Ball seems to love to go on Tucker Carlson's show and "find common ground" with Tucker, Trump, and the "populist right"

 






Joined
Feb 22, 2020
Messages
1,173
Who exactly are you talking about? Leftists that were subtly pro trump and covered up his Russian collusion connections? The leftist media talked about it for years and it went away because the “Russian connections” were the Israeli Russian oligarchs like Roman abramovich. Trump colluded with Israel and the Zionist lobby to get elected. I suppose you could say Zionism is fascism or Hillary Clinton is a neo con. Not seeing the specifics in what you’re saying
I'm going to be contributing more to this thread, I understand its a bit vague for now, but to name names

Krystal Ball
Jimmy Dore
Michael Tracey
Kim Iverson
Tulsi Gabbard
Niko House
Jamarl Thomas

a lot of these guys are Youtube commentators, but that is the new frontier in the propaganda war.

a lot of "leftists" who appear on Russia Today as well. RT is heavily linked in with this agenda.

Yeah the Russians who colluded with Trump are Zionists, but all these agents are trying to convince you that Russia has nothing to do with Israel
 






Last edited:
Joined
May 18, 2018
Messages
1,539
Tulsi gabbard and Jimmy dore aren’t “fascists”. Tulsi was the only anti war candidate seen for I don’t know how long. She was one of the only ones not bought off by the Zionist lobby.Thus she was buried by the establishment. Jimmy dore is a comedian and has some decent takes. He’s not a fascist unless you are using that word in the sense that you just don’t like him like people sometimes do. I don’t think he is responsible for burying the israeli connection to trump like you claim. Don’t know the other names.

If you want to create connections or theories you should be more careful with your language. Saying things like dore and gabbard are fascist makes you seem hysterical. They’re not. Fascism is a specific ideology with actual historical and contemporary proponents. Using language like that makes whatever connections you are seeing become convoluted.
 






Joined
Feb 22, 2020
Messages
1,173
WHO IS KRYSTAL BALL REALLY WORKING FOR ?

Who is behind THE HILL, that Krystal Ball works for ? If we look at that I think we can find out really what her motives are, and why she seems to be so cozy with Tucker Carlson.

Krystall of course is now being attacked on twitter because of her giving praise to Tucker Carlson over this.


Now I think again that anybody who agrees with the idea that Tucker Carlson is somehow "confronting the Republican establishment" needs to really examine their logic.

Does anybody think Rupert Murdoch, who owns Fox News through Newscorp would actually allow a REAL dissenting voice on his channel ?

Krystal Ball is playing along with this fake "Trump and Tucker are anti-establishment" game.

Now why would she do that ? It wouldn't be because she actually works for Trump supporters AND FRIENDS would it ?

The HILL is run by Jimmy Finkelstein.


Jimmy Finkelstein has been friends with Donald Trump for decades, his wife is close with Melania Trump. Rudy Giuliani, former mayor of NY and Trump lawyer and friend is also good friends with Finkelstein, and Giuliani has spent multiple weekends and Finkelstein's place. Staffers have revolted from The Hill, because Finkelstein has complained when people wrote stories that were "too anti-Trump" and he intervened. Apparently Krystal Ball is not one of the staffers who complained about the pro-Trump bias. The Hill was also a source pushing the pro-Trump narrative during the Ukraine-Gate. Giuliani also attended The Hill TV launching events.

read all in article below.

https://www.cnn.com/2019/11/18/media/jimmy-finkelstein-the-hill-ukraine/index.html

Finkelstein hired another pro-Trump guy to become executive vice president at the Hill and that is one John Solomon

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Solomon_(political_commentator)

- John Solomon formerly an editor in chief at Washington Times (Newspaper run by the CNP)
- FoxNews contributor
- Solomon's stories about Biden lead Trump to ask Ukrainian Prime minister for the quid pro quo
- pro-Trump. Pushed anti-Clinton anti-Biden conspiracies
- was in constact contact with convicted criminal and Giuliani associate Lev Parnas

from his wiki article

In January 2018, it was reported that newsroom staffers at The Hill had complained about Solomon's reporting for the publication.[21][22][23] The staffers reportedly criticized Solomon's reporting as having a conservative bias and missing important context, and that this undermined The Hill's reputation.[21][22] They also expressed concerns over Solomon's close relationship with conservative Fox News personality Sean Hannity, on whose TV show Hannity he appeared on more than a dozen times over a span of three months.[21]

Pro-Donald Trump opinion pieces
Solomon published a story alleging that women who had accused Trump of sexual assault had sought payments from partisan donors and tabloids.
[23]

On June 19, 2019, The Hill published an opinion piece written by Solomon alleging that the FBI and Robert Mueller disregarded warnings that evidence used against Trump’s former campaign manager Paul Manafort may have been faked.[24] His source was Nazar Kholodnytsky, a disgraced Ukrainian prosecutor, and Konstantin Kilimnik, who has been linked to Russian intelligence and who happens to be Manafort's former business partner.


Solomon's role in Ukraine-Gate

Solomon's part in the Trump–Ukraine scandal
Further information: Conspiracy theories related to the Trump–Ukraine scandal

In April 2019, The Hill published two opinion pieces by Solomon regarding allegations by Ukrainian officials that "American Democrats" and particularly former Vice-President Joe Biden of collaborating with "their allies in Kiev" in "wrongdoing...ranging from 2016 election interference to obstructing criminal probes."[26][27] Solomon's stories attracted attention in conservative media.[22] Fox News frequently covered Solomon's claims;[28] Solomon also promoted these allegations on Sean Hannity's Fox News show.[22] According to The Washington Post Solomon's pieces "played an important role in advancing a flawed, Trump-friendly tale of corruption in Ukraine, particularly involving Biden and his son Hunter", and inspired "the alleged effort by Trump and his allies to pressure Ukraine’s government into digging up dirt on Trump’s Democratic rivals."[22] On the same day that The Washington Post published its article, The Hill published another opinion piece by Solomon in which Solomon states that there are "(h)undreds of pages of never-released memos and documents...(that) conflict with Biden’s narrative."[29]

Solomon's stories had significant flaws.[22][19] Not only had the State Department dismissed the allegations presented by Solomon as "an outright fabrication", but the Ukrainian prosecutor who Solomon claimed made the allegations to him is not supporting Solomon's claim.[22][19] Foreign Policy noted that anti-corrupton activists in Ukraine had characterized the source behind Solomon's claims as an unreliable narrator who had hindered anti-corruption efforts in Ukraine.[30] Solomon pushed allegations that Biden wanted to remove a Ukrainian prosecutor in order to prevent an investigation of Burisma, a Ukrainian company that his son, Hunter Biden, served on; however, Western governments and anti-corruption activist wanted the prosecutor removed because he was reluctant to pursue corruption investigations.[19] By September 2019, Solomon said he still stood 100% by his stories.[22] There is no evidence of wrong-doing by Joe Biden and Hunter Biden, and no evidence that Hunter Biden was ever under investigation by Ukrainian authorities.[31] WNYC characterized Solomon's Ukraine stories as laundering of foreign propaganda.[32]

Prior to the publication of a story where Solomon alleged that the Obama administration had pressured the Ukrainian government to stop investigating a group funded by George Soros, Solomon sent the full text of his report to Ukrainian-American businessman Lev Parnas and the two pro-Trump lawyers and conspiracy theorists Joseph diGenova and Victoria Toensing.[33] Solomon said he did so for fact-checking, but Parnas, DiGenova and Toensing were not mentioned in the text, nor did Solomon send individual items of the draft for vetting (but rather the whole draft).[33]

During October 2019 hearings for the impeachment inquiry against Donald Trump, two government officials experienced in Ukraine matters — Alexander Vindman and George Kent — testified that Ukraine-related articles Solomon had written and that were featured in conservative media circles contained a "false narrative" and in some cases were "entirely made up in full cloth."[34][35]

Solomon worked closely with Lev Parnas, an associate of Rudy Giuliani - Trump’s personal attorney – who was indicted for funneling foreign money into American political campaigns, to promote stories that Democrats colluded with a foreign power in the 2016 election (the U.S. intelligence community's assessment is that Russia interfered in the 2016 election to aid Trump, then a Republican presidential candidate). Parnas worked with Solomon on interviews and translation. Solomon defended his work with Parnas: "No one knew there was anything wrong with Lev Parnas at the time. Everybody who approaches me has an angle." Parnas helped to set Solomon up with the Ukrainian prosecutor who accused the Bidens of wrong-doing (before later retracting the claim).[2]

Solomon and the impeachment inquiry against Donald Trump
Solomon has been mentioned in a draft report by the House Intelligence Committee pubished Dec. 3, 2019, documenting President Trump's alleged abuse of office for his personal and political gain by using congressionally approved military aid to induce Ukraine initiate investigations against Trump's domestic political rival. The report documented phone records showing Solomon was in frequent contact with Lev Parnas, a now indicted associate of Giuliani, exchanging "at least 10 calls" during the first week in April.[36]
 






Joined
Feb 22, 2020
Messages
1,173
Tulsi gabbard and Jimmy dore aren’t “fascists”. Tulsi was the only anti war candidate seen for I don’t know how long. She was one of the only ones not bought off by the Zionist lobby.Thus she was buried by the establishment. Jimmy dore is a comedian and has some decent takes. He’s not a fascist unless you are using that word in the sense that you just don’t like him like people sometimes do. I don’t think he is responsible for burying the israeli connection to trump like you claim. Don’t know the other names.
If you want to create connections or theories you should be more careful with your language. Saying things like dore and gabbard are fascist makes you seem hysterical. They’re not. Fascism is a specific ideology with actual historical and contemporary proponents. Using language like that makes whatever connections you are seeing become convoluted.
I didn't say they were fascists. I said they are being controlled and manipulated by fascists.

They are useful idiots who are either too stupid to realize they are spreading fascist propaganda, or they are being paid too handsomely to care.

Tulsi Gabbard is a fraud who I will be discussing later on this thread. She isn't really anti-war, she was just using that as a talking point, same way Trump was back in 2016.

I haven't heard of somebody being "anti-war" yet they are quick to deploy an serve in the army OVERSEAS.

https://www.rollcall.com/2019/08/29/tulsi-gabbard-is-back-from-active-duty-after-being-cut-off-from-her-campaign/
 






Joined
Feb 22, 2020
Messages
1,173
Conrad Black , owner of Hollinger International which owns the far right Jerusalem Post, and the Daily Telegraph bought The Hill in 2002

https://nypost.com/2002/06/27/black-buys-hill-dans-for-20m/

Conrad Black was a former member of Bilderberg, he was knighted by the British Queen, and was pardoned from serving a 6 year sentence for fraud by Donald Trump.

He is also a major editorial contributor to the Epoch Times, a fiercely anti-China paper run by the Falun Gong cult. They promote right wing conspiracy theories like Q-Anon, and are connected to the CIA. Epoch Times are the number one funder of pro-Trump propaganda on the internet.

Conrad Black on epochtimes

https://www.theepochtimes.com/author-conrad-black.

So Krystal Ball is in essence working for the likes of

Conrad Black
Jimmy Finkelstein
John Solomon

All Zionists, all pro-Trump, and all pro-Russia

she works along with and co-wrote a book with a guy who worked for Tucker Carlson, who is also in bed with the far right and the white nationalist movements.

and we should take her seriously as a progressive or a leftist ?
 






Joined
Feb 22, 2020
Messages
1,173
Dore and Tracy are what we call the “dirtbag left”. They hate liberals more than they do fascists and end up enabling people like Trump. Tracy is the worst as he is all but a de facto Trump supporter.

There are a lot of leftists who will spend double the time attacking Biden then they will Trump same happened last time. I cant stand liberals either, but obviously it’s less bad than Donald Trump and the Christian Taliban that backs him.
they spend double the time attacking Biden, because their goal is to get Trump re-elected. End of.

Its just a way to spread fascist propaganda to the left. There is a network of these guys who spend all their time attacking Obama, Clinton, Pelosi, Biden (all despicable figures, but lets have some context PLEASE) They do so to take the heat off of Trump, and often side with him outright.

It should be bloody obvious, but too many have fallen into the "hating liberals/Democrats" schtick.
 






Joined
May 18, 2018
Messages
1,539
Here’s what dore has to say about Biden
If the left wants his vote, don’t run a total retard. They shouldn’t be able to run a despicable candidate and expect you to vote for him because you don’t want trump. They should run a good candidate. That’s how politics works, but in America that escapes from their game.

If you want to see where the left has been infiltrated by fascists, look no further than Pelosi, Biden, Clinton, and Obama. Don’t look at some comedian trying to make sense of this. Look at the actual people doing it.

If you are saying that at the top there is no left and right, they’re all in bed together and “left vs right” is just a show for the masses, this I think is accurate. Hell trump used to be a democrat. He’s probably more leftist than Biden. Although Biden is mentally demented now so I don’t think he has an ideology lol
 






Joined
Feb 22, 2020
Messages
1,173
Here’s what dore has to say about Biden
If the left wants his vote, don’t run a total retard. They shouldn’t be able to run a despicable candidate and expect you to vote for him because you don’t want trump. They should run a good candidate. That’s how politics works, but in America that escapes from their game.
I agree. Biden is literally the worst candidate the Democrats could have chosen out of all who ran, with the exception of Bloomberg. Its my opinion that this was done on purpose to make Trump's re election as easy as possible.

If you want to see where the left has been infiltrated by fascists, look no further than Pelosi, Biden, Clinton, and Obama. Don’t look at some comedian trying to make sense of this. Look at the actual people doing it.
those are all corporatists for sure, or neoliberals, and yes they have infiltrated the left, but they aren't outright fascists. What the comedian is doing however, is ignoring the vast amount of investigative journalism he could be doing into Trump and instead focusing all of his time and energy into making the Democrats look bad, and thus propping up Trump by default. Also completely SHILLING his soul for Trump over Russiagate. He is one of the worst ones out there. Dore is a fascist enabler.
If you are saying that at the top there is no left and right, they’re all in bed together and “left vs right” is just a show for the masses, this I think is accurate. Hell trump used to be a democrat. He’s probably more leftist than Biden. Although Biden is mentally demented now so I don’t think he has an ideology lol
Yeah I'm kind of saying that but there are differences between what I see as the 2 different factions of elites which operate.

while they both agree on many things, they do see things differently and have different ways of attaining similar goals.

Trump being a Democrat was a ruse. Trump and his family have been linked in with the John Birch Society crowd which have a hard right view, so I would say he was simply infiltrating that crowd. Guys like Manafort and Roy Cohn were talking about Trump running for president back in the 80's.[/QUOTE]
 






Joined
May 14, 2017
Messages
1,177
Can fascists really infiltrate right-wing politics? In America, there is no real "left-wing"; the most "radical" candidate we had is Bernie Sanders, who would be center-left in any other country. Rank and file Democrats love to chime in how progressive they are but the party is center-right.

I mean at risk of you thinking I'm a fascist... Donald Trump is fucking awful, but I don't think the best way to fight an increasing shift to the right is to follow along and try to "appeal to the moderates" and that's just what the Democratic Party is doing (and has done) for a long time. Some people, especially young people who still have fire, are getting sick of that.





I suppose you could say Zionism is fascism.
Isn't it? Objectively. Zionism tends to be far-right, authoritarian when influencing government, and very militaristic.
 






Joined
Feb 22, 2020
Messages
1,173
Can fascists really infiltrate right-wing politics? In America, there is no real "left-wing"; the most "radical" candidate we had is Bernie Sanders, who would be center-left in any other country. Rank and file Democrats love to chime in how progressive they are but the party is center-right.

I mean at risk of you thinking I'm a fascist... Donald Trump is fucking awful, but I don't think the best way to fight an increasing shift to the right is to follow along and try to "appeal to the moderates" and that's just what the Democratic Party is doing (and has done) for a long time. Some people, especially young people who still have fire, are getting sick of that.
I agree with you 100%

I dont want any "moderates" I'm really pissed off about what happened to Sanders, who you correctly point out isn't even really that radical at all.

But when people who are supposedly "progressives" spend all their energy making Democrats look bad, and buy into fake narratives about Trump or Tucker Carlson being "anti-establishment" or somehow "better than the Dems" then that is a problem.
 






Tidal

Star
Joined
Mar 4, 2020
Messages
2,057
During the 2016 election Donald Trump outflanked Hillary Clinton on many issues, which helped to solidify his "anti-establishment" credentials. Of course it was all a ruse to get elected, but an effective strategy none the less...

Don didn't need any "ruse" to get elected; the great American people took one look at Hillary and decided "no way do we want her"..
:D
 






Joined
Feb 22, 2020
Messages
1,173
this guy really gets it. He's made some good videos calling out these "leftists" who all seem to be some crazy Tulsi Gabbard cult and they all love Tucker Carlson. Here he is calling them out. Especially Kim Iversen and Jimmy Dore.


 






Last edited:

Tidal

Star
Joined
Mar 4, 2020
Messages
2,057
While it is true that the Democrats are corrupt and hypocrital, the hyper focus on this, while ignoring or whitewashing the greater crimes of the Trump regime..

Speaking of "crimes", Obama and his babe Hillary gave the Iran terror regime permission to build nukes, and as a neutral English observer I can't help wondering whose side the Dems are on?..:eek:


-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 






Joined
Feb 22, 2020
Messages
1,173
This will all tie into the LaRouche network. You look hard enough and you’ll find the connections. All the dirtbag left ties into LaRouche.
hmmm, interesting. I haven't seen any links between LaRouche and any of these people I have outlined. I know that Webster Tarpley had a fallout with LaRouche long ago. He's the only one I'm aware of and I like Tarpley's work.

LaRouche tbh has done some good work with his Executive intelligence review, but yeah they allied with the white nationalist Liberty Lobby back in the 80's I believe which is highly suspicious.

what are these connections specifically ?



so does every conspiracy theory here.

Literally this website promotes LaRouche propaganda and his topics are routinely discussed here
[/QUOTE]

what are the LaRouche propaganda and conspiracies that this website promotes ?
 






Top