The "Coming" Class System

Karlysymon

Superstar
Joined
Mar 18, 2017
Messages
6,339
This guy (Clive Thompson), not wanting to be alarmist claims that once the economic reset happens, it will be beneficial to the little man on the street but Klaus Schwab says that this transition is going to be "socially very painful". Maybe it is why we see this push for suicide as the easy way out.
(17mins to end)

"There aren’t many people in the world who talk regularly to as many CEOs and world leaders as you do. What are you hearing and feeling about the economic outlook for ’23?

I wouldn’t relate it only to ’23. We are in a restructuring of the global economy. When you have a restructuring in a company, you write off the costs on your balance sheet, and shareholders are suffering and sometimes employees have to go. But when you have a restructuring of an economy, it bites into the purchasing power of the people. We should not look at the global economy with a crisis mindset and a short-term approach. We have to manage in a strategic way this transformation period, which may last three, four, five years and will be socially very painful."

"Deep societal fragmentation" won't just be on the economic level but on the genetic level as well...which is what the 4IR is all about.
 

Karlysymon

Superstar
Joined
Mar 18, 2017
Messages
6,339
Interesting

1924
1675685932376.png

Social credit is a distributive philosophy of political economy developed by C. H. Douglas. Douglas attributed economic downturns to discrepancies between the cost of goods and the compensation of the workers who made them. To combat what he saw as a chronic deficiency of purchasing power in the economy, Douglas prescribed government intervention in the form of the issuance of debt-free money directly to consumers or producers (if they sold their product below cost to consumers) in order to combat such discrepancy.[1]

In defence of his ideas, Douglas wrote that "Systems were made for men, and not men for systems, and the interest of man which is self-development, is above all systems, whether theological, political or economic."[2] Douglas said that Social Crediters want to build a new civilization based upon "absolute economic security" for the individual, where "they shall sit every man under his vine and under his fig tree; and none shall make them afraid."[3][4] In his words, "what we really demand of existence is not that we shall be put into somebody else's Utopia, but we shall be put in a position to construct a Utopia of our own."[5]

The idea of social credit attracted considerable interest in the interwar period, with the Alberta Social Credit Party briefly distributing "prosperity certificates" to the Albertan populace. However, Douglas opposed the distribution of prosperity certificates which were based upon the theories of Silvio Gesell.[6] Douglas' theory of social credit has been disputed and rejected by most economists and bankers. Prominent economist John Maynard Keynes references Douglas's ideas in his book The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money,[7] but instead poses the principle of effective demand to explain differences in output and consumption.



 
Last edited:

Karlysymon

Superstar
Joined
Mar 18, 2017
Messages
6,339
It's interesting to me that this report was funded by Wellcome Trust.

Experts in politics and public health will gather in Newcastle this week to discuss how Universal Basic Income could provide a solution to the UK’s current economic and public health crises.

As the price of fuel, food and other essentials continues to soar, the cost-of-living crisis is hitting communities in the North of England particularly hard. This is causing unprecedented pressure on households, resulting in an increase in the number of people suffering from mental health conditions such as anxiety and depression – particularly among 16–24-year-olds.

With conventional policy making failing to tackle the crisis, a new Royal Society of Arts report, led by Professor Matthew Johnson, of Northumbria University, explores an alternative solution – the introduction of Universal Basic Income (UBI).

Under the scheme, every UK citizen would receive regular payments to support their basic needs. This addresses a fundamental grievance about the present welfare system: that it does not support those who are aspirational, hard working and responsible. UBI grants security to those who are presently being squeezed by the cost-of-living and upcoming mortgage cost crises, especially those who were, until recently, ‘just about managing’.

Findings by Professor Johnson and his research colleagues reveal that:

  • UBI is economically feasible,
  • that it can prevent or delay a wide range of health conditions
  • that it is particularly effective in mitigating the mental health pandemic among young people
  • and that public support for UBI is strong, especially in the ‘red wall’ constituencies of Wales, the Midlands and North of England.
A full report of their research, which has been funded by the Wellcome Trust, will be launched in Newcastle on Friday (7 October).
 

Karlysymon

Superstar
Joined
Mar 18, 2017
Messages
6,339
This is exactly what the group in the OP claimed: Digital money will be capped so the only question here is whether the millionaires and billionares will have their money capped too.

Britons would be limited to 20,000 digital pounds ($24,000) each if the country goes ahead with a digital currency, Bank of England Deputy Governor Jon Cunliffe said on Tuesday.

Britain's government said on Monday that it and the BoE were pressing on with work on a possible digital pound that was likely to enter circulation in the second half of this decade and be held in a "wallet" provided by banks, although no final decision has been made.

"We propose a limit of between 10,000 pounds and 20,000 pounds per individual as the appropriate balance between managing risks and supporting wide usability of the digital pound," Cunliffe said in a speech.

A limit of 10,000 pounds would mean that three quarters of people could receive their pay in digital pounds as well as holding pre-existing balances in the same account, while a 20,000 pound limit would allow almost everyone to use digital pounds for day-to-day transactions, Cunliffe said.

 

FilthPig

Veteran
Joined
Jul 28, 2021
Messages
740
so the only question here is whether the millionaires and billionares will have their money capped too.
Billionaires have very little wealth in the bank . Most of their wealth is in stocks,real estate etc .If money dissapears they will remain wealthy .
All those billionaires are tied to tax-heavens and other crooked places like swizerland so the laws mentioned above will probably not apply to them.Only for "peasants" who will be locked to their zone/gated community/smart city. Billionaires will be "global citizens" with their 2-3 passports and they will register themselves into Cayman islands or to some other maffia country and they will live very differently than the modern peasant bug-eaters ... Peasants will be pushed into smart-city's while they will be living in country side mansions or in some exotic island etc.
 

Karlysymon

Superstar
Joined
Mar 18, 2017
Messages
6,339
Billionaires have very little wealth in the bank . Most of their wealth is in stocks,real estate etc .If money dissapears they will remain wealthy .
All those billionaires are tied to tax-heavens and other crooked places like swizerland so the laws mentioned above will probably not apply to them.Only for "peasants" who will be locked to their zone/gated community/smart city. Billionaires will be "global citizens" with their 2-3 passports and they will register themselves into Cayman islands or to some other maffia country and they will live very differently than the modern peasant bug-eaters ... Peasants will be pushed into smart-city's while they will be living in country side mansions or in some exotic island etc.
If money in the bank is going to have a cap, it stands to reason that hard assets will be capped too and the concept of 15min cities will make sure of that. It will be difficult to run/own a business or even just owning land or a house in another city, town, district, state, country. Ofcourse, the billionaires will be exempt. Which is why MSM is awash with articles such as this
1677410411969.png
 

Karlysymon

Superstar
Joined
Mar 18, 2017
Messages
6,339
2019
Professor Larry Backer of Penn State University writes in a 2018 paper that resistance to social credit systems in the West could be dissolved when the masses are “socialized… as a collective” and “…the great culture management machinery of Western society develop a narrative in which such activity is naturalized within Western culture.”
Backer proposes that the “great culture management machinery of the West normalize the idea of social credit and sharing private data. Backer writes:

But is it possible to socialize the masses, or even mass democracy as a collective, to embrace this pattern of data disclosure beyond these immediately self-serving closed loop systems? Would it be possible for the state to develop systems for the enforcement of laws (criminal and regulatory) that depends on intelligence by inducing the masses to serve as positive contributors of data necessary for enforcement or regulation? The answer, in Western liberal democracies, may depend on the ability of the great culture management machinery of Western society– its television, movies and other related media–to develop a narrative in which such activity is naturalized within Western culture."
 

TempestOfTempo

Superstar
Joined
Jan 29, 2018
Messages
7,602
2019
Professor Larry Backer of Penn State University writes in a 2018 paper that resistance to social credit systems in the West could be dissolved when the masses are “socialized… as a collective” and “…the great culture management machinery of Western society develop a narrative in which such activity is naturalized within Western culture.”
Backer proposes that the “great culture management machinery of the West normalize the idea of social credit and sharing private data. Backer writes:

But is it possible to socialize the masses, or even mass democracy as a collective, to embrace this pattern of data disclosure beyond these immediately self-serving closed loop systems? Would it be possible for the state to develop systems for the enforcement of laws (criminal and regulatory) that depends on intelligence by inducing the masses to serve as positive contributors of data necessary for enforcement or regulation? The answer, in Western liberal democracies, may depend on the ability of the great culture management machinery of Western society– its television, movies and other related media–to develop a narrative in which such activity is naturalized within Western culture."
I wonder if he's one of the American academia "tech experts" who helped build China's Uighur surveillance/surveillance state/social credit (control) systems?
 
Last edited:

Karlysymon

Superstar
Joined
Mar 18, 2017
Messages
6,339
This is exactly what the group in the OP claimed: Digital money will be capped so the only question here is whether the millionaires and billionares will have their money capped too.

Britons would be limited to 20,000 digital pounds ($24,000) each if the country goes ahead with a digital currency, Bank of England Deputy Governor Jon Cunliffe said on Tuesday.

Britain's government said on Monday that it and the BoE were pressing on with work on a possible digital pound that was likely to enter circulation in the second half of this decade and be held in a "wallet" provided by banks, although no final decision has been made.

"We propose a limit of between 10,000 pounds and 20,000 pounds per individual as the appropriate balance between managing risks and supporting wide usability of the digital pound," Cunliffe said in a speech.

A limit of 10,000 pounds would mean that three quarters of people could receive their pay in digital pounds as well as holding pre-existing balances in the same account, while a 20,000 pound limit would allow almost everyone to use digital pounds for day-to-day transactions, Cunliffe said.
Amazingly, this news broke in early 2021 as the vaxx rollout was getting underway. It didn't register on our radar because we didn't know anything about the CSRQ management software.

Euro-area residents’ holdings of a future digital currency could be limited to 3,000 euros ($3,633) to prevent bank runs, European Central Bank Executive Board member Fabio Panetta suggested in an interview with Germany’s Spiegel.

Panetta insisted fears that digital currency initiatives could lead to systemic instability by offering consumers the safer alternative of storing money directly with the central bank were unfounded due to precautionary measures.

1678020223010.png
 
Last edited:

Lil axe

Veteran
Joined
May 11, 2020
Messages
893
"Coming" in quotes because it looks like the infrastructure is already in place, it only awaits a "good crisis" that won't be wasted. I'd posted a video of theirs in a couple of threads but now that i've read quite abit of what's posted on their website, iam very intrigued and i thought the whole thing deserves a thread. The purpose of the thread is mainly to post corroboration that TPTB have filtered through MSM. Iam intrigued by the material on their site and if people see bits and pieces of information in MSM that corroborates the Oculum material, then maybe people will take it more seriously.


C- Common Class
Amount of accounts: 7.1 Billion or 95.5% of humans (approximate)

Covid vaccination required: Yes

Booster shots required: Yes (2 or more)

Monthly USDR stipend: $1,000.00

Asset limitations: Yes (no greater than $5,000 USDR net worth at any given time)

Account limitations: Yes (bank account cannot exceed $1,000 USDR)

Carbon score: Yes (restricts travel and food consumption; 1 is lowest and best, 500 is highest and worst).

S – Sovereign Class

Amount of accounts: 7-8 Million or 0.1% of humans (approximate)

Covid vaccination required: No

Booster shots required: No

Monthly USDR stipend: N/A

Asset limitations: No (no maximum or ceiling for total net worth)

Account limitations: No (bank account has no limit)

Carbon score: No (no score is calculated or enforced)

R – Restricted

Amount of accounts: 250 Million or 3.36% of humans (approximate)

Covid vaccination required: Yes

Booster shots required: Yes (3 or more)

Monthly USDR Stipend: $500.00

Asset limitations: Yes (no greater than $1,000 net worth at any given time)

Account limitations: Yes (bank account cannot exceed $500 USDR)

Carbon score: Yes (restricts travel and food consumption; 1 is lowest and best, 500 is highest and worst).

Q – Quarantined

Amount of accounts: 75 Million or 1% of humans (approximate)

Covid vaccination required: Yes

Booster shots required: Yes (5 or more)

Monthly USDR Per Month: $250.00

Asset limitations: Yes (no greater than $500 net worth at any given time)

Account limitations: Yes (bank account cannot exceed $250 USDR)

Carbon score: Yes (restricts travel and food consumption; 1 is lowest and best, 500 is highest and worst).

Each class also contains separate screens for fines, demerits, penalties and so on, as well as sections for rewards for good behaviour.

Sovereign accounts do not have these variables, though they appear to contain a separate module for certain benefits, such as vacations, golf club memberships and so on.
just started to read this thread, reminded me of politician in manitoba, when asked why government gyms were open and public ones were closed, his response " public health orders dont apply to any level of government

video -

-
also when i watch behind the scenes of filming documentaries or bands performing or movie production, workers are masked up, higher ups are not
 
Top