Now I'm not going to apologise for posting this link again but it is a perfect example of how Government/BBC construct utter bullsh*t "news programmes" and present them as fact.
Take particular notice at 47 seconds in when BBC News-whore Victoria Derbyshire, just at the very end of her "report" says the information came from an eye-witness. It's just as they fade her voice out, listen carefully. So that means that the news they were reading out came from somebody who actually seen it, does it not?
That brings up the obvious question why did the "investigation" not start there? Surely any reporter would have to take the personal details of anyone giving them information as an eye witnesses?
Now moving on to the "Professor" who's main job was to convince us it was all a trick of the mind, a common phenomena apparantly. Yeah we draw inferences from what we may have seen and then information from outside sources becomes accessable and can contaminate our memory.... Yea it makes perfect sense that, just one little thing you forgot to mention. Most people's f#@ing inferences were given to them by some lying b*stard BBC employee saying he saw it happen!!!
Now on to Mr Jody Martin. Now I think he played the role of axe-wielding superhero a lot better than the observant bystander.
He arrived at the same time as the fire brigade and there was smoke "billowing out" of a 4th story window? He then saw a woman holding her toddler out of a horizontally opening lifter window, and she was getting to the bottom of the window to get air, this implies the window wouldn't open fully... So how the f@#k is she dangling her toddler out of it? Did she put her through sideways then turn her upright?!?!
The important question to ask here is did this happen before he had ran in the building with an axe or after? Because that's what he told the BBC on camera the day after it happened!
Now you know why the comments section on these videos are locked, it's for protection.
So let's look at the conclusion of Newsnight's investigation.
Look, this woman said she saw it and next thing all the newspapers except the Sun had ran it. Two days later the Sun runs a story showing actual pictures of the hero baby catcher but that turned out to be b*llocks. Now the woman is suffering with memory problems and doesn't want to talk about it anymore and that Olu fella probably knows nothing about it so we didn't speak to him.
Now we know George said he had seen it but he had been up all night so he was probably that tired he didn't know what he was saying, we didn't feel it was fair to approach George to try and recall what he saw on such a contentious issue.
Now we did manage to find somebody who was right at the scene and he can confirm that no baby was dropped and what people actually saw was a selfless mother oxygenating her child whilst waiting for fire brigade rescue. We didn't bother looking for her or think she was important to this particular investigation and can not confirm if she is alive or dead... Or even existed in the first place.
So half the people who said they saw it didn't exist and the other half don't want to talk about it.
We can only conclude that maybe it didn't happen but it wasn't the media's fault for making people think it did happen.... Honest.