The American “Coup d’etat”

justjess

Superstar
Joined
Mar 16, 2017
Messages
11,510
well it’s November 19. Where are these groundbreaking audits. Arizona is done and found no fraud and in case you had trouble counting before Georgia and Pennsylvania turned blue, Biden was already winning at that point.

he doesn’t need either state to win.
Georgia completed the audit he was talking about yesterday. Biden still won. No significant discrepancies were found.
 

justjess

Superstar
Joined
Mar 16, 2017
Messages
11,510
Dominion's link to Venezuela and Chavez was even investigated in the MSM a few years ago. You don't know shit. Carry on with your TDS though.


Excerpt

"Smartmatic enters the game
On April 11, 2000, three young Venezuelan engineers, Antonio Mugica, Alfredo José Anzola and Roger Piñate, founded the company Smartmatic in Delaware, United States. Due to their concern about the obsolescence of elections worldwide, the Venezuelan group dedicated themselves to the development of a software that could manage the electoral processes in a better way.

According to the New York Times, at the beginning of 2004, a Venezuelan government financing agency invested more than US$ 200,000 in a technology company owned by the same owners of Smartmatic: Bitza.

By that year, Venezuela was going through a severe political storm. The Venezuelan opposition, after months of demonstrations against the government of Hugo Chávez, managed to arrange a referendum against the leader of the Bolivarian Revolution. Finally, it was agreed that the referendum would be held on August 15, 2004. And, in the bidding process for the award of the contract to the company that would build the voting system, the SBC consortium won: Smartmatic, Bitza and CANTV, the Venezuelan phone company.

The recall referendum was the first Venezuelan election to have the software designed by the three young engineers. It was not a good start, since civil organizations such as Súmate (led by María Corina Machado), denounced the possibility of fraud. On that August 15, 2004, the Bolivarian system began to consolidate, leading to a cruel dictatorship accustomed to electoral fraud.

After the failed referendum, Smartmatic won two more contracts with the government of Hugo Chávez. Thanks to the income from these agreements, the company was able to amass a small fortune. In March 2005, it bought from the British firm De La Rue the much larger and more established electronic voting company, Sequoia Voting Systems, for US$ 16 million.

The battle for Sequoia
“Since its acquisition by Smartmatic in March 2005, Sequoia has worked hard to market its voting machines in Latin America and other developing countries,” reads a report in The New York Times.

“The goal is to create the world leader in electronic voting solutions,” Smartmatic spokesman Mitch Stoller told the U.S. newspaper.

An important detail is that, right after the company of the three Venezuelans acquired the electronic voting company Sequoia, Smartmatic reorganized itself into a holding of several companies with headquarters in Delaware (Smartmatic International), the Netherlands (Smartmatic International Holding, B.V.) and Curaçao (Smartmatic International Group, N.V.).

But not everything went well for Smartmatic. Its relationship with the regime of Hugo Chávez made some people in the United States uncomfortable, and in May 2006, Democratic Congresswoman Carolyn Maloney asked the Treasury Department to investigate Smartmatic’s purchase of Sequoia.

“I am writing because of possible investments by the Venezuelan Government in Smartmatic, an electronic voting company with business in the United States, and its acquisition of Sequoia, a U.S.-based electronic voting company,” reads the letter Maloney sent to then-Treasury Department Secretary John W. Snow.


Speaking to the New York Times, Maloney said, “The government should know who owns our voting machines. This is a national security concern.”

At the time of the publication of The New York Times report on October 29, 2006, Sequoia Voting Systems, owned by Smartmatic, had “voting equipment installed in 17 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.”

Sequoia’s machines began to be tested and, as in Venezuela, irregularities began to occur: in August 2007, then California Secretary of State Debra Bowen withdrew approval and vetoed Sequoia’s voting and optical scan machines after “a review of the machines certified for use in California in 2007 found significant security weaknesses in the entire Sequoia system.”

All of the software that Sequoia was using was, in fact, from Smartmatic. The old voting machines were renovated and all of their technology was developed and patented. As a consequence of the changes that Smartmatic was promoting in Sequoia, the company managed to be successful until, after the controversies and the warning call from Congresswoman Maloney, the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States ordered, in November 2007, that Smartmatic sell Sequoia.

In an article published on April 10, 2008, journalist Bradley Friedman writes: “Smartmatic had been forced to relinquish control of Sequoia after the media and Congress noticed that the company had links to Hugo Chávez.” In the end, the buyers were the company’s own managers, but those with U.S. citizenship.

But the verdict did not end Smartmatic’s controversial relationship with Sequoia. In fact, in April 2008 a market competitor, Hart InterCivic, tried to acquire Sequoia in a hostile move. This led to the involvement of the courts. Smartmatic was exposed.

Court documents unearthed at the time revealed that Smartmatic still retained much of the financial control of Sequoia. Smartmatic also continued to retain, due to the contract signed, ownership of the rights to some of the products that Sequoia had deployed throughout the United States. In fact, Sequoia’s CEO at the time was Jack Blaine, who had been an executive at Smartmatic.

Finally, pressure was applied and the owners of Sequoia, who had been exposed shortly before, sold the company on June 4, 2010. The buyer, this time, was a small Canadian company that manufactures electronic voting equipment and optical scanners: Dominion Voting Systems.

That day the Canadian company not only bought Sequoia, but also acquired all the software and technological development that Smartmatic had patented and which the controversial company linked to Chavismo still owned.

Almost an oligopoly
Before Dominion Voting Systems acquired Sequoia on June 4, 2010 —taking approximately 20 percent of the American electoral market presence— the Canadian company had already made a major breakthrough in the system. One that went virtually unnoticed in the public sphere: Dominion bought Premier Election Solutions, also known as Diebold/Premier, in 2010.

With the sudden acquisition of Sequoia and Diebold/Premier, Dominion now has —in approximate numbers— 50 % of the private electoral market of the electronic vote in the United States. There were two competitors left: ES&S, with 40%, and Hart InterCivic, with 10%, according to a Huffington Post report published in 2017.

A press release distributed by Dominion on May 19, 2010, highlights the agreement with ES&S —Premier Election was a wholly-owned subsidiary of ES&S— and celebrates the acquisition of the company’s main assets, including intellectual property, software, firmware and hardware of its voting systems.

ES&S, by the way, is forced to sell Premier Election Solutions by a Department of Justice requirement due to potential monopoly concerns —which prevents it from dominating most of the private electoral market—. Dominion took advantage of this.

According to Dominion, the agreement was approved by the U.S. Department of Justice and nine state and federal attorneys general, while retaining “the right to hire current and former Premier employees and to enter into agreements with Premier distributors experienced in implementing and supporting these systems.”

With the purchase, Dominion limited the ability of ES&S to sell Premier equipment. And the same Canadian company noted that “Premier’s voting systems are currently used in more than 1,400 jurisdictions in 33 states and serve nearly 28 million U.S. voters.” In short, a roundtable purchase for a new “titan” of the American private electoral market.

“It’s not exactly an oligopoly, but it’s like one,” Charles Stewart, a political science professor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), told the Wall Street Journal of the skillful way in which e-voting companies have moved.

But behind that pair of acquisitions that positioned Dominion at the top of the electoral market, there was a black hand related to Smartmatic.

The Huffington Post investigates
According to the Huffington Postin an exclusive report that revealed the relationship between Smartmatic, Sequoia and Dominion— “The ‘intellectual property’ of the voting systems (of Sequoia, acquired by Dominion) remains the property of the company linked to the Venezuelan president (Smartmatic and Hugo Chávez), despite the rather misleading press statement” issued by Dominion in 2010.

The report mentions, among many other details, that the intellectual property “of most/almost all of Sequoia’s voting systems was actually secretly owned by the firm Smartmatic”, linked to Chavism and the numerous electoral fraud scandals in Venezuela.

Then, from a moment to another in 2010, a small Canadian company linked to Smartmatic bought a large part of the private electoral market and entered the US from its offices in Colorado.

Later, it was discovered that Smartmatic still had interests with Sequoia and, to make matters worse, controlled the company’s intellectual property, even reserving rights to negotiate through non-competition agreements abroad. The Foreign Investment Committee had agreed to close the investigation if Smartmatic divested itself of Sequoia in its entirety.

Now, who is the real owner of the Sequoia intellectual property that was acquired by Dominion? According to the Huffington Post’s article, Chris Riggall, a spokesman for Dominion, confirmed that “Smartmatic’s intellectual property was not included in the Sequoia transaction because Sequoia did not own it.”

The big detail is that Dominion, in its press release, secured the purchase of “Sequoia’s inventory and all intellectual property.” In other words, misleading or directly false information that happened without suspicion.

Riggall himself was questioned for this inconsistency between Dominion’s press release and the reality of the acquisition. The spokesman’s response was revealing:
Thank GOD we have those paper backup ballots then, huh?
 
Joined
Feb 22, 2020
Messages
2,506
They hand counted the ballots that were in question due to the dominion software. They had paper backups. The results were confirmed for Biden. There were no statistically significant differences between the paper ballot results and the results tabulated by the software. They also walked back the claim in pennsylvania that their observers weren’t allowed in and admitted that in fact they were, now they aren’t happy with how close they were allowed to stand? Both sides observers had to follow the same rules including distancing.

trump and his legal team are just going to keep switching goalposts until their out of time hoping anything they throw at the wall sticks enough to convince their base they’ve been cheated - god only knows to what ends.
Dominion has been used all the way back in 2000. So Dominion twice favoured Bush and once favoured Trump. But we are to believe all of a sudden it cheated against Trump ?

These guys just make up any stupid conspiracy theory on the spot, and their cult followers believe them simply because it contradicts the MSM.

Believe it or not there is something with far worse credibility than the MSM

Trump's network of "alt media" and social media shills. Far less credible than the MSM, and we are witnessing that in real time with this whole election thing.
 

justjess

Superstar
Joined
Mar 16, 2017
Messages
11,510
Dominion has been used all the way back in 2000. So Dominion twice favoured Bush and once favoured Trump. But we are to believe all of a sudden it cheated against Trump ?

These guys just make up any stupid conspiracy theory on the spot, and their cult followers believe them simply because it contradicts the MSM.

Believe it or not there is something with far worse credibility than the MSM

Trump's network of "alt media" and social media shills. Far less credible than the MSM, and we are witnessing that in real time with this whole election thing.
Yeah I get that. But it doesn’t even matter. If they think it should be checked.. let them check. We have paper backups for a reason. The issue is we have now checked the paper backups and now that isn’t good enough. We can’t keep switching goalposts for the rest of eternity because trump got his ego bruised. The big secret was that trump supporters were never the silent majority, they are a dying breed and accepting that hurts their egos too.
 

justjess

Superstar
Joined
Mar 16, 2017
Messages
11,510
You'll have to dumb it down even more, Jess, cause all I'm hearing is the typical laissez-faire capitalist argument against economic protectionism. You're not a mouth-piece for laissez-faire capitalism, are you? Or will you appropriate anything just so you can bash Trump?

The whole point of these tariffs is to incentivise people to buy American. The prices go up if you buy Chinese.

What recession are you even talking about? The recession induced by lockdowns? By the end of 2019, middle class income rose by $6.000, the American average with $4.000. Your customers have less money during the COVID19 pandemic? No shit. You're just about as dishonest as the article using that misleading graph. "Because of these tariffs" in some cases. So what? You win some, you lose some. NOT implementing those tariffs would've meant American SMEs in the sector to continue to suffer as they have been for decades.
Your. An. Idiot.

the tarrifs on steel and aluminum have significantly increased the cost of equipment and materials I use in my own American small business and your going to tell me I’m full of shit? From your comfy socialized perch in Europe? Gtfoh.

if the tarrifs are so great for American business why has he granted exemptions from them for al the high powered multimillion dollar corporations who could afford the lawyers to ask him to do so?


Wake the fuck up. This isn’t about helping Americans.This is about destroying small business by making them even less competitive with the global tycoons then they already were.
 
Joined
Feb 22, 2020
Messages
2,506
The real coup de' tat is Trump trying to remain in office thus becoming a dictator.

I still do not put that past these guys.

and like I have been saying for half a decade, if or when these guys are kicked out of office, they will activate their right wing terror network (White ISIS) and you will see an increase of anti-government terrorism.

Again this plan has been in the works for well over half a century.

"Conspiracists" try to claim TPTB want to destroy the 2nd ammendment, but thats hogwash, I truly hope we will not see the real reason why the 2nd ammendment is so dear to them, and why they have flooded America with all kinds of weapons, but I suspect that will soon become apparent to those who have eyes to see.

Qanon ties into this as well. The conspiracy movement and Qanon on a much more widespread basis, are brainwashing the public to hate the government on behalf of the fascist network. There will be calls, both subliminal and overt to pick up arms (2nd ammendment) and do something about "the corrupt, lying, cheating pedophiles" who run the system. But not just to act against the government, but also the common citizens who support them. Basically anybody who is not a part of this fascist cult is a target. See any similarities to ISIS ?

Dark days ahead
 

justjess

Superstar
Joined
Mar 16, 2017
Messages
11,510
lol, the coup already happened. Evidence, even proof of the election fraud is rampant in this thread alone, which you not undeliberately chose to ignore.

Voter fraud in Pennsylvania, and Michigan, and Wisconsin, and Georgia, and Arizona, and Nevada, and Virginia, and New Mexico, and California, and who knows how many more.
Why aren’t they challenging the states they won in? Why aren’t the challenging the confessional results? Why wouldn’t the Dems have gotten rid of McConnell instead - who’s a much bigger issue if we are being honest? Yelling something repeatedly doesn’t make it true.

they counted the paper ballots. He still lost. It’s over.
 

TempestOfTempo

Superstar
Joined
Jan 29, 2018
Messages
8,076
What are you talking about? There are hard coups with the use of military force, whether foreign or domestic, and you have soft coups executed through subversion tactics, or as in the case of the Dems and the 2020 US elections, voter fraud.
I dont think there is any "coup" in place by tptb. If dissent was that strong, there would have never been these controlled, sham primaries and elections in the first place. But I respect your opinion on the matter.
 

TempestOfTempo

Superstar
Joined
Jan 29, 2018
Messages
8,076
Yeah, but who is on Trump’s side? Could you name them and identify their position of power? Please don’t say Russia, lol
I think his masters are formidible enough that they have contingency plans to continue their efforts and agenda's... regardless who emerges "victorious" from this election cycle.
 
Joined
Apr 13, 2017
Messages
4,424
There is no distinction. One fuels the other. Globalism, as in NWO, can’t exist without the global markets that tie us together.

there is no National sovereignity without real isolationism. Real isolationism requires not manufacturing cheap shoes and ties in China to save a couple bucks on labor. You can’t seperate any pieces of this chain out. And I can’t take a “nationalist” who benefits from globalism on a massive scale serious whatsoever.
So now you’re going to explain to people what “real nationalism” is? You have to be kidding, right?
 
Joined
Apr 13, 2017
Messages
4,424
They hand counted the ballots that were in question due to the dominion software. They had paper backups. The results were confirmed for Biden. There were no statistically significant differences between the paper ballot results and the results tabulated by the software. They also walked back the claim in pennsylvania that their observers weren’t allowed in and admitted that in fact they were, now they aren’t happy with how close they were allowed to stand? Both sides observers had to follow the same rules including distancing.

trump and his legal team are just going to keep switching goalposts until their out of time hoping anything they throw at the wall sticks enough to convince their base they’ve been cheated - god only knows to what ends.
They did not walk back the claim in PA. You need to stop getting your info from the MSM. The entire team of Trump lawyers has denied it.
 

A.J.

Star
Joined
Mar 14, 2017
Messages
1,249
A few of you were wondering about Covid-19 and the purpose of all the chaos that’s befallen us. Thankfully, they always tip their hand......


Welcome To 2030: I Own Nothing, Have No Privacy And Life Has Never Been Better

World Economic Forum04:26am EST
By Ida Auken

Welcome to the year 2030. Welcome to my city - or should I say, "our city." I don't own anything. I don't own a car. I don't own a house. I don't own any appliances or any clothes.

It might seem odd to you, but it makes perfect sense for us in this city. Everything you considered a product, has now become a service. We have access to transportation, accommodation, food and all the things we need in our daily lives. One by one all these things became free, so it ended up not making sense for us to own much.

First communication became digitized and free to everyone. Then, when clean energy became free, things started to move quickly. Transportation dropped dramatically in price. It made no sense for us to own cars anymore, because we could call a driverless vehicle or a flying car for longer journeys within minutes. We started transporting ourselves in a much more organized and coordinated way when public transport became easier, quicker and more convenient than the car. Now I can hardly believe that we accepted congestion and traffic jams, not to mention the air pollution from combustion engines. What were we thinking?
Sometimes I use my bike when I go to see some of my friends. I enjoy the exercise and the ride. It kind of gets the soul to come along on the journey. Funny how some things seem never seem to lose their excitement: walking, biking, cooking, drawing and growing plants. It makes perfect sense and reminds us of how our culture emerged out of a close relationship with nature.

In our city we don't pay any rent, because someone else is using our free space whenever we do not need it. My living room is used for business meetings when I am not there.

Once in a while, I will choose to cook for myself. It is easy - the necessary kitchen equipment is delivered at my door within minutes. Since transport became free, we stopped having all those things stuffed into our home. Why keep a pasta-maker and a crepe cooker crammed into our cupboards? We can just order them when we need them.

This also made the breakthrough of the circular economy easier. When products are turned into services, no one has an interest in things with a short life span. Everything is designed for durability, repairability and recyclability. The materials are flowing more quickly in our economy and can be transformed to new products pretty easily. Environmental problems seem far away, since we only use clean energy and clean production methods. The air is clean, the water is clean and nobody would dare to touch the protected areas of nature because they constitute such value to our well-being. In the cities we have plenty of green space and plants and trees all over. I still do not understand why in the past we filled all free spots in the city with concrete.

Shopping? I can't really remember what that is. For most of us, it has been turned into choosing things to use. Sometimes I find this fun, and sometimes I just want the algorithm to do it for me. It knows my taste better than I do by now.

When AI and robots took over so much of our work, we suddenly had time to eat well, sleep well and spend time with other people. The concept of rush hour makes no sense anymore, since the work that we do can be done at any time. I don't really know if I would call it work anymore. It is more like thinking-time, creation-time and development-time.

For a while, everything was turned into entertainment and people did not want to bother themselves with difficult issues. It was only at the last minute that we found out how to use all these new technologies for better purposes than just killing time.

My biggest concern is all the people who do not live in our city. Those we lost on the way. Those who decided that it became too much, all this technology. Those who felt obsolete and useless when robots and AI took over big parts of our jobs. Those who got upset with the political system and turned against it. They live different kind of lives outside of the city. Some have formed little self-supplying communities. Others just stayed in the empty and abandoned houses in small 19th century villages.

Once in a while I get annoyed about the fact that I have no real privacy. Nowhere I can go and not be registered. I know that, somewhere, everything I do, think and dream of is recorded. I just hope that nobody will use it against me.

All in all, it is a good life. Much better than the path we were on, where it became so clear that we could not continue with the same model of growth. We had all these terrible things happening: lifestyle diseases, climate change, the refugee crisis, environmental degradation, completely congested cities, water pollution, air pollution, social unrest and unemployment. We lost way too many people before we realized that we could do things differently.


This blog was written ahead of the World Economic Forum Annual Meeting of the Global Future Councils.

Ida Auken is a Young Global Leader and Member of the Global Future Council on Cities and Urbanization of the World Economic Forum,
 
Joined
Apr 13, 2017
Messages
4,424
your going to tell me I’m full of shit?
Yes.

Let me explain (or dumb it down in your vocabulary). If you do not implement tariffs on cheap imports, you are crippling domestic manufacturers by flooding their market with cheap suppliers. What you get is that businesses dependent on those supplies will buy foreign and cheap, which hurts domestic produce and renders the industry hostage to "your version" of globalism, victim to the globalized free-market system. The tariffs will incentivize Americans to buy American, which obviously will mean a temporary increase in costs for that particular sector dependent in those goods, but long-term, because American suppliers now have high demand (and therefore job growth!), a much higher GDP for the American industry. This is how you become a net exporter instead of importer, and how you gain economic and industrial independence.
 

A.J.

Star
Joined
Mar 14, 2017
Messages
1,249


The Elite’s Great Reset Doctrine Is Considered an Advance Toward a New Type of Political Globalism and Fascism
“This new fascism is today being advanced in the guise of global governance, biosecurity, the ‘New Normal,’ the ‘New Deal for Nature’ and the ‘Fourth Industrial Revolution”
 

Red Sky at Morning

Superstar
Joined
Mar 15, 2017
Messages
13,931

It’s going to turn out to be the worst case of a bad loser in US history, or a legal bloodbath if the fraud claims check out upon scrutiny. I guess the next few weeks will be climactic!
 
Top