The American “Coup d’etat”

Joined
Apr 13, 2017
Messages
4,101
They’re moving the pieces. All swing states assigned to conservative Justices.

 






Joined
Apr 13, 2017
Messages
4,101
They’re moving the pieces. All swing states assigned to conservative Justices.

This was Biden’s birthday present.

House Judiciary didn’t want to leave him out after their b-day gift to Hillary back in October.

 






Joined
Apr 13, 2017
Messages
4,101
If what he says turns out to be true, a series of dreams by an American pastor (beginning last December) will prove to have been correct.

The Chinese / Russian soldiers in the streets of DC put me off a bit, but it could be metaphorical. What was interesting though was his prediction of hyperinflation. It’s something that he could’ve already been aware of by the time he made this video, since it’s been going on all year, but the FED has been issuing dollars like crazy.

 






Red Sky at Morning

Superstar
Joined
Mar 15, 2017
Messages
10,690
The Chinese / Russian soldiers in the streets of DC put me off a bit, but it could be metaphorical. What was interesting though was his prediction of hyperinflation. It’s something that he could’ve already been aware of by the time he made this video, since it’s been going on all year, but the FED has been issuing dollars like crazy.

As for the “blue helmets”, I guess it depends. If Trump is declared the winner, there may be left leaning elements which may not readily agree!
 






A.J.

Star
Joined
Mar 14, 2017
Messages
1,237
From an article at the American Thinker: "These are the questions the Democrats must answer if they want us to accept Joe Biden as the president of the United States.

1. Before you mailed out unsolicited ballots across your county or state, did you purge your voter rolls? Can you prove that ballots were only sent to eligible voters?

2. What procedure did you use to verify the address of each voter? Can you prove that the voter to whom you mailed the ballot is the person who received it?

3. How did you verify the ballots? Can you prove that the person who filled out the ballot is the same person to whom it was mailed?

4. In states that allow ballot harvesting, what safeguards do you have in place to ensure these ballots were not altered? Can you provide a chain of custody that proves no votes were tampered with?

5. In states that do not require an ID for in-person voting, how do you ensure that the person voting is an eligible, registered voter? Can you prove that every person to whom you handed a ballot was who they said they were?"

Nanamiro
Posted: Sat, 11/14/2020 10:26 pm
What leads me to believe something fishy happened in this election is: 1) Biden had virtually no campaign or excitement from Americans. Even here in the Portland area I saw few placards or bumper stickers for Biden. How could he possibly have gotten record-breaking votes? Trump even got record breaking votes, so clearly former Trump voters didn't just switch their votes to Biden. And what did the Biden campaign spend all their money on? 2) The obsession with pushing mail-in voting by the left was strange. If standing in line to buy groceries is safe, why not waiting in line to vote? Democrats are notorious for being against any laws that might prevent voter fraud (ie voter ID laws). 3) After seeing the complete level of bold and blatant corruption behind Russia-gate, I just wouldn't put it past the Trump-hating leftists to manage organizing fraud attempts across the country. Their hate is just so intense. 4) Main-stream media has so immediately and thoroughly rejected any discussion or investigation into allegations. If Biden had raised these questions, I think they would have been all over it.
More than anything, I just want the candidate to win that the American people (though a tiny majority) chose. If excessive voter fraud did happen and our media and leaders don't get to the bottom of it, I fear for our republic.
 






A.J.

Star
Joined
Mar 14, 2017
Messages
1,237
Gregory P
Posted: Mon, 11/16/2020 01:05 pm
In accordance with the Constitution for the United States (Article II, Section 1), before entering "the Execution of his Office," Donald J. Trump swore this Oath: “I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.”
Fraud in the election process is obviously an attack on the Constitution and the people of the United States. The Governor and Supreme Court and other officials of the State of Pennsylvania violated the Constitution of the United States. In violation of laws officials prevented Republican observers from observing the counting of over a hundred thousand votes in Pennsylvania and other states. Why? How can we have confidence in the results? There is evidence of fraud, ballots from people not registered in the state where the ballot was cast, whether the actual people are registered elsewhere or are dead. There have been reports of tens of such ballots in places, maybe hundreds, maybe thousands. Certainly some may be for Trump, but probably the vast majority of illegal ballots are for Biden. And how much fraud is acceptable? Do we have to wait until we see tens of thousands of illegal ballots in a state before we are concerned? Several races have turned from being called for the Democrat candidate to the Republican. And there have been several who have indicated not just the possiblity but the probability of machines being manipulated to change vote totals, and testimony that that has been done.
President Trump has the duty to check for fraud in the election and should be encouraged to do so. Meanwhile, Christians should be praying for fraud to be exposed. What is wrong with demanding that every valid ballot be counted, and every illegal one be discarded?

  • RA
    Posted: Mon, 11/16/2020 01:39 pm
    .. a close look at claims of fraud, but is actually a review of some social media traffic on what are some marginal election issues. Then the article concludes that there’s nothing to see here and that we should all just move along.
    I don’t remember all this impatience to move along when Al Gore contested Florida for 37 days in the 2000 election.
    Whether or not there is “widespread” fraud is irrelevant. It only requires enough fraud in targeted blue cities (Detroit, Philadelphia, Pittsburgh, Atlanta, Milwaukee, etc.) which can absorb a large number of illegal ballots in order to swing an election.
    Some people with pretty good records - including Rudy Giuliani, Sidney Powell, Jay Sekulow, Lin Wood - believe there have been significant - not small - attempts at key places in the country to undermine a fair election:
    1. Mail-in ballots have been declared by courts (including Suder from the Supreme Court) to be unreliable and difficult to verify; alarming in light of the large role played by mail-in ballots in the swing from a Trump victory to a Biden victory.
    2. If a voter stayed up late on election night watching election coverage he or she went to bed early on the morning of November 4th convinced by the voting returns that President Trump had won reelection by a comfortable margin. It was only after murky events during the night tied to mail-in ballots that the entire election changed in the states that are currently in dispute.
    3. Republican observers in Pennsylvania were not allowed to observe the processing of mail-in ballots for twenty-one hours.
    4. In Michigan, over 100,000 ballots turned up during the night. These ballots were marked almost exclusively for Joe Biden. Large numbers were only filled out quickly for the presidential race with no markings for any down-ballot contests, generally an indicator of possible irregularity, especially in these quantities.
    5. As many as 600,000 Pennsylvania mail-in ballots were processed without the legally required observation by people of both parties (Republicans in particular).
    6. Republican observers in Pennsylvania and Michigan (Detroit, specifically) were denied adequate access to the counting areas so that they could fulfill their legal duty to confirm the proper processing of ballots. In the case of Detroit, Republican observers were harassed and removed from the counting rooms and denied re-admission. Much of this has been attested to in a published 234 page book of sworn affidavits.
    7. There are sworn affidavits from Michigan witnesses about ballots being run through voting machines multiple times.
    8. Supreme Court justice Samuel Alito has forced Pennsylvania to set aside mail-in ballots received after the legal deadline. Many of these late ballots were said by observers to have had the real late dates on the envelopes scratched out and replaced with an earlier date. These illegal ballots were then tossed into the pile to be counted.
    9. Voting machines from a particular company switched votes from Trump to Biden. This is not in dispute because a large number of votes were corrected in one jurisdiction. The only thing not yet determined is where undiscovered instances of false counting by this brand of voting machine remain - because over 30 states use that particular company’s machines.
    We cannot now know which, if any, of these charges are true. And because the mainstream media does not seem overly concerned with the truth, we must rely on the courts to judge. But to diminish the importance of the sworn testimony of poll workers and the hard work and conviction of some of our most able legal minds is unworthy of serious people.
    I suspect, but don’t know, who really won this election. However, even if Vice President Biden has won legitimately, the real story here is the transparency with which the counting of an unconscionable number of ballots was manipulated in states like Michigan and Pennsylvania.
    Elections have been stolen in the past. We know about it and even make jokes about “Vote early and Vote often”. It’s not really funny.
    This election may not have been stolen, but it wasn’t for lack of trying. To treat this lightly risks the Republic.




    LW
    Posted: Mon, 11/16/2020 06:00 pm
    All of this points to the need for transparency. Regardless of who "wins" the election now, the lack of transparency has made us all "lose" in a sense. How can either side legitimately have confidence in the outcome? Had there been transparency, which fosters accountability, this article would have been unnecessary. Even with mistakes that have already been made which might bring transparency into question, why not make an undeniable commitment to it now. What does it hurt? Who does it hurt? It would even serve Biden. (In fact, he should be the most vocal in asking for it.)
    For those claiming (and some judges ruling) that there is not enough evidence for substantiating out-of-the-norm fraud or for it to be consequential, you are absolutely right! BUT how could there be … if access to the evidence is denied? Why not grant it to silence the naysayers? (Or is there something to hide after all?)
    I must agree with DM. We need those kinds of questions answered for there to be any confidence as to us having a reliable outcome of this election. It is the best way to foster reconciliation and rebuild trust, especially when there’s already an enormous basis for governmental distrust and skepticism. (The inept mass media has only added to it.)
    It is sad to think that my here-to-fore confidence, that our country is different ... better, might have been in vain. At the moment, it is on trial, and there might be 70+ million people who feel the same way.
    Fortunately, what is not on trial is that we can have a confident and undiminishing trust in God … regardless of the state of our democracy. It could be that He is working all these circumstances to make it clear that He is the only one to be trusted in the first place! He is accomplishing His greater and good purposes, even if it might feel unsettling.
    Similar to the freedom granted us in Christ, we have been granted a measure of freedom in our country. In both cases, may we heed Galatians 5:13 “For you, brothers, were called to freedom; but do not use your freedom as an opportunity for the flesh. Rather, serve one another in love.”
 






Maes17

Superstar
Joined
Jul 27, 2017
Messages
5,083
Trump is not only more anti-establishment than JFK and less corrupt (JFK had his own shady ties with the Jewish mafia), he is a lot more effective.

And if you think JFK was the real deal because he got whacked by the CIA (and he did want to expose and remove corruption ultimately) there’s now an established link between Trump and JFK.

Here’s JFK’s grandkids singing “It’s Going Down”:


Recognize this guy? (starting 0:50)

View attachment 46571
Trump is not anti establishment. He didn’t even drain the swamp like he said.

And yeah maybe JFK was a spook. Anyone involved in big name politics are.
 






A.J.

Star
Joined
Mar 14, 2017
Messages
1,237
I just came across this. I’m not saying this applies to anyone or everyone here. Let’s always keep an eye on former and current FBI/CIA.... we want to be on the opposite side of them.

1606003339072.jpeg
 






Joined
Apr 13, 2017
Messages
4,101
Trump is not anti establishment. He didn’t even drain the swamp like he said.

And yeah maybe JFK was a spook. Anyone involved in big name politics are.
You didn’t answer the question. I really want you to answer the question.
 






Maes17

Superstar
Joined
Jul 27, 2017
Messages
5,083
You didn’t answer the question. I really want you to answer the question.
Answer which. If I recognized half a face? Nooo. Lol.


This isn’t gonna go far in the supreme courts. And if this does well trump is no different than anyone else using shady tactics to win.

I don’t like biden as much as any trump supporter does. But there really isn’t anything to see. The powers that be used trump for their plans and that was to divide us. He’s being tossed away now.

Pedo joe will fall in line for the nwo agenda
 






Maes17

Superstar
Joined
Jul 27, 2017
Messages
5,083
If there’s no fraud; it’s worth reviewing the system. Short of tangible proof to the contrary, yes. But not cause the deep state tell us so.
I agree.

But be honest with ourselves. The deep state will always run the shit show.
Anyone who challenges them ends up whacked
 






Joined
Apr 13, 2017
Messages
4,101
Answer which. If I recognized half a face? Nooo. Lol.
I didn’t think you did, even though he’s already appeared in this thread, namely as the new Undersecretary of Defense who put Special Operations directly under government control, cutting out the CIA.


Quoting bits from JFK’s June 6, 1962 West Point speech, isn’t a coincidence.
 






Red Sky at Morning

Superstar
Joined
Mar 15, 2017
Messages
10,690
An election challenge lawsuit planned to be filed early this week is new and will be "shocking," according to President Donald Trump lawyer Jordan Sekulow on Newsmax TV.

"We have got lawsuits likely to be filed in Georgia on either Monday or Tuesday; I can't get into the details," Sekulow, the son of Trump personal attorney Jay Sekulow, told Saturday's "America Right Now."

"I can't tell you right now, but what's coming in Georgia will be shocking, when we file this in federal court Monday or Tuesday," Jordan Sekulow told host Tom Basile. "It's nothing that we have talked before. It's not what you heard in the press conference [Thursday] either.

"This is something completely separate."

Read Newsmax: Jordan Sekulow to Newsmax TV: Pending Georgia Lawsuit 'Shocking'
 






Top