The American “Coup d’etat”

Aero

Superstar
Joined
Mar 13, 2017
Messages
5,910
We elected Trump and put him in our White House. So I don't see how anyone can not be a little salty he threw a ghost pepper on his way out. It's literally the most Trumpian move ever. The capital riots were about glory, not change or revolution. Seeking recognition and accolades defines his whole presidency. At least on the surface.

I'm okay with shaking things up, but this was too little too late. The word ill-advised comes to mind. That's what I chalk it up to anyway. Trump's advisors didn't have a clue what they were doing. They were jockeying for position rather than trying to make the best plan. Like no imagination, no foresight, just high school level mentalities trying to play the big boys game.
 
Joined
Feb 22, 2020
Messages
2,506
Putin and the Russian Chabad billionaires have to protect their guy.

Nothing has collapsed.

They are saying the officer MIGHT have died from bear mace instead of being hit by a fire extinguisher. He was still murdered by rioters, whether it was bear mace or a fire extinguisher. So pretty much an irrelevant point.

RT then reports on ONE piece of evidence about a Trump phonecall that apparently was not true. I hadn't even heard of that piece of evidence. It changes nothing because there are mountains of evidence.


So no, narratives have not collapsed, Russia is just spreading their disinfo via their false "clickbait" headline to protect Trump as usual.

If you have dozens of pieces of evidence, and just one turns out to be false, one which isn't even an important piece, that doesn't "collapse" your case.


and I wonder if RT put together the number and amount of lies the Trump defence has told ? Not interested I assume. They'd rather scrape the bottom of the barrel to find any little thing they can find to oppose the truth.

I guess their original "Antifa did it" narrative was too retarded to stick. RT has absolutely NO CREDIBILITY when it comes to matters regarding Trump.
 
Last edited:

A Freeman

Superstar
Joined
Nov 11, 2019
Messages
8,376
Putin and the Russian Chabad billionaires have to protect their guy.
Their guy being Joe Biden?



Nothing has collapsed.
You can't be serious. There are hundreds of thousands of small businesses that have already gone belly up and millions more about to do the same all over the world under the guise of the magic virus scam. Governments are presently handing out trillions of dollars, pounds, shekels, etc. they don't have, driving all of them further into debt to the international banking cartel, which will eventually bankrupt them all. Can you really not see that, or are you intentionally ignoring it?

They are saying the officer MIGHT have died from bear mace instead of being hit by a fire extinguisher. He was still murdered by rioters, whether it was bear mace or a fire extinguisher. So pretty much an irrelevant point.
The article very plainly stated that the following:
But the Sicknick story has crumbled in recent days with the revelation that medical examiners didn't find any indication that the officer sustained any blunt force trauma.
Which is extremely relevant given the lies that the MSM has been pumping out for weeks about how Sicknick was bludgeoned by rioters, which we now know with absolute certainty DID NOT HAPPEN.

So you can continue your disinformation campaign/cheerleading efforts for the MSM all you wish, but nobody is buying the lies that you're peddling. You either don't know what you're talking about or are intentionally lying. Which is it please? Or don't you have the courage to admit when you are wrong?

RT then reports on ONE piece of evidence about a Trump phonecall that apparently was not true. I hadn't even heard of that piece of evidence. It changes nothing because there are mountains of evidence.
There is thus far not a single shred of evidence that Trump conducted an act of "insurrection" nor incited any riot or violence by challenging the results of the most corrupt, fraudulent U.S. presidential election in U.S. history. There is nothing in any of his speeches, telephone calls, tweets, etc. that calls for any violence. If you have ANY evidence to the contrary, then please post it, in its original context. Peacefully challenging fraud anywhere and everywhere is his and every American's God-given right.

And you pretending it doesn't change anything to find out that the so-called evidence being presented by the Democrats is based on LIES that they knowingly submitted with malice aforethought is further proof that you are a disinformation agent, unwittingly or otherwise. It also seems extremely desperate on your part, the incessant promotion of known lies, trying to hang on to the false accusations leveled against Trump, e.g. the false and treasonous "Russian collusion" narrative and now the capitol "riot" nonsense.

Even according to the U.S. Constitution, the American people have the right to peacefully assemble and to petition the government for a redress of grievances. Both of these are listed as part of the first amendment.

First Amendment (to the U.S. Constitution)
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

Now that we know with absolute certainty that NO ONE was murdered by ANY Trump supporter, we can truthfully say that there was no "riot" at the capitol. And if there was no riot at the capitol, then these pointless impeachment proceedings, being held after the subject of them has vacated office, are not only without merit, but criminal.

Every single member of Congress who voted for, or is pushing this impeachment of someone who is no longer in office, has broken their oath of office, and is therefore no longer a member of congress according to their own rules, and is now impersonating a public official, to add to the list of their crimes.

It should also be pointed out that according to our Creator's Law, the punishment for bearing false witness against anyone else is to inflict upon the false accuser the same penalty they were trying to inflict upon their victim. Which means in this case those promoting this baseless impeachment should themselves be impeached and removed from office, and made to repay the American tax payers out of their own pockets for all of the money they wasted and continue to waste, on their Russian collusion lies and now the capitol riot lies.

Perfect divine justice.

So no, narratives have not collapsed, Russia is just spreading their disinfo via their false "clickbait" headline to protect Trump as usual.
Nonsense. You are the one spreading disinformation. And your lies have been exposed, repeatedly. One has to wonder why do you feel it's so important to offer your deceitful and irrelevant commentary? Can't people simply read the article for themselves?

If you have dozens of pieces of evidence, and just one turns out to be false, one which isn't even an important piece, that doesn't "collapse" your case.
If someone knowingly presents lies as evidence, then NOTHING they say can be trusted. And besides, it isn't just one "unimportant" piece of so-called evidence; it's a repeating theme, where personal opinions and fabricated media stories are now counted as evidence.

and I wonder if RT put together the number and amount of lies the Trump defence has told ? Not interested I assume. They'd rather scrape the bottom of the barrel to find any little thing they can find to oppose the truth.
How would you know what is true and what is a lie? Given how often you espouse and promote lies, you clearly are either incapable of discerning the truth from lies or you are intentionally promoting lies because you prefer them to the truth. Again, which is it please?

I guess their original "Antifa did it" narrative was too retarded to stick. RT has absolutely NO CREDIBILITY when it comes to matters regarding Trump.
Because you desperately want to dismiss the truth that the article contains? YOU ARE THE ONE WHO HAS NO CREDIBILITY.

Did House impeachment manager Jamie Raskin (D-Maryland) get caught lying on Wednesday about the content of an alleged telephone call between Trump and a Republican senator during the Capitol riot? YES.

Did he (Raskin) admit that his claim was false? YES.

Does this mean Raskin knowingly presented false evidence, i.e. bore false witness? YES.

Did the MSM and Democrat politicians repeatedly claim that Brian Sicknick died from being bludgeoned in the head with a fire extinguisher? YES.

Did the medical examiners find NO INDICATION that Brian Sicknick sustained ANY blunt force trauma? YES.

Does this mean the MSM and Democrat politicians (and the Republican politicians who went along with all of this) were making this FALSE claim without any actual evidence? YES.

You really need to give it up. You don't know what you're talking about, or you are intentionally promoting lies, while hypocritically accusing others of what you are doing, as criminals always do.

ALL of these things that are happening now are part of the prophesied revealing during the end-times, as a further "sign of the times" to help awaken those who have a genuine love for the truth.

ALL of the world's corporate governments have been irreparably corrupted, including all of their courts, agencies and officers, etc. It doesn't matter whether someone comes to Congress, Parliament, etc. with the best of intentions; the evil system currently in place assures that the outcome will continue on its steady march toward total destruction.

There are NO free, fair, and honest elections.

The current magic virus scam has absolutely NOTHING to do with public health or safety. It is nothing more than another deceitful mechanism being used to destroy economies, poison and eventually starve out billions, invariably leading to WW3, which the U.S. and U.K. will lose to Russia and China.

The ONLY Solution is to get rid of all of this fraudulent, man-made legislation, rules, etc. and go back to The Law our Creator gave us to protect us from all of this evil and to set and keep us free. Under The Law, we are to judge everyone according to their works, whether they be good or evil (according to and by The Law), rather than conducting which hunts, sham inquisitions, trials by media and public opinion polls. There is no other way to discern good from evil.

And, as Martin Luther King said:

"Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere."

and


"Darkness cannot drive out darkness; only light can do that. Hate cannot drive out hate; only love can do that."
 
Last edited:
Joined
Feb 22, 2020
Messages
2,506
Their guy being Joe Biden?
No their guy being Trump. Yeah the Bidens and Obamas may have done a deal or two but Trump is their guy, if you haven't realized that by now you are utterly clueless.

https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2017/04/the-happy-go-lucky-jewish-group-that-connects-trump-and-putin-215007/

https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2017-06-21/trump-russia-and-those-shadowy-sater-deals-at-bayrock

https://medium.com/mosaic2/nixon-center-kremlin-trump-35018040f65e

https://ordoabchao.ca/volume-six/from-russia-with-love

You can't be serious. There are hundreds of thousands of small businesses that have already gone belly up and millions more about to do the same all over the world under the guise of the magic virus scam. Governments are presently handing out trillions of dollars, pounds, shekels, etc. they don't have, driving all of them further into debt to the international banking cartel, which will eventually bankrupt them all. Can you really not see that, or are you intentionally ignoring it?
I'm talking about Jan 6 dude, why you completely changing the subject ?

The article very plainly stated that the following:


Which is extremely relevant given the lies that the MSM has been pumping out for weeks about how Sicknick was bludgeoned by rioters, which we now know with absolute certainty DID NOT HAPPEN.

So you can continue your disinformation campaign/cheerleading efforts for the MSM all you wish, but nobody is buying the lies that you're peddling. You either don't know what you're talking about or are intentionally lying. Which is it please? Or don't you have the courage to admit when you are wrong?
the fire extinguisher narrative came from the New York Times article which sourced POLICE as saying he was hit in the head.

https://www.nytimes.com/2021/01/08/us/brian-sicknick-police-capitol-dies.html

and yes they have updated their story, which was contradicted by reporting from CNN where Police now say they cannot confirm cause of death, and other medical officials deny the bludgeoning. So frankly it remains unclear his cause of death, and the autopsy has not been released yet, either way it appears he was murdered by the Trump mob, you are arguing the cause of death, which even the original NYT article states there was much confusion over.

So you are now trusting CNN when it suits your narrative ? The cause of Sicknicks death was always unclear, regardless he died at the hands of the Trump mob.

https://www.mediaite.com/news/did-house-impeachment-managers-rely-on-a-flimsy-new-york-times-report-on-brian-sicknicks-death/

There is thus far not a single shred of evidence that Trump conducted an act of "insurrection" nor incited any riot or violence by challenging the results of the most corrupt, fraudulent U.S. presidential election in U.S. history. There is nothing in any of his speeches, telephone calls, tweets, etc. that calls for any violence. If you have ANY evidence to the contrary, then please post it, in its original context. Peacefully challenging fraud anywhere and everywhere is his and every American's God-given right.
Yes I know your head has been in the sand these past 4 years. Trump has incited violence since he got into office, he has lied to and riled up his supporters, he has made them feel paranoid and scared.

history of Trump inciting violence

https://www.vox.com/21506029/trump-violence-tweets-racist-hate-speech

Trump rioters screaming "STOP THE STEAL" Who told them about that ?

screaming "HANG MIKE PENCE" after Trump threatened him to overturn the vote. He even tweeted against Pence AFTER he knew the mob was after him.

https://www.huffingtonpost.ca/entry/trump-pence-tweet-capitol-riot-impeachment-trial_n_6024b281c5b6b295bc045640?ri18n=true

Why did those rioters do what they did then ? YOu are an utter joke to think Trump did not create the environment for what went down. Just another sycophant defending him at every turn.
And you pretending it doesn't change anything to find out that the so-called evidence being presented by the Democrats is based on LIES that they knowingly submitted with malice aforethought is further proof that you are a disinformation agent, unwittingly or otherwise. It also seems extremely desperate on your part, the incessant promotion of known lies, trying to hang on to the false accusations leveled against Trump, e.g. the false and treasonous "Russian collusion" narrative and now the capitol "riot" nonsense.
One piece of evidence was "based on lies" First off you ignore mounds of evidence to focus on one piece (which doesn't change anything with its exclusion) The evidence was based on a piece from THE DESERT NEWS (owned by Mormons), which reported something attributed to Rep Mike Lee, which Lee denied. So the culprit here is DESERT NEWS or Rep Lee is lying, not the impeachment managers who rightfully had that ONE PIECE of evidence removed once Lee took exception to it. They didn't "knowingly" submit a lie, again that is just your opinion.

https://www.politico.com/news/2021/02/10/mike-lee-trump-impeachment-468509

here is the desert News article impeachment lawyers cited which Mike Lee denied

https://www.deseret.com/utah/2021/1/7/22218897/donald-trump-mike-lee-misdial-capitol-siege-congress-electoral-insurrection-moore-curtis-stewart

The desperation is comming from you so willing to defend the lying and corrupt Donald Trump even though you claim you are against him.

Now that we know with absolute certainty that NO ONE was murdered by ANY Trump supporter, we can truthfully say that there was no "riot" at the capitol. And if there was no riot at the capitol, then these pointless impeachment proceedings, being held after the subject of them has vacated office, are not only without merit, but criminal.
You dont know with "absolute certainty" That is just a flat out lie. As I have pointed out to you the CApitol Police officers death is uncertain. There are contradicting claims. The autopsy hasn't been released. What is known is that he collapsed after fighting the rioters and then he died later the next day. People dont just die for no reason, I think its fairly logical to assume he died as a result of fighting Trump rioters.

they are now saying he may have died from the bear mace THAT TRUMP RIOTERS FIRED. Lets wait for the autopsy to come out.

and second NOBODY NEEDS TO DIE for it to be a riot.
Every single member of Congress who voted for, or is pushing this impeachment of someone who is no longer in office, has broken their oath of office, and is therefore no longer a member of congress according to their own rules, and is now impersonating a public official, to add to the list of their crimes.
That is just a lie. Anyone condoning Trumps attempted coup and supporting the overturning of democracy is the one breaking an oath.

Nonsense. You are the one spreading disinformation. And your lies have been exposed, repeatedly. One has to wonder why do you feel it's so important to offer your deceitful and irrelevant commentary? Can't people simply read the article for themselves?
You clearly didn't read the RT article because all it states is that ONE PIECE of evidence has been taken away. THe case never hinged on that one piece of evidence, and that one piece of evidence that was contested was based on a Newspaper report owned by Mormons in Salt lake City.

To claim a narrative has "collapsed" because ONE piece of evidence amongst hundreds is no longer valid, is pushing a false narrative.


If someone knowingly presents lies as evidence, then NOTHING they say can be trusted. And besides, it isn't just one "unimportant" piece of so-called evidence; it's a repeating theme, where personal opinions and fabricated media stories are now counted as evidence.
They didn't KNOWINGLY present a lie. They presented a piece of information based on a Newspaper article from DESERT NEWS, and that piece of information was contested, and when it was the evidence was struck, because it wasn't even important in the first place.

and going by your logic WHY DO YOU BELIEVE ANYTHING TRUMP SAYS ? Since he is a proven liar and fraud.

NOTHING he says can be trusted since he lies more often than any MSM outlet, yet you choose to believe him for some strange reason, being a "christian" and all, yet you hang on to the words of a serial LIAR and FRAUDSTER.

How would you know what is true and what is a lie? Given how often you espouse and promote lies, you clearly are either incapable of discerning the truth from lies or you are intentionally promoting lies because you prefer them to the truth. Again, which is it please
?

talking about yourself ?
Did House impeachment manager Jamie Raskin (D-Maryland) get caught lying on Wednesday about the content of an alleged telephone call between Trump and a Republican senator during the Capitol riot? YES.
Nope he didn't lie, he used a faulty source. YOur anger should be directed towards DESERT NEWS.

Did he (Raskin) admit that his claim was false? YES.
Yes he admitted the claim made by DESERT NEWS was false
Does this mean Raskin knowingly presented false evidence, i.e. bore false witness? YES.
No it doesn't. That is your opinion. How could he have possibly known the DESERT NEWS article was false until Rep. Lee challenged it in court, and when he did, he had no problem to dismiss that claim and retract it.

stop being so hyperbolic.

Did the MSM and Democrat politicians repeatedly claim that Brian Sicknick died from being bludgeoned in the head with a fire extinguisher? YES.
Yes again based on the info at the time, a NYT article, now a CNN article has contradicted those earlier and unclear claims. CNN who you love to hate, but now you believe them. Again stop being so hyperbolic and try and understand what is really happening without your predictable emotional reaction.


Did the medical examiners find NO INDICATION that Brian Sicknick sustained ANY blunt force trauma? YES.
It appears so but again it is unclear and there are contradicting reports, so I would wait for more information before you make any definitive statements. Either way no blunt force trauma would not negate the very likely fact that he was killed as a result of fighting the Trump mob.

Does this mean the MSM and Democrat politicians (and the Republican politicians who went along with all of this) were making this FALSE claim without any actual evidence? YES.
The MSM are the ones who contradicted the original claim. Without the MSM you wouldn't be getting all worked up. Information can change with time, it appears its the Police who aren't sticking to their story. The MSM was just reporting what they got from Police sources, they aren't making shit up. Again if you want to be angry at somebody it should be the police for putting out contradicting and unclear reports.
You really need to give it up. You don't know what you're talking about, or you are intentionally promoting lies, while hypocritically accusing others of what you are doing, as criminals always do.
You dont know what you are talking about. You dont know how to read news stories beyond the sensational headlines. You dont know how to dig into who is providing sources, you just emotionally react with your pre packaged rhetoric and slogans. Go back to your White Jew cult.
 
Last edited:

Karlysymon

Superstar
Joined
Mar 18, 2017
Messages
7,324
Very Interesting! This was posted on 10/17/2020
Scary! Creepy!
If your family rats you out for owning a gun, surely they'll rat you out for believing in conspiracies aswell because we know outlawing belief in conspiracies is on the table too.

We know this much that there are going to be terror attacks to be blamed on the right, to shell-shock the nation and get people "in line". But before they happen, it is important that people remember the past....the US government's own actions in aiding, abetting and scapegoating the right. Whatever the media says when those attacks happen should be seen through these lens;


Because; "The majority of terrorism throughout history has found its sponsors in the hallowed halls of officialdom, in the entity known as government. Terrorism is surrogate warfare, a manufactured crisis designed to induce social change. Its combatants consciously or unconsciously wage the war on behalf of higher powers with higher agendas. Whether its adherents are aware of it or not, terrorism always serves the ambitions of another."
 
Last edited:

Karlysymon

Superstar
Joined
Mar 18, 2017
Messages
7,324
a highly recommended read chock full of information that few are bringing up in regards to Jan 6 and the inner conflicts of the National Security State during the Trump years.

http://visupview.blogspot.com/2021/02/similiar-shades-of-gray.html

Essentially there has been a conflict between the CIA and the JSOC (Joint Special operations command) which would explain why early in Trump's tenure he sort of came out against the CIA. Contrary to the beliefs of many the CIA is not the only intelligence agency in town, nor are they the most secretive, or even most influential. That badge of honor goes to JSOC, which has become far more influential and secretive since the Bush Jr. years.

https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2009/12/the-special-ops-command-thats-displacing-the-cia/31038/

Behind the JSOC are guys like Michael Flynn, General William Boykin (CNP member), Chris Miller (Trump's def sec. during Jan 6) Erik Prince (Blackwater worked for both CIA and JSOC, but Prince has beef with CIA). JSOC is basically the special forces operators who were behind Donald Trump and are running the QAnon Psy op.

Also interesting to note that the Army psychological warfare officer who was arrested taking part in the storming was based in Fort Bragg, which is where JSOC is stationed.

https://www.militarytimes.com/news/your-military/2021/01/11/1st-special-forces-command-investigating-psyop-captain-for-involvement-in-trump-dc-rally/

The JSOC crew are aligned with Netanyahu and the Likud party, along with the Russians.

The traditional CIA and regular army came out publicly to warn any members of the military not to take part in a coup.

Anyways it seems that weeks before Jan 6 Trump purged the DOD and installed the JSOC crew, who ordered the stand down and were basically running the Qanon psy op through Flynn and his protege Ezra Cohen Watnick who was placed highly in the DOD after the purge.

It appears to me that there was an attempted "soft coup" by the JSOC crew, and they have since thrown Trump under the bus to disguise the fact that it was a much bigger operation than even the MSM is willing to admit.

Basically blame Trump instead of a much greater Op with JSOC and perhaps even foreign intelligence involvement.

I highly recommend the VISUP article which delves into much of whats going on behind the scenes.
I read the VISUP article and it just left me all confused, without a clear narrative proposed by the author (maybe that was the point anyway...sow confusion). So were the events of Jan 6th done by JSOC and to what end since, as the article alleges, Trump was JSOC’s guy?? Was it to remove him or keep in office somehow?

In that regard, how do you think….the fact that literally days after Trump’s inauguration, there was a flurry of articles (see THIS and THIS for examples) about how Trump should/could be removed from office through a military coup,….that plays into what the article alleges? Were those 2017 articles just more evidence of faction fighting bubbling to the surface?

1613250327719.png
Then again, this section of the article made me revisit that talk I posted a while back on secret/covert warfare. (at 32-34mins it’s about de Gaulle coup and 42-45mins it’s about Gen. Maletti’s Piazza Fontana trial testimony but the whole talk is very worthwhile)

And now iam wondering if Jan 6th could have been Gladio all over again…maybe for some faction in military intelligence?? With all the fevered talk about right-wing domestic terrorism at the moment, we know that just like Islamic terrorism, it is going to be used to be accomplish a bunch of things up to/including Secession. We know that because some of bills up for consideration specifically mention “far-right” terrorism not “far left”. [SEE the Guardian article i posted in the previous post]
 
Joined
May 18, 2018
Messages
4,060
You voted that there was no evidence that trump incited violence? You will pay in blood. Hey followers! Go commit acts of violence against them! - democrat.
8D23520C-67F6-4D3C-872F-DBE691A38C57.jpeg
 
Last edited:

Karlysymon

Superstar
Joined
Mar 18, 2017
Messages
7,324
Very Interesting! This was posted on 10/17/2020

"Unlike the “exigent circumstances” and “emergency aid” exceptions, the community caretaking exception is not limited to circumstances where there is no time to apply for a warrant. And the question of what sort of caretaking falls under this exception is extremely vague. Will the police be able to use it, for example, to conduct warrantless searches of political protesters’ homes to make sure they aren’t planning on violent behavior at their next political rally? The Supreme Court is going to take a very close look at this case and there is a good chance that it will overrule the lower court’s decision."
 

Cintra

Star
Joined
Jan 11, 2020
Messages
3,224
so...

Trump didn't get impeached?
He wasn't responsible for the thing at the capitol?

Is that correct?
 

A Freeman

Superstar
Joined
Nov 11, 2019
Messages
8,376
The fact that Biden signed 52 executive orders to reverse anything Trump did, should let everyone know that Biden is a Vatican/CCP puppet.
I read the VISUP article and it just left me all confused, without a clear narrative proposed by the author (maybe that was the point anyway...sow confusion). So were the events of Jan 6th done by JSOC and to what end since, as the article alleges, Trump was JSOC’s guy?? Was it to remove him or keep in office somehow?

In that regard, how do you think….the fact that literally days after Trump’s inauguration, there was a flurry of articles (see THIS and THIS for examples) about how Trump should/could be removed from office through a military coup,….that plays into what the article alleges? Were those 2017 articles just more evidence of faction fighting bubbling to the surface?

View attachment 52071
Then again, this section of the article made me revisit that talk I posted a while back on secret/covert warfare. (at 32-34mins it’s about de Gaulle coup and 42-45mins it’s about Gen. Maletti’s Piazza Fontana trial testimony but the whole talk is very worthwhile)

And now iam wondering if Jan 6th could have been Gladio all over again…maybe for some faction in military intelligence?? With all the fevered talk about right-wing domestic terrorism at the moment, we know that just like Islamic terrorism, it is going to be used to be accomplish a bunch of things up to/including Secession. We know that because some of bills up for consideration specifically mention “far-right” terrorism not “far left”. [SEE the Guardian article i posted in the previous post]
People NEED to stop believing the predictive programming we've been spoon-fed and start looking at the results being achieved. There was no "attack" on or "insurrection" at the Capitol. No so-called Trump supporter attacked, shot or bludgeoned anyone, including Officer Brian Sicknick.

The result of the staged Capitol incident was the deployment of tens of thousands of national guard troops on the streets of Washington D.C. to guard the criminals people refer to as politicians. The protests at the Capitol, which very clearly included groups of people for and against Trump, were merely used as an excuse to introduce the idea of troops and militarized police on the streets, and for the sham impeachment proceedings. That way, when the troops are later used to forcibly administer vaccinations, and/or round-up "insurrectionists" and/or unlawfully collect lawfully acquired guns and ammunition from the American people, it will be more readily accepted.

What seems particularly amazing is that virtually everyone is ignoring the fact that in signing 52 or however many executive orders Joe Biden has signed thus far, he has proven beyond any reasonable doubt that he is nothing more than a NWO/Vatican/CCP puppet, if there was ever any doubt of that. It also proves beyond any reasonable doubt that despite his many failings, Trump was obviously doing something that was slowing down the plans of the parasitic criminal class -- particularly by not committing U.S. troops to a war against Iran after they bombed the Al Asad airbase and another near Erbil in response to the criminal Soleimani assassination* -- or there would have been no need to replace him.

*exactly as the Israelis hoped would happen when they fed Trump the intel about Soleimani

With their puppet Biden in place, the situation will digress at an accelerated pace. It would be ludicrous to believe otherwise in the face of the planned, magic virus induced economic collapse that is nearing completion.
 

A Freeman

Superstar
Joined
Nov 11, 2019
Messages
8,376
What has happened then?
I am finding the news over here confusing and contradictory
Trump was impeached by the house for a second time back on the 13th of January, a week after the protest at the Capitol.

Trump was subsequently acquitted by the Senate (who failed to achieve the two-thirds majority required to uphold the impeachment) of wrongdoing, i.e. of inciting the "riot" at the Capitol on January 6, 2021.

That's all the drama you've missed thus far. Be sure to tune in next week for the next exciting chapter of bizarro world, where the world's craziest inmates are the one's temporarily running this lunatic asylum.
 

justjess

Superstar
Joined
Mar 16, 2017
Messages
11,534
Just like last time: the house impeached him and the senate failed to convict. Last time one republican voted against party, this time seven did. Of the republicans that voted to acquit this time - some are saying it’s unconstitutional to impeach once the presidents left office, some are saying this is a matter for the CJS, some are still blaming him for what happened and not giving their reasons to vote to acquit regardless. The only people saying he isn’t responsible during the trial were his own lawyers.

edit: and maybe ted Cruz but idk I haven’t been paying that much attention
 
Joined
May 18, 2018
Messages
4,060
I have to say this guy smoked MSM and said it was both sides of it tearing the nation apart while squelching the attempted narrative.
Called no witnesses and their evidence was doctored. liberals will cry about a state run media - a media run state is 1000x times worse
 

Cintra

Star
Joined
Jan 11, 2020
Messages
3,224
Trump was impeached by the house for a second time back on the 13th of January, a week after the protest at the Capitol.

Trump was subsequently acquitted by the Senate (who failed to achieve the two-thirds majority required to uphold the impeachment) of wrongdoing, i.e. of inciting the "riot" at the Capitol on January 6, 2021.

That's all the drama you've missed thus far. Be sure to tune in next week for the next exciting chapter of bizarro world, where the world's craziest inmates are the one's temporarily running this lunatic asylum.
Just like last time: the house impeached him and the senate failed to convict. Last time one republican voted against party, this time seven did. Of the republicans that voted to acquit this time - some are saying it’s unconstitutional to impeach once the presidents left office, some are saying this is a matter for the CJS, some are still blaming him for what happened and not giving their reasons to vote to acquit regardless. The only people saying he isn’t responsible during the trial were his own lawyers.

edit: and maybe ted Cruz but idk I haven’t been paying that much attention
Thank you to you both.

I understand that my questions are akin to someone asking me to explain brexit in a few sentences, so I really appreciate your replies.
 
Top