Artful Revealer
Star
- Joined
- Apr 13, 2017
- Messages
- 4,426
Pieczenik confirms the confiscation of German servers:
You seem to be purposely missing the fact that the majority of people live in cities and sue urban clusters. If you want majority rule... then the majority goes by actual amount of people. I’m not sure how you can argue that the niche interests of a smaller population base inside the United States should take precedence over the majority... atleast not in good faith. Land doesn’t vote, people do. Land doesn’t have needs or opinions, people do. Land doesn’t pay taxes, people do. Maybe all the conservatives living in cities should strategically relocate themselves to places where they have more commonality and increase the population base of those counties/states. But they don’t... because they benefit from being in those liberal cities.It shows the absurdity of people complaining about the electoral college. They don't want the majority of people to be ruled by the minority because of a 2% difference. Here we're talking about less than 20% of counties ruling over the other 80+%.
Supremacy of the metropolitans.
Incoming presidents are always privileged to briefings before their terms begin. Trump was as well.So they are treating Biden as a sitting president already. I am pretty sure that is illegal.
Zerohedge
ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zerowww.zerohedge.com
The deliberate withholding of the announcement WAS politicisation.Incoming presidents are always privileged to briefings before their terms begin. Trump was as well.
I can guarantee they held off the vaccine announcement until after the election to avoid it becoming politicized.
We’re talking about a 5-to-1 ratio. Not about a 2% win or lead that probably exists because of illegal voting in the first place. You’re the one who supports the popular vote. I’m just saying it’s absurd to do so in light of these stats. Your argument of people vs land is deceiving. It’s communities that are governed. It’s individuals vs communities.You seem to be purposely missing the fact that the majority of people live in cities and sue urban clusters. If you want majority rule... then the majority goes by actual amount of people. I’m not sure how you can argue that the niche interests of a smaller population base inside the United States should take precedence over the majority... atleast not in good faith. Land doesn’t vote, people do. Land doesn’t have needs or opinions, people do. Land doesn’t pay taxes, people do. Maybe all the conservatives living in cities should strategically relocate themselves to places where they have more commonality and increase the population base of those counties/states. But they don’t... because they benefit from being in those liberal cities.
you guys are a ok with someone becoming president without winning the popular vote.. but now want to complain that less counties voted for the incumbent? That’s logically inconsistant.
It is not deceiving. You are giving human qualities to non human entities. I’ve never seen a community imprisoned. I’ve never seen a community take on a job. I’ve never seen a community pay taxes that weren’t first pooled from the individuals that make up that community. People vote. People obey or break the law. People pay taxes. People engage in employment which fuels this country and it’s economy. Not communities. Not counties. Not states.We’re talking about a 5-to-1 ratio. Not about a 2% win or lead that probably exists because of illegal voting in the first place. You’re the one who supports the popular vote. I’m just saying it’s absurd to do so in light of these stats. Your argument of people vs land is deceiving. It’s communities that are governed. It’s individuals vs communities.
If trumps base was the type to be happy and excited about a demon vaccine I’d agree with that. In this case... with how many people are anti this vaccine, universally but especially among people who would vote for him... I can’t. Because honestly announcing this prior probably would have hurt trump, not helped.The deliberate withholding of the announcement WAS politicisation.
I am concerned with your and others close mindedness.I don’t know what I believe about corona. Atleast that’s an honest answer. I’m human and I don’t know everything - I know even less about large numbers since no one can actually experience those themselves. What I do know is the people screaming that corona was a scam that was going to disappear after the election were using what they claimed as fraudulently high case counts to make their case. The argument was the case counts would miraculously decrease after the election. The opposite has happened based on the same data sets which were used in the theory/argument. So you really can’t continue to say that, can you?
I agree with that - and am not sure how to read Trump on this. Is he for forced vaccinations? I know he doesn’t have control over the satanists that really run things. And YOU have to keep that in mind as well. But if he IS totally on board then he is my enemy. But I’m not sure how much he really has control over. That’s not an excuse, rather it’s knowledge that this is at least 100 years in the making....If trumps base was the type to be happy and excited about a demon vaccine I’d agree with that. In this case... with how many people are anti this vaccine, universally but especially among people who would vote for him... I can’t. Because honestly announcing this prior probably would have hurt trump, not helped.
No it isn’t. I am not for forced vaccines and I’m not for this particular vaccine at all. I am certainly not “right” in the slightest.Also BOTH registered Dems, Repubs, (and Indies) - a majority are against forced vaccines. So this is not a right - left issue.
Had he funded his campaign himself that is a line of reasoning I would have went down... he didn’t. Billionaire or not he took plenty of money from swamp creatures to get himself the throne. I’ve pointed out the barr/Epstein/trump connections before myself. They typically get ignored around here.@justjess
here’s Whitney Webb on AG Barr - she also makes connections with Trump and shadiness - Trump has rubbed arms with lots of shady characters. But I didn’t see him as indebted as say Obama who relied on benefactors - cause Obama was a nobody. So I was giving Trump a 25% benefit of the doubt that he was independent and not truly tainted by some of these former associations. Barr is certainly deep state scum. Which means HIM and BIDEN ARE on the SAME team. You realize Bush and Biden are on the same team, right?
“Prior to resigning from his post at the CIA, Gregg had worked directly under William Casey and, in the late 1970s, alongside a young William Barr in stonewalling the congressional Pike Committee and Church Committee, which investigated the CIA beginning in 1975. Among the things that they were tasked with investigating were the CIA’s “love traps,” or sexual blackmail operations used to lure foreign diplomats to bugged apartments, complete with recording equipment and two-way mirrors.
Barr would later become Bush’s Attorney General, rising to that post yet again under Trump. Furthermore, Barr’s father worked for the precursor to the CIA, the Office of Strategic Services (OSS) and recruited a young Jeffrey Epstein, then a high school drop-out, to teach at the elite Dalton School, from which Epstein was later fired. A year prior to hiring Epstein, Donald Barr published a science fiction fantasy novel about sex slavery. Notably, the same year Donald Barr hired Epstein, his son was working for the CIA. Bill Barr has refused calls to recuse himself from the Epstein case, even though he worked at the same law firm that has represented Epstein in the past.” https://www.mintpressnews.com/blackmail-jeffrey-epstein-trump-mentor-reagan-era/260760/