Frank Badfinger
Superstar
- Joined
- Aug 4, 2019
- Messages
- 15,819
The promo art looks like something I'd expect from an album cover for The Weekend.
The Favourite did the same thing. There were apparently only tenuous insinuations (possibly smear propaganda from political opponents) of any lesbianism between the real life people in that movie, so again... likely revisionism at play. Heterosexuality on screen in present day Hollywood doesn't exist it seems. At least not between two white people, which is a whole other bag of worms. The lgbt agenda in full swing. Nothing against gay people but the vast vast majority of most people aren't gay, thus these projects cling a bit false. I could be wrong but to me it seems this increased post all the Metoo shenanigans.New movie that's based on historical figures from the 1800s. Mary Anning was a real paleontologist but there's nothing to support she was a lesbian in real life from what I've read. I admittedly haven't heard of her until I did a little Googling about the movie so I could be wrong about this but it sounds like the movie is trying to retroactively say the two real historical people (who are portrayed by Winslet and Ronan) were TOTES GAY for each other when in real life this might not have been the case at all...it could have simply been a friendship between to female ladies...one of whom was married at the time.
(I'm bisexual - obvs I don't have a problem with gay people, but I don't think we should be rewriting history. Facts matter. If the two main characters were not based on real people I probably wouldn't have an issue with the movie.)
Anyways, check out the one-eye symbolism on the poster. Make me feel like there is an agenda behind this movie especially in regards to the rewriting history part.
View attachment 42054
This is what it comes down to if you are a woman in the entertainment industry? Either you’re a whore like the singers are...or you have to be a lesbian to make a film without men in it?New movie that's based on historical figures from the 1800s. Mary Anning was a real paleontologist but there's nothing to support she was a lesbian in real life from what I've read. I admittedly haven't heard of her until I did a little Googling about the movie so I could be wrong about this but it sounds like the movie is trying to retroactively say the two real historical people (who are portrayed by Winslet and Ronan) were TOTES GAY for each other when in real life this might not have been the case at all...it could have simply been a friendship between to female ladies...one of whom was married at the time.
(I'm bisexual - obvs I don't have a problem with gay people, but I don't think we should be rewriting history. Facts matter. If the two main characters were not based on real people I probably wouldn't have an issue with the movie.)
Anyways, check out the one-eye symbolism on the poster. Make me feel like there is an agenda behind this movie especially in regards to the rewriting history part.
View attachment 42054
I think that book is already has been..the dems we’re hoping it would slam trump for more than a minute but his voters just don’t care what the next lies are.New book out about Trump. We taped the author's interview on the Stevem Colbert show and I'm about to watch it. My parents said Bob Woodward, the author, helped expose Nixon being a crook. Check out the cover.
Edit: my mom thinks Trump might be the antichrist because of the amount of Christians who support him and has gotten a lot of criticism from people for wondering about it. I have ran different variations of his name through numerology calculators and have not found a combo that equals 666, so I am skeptical of this possibility.
View attachment 42091
He wrote another one called "Fear" a few years ago about Trump. I guess this is his second one about this presidency?I think that book is already has been..the dems we’re hoping it would slam trump for more than a minute but his voters just don’t care what the next lies are.
#landslide.
I didn’t know he wrote the first one...you’d think he’d have other interests to write about.He wrote another one called "Fear" a few years ago about Trump. I guess this is his second one about this presidency?