Why would it be immoral? What basic aspects are ya talking about?
Being able to walk, talk, learn, love, very much basic aspects of life. What many would call "rights". Yes or no?
Immoral because if life has meaning and a purpose and if there is no way for them to fulfill that meaning and purpose - then restricting them the choice to end their life
is immoral.
I think it’s the fear of suffering that brings many people to think death is the answer when maybe that isn’t the answer. Just because people do it to pets doesn’t mean that it’s ok for people. Idk if it’s ok for pets, but then I haven’t had to make such a decision.
I really have no clue what you are waffling on about here.
Exactly what I said. Some people become mentally, emotionally, spiritually backed into a corner (even if other people do not observe the inner conflict), which leads to the idea of suicide not only being favorable to the person but a necessity. I don't blame these people because the world is a shitty place and not everybody lives a life that they themselves feel is worth living.
Why do you narrow it down to a minute? To prove it’s hopeless?
This reply is both an example of small thinking and evidence of why it is so important to think about. The fact I said one minute and not a year, is to show how little people do indeed lack contemplation about this topic, which is again, never pleasant on any side.
As I also said, the topic itself extends beyond just suicide and euthanasia to the very fundamental reason you, I or someone else actually rationalizes to themselves that this life we are living is worth living in the first place, and not merely as an extreme reaction to something but as a daily self-knowledge.